Apple WWDC 2025 event to put focus on ‘existential risk' of AI struggles
Apple Inc. shares have been heavily tethered to US trade policies this year, but its annual developer's conference could refocus Wall Street's attention on a potentially bigger problem: its struggles with artificial intelligence.
The iPhone maker's WWDC event kicks off Monday and isn't expected to feature much in the way of major AI releases. That could shine a light on Apple's shortfalls with the critical technology, threatening further weakness for its shares with few obvious catalysts on the horizon to turn things around.
'It's hard to argue that Apple's lack of standing with AI isn't an existential risk, and it would be a real surprise if it came out with a significant AI development or application at WWDC,' said Andrew Choi, portfolio manager at Parnassus Investments. 'If it can paint a future where it is integrating and commoditizing AI, that would be compelling, because otherwise, what is going to get people to buy their next phone for a lot more money?'Shares are down 19% this year, making them by far the biggest drag on the Nasdaq 100, which has advanced 3.6%. While much of the selloff reflects Apple's exposure to President Donald Trump's tariffs and political uncertainty, its struggles with AI have been another significant headwind.
The conference marks the one-year anniversary of the introduction of Apple Intelligence, which sparked an initial wave of optimism that the AI features it unveiled would prompt consumers to upgrade their iPhones in droves. That proved premature, however, as features failed to impress and were repeatedly delayed, culminating with an AI-version of the Siri digital assistant getting postponed for the foreseeable future.
Also Read: Apple WWDC 2025 Live Streaming: Date, time and where to watch the event in India
The lack of a robust AI offering stands in contrast to some Big Tech peers. Alphabet Inc. recently debuted a number of well-received AI features, and Microsoft Corp. is trading at all-time highs on AI optimism. Apple also faces potential competition from ChatGPT owner OpenAI, which said last month it's acquiring io, a device startup co-founded by Jony Ive, the legendary designer and former Apple executive.
Of course, Apple still offers plenty of attractive characteristics, including a huge user base, its high-margin services business, and immense profitability that it taps to return capital to shareholders through buybacks and dividends.Those attributes still make the stock appealing to Mark Bronzo, chief investment strategist at the Rye Consulting Group, despite lagging in AI.
'I expect its AI features will be more functional than cutting edge, and that means there's nothing exciting about Apple where you'd want to own it over Nvidia, Microsoft, or Amazon, which have strong growth from their AI stories,' he said. 'The flip side is that Apple's cash flow and services business mean it can maintain its P/E in a downturn. It can sometimes be useful to be in a boring stock if the market goes sideways.' Still, Apple's AI struggles add to other investor concerns. Apple's revenue growth is projected to be about 4% in fiscal 2025, compared with 14% for Microsoft or 11% for Alphabet. It also trades at 27 times estimated earnings, well below a recent peak around 34, but a premium to its average over the past decade of 21.Last week, Needham became the latest Wall Street firm to downgrade the stock. Generative AI innovations from competitors 'open the door for new hardware form factors that threaten iOS devices,' analyst Laura Martin wrote, cutting her rating to the equivalent of neutral.Fewer than 60% of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg who cover the company recommend buying, the lowest such rate among the seven most valuable US technology companies, which include Microsoft, Nvidia Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet, Meta Platforms Inc. and Broadcom Inc.'Apple is growing at a single-digit pace without much ability to expand its margins, plus it faces risks from tariffs and China exposure while competitors make inroads with AI and it trades at a premium price,' said Choi. 'There's nothing compelling about all that.'
Also Read: iOS 19 or iOS 26: New iPhone operating system set for overhaul at Apple WWDC 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran claims US bases to be targeted if conflict breaks out between countries
Iran threatened Wednesday to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, while President Donald Trump said he was "less confident" about reaching a nuclear deal. Amid escalating tensions, a US official said staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution. Watch: Iran swears to annihilate Israel in revenge: who will strike first & why? Here are 5 deadly triggers Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails. Also Read: Trump travel ban shows 'deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran "All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar. Also Read: Why has Iran been banning people from walking dogs in public? Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington calling it as a "red line". Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month Washington was "getting close" to securing a deal. But in an interview published Wednesday, Trump said he was "less confident" the United States and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium. 'A shame' Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Western countries, including the United States and its ally Israel, have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear programme and that Washington "cannot have a say" on the issue. During the interview with the New York Post's podcast "Pod Force One", which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago," he said. "Something happened to them but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final." Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying "it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying". On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal for a nuclear deal, with Araghchi later saying the text contained "ambiguities". Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years. On Monday, the United Nations nuclear watchdog began a Board of Governors meeting in Vienna that will last until Friday to discuss Iran's atomic activities and other issues. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meeting followed a report issued by it criticising "less than satisfactory" cooperation from Tehran, particularly in explaining past cases of nuclear material found at undeclared sites. Iran has criticised the IAEA report as unbalanced, saying it relied on "forged documents" provided by its arch-foe Israel. In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the US strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at Baghdad airport. Dozens of US soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Oil's Lost Decade Is About to Be Repeated
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- For as long as most of us can remember, a rule of thumb has held true: Every year, the world's production of oil goes up by one million barrels a day. In 1983, the figure stood at 56.6 million barrels. In 2023, 40 years later, it was 40 million barrels more: 96.3 million. Annual figures may jump around thanks to wars, recessions, and the rise and fall of economies, but averaged over the longer term, every decade we've added an extra 10 million daily barrels to the headline total. But you have to look closer than that. Much of what's labeled 'oil production' isn't oil at all, but gases such as ethane, propane and butane as well as biofuels. If you consider only crude oil — the stuff subject to OPEC's quota policies, with prices quoted on the nightly news — production is barely increasing at all. Global output this year will be just 360,000 daily barrels greater than in 2015, according to the latest outlook from the US government's Energy Information Administration. Even looking forward to 2026, crude output is likely to remain below the production peak the world hit in 2018. This will be the first time the industry hit a lost decade since the 1980s, when it was buffeted by the aftermath of the 1970s oil crises and decline of the Soviet bloc. As electric vehicles take more market share and climate damage grows, subsequent decades will be even worse. That's certainly what you'd expect from the way the oil industry is investing. Upstream oilfield spending will fall 6% this year to $420 billion, the International Energy Agency wrote last week, less than the $450 billion going to solar. Fossil fuels as a whole will receive $1.1 trillion of investment, just half the $2.2 trillion for clean energy. Those figures suggest reports of the death of ESG have been greatly exaggerated. Spending on new supplies of oil and gas did indeed increase after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but only slightly. The growth wasn't enough to lift investment even to the levels seen in the late 2010s, let alone the fat years in the early part of that decade. Inflation makes the picture even more stark. Clean technology is getting cheaper, with the price of the best standard solar modules falling 20% over the past year to 9 cents per watt, according to BloombergNEF. That means each dollar spent is buying more energy than in the past. The opposite is happening in the oil patch — particularly in the US, where President Donald Trump's 50% steel tariffs are making it far more expensive to buy pipes and machinery. After adjusting for costs, activity levels in the upstream oil and gas sector are set to fall globally by about 8% this year, according to the IEA, the first drop since 2020. That's being felt most sharply by US shale players, some of the highest-cost and most price-sensitive producers out there. They're retrenching rapidly as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries pumps extra barrels into an oversupplied market. The signs are showing up throughout the chain, from exploration to development. Since the end of March alone, about 5.6% of all operating drill rigs in the US have been pulled from the fields, according to global energy technology company Baker Hughes, leaving the drill fleet almost a third smaller than at its last peak in late 2022. That suggests companies are spending less on exploration. The number of wells being actively fracked is also the lowest since 2021, in the teeth of Covid-19 — evidence that they're not rushing to get production out of the fields they've already discovered, either. In previous eras, slumps in those measures were often justified by the large backlog of developed wells being kept in reserve until prices recovered, but even this so-called fracklog is shrinking. The number of such drilled but uncompleted wells now stands at 5,332, about half the level in early 2020. December's figure was the lowest on record. If you thought the Gulf would come to the rescue, don't hold your breath. These days, Saudi Arabian Oil Co. is spending more on gas than on crude. Its largest development project is the Jafurah gas field, due to start production later this year. Riyadh's decision last year to cut Aramco's maximum oil capacity target only makes sense if prospects for crude demand are dimming. Look to China, and you can see why. Apparent oil consumption has been falling ever since September 2023, based on government data. Even the more granular estimates by state-owned China National Petroleum Corp. suggest demand will hit its ceiling this year, five years earlier than expected. Consumption of gasoline and diesel will be 400,000 barrels a day lower than in 2021, according to the IEA, as EVs, more-efficient vehicles, and shifts to public transport cause usage to evaporate. The situation in India, as my colleague Javier Blas has written, may be even worse. As we've argued, the oil industry is already past its peak. The decades to come will only be worse. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. More stories like this are available on
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Senate GOP Seeks to Scale Back Food Aid Cuts in Trump Tax Bill
Bloomberg Updated 12 Jun 2025, 02:52 AM IST Senate Republicans plan to scale back cuts to federal food aid for the poor that their counterparts in the House used to help pay for Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package, a key senator said Wednesday. The Senate version of the tax legislation would exempt states that keep their food stamp payment error rates low from a new cost-shifting provision House Republican imposed requiring state governments to cover as much as a quarter of the cost of federal food stamps received by their residents, Senate Agriculture Chairman John Boozman said. Boozman, whose committee has jurisdiction over portions of the legislation covering federal food aid and farm subsidies, said the Senate version also would exempt parents of children younger than 10 years old from work requirements for food assistance. The House version of the tax bill imposes work requirements on parents once their children turn 7 years old. The House version of the legislation would require states to pay between 5% and 25% of the cost of benefits their residents receive through federal food stamps, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SN. States with lower payment error rates would pay a smaller share of food stamp costs. The new requirements for SN will be delayed to 2028 to give states time to adjust, Boozman said. The Senate version would exempt states with a payment error rate below 6% from the cost-sharing requirement, Boozman said. Republicans on the Senate Agriculture Committee considered the House version too burdensome on states, the Arkansas senator said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
