logo
The Specifics Matter

The Specifics Matter

Yahoo27-02-2025
Agency shakeups: In the first Cabinet meeting of the new administration, President Donald Trump announced that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head Lee Zeldin will be cutting 65 percent of his agency's workforce, or almost 10,000 jobs. "Hours later, an E.P.A. official said Mr. Trump was referring to overall agency budget cuts and not a 65 percent reduction in personnel," reports The New York Times. Trump and co. should get their stories straight and be consistent, but a massive headcount reduction at the agency will probably be necessary regardless.
"After recently identifying $20 billion fraudulent in spending, Administrator Zeldin is committed to eliminating 65% of the EPA's wasteful spending," says White House spokesman Taylor Rogers. "The $20 billion Rogers referred to is the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, for which the Biden administration placed $20 billion in grants to be administered by nonprofit groups in Citibank," adds Politico. "EPA has not identified any fraud under the program but is trying to get the money back from Citibank."
The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has become something of a controversy (though calling it "fraudulent" is probably not accurate). The massive grant, doled out as former President Joe Biden was winding down his time in office, was supposed to fund clean energy and transportation projects in poorer communities. That $20 billion cited is a chunk of the slightly larger $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which was created in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). (You might be wondering, "What does this have to do with reducing inflation?" Absolutely nothing, of course. Thanks, Biden. In that sense, all unrelated things authorized by the IRA are fraudulent, I suppose, deliberately branded as something they're not.)
Anyway, the grant was basically given to financial institutions, which doled it out to nonprofits who would give home retrofitting grants to individual homeowners (among other things). Certain amounts were earmarked for rural areas and tribal nations. It all seems like something that shouldn't be in the government's purview. Now, Zeldin has vowed to get this money back, to end the contracts and rescind the grants. But the administration has done this in a maximally aggressive way, and senators are chafing at the methods, saying that this money was legally appropriated by Congress and that circumventing that process is wrong. For example, "Trump administration officials had instructed Denise Cheung, a prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney's office, to start a criminal probe of the funding in an effort to claw back the money that is currently held by Citibank, which holds a financial agency agreement with the Treasury," reports Reuters. But Cheung resigned from the U.S. Attorney's office last week over this very issue, saying the administration made an improper demand.
This whole saga feels like the second-term Trump administration in a nutshell: Identifying a legitimately bad use of taxpayer dollars; publicizing how insane it is; wrongly flouting separation of powers as a means of attempting to get that money back; Democrats getting next-level apoplectic at them for the methods, seemingly unable to concede the foolishness of the spending in the first place; rinse and repeat.
DOGE and the software licenses: "Agencies often have more software licenses than employees, and the licenses are often idle (i.e. paid for, but not installed on any computer)," writes the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on its X account, implying this is some sort of significant cost-savings. "For example, at GSA [General Services Administration], with 13,000 employees, there are: 37,000 WinZip licenses; 19,000 training software subscriptions (and multiple parallel training software platforms); 7,500 project management software seats for a division with 5,500 employees; 3 different ticketing systems running in parallel. Fixes are actively in work."
But this misunderstands a few things about how software licensing works: Customers buying software licenses, across all sectors, frequently get volume discounts, so 5,000 seats can be gotten more cheaply in many cases than, say, 4,578 seats; you can use a higher employee count to get into a different (and better) pricing tier. For federal employees in particular, duplicate licenses are frequently required due to using classified networks vs. unclassified ones. There's also flux in headcount (seasonal workers, interns, etc.), so agencies see fit to overbuy. In other words, Elon Musk is fixating on something that probably isn't a real example of government waste. More importantly, the aggressive slashing of these licenses will probably provide a disincentive for private companies to secure government contracts, which means more government-built software vs. contracting it out to the private sector. (I can think of no scarier concept.)
Though the execution may be stupid, maybe DOGE is more symbolic than anything else:
"I have just informed the purchasing department that they should no longer purchase paper clips. All of us receive documents every day with paper clips on them. If we save these paper clips, not only will we have enough for our own use, but we will also, in a short time, be awash in the little critters," reads the original 1985 memo to employees from Bear Stearns CEO Alan "Ace" Greenberg. "This action may seem a little petty, but anything we can do to make our people conscious of expenses is worthwhile.…Bear Stearns is probably going to sell stock to the public, and there is one guarantee that I would like to give the potential buyers of our stock—they are going to get the fairest shake from us that management can give any public shareholder."
Obviously, neither Greenberg nor Bear Stearns are with us any longer; the whole sordid tale of the investment bank's collapse isn't worth getting into. Maybe it undermines the analogy. Or maybe there's an important message that federal employees ought to heed: The government is no longer immune from consequences when it wastes taxpayer dollars.
Still, the specifics really do matter. Maybe you could make the case that DOGE's primary value is gotten via slashing headcount, but firing is expensive; short-term costs will necessarily be incurred, possibly for long-term gain. But can that long-term gain be reaped if the next administration simply works to rehire and rebuild the gutted federal bureaucracy? If Musk and team were more deliberate about what's worth cutting and what's worth keeping, we might be in a better spot. But so far, they're directionally correct yet terribly sloppy.
Pivot to…? Jeff Bezos, who founded Amazon and owns The Washington Post, appears to have finally read what his own paper has been publishing.
Anyway, he clearly didn't love what he saw. He issued a memo to the staff making clear that the opinion section will be repurposed to only publish pieces in favor of "personal liberties and free markets." Articles that fail to support those views will not be published.
"There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader's doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views," Bezos said. "Today, the internet does that job. I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America's success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical—it minimizes coercion—and practical—it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity." The existing opinion editor, when presented with this new mandate, hilariously stepped down; the spot's now vacant, but I must say, free markets don't appear to have a lot of supporters within the journalism industry. I wish him luck in his endeavor.
Columbia University and Barnard College students are still hot for Hamas.
"President Donald Trump said Wednesday the United States will end the Biden administration's concessions aimed at promoting free elections in Venezuela, canceling a license that allowed U.S. oil company Chevron to produce and export oil in the country," reports Politico. "Trump said in a social media post the conditions the Biden administration reached with Venezuela in 2022 that allowed the country to export oil 'have not been met by the Maduro regime.'" This will go into effect March 1.
"Nvidia Corp., the chipmaker at the center of an AI spending boom, delivered good-but-not-great quarterly numbers on Wednesday, drawing a muted response from investors accustomed to blowout results," reports Bloomberg.
Trump, who may be pursuing a weakening of the U.S. dollar, has a lot of levers he could pull to get there. "He could drive up the value of a foreign currency by ordering the Treasury Department to buy more of it, for instance," writes Patricia Cohen for The New York Times. "Or he could pressure other nations to revalue their own currencies or buy more American goods by threatening to impose tariffs on their imports."
Excellent answer:
Axios correspondent Alex Thompson has done a good job reporting on Biden's cognitive decline (and the mass cover-up from administration insiders and the complicit mainstream media). Journalist Jake Tapper was very much part of the problem, however:
"U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday paused a federal judge's order requiring President Donald Trump's administration to pay foreign aid funds to contractors and grant recipients for past work," reports Reuters.
RIP Gene Hackman, star of The French Connection, The Conversation, The Royal Tenenbaums, Bonnie and Clyde, and many others. The 95-year-old was found dead at home, oddly with both his 64-year-old wife and dog dead as well, though authorities don't suspect foul play (?). I think this line, from this piece, sums Hackman up well: "In his performances, as in life, the good guys aren't always nice guys, and the villains have charm." (Also, today I learned the famous car chase scene in The French Connection was filmed illegally, without all the proper permits from the New York Police Department. Incredible.)
The post The Specifics Matter appeared first on Reason.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Commerce Dept. widens products subject to steel, aluminum tariffs
US Commerce Dept. widens products subject to steel, aluminum tariffs

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Commerce Dept. widens products subject to steel, aluminum tariffs

(Reuters) -The Trump administration on Friday widened the reach of its 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports by adding hundreds of derivative products to the list of goods subject to the levies. In a Federal Register notice late on Friday, the Commerce Department said the Bureau of Industry and Security was adding 407 product codes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States that identify the goods to be hit with the additional duties on the steel and aluminum content of those products. The non-steel and non-aluminum content will be subject to the tariff rates President Donald Trump has imposed on the goods originating from specific countries, the notice said. The levies on the goods on the expanded list go into effect on August 18. Earlier on Friday, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he headed to a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska that he planned additional announcements on steel tariffs and on levies for semiconductor imports. (Reporting By Dan Burns; Editing by Leslie Adler) Sign in to access your portfolio

Intel stock is spiking after a report says the US government could buy a stake
Intel stock is spiking after a report says the US government could buy a stake

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Intel stock is spiking after a report says the US government could buy a stake

Intel stock jumped Friday on news that the Trump administration could be taking a stake. Trump recently criticized Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over ties to China. The move: Intel stock surged on Friday, jumping as much as 5% to add to the gains logged in Thursday's session. Intel stock has been volatile this year, with the ailing chip maker lagging competitors like AMD and Nvidia, though the shares are still up 23% year-to-date. Why: The fresh momentum follows a report that the US government could take a stake in the company. Bloomberg reported that plans came about after a meeting between President Donald Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Details are still being assessed but sources said that the US government plans on paying for a stake in the company. The report follows news this month that the administration had struck deals with Nvidia and AMD that would see those firms pay 15% of their China chip revenues to the US government. Other examples of the government getting involved in private businesses include the US Department of Defense's plans to take an equity stake in MP Materials, a rare earth mining company. No details of the White House's deal with Intel have been formally announced. What it means: On August 7, Trump posted to Truth Social that Tan was "highly conflicted" and needed to resign immediately. Tan responded a few days later, defending his integrity and reaffirming that he remains committed to the company. A week later, Trump appears to have changed his stance on Tan and seems open to working with him. If the White House does acquire a stake in Intel, it could allow the company to expand its chip manufacturing in the US, helping it stay competitive in the key corner of the tech space. Once a pillar of the tech sector, Intel stock has shed almost half its value over the past five years, even as the artificial intelligence boom has sent demand for semiconductors soaring. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Putin and Trump conclude high-stakes summit over Ukraine war
Putin and Trump conclude high-stakes summit over Ukraine war

Los Angeles Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Putin and Trump conclude high-stakes summit over Ukraine war

President Trump and Vladimir Putin held nearly three hours of talks over the prospects for a ceasefire in Ukraine on Friday, negotiating for hours at a U.S. air base in Alaska over the future of Russia's military campaign, a war of conquest that has resulted in Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War had said before the summit he would know if Putin was serious about peace within minutes of their meeting. Yet, before the talks began, the Russian leader, a global pariah since launching his full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, received a red carpet arrival on American soil and a greeting of applause from the U.S. president. It was an extraordinary welcome for Putin, whose government has called the United States an 'enemy state' and who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court over war crimes in Ukraine. Putin's war has led to 1.4 million casualties, according to independent analysts, including 1 million dead and wounded among Russian soldiers alone.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store