
Groundwater by Thomas McMullan review – a lesson in foreboding
An unexpected inheritance has spurred John and Liz to trade in their rented flat in London for a remote house by a lake. After years of trying unsuccessfully for a baby, their relationship strained, both hope that the change will shift something inside them. Meanwhile, though most of their furniture is yet to arrive, they must prepare the house for Liz's sister Monica and her family, who have invited themselves to stay.
From the opening pages McMullan stokes an unambiguous sense of foreboding. It is August and the weather is stifling. Walking by the lake John encounters a baby deer, struggling to stand on an injured leg. The next day after breakfast, Monica's children find the fawn dead on the doorstep. A stranger claiming to be a local warden materialises on their land and invites himself to stay. No one thinks to check his claims. When three students from a local campsite also contrive to inveigle themselves into the group, something terrible, it seems, must happen.
Reading Groundwater, I was repeatedly reminded of Chekhov's famous exhortation that one must not put a loaded rifle on the stage if no one is thinking of firing it. The warden, Jim Sweet, tells John and Liz about the caves deep below the surface of the lake, miles and miles of unmapped tunnels snaking through the limestone. Liz is haunted by the memory of a dog she watched dying in the hallway outside their London flat. She stares at the walls of trees around the lake and thinks of the California wildfires on the news: 'All that burning, a thousand things dying.'
Ominousness is piled upon unease and yet McMullan meets his own challenge only with the humdrum. Terrors are proved baseless. Confrontations blaze briefly and fizzle out. Unable to bring themselves to say what they are really thinking, the adults conduct long and often mundane conversations about inconsequentialities, while the twin interior monologue that shifts often confusingly between John and Liz adds little insight or forward propulsion to the narrative. Insufficiently differentiated, their voices blur: though we spend much of the novel inside their heads, their true selves remain opaque, unformed, out of reach not only of themselves but of the reader.
Liz, a writer, is working on a scheme to monitor the black rhinos in a national park in Kenya, but 'she hadn't been to the national park herself … everyone was remote'. The same sense of remoteness, of a reality half-understood but never experienced, pervades these pages. Meanwhile a second intercut narrative, in which dream-like versions of John and Liz draw items including a crystal decanter, a crutch and a child's hobby horse from the waters of the lake, adds a baffling dollop of mysticism to proceedings.
As I read on, my thoughts kept returning to another novel set by a lake, Sarah Moss's Summerwater, and not only because of the powerful echo in the title. Like Groundwater, Summerwater, told over a single rain-lashed day in a lochside holiday park in Scotland, is preoccupied with the quotidian, exploring through its 12 narrators the fissures and fractures that open in relationships, the certainties brandished like weapons against fear and vulnerability, the joys, yes, but also the small, terrible failures of courage and understanding.
Why, then, does Moss's novel triumphantly succeed and McMullan's never take flight? It helps that Summerwater's simmering tension finally explodes into catastrophe, while Groundwater swerves perplexingly away from climax and sputters out. But it is Moss's astonishing acuity, her uncanny ability to see inside the human heart, that lends her work such power. It is much, much harder than she makes it look to draw readers deeply into the small dramas of small lives, harder still to find the universal in the particular, to draw fresh and meaningful patterns between people and landscape, between age-old cycles of existence and the insistent demands of the here and now. Moss manages it with flourishes of sly humour that both leavens and intensifies the horror to come.
McMullan's novel would definitely have profited from a few more laughs. Instead, in striving for an elusive profundity, he reminds us how strikingly difficult it is to spin gold from straw, and how very rare and precious are those Rumpelstiltskin writers who show us how it's done.
Groundwater by Thomas McMullan is published by Bloomsbury (£18.99). To order a copy go to guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
In a crowded field, Stuart Broad has emerged as Sky Cricket's new all-rounder
An excellent day's cricket that could and maybe should have been a stone-cold classic, superbly covered on Sky Sports, and it fell to the channel's emerging star man Stuart Broad to ask the question that fans were all thinking on Sunday evening when he wondered: 'Still 20 minutes away from possible start time, everyone has their sunglasses on at the train station. Felt the supporters deserved to see a finish to that Test Match today. Felt a lazy decision to call it off at 6pm in my opinion. I wonder who makes it?' Broad was right to query whether the umpires and ground staff could have done more, nailing the key moment of the evening's narrative, and with an eye for the provocative as well: further evidence that he is shaping up to be the complete all-rounder in his media career in a way he once, briefly and thrillingly, threatened to be on the field of play. As long as Varun Aaron doesn't reinvent himself as a TV critic, there seems to be no stopping Broad's frictionless glide towards cricket media world domination. It is to the credit of Sky Cricket head honcho Bryan Henderson and the team that, even in the strongest talent line-up in British sports broadcasting, Broad is already a standout. They had identified Broad while he was still playing, they blooded him during some lower-profile matches with an arm-around-the-shoulder approach and have developed him. It is clear Broad himself has the brains, ego and work ethic to want to get seriously good on the TV. He is also adept at the social media and not shy of putting himself about a bit, be it doing a book called, natch, Broadly Speaking (interested), running upmarket pubs (sure, why not) and flogging his own-label South African rosé (perhaps not). He is already holding his own against quality technical analysts like Ricky Ponting, Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton, and is also charismatic and telegenic enough to do the more knockabout features as well. There was a fun segment on Sunday lunchtime where Hussain and Broad went around the home dressing room at the Oval, with Broad offering countless little nuggets about which players sit where, who are the biggest bat-chuckers and so on. He pointed out a poster the players attach to the wall to make sure they always feel they are the owners of the space, the home side. 'We take this poster around everywhere… I say we. The team,' said Broad, and then caught himself again when he began to say: 'We have to make – England have to make…' "Stokesy is the messiest by a country mile, Rooty is the tidiest" 😅 Stuart Broad and Nasser Hussain show us round the England dressing room at The Oval! — Sky Sports Cricket (@SkyCricket) August 2, 2025 That said, he doesn't strike you as one of these former players who remains stuck, unable to move onto the next stage of his life, hanging around the dressing room literally or metaphorically like a sad-case sports Fonzie. He is still clearly personally and sportingly close to the current men in the arena but shrewd enough, outwardly anyway, not to seem like he's pining too much for his era, the in-my-day trap that has ensnared many a former great and made them a commentary box bore. Based on what he has said during this series, the telly role has been the ideal soft landing: 'I have walked into a new changing room,' he said of the Sky Studio. 'I am getting into a new groove, improving. I don't miss being in there [the England camp] but I wish everyone the best of luck.' This superb Test match has had a bittersweet flavour because of the celebration and memorial for Graham Thorpe and while his suicide, as all are, sounds like it was multifactorial and complex, cricket lovers might have found themselves ruminating about the huge and distressing changes that these former playing greats have to go through when they are ejected from the only life they have known: being a person, sadly, turning out to be even harder than being a Test cricketer. Sky, as it has done with issues of racism in cricket, leaned into the Thorpe moment with compassion, finesse and heart. Its cricket coverage remains the gold standard and, for this viewer at least, a more enticing proposition for a day's watching than the £185 ticket price for the Saturday at Lord's. A 39th Test match for Joe Root 🙌✨ 🎙️ "A truly magnificent cricketer in the form of his life" — Sky Sports Cricket (@SkyCricket) August 3, 2025 We will no doubt be seeing a lot more of Broad. And, as Atherton reported from the Oval, not just UK viewers: 'A piece of news from Australia that seems to have gone down like a bucket of sick with the locals', that Broad has signed up to commentate for that country's Channel Seven during the Ashes. Atherton reminded Broad that the Brisbane Courier Mail


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What are Nigella Lawson, Robert Irwin and a cartoon kangaroo doing in Australia's latest round of tourism ads?
So Steph, what do Robert Irwin, Nigella Lawson, and a cartoon kangaroo have in common? Wait, is this a joke? No not at all, I'm genuinely asking. Oh, sorry. The answer is a new round of ads spruiking Australia as a tourist destination to potential international visitors. Is this the latest from Scott Morrison's old workplace? Do you mean Tourism Australia? Yes, the former PM and former director of Tourism Australia liked to claim he was responsible for the 'where the bloody hell are you?' ad that featured Lara Bingle (and was banned from the UK for being too risque). This new round of ads feature a bunch of personalities from places where the agency intends them to air. So the ads featuring actor Yosh Yu will show in China, those with Japanese comedian Abareru-kun will air in Japan, those featuring influencer Sara Tendulkar will run in India and Nigella Lawson will front the ads showing in the UK. I assume the UK don't think Nigella Lawson is too risque. Wait, so is Robert Irwin supposed to be appealing to … other Australians? No, he'll be shown in the ads for Americans, blasting over sand dunes in a four-wheel-drive, chasing an emu that's stolen an American tourist's phone. Tourism Australia's current managing director, Phillipa Harrison, says the ads having international stars as well as locals in them will 'create bespoke invitations for five markets'. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning Isn't Robert Irwin a wildlife warrior though? Ripping it up through the sand dunes isn't great for the environment, and I don't think you're supposed to chase emus. No, but these ads also feature a multilingual cartoon kangaroo, Ruby the Roo, who you may remember from a previous round of government tourism propaga … I mean, campaigns. I don't think they're going for realism here. The general gist of it is that travellers will tell their friends and family back home about their wild and unbelievable adventures in Australia. How much is selling the magic of these wild and unbelievable adventures going to cost us? Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion About $130m. The argument for it is that tourism is a significant part of the Australian economy: around 360,000 Australian businesses rely on tourism and the government estimates that the number of international arrivals will hit 10 million in 2026 and 11.8 million in 2029. When he announced the campaign, the tourism minister, Don Farrell, called tourism 'the lifeblood of so many communities right around the country' and claimed the previous campaign 'struck a chord with visitors, with Ruby the Roo bounding into the imagination of countless guests'. Please tell me that they've at least stopped leaning into cliches about Australia when trying to sell us to the world? It's an extension of the 'Come and Say G'day' campaign from 2022. I regret to inform you that this version features pavlova, beaches and a riff on the old Crocodile Dundee 'shrimp on the barbie' line. I can hear you groaning from here. Didn't Tourism Australia also once have an ad where Kylie Minogue sang a song of mateship? Let's not go there.


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: How Meghan Markle's 'warm, friendly, hug-everyone approach' caused tension in the 'rather awkward' royal household
Once upon a time, the so-called 'fab four' - comprising Prince Harry, Meghan, Prince William and Kate - were the Royal Family 's dream team. Indeed when Harry and Meghan started dating, Kate and William reportedly found the former actress 'delightful' - with the young royals appearing at a number of engagements together. Fast forward to the present and, while the so-called 'peace summit' in July 2025 suggests that relations between the Sussexes and the Prince and Princess of Wales could be thawing, both camps appear to be a long way from a reconciliation. It has been widely established that Meghan was at the centre of the tension between Harry and William in particular. But one royal author has claimed the falling out was to do with how the Duchess of Sussex acted, not what she said. Meghan's 'warm, friendly, hug-everyone approach' ruffled feathers, according to Tom Quinn's history of royal servants, titled Yes, Ma'am. He wrote: 'It made William uncomfortable because [Meghan] hugged him virtually every time they bumped into each other.' The prince's opposition to the displays of affection was not due to a dislike of Meghan but concern for what courtiers might think. 'The hugging and cheek kissing fuelled gossip among the staff that Meghan was flirting with William, which she was obviously not. But the tense atmosphere caused by all the touchy-feeliness (and the resultant gossip) deepened the rift between the brothers,' Quinn said. Likewise, Meghan clashed with William's 'rather awkward, even inhibited personality' - which she reportedly found 'baffling'. Quinn wrote: 'A member of staff recalled Meghan asking, "Why do William and Charles sound so serious all the time?" 'She used to make jokes about Harry not having the same parents as William, as she insisted, "Harry isn't pompous at all. He's chill".' But it was Meghan's treatment of staff while working as a royal that put the most strain on the princes' relationship. Concerns were raised to the Sussexes about their alleged behaviour towards staff as early as 2017, it was reported in Robert Lacey's Battle of Brothers book. Meghan would send emails as early as 5am, leaving staff with a 'barrage' of messages in their inboxes, a Kensington Palace source claimed. The couple reigned over a 'really toxic environment' which saw colleagues shaking before meetings alongside allegations of bullying, they added. There was even a claim the encounters left one employee with PTSD. While Meghan brushed off a complaint about her conduct from a senior aide, claiming 'it's not my job to coddle people', Prince William did not respond so flippantly to the issue. When Jason Knauf – a royal aide who worked with the Sussexes – presented William with a 'dossier of distress' about their behaviour he 'went ballistic' and was left 'astonished' and 'horrified' by what he heard, according to Lacey. William's anger stemmed from the fact that a tradition of treating the staff 'like family' had been broken and that he personally knew many of those named, Lacey wrote. Harry and his brother then allegedly had a testy phone call, in which the Duke of Sussex 'flared up in a fierce defence of his wife'. Lacey added: 'The moment the prince heard the bullying allegations, he got straight on the phone to talk to Harry – and when Harry flared up in furious defence of his wife, the elder brother persisted. 'Harry shut off his phone angrily, so William went straight round to find his brother on the Kensington campus.' As early as 2019, rumours of a falling out between the brothers began circulating. It was first addressed by Harry in the documentary Harry & Meghan: An African Journey, with him saying: 'You have good days, you have bad days.' By 2020, tensions appeared to have deepened when Harry and Meghan announced their plans to step back as senior royals. Harry later claimed in his Netflix series with Meghan that William shouted at him during the Sandringham summit. The brothers were last publicly together at Queen Elizabeth II's funeral in September 2022, though they both attended the private funeral for their uncle Robert Fellowes last summer. The estrangement between the two princes had been 'hard and sad ', Knauf revealed in an Australian documentary this year. He said: 'We have ups and downs in family. Even when you really love someone, you can have times when you don't want to spend that much time with them. 'It's very difficult to have this stuff play out in the public eye, but [William's] chosen to keep his thoughts on it private and I think all of us who know him really have to respect that. 'We should do the same, but I will say of course it's been hard and sad - especially for all of us who know both of them.' Meghan's 'touchy-feely' style does have some fans. Producer Jane Marie, who worked with Harry and Meghan during the development of Archewell Audio projects, insisted to Vanity Fair that Meghan is 'just a lovely, genuine person'. Other staff members have claimed that she would send her employees gifts ranging from dog leashes to skincare products.