Plans for battery storage site in countryside given go-ahead despite objections
The Development Management Committee agreed to back the facility in the interests of reducing long-term carbon emissions.
However, councillors accepted recommendations that the site's operational lifespan should be only 30 years rather than the 50-year lifespan, which would have seen the facility operating until 2075.
In a written objection, Colin Frame of Bathgate questioned whether the fire suppression systems outlined in the plans would be enough.
He said: 'Owing to the prevailing south westerly wind, toxic smoke and fumes from a fire at the site would quickly end up over the nearby housing on the west side of Bathgate, not to mention Windyknowe Primary School to the south, putting residents' health at risk.
'The 2020 fire at a Merseyside BESS site took over 50 hours to extinguish. This type of fire is clearly extremely dangerous and difficult for the Fire and Rescue Services to deal with.
'Should the wind be coming from the east, traffic using the A801 would be immediately affected and Armadale residents also at risk.'
Planning officers said the rural location of the 'relatively small site' was acceptable. The land is north-west of Middlerigg Farm in between Bathgate and Armadale, just off the A801. The site is around eight acres and will store up to 49.9MW.
Planners added: 'The proposal includes the installation of battery energy storage containers, inverter panels (2.0m in height) with transformer and air handling unit panels (both 2.5m in height), a district/customer substation, control room, water tank, security lighting with cctv and a SUDs basin, as well as two swales for surface water drainage.'
More than 100 trees, described as mainly roadside shrubbery, will be taken down but the developers promised to plant 200 trees around the site to provide additional screening.
In papers to the DMC planners said: 'The land is not, however, classed as prime agricultural land, albeit it is a countryside belt. Given the site's topography, the application site will not be highly visible from main vantage points.'
Councillors accepted that the applicants Galileo 10 Ltd had submitted a Fire Safety Plan.
Councillor Tony Boyle said: 'Looking at the objection, I am satisfied that Scottish Fire and Rescue has said that it conforms to all standards.
Chairing the meeting, Harry Cartmill a Bathgate councillor, said: 'None of us is going to be here in 40 years time but nevertheless we need to get this right, if we are to determine this positively.'
Wendy McCorriston, the development management manager, told the meeting: 'I realise our condition suggests 50 years and our applicant has mentioned 40 years. The most recent battery storage site we have approved has been for 30 years.
'Given the potential changes in technology, 50 years would not be appropriate.'
She outlined that facilities such as wind turbines had initially been given 20-year lifespans, and some have been extended, while photo-voltaic sites, or 'solar farms,' have been granted 30-year lifespans.
Laura Petrie, for the firm, said the 30-year lifespan would be acceptable.
Councillor Damian Doran-Timson had raised questions about replacing the storage cabinets on the site. When told that equipment would need to be replaced in 10 to 15 years, the head asked: 'What would be the likely impact of equipment replacement within 10 to 15 years. Would the access be sufficient?'
Colin Laverty, an agent for the developers, said: 'Yes, it would.'
Mrs McCorriston told the meeting: 'It is a balance and i think in terms of planning policy this is a site that is not readily visible but a distance from main residential areas is acceptable and in terms of the land take it is relatively small .'
Bathgate Councillor Pauline Stafford, who had asked for the application to be discussed by DMC, was not at the meeting, but fellow town representative Willie Boyle attended remotely.
He told the meeting: 'My concern about this site is simply that what we are granting is a commercial site on agricultural land.
'I understand the locational need. I don't have a great issue with it, but because it is a commercial site the screening is important and I welcome the assurances and I look forward to seeing a copy of the final planting plan, but I am reassured from what I have heard.
'Demand changes, and we have to change with it. Other than that, I'm quite happy to support what's been put forward.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
Norfolk County Council urges action over battery farm fire fears
Energy secretary Ed Milliband will be asked to fund training and equipment for fire services in areas where large battery farms are County Council voted in favour of asking for government support for emergency services because of concerns they may have to deal with blazes at battery energy storage systems (Bess).A number are planned for Norfolk, and Conservative council leader Kay Mason Billig said she fears "they pose a serious risk", whilst calling for fire services to be consulted on battery farm planning Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said "fires at storage sites in the UK are rare" and "high safety standards" were already in place. Bess are used to stockpile excess energy from sources such as fossil fuels, solar and wind - and then release it when the power is needed electricity is held inside lithium batteries, which are housed in structures similar to shipping are seen as a key part of the government's plan for green power and energy security, with it aiming to increase storage capacity from 4.5 GW in 2024, to up to 27 GW by whilst Bess fires are rare, concerns have been raised about their safety, with Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service describing them as "an emerging risk".There is currently no single authority setting safety standards for them, but they are regulated by the Health and Safety Executive.A growing number of applications have been submitted for Bess sites, although developers recently suspended their plans for a large one at Rushall, near Diss. Mason Billig told a meeting of Norfolk County Council that she was concerned there was no legal requirement for fire services to be consulted on planning applications for Bess for a change in the law she also said she wanted ministers to make sure emergency services were equipped to deal with any fires at them."They present a real challenge to our fire and rescue services who are expected to respond to these highly complex incidents with no additional funding, training or equipment from the government or developers," she Billig added she wanted the government to set national safety standards for battery farms. Catherine Rowett, who leads the council's Green group, said she supported tighter guidelines and fire service funding – but warned against "scaremongering".She said Bess sites where there had been fires – such as one in Liverpool in 2020 – were based on older technology that is now out of use."We should resist the temptation to overstate the risks from Bess installations because local residents are receiving sensationalist misinformation that are causing many to fear for their lives," she councillors voted in favour of Mason Billig's proposals – 11 abstained and none voted against – so she will now write to Milliband.A spokesman for Norfolk's Fire and Rescue Service said it "would welcome closer fire service involvement in these sites as a positive step towards greater public safety in an emerging technology".The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero's spokeswoman said that "every battery storage facility we construct helps protect families from future energy shocks".She added: "Battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK and we already have high safety standards in place to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
STV News
6 days ago
- STV News
Plans for battery storage site in countryside given go-ahead despite objections
Councillors have backed plans for a battery energy storage site (BESS) in open countryside a few minutes drive from Bathgate and Armadale town centres despite concerns over the fire risks. The Development Management Committee agreed to back the facility in the interests of reducing long-term carbon emissions. However, councillors accepted recommendations that the site's operational lifespan should be only 30 years rather than the 50-year lifespan, which would have seen the facility operating until 2075. In a written objection, Colin Frame of Bathgate questioned whether the fire suppression systems outlined in the plans would be enough. He said: 'Owing to the prevailing south westerly wind, toxic smoke and fumes from a fire at the site would quickly end up over the nearby housing on the west side of Bathgate, not to mention Windyknowe Primary School to the south, putting residents' health at risk. 'The 2020 fire at a Merseyside BESS site took over 50 hours to extinguish. This type of fire is clearly extremely dangerous and difficult for the Fire and Rescue Services to deal with. 'Should the wind be coming from the east, traffic using the A801 would be immediately affected and Armadale residents also at risk.' Planning officers said the rural location of the 'relatively small site' was acceptable. The land is north-west of Middlerigg Farm in between Bathgate and Armadale, just off the A801. The site is around eight acres and will store up to 49.9MW. Planners added: 'The proposal includes the installation of battery energy storage containers, inverter panels (2.0m in height) with transformer and air handling unit panels (both 2.5m in height), a district/customer substation, control room, water tank, security lighting with cctv and a SUDs basin, as well as two swales for surface water drainage.' More than 100 trees, described as mainly roadside shrubbery, will be taken down but the developers promised to plant 200 trees around the site to provide additional screening. In papers to the DMC planners said: 'The land is not, however, classed as prime agricultural land, albeit it is a countryside belt. Given the site's topography, the application site will not be highly visible from main vantage points.' Councillors accepted that the applicants Galileo 10 Ltd had submitted a Fire Safety Plan. Councillor Tony Boyle said: 'Looking at the objection, I am satisfied that Scottish Fire and Rescue has said that it conforms to all standards. Chairing the meeting, Harry Cartmill a Bathgate councillor, said: 'None of us is going to be here in 40 years time but nevertheless we need to get this right, if we are to determine this positively.' Wendy McCorriston, the development management manager, told the meeting: 'I realise our condition suggests 50 years and our applicant has mentioned 40 years. The most recent battery storage site we have approved has been for 30 years. 'Given the potential changes in technology, 50 years would not be appropriate.' She outlined that facilities such as wind turbines had initially been given 20-year lifespans, and some have been extended, while photo-voltaic sites, or 'solar farms,' have been granted 30-year lifespans. Laura Petrie, for the firm, said the 30-year lifespan would be acceptable. Councillor Damian Doran-Timson had raised questions about replacing the storage cabinets on the site. When told that equipment would need to be replaced in 10 to 15 years, the head asked: 'What would be the likely impact of equipment replacement within 10 to 15 years. Would the access be sufficient?' Colin Laverty, an agent for the developers, said: 'Yes, it would.' Mrs McCorriston told the meeting: 'It is a balance and i think in terms of planning policy this is a site that is not readily visible but a distance from main residential areas is acceptable and in terms of the land take it is relatively small .' Bathgate Councillor Pauline Stafford, who had asked for the application to be discussed by DMC, was not at the meeting, but fellow town representative Willie Boyle attended remotely. He told the meeting: 'My concern about this site is simply that what we are granting is a commercial site on agricultural land. 'I understand the locational need. I don't have a great issue with it, but because it is a commercial site the screening is important and I welcome the assurances and I look forward to seeing a copy of the final planting plan, but I am reassured from what I have heard. 'Demand changes, and we have to change with it. Other than that, I'm quite happy to support what's been put forward.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Daily Record
7 days ago
- Daily Record
West Lothian battery energy storage site wins approval despite fire concerns
The Development Management Committee agreed to back the facility in the interests of reducing long term carbon emissions. Councillors have backed plans for a battery energy storage site (BESS) in open countryside a few minutes drive from Bathgate and Armadale town centres despite concerns over the fire risks. The Development Management Committee agreed to back the facility in the interests of reducing long term carbon emissions. But councillors accepted recommendations that the operational lifespan of the site should last only 30 years rather than the 50 year lifespan which would have seen the facility operating until 2075. In a written objection Colin Frame of Bathgate questioned whether the fire suppression systems outlined in plans would be enough. He said: 'Owing to the prevailing south westerly wind, toxic smoke and fumes from a fire at the site would quickly end up over the nearby housing on the west side of Bathgate, not to mention Windyknowe Primary School to the south, putting residents' health at risk. 'The 2020 fire at a Merseyside BESS site took over 50 hours extinguish. This type of fire is clearly extremely dangerous and difficult for the Fire and Rescue Services to deal with. Should the wind be coming from the east, traffic using the A801 would be immediately affected and Armadale residents also at risk.' Planning officers said the rural location of the ' relatively small site' was acceptable. The land is north-west of Middlerigg Farm in between Bathgate and Armadale, just off the A801. The site is around eight acres and will store up to 49.9MW. Planners added: 'The proposal includes the installation of battery energy storage containers, inverter panels (2.0m in height) with transformer and air handling unit panels (both 2.5m in height), a district/customer substation, control room, water tank, security lighting with cctv and a SUDs basin, as well as two swales for surface water drainage.' More than 100 trees, described as mainly roadside shrubbery, will be taken down but the developers promised to plant 200 trees around the site to provide additional screening. In papers to the DMC planners said: 'The land is not, however, classed as prime agricultural land albeit it is countryside belt. Given the site's topography, the application site will not be highly visible from main vantage points.' Councillors accepted that the applicants Galileo 10 Ltd had submitted a Fire Safety Plan. Councillor Tony Boyle said: 'Looking at the objection I am satisfied that Scottish Fire and Rescue has said that it conforms to all standards. Chairing the meeting, Harry Cartmill a Bathgate councillor, said: 'None of us is going to be here in 40 years time but nevertheless we need to get this right, if we are to determine this positively.' Wendy McCorriston the Development Management Manager told the meeting: 'I realise our condition suggests 50 years and our applicant has mentioned 40 years. The most recent battery storage site we have approved has been for 30 years. Given the potential changes in technology 50 years would not be appropriate.' She outlined that facilities such as wind turbines had initially been given 20 year lifespans and some have been extended while photo-voltaic sites 'solar farms' have been granted 30 year lifespans. Laura Petrie, for the firm, said the 30 year lifespan would be acceptable. Councillor Damian Doran-Timson had raised questions about replacing the storage cabinets on the site. When told that equipment would need to be replaced in 10 to 15 years head asked: 'What would be the likely impact of equipment replacement within 10 to 15 years be. Would the access be sufficient?" Colin Laverty, an agent for the developers said: 'Yes it would.' Mrs McCorriston told the meeting: 'It is a balance and i think in terms of planning policy this is a site that is not readily visible but a distance from main residential areas is acceptable and in terms of the land take it is relatively small.' Bathgate Councillor Pauline Stafford, who had asked for the application to be discussed by DMC was not at the meeting but fellow town representative Willie Boyle attended remotely. He told the meeting: 'My concern about this site is simply that what we are granting is a commercial site on agricultural land. I understand the locational need. I don't have a great issue with it,but because it is a commercial site the screening is important and I welcome the assurances and I look forward to seeing a copy of the final planting plan, but I am reassured from what I have heard. 'Demand changes and we have to change with it. Other than that I'm quite happy to support what's been put forward.'
