Plans for battery storage site in countryside given go-ahead despite objections
The Development Management Committee agreed to back the facility in the interests of reducing long-term carbon emissions.
However, councillors accepted recommendations that the site's operational lifespan should be only 30 years rather than the 50-year lifespan, which would have seen the facility operating until 2075.
In a written objection, Colin Frame of Bathgate questioned whether the fire suppression systems outlined in the plans would be enough.
He said: 'Owing to the prevailing south westerly wind, toxic smoke and fumes from a fire at the site would quickly end up over the nearby housing on the west side of Bathgate, not to mention Windyknowe Primary School to the south, putting residents' health at risk.
'The 2020 fire at a Merseyside BESS site took over 50 hours to extinguish. This type of fire is clearly extremely dangerous and difficult for the Fire and Rescue Services to deal with.
'Should the wind be coming from the east, traffic using the A801 would be immediately affected and Armadale residents also at risk.'
Planning officers said the rural location of the 'relatively small site' was acceptable. The land is north-west of Middlerigg Farm in between Bathgate and Armadale, just off the A801. The site is around eight acres and will store up to 49.9MW.
Planners added: 'The proposal includes the installation of battery energy storage containers, inverter panels (2.0m in height) with transformer and air handling unit panels (both 2.5m in height), a district/customer substation, control room, water tank, security lighting with cctv and a SUDs basin, as well as two swales for surface water drainage.'
More than 100 trees, described as mainly roadside shrubbery, will be taken down but the developers promised to plant 200 trees around the site to provide additional screening.
In papers to the DMC planners said: 'The land is not, however, classed as prime agricultural land, albeit it is a countryside belt. Given the site's topography, the application site will not be highly visible from main vantage points.'
Councillors accepted that the applicants Galileo 10 Ltd had submitted a Fire Safety Plan.
Councillor Tony Boyle said: 'Looking at the objection, I am satisfied that Scottish Fire and Rescue has said that it conforms to all standards.
Chairing the meeting, Harry Cartmill a Bathgate councillor, said: 'None of us is going to be here in 40 years time but nevertheless we need to get this right, if we are to determine this positively.'
Wendy McCorriston, the development management manager, told the meeting: 'I realise our condition suggests 50 years and our applicant has mentioned 40 years. The most recent battery storage site we have approved has been for 30 years.
'Given the potential changes in technology, 50 years would not be appropriate.'
She outlined that facilities such as wind turbines had initially been given 20-year lifespans, and some have been extended, while photo-voltaic sites, or 'solar farms,' have been granted 30-year lifespans.
Laura Petrie, for the firm, said the 30-year lifespan would be acceptable.
Councillor Damian Doran-Timson had raised questions about replacing the storage cabinets on the site. When told that equipment would need to be replaced in 10 to 15 years, the head asked: 'What would be the likely impact of equipment replacement within 10 to 15 years. Would the access be sufficient?'
Colin Laverty, an agent for the developers, said: 'Yes, it would.'
Mrs McCorriston told the meeting: 'It is a balance and i think in terms of planning policy this is a site that is not readily visible but a distance from main residential areas is acceptable and in terms of the land take it is relatively small .'
Bathgate Councillor Pauline Stafford, who had asked for the application to be discussed by DMC, was not at the meeting, but fellow town representative Willie Boyle attended remotely.
He told the meeting: 'My concern about this site is simply that what we are granting is a commercial site on agricultural land.
'I understand the locational need. I don't have a great issue with it, but because it is a commercial site the screening is important and I welcome the assurances and I look forward to seeing a copy of the final planting plan, but I am reassured from what I have heard.
'Demand changes, and we have to change with it. Other than that, I'm quite happy to support what's been put forward.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
6 days ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Enough self-flagellation, Edinburgh University, tackle modern slavery
Today's University of Edinburgh should stop being ashamed of past links to slavery, says reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I thank A Lewis (Letters, 30 July) for a very thoughtful comment on the foolishness of imposing the standards of the present on the past. Of course slavery was evil and should be recognised as such. But the self-flagellation evident now for the deeds of the past should be reserved for the stain on our society caused by mostly covert 'modern slavery' in our own age. The University of Edinburgh has already made itself look, at best, foolish by disparaging David Hume. The university for long boasted of its connection with the great philosopher as an alumnus who brought lustre to it – until someone found in one of his books a footnote that in the 21st century is anathema. So the university renamed the David Hume Tower '40 George Square'. Now they are gunning for Dugald Stewart. Who's next? Adam Ferguson? William Robertson? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is deeply depressing that a university, of all places, should show itself to be utterly ignorant of history and the way in which manners and mores change over time. But, for reasons that are not hard to fathom, Edinburgh has bowed to the current fashion and repudiated part of its distinguished history and its actors, through its Race Review Response Group. This was co-led by its 'equality, diversity and inclusion lead', who, with unconscious irony, claimed to want to provide a 'welcoming and nurturing environment in which all members of our community feel a sense of belonging'. That is, 'all' who agree with renouncing the university's history and its greatest thinkers. As twice a graduate of the university, and once an employee, I am ashamed of it. In recent years Edinburgh University has distanced itself from philosopher David Hume Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh Assess risks There is an absolute responsibility in both the Highland Council and our Scottish Parliament of duty of care to the population. The planning process for the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at Mey gives no consideration to a risk assessment, whose purpose is to identify the risks and safeguards the developer must provide to ensure no harm arises. The developer expects others to provide such infrastructure at no cost to themselves; this is unacceptable in the privatised world of energy supply and places a huge burden on the public purse. My example is that of fire in a BESS unit. One of the combustion products is Hydrogen Fluoride, an incredibly dangerous and corrosive material that causes harm by acidic burns, skin penetration, corrosion of the victims' bones and long-lasting damage to survivors. The concentration of HF in a fire efflux is many hundreds of times the safe level. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A battery fire requires huge quantities of water to extinguish. A fire in a single BESS unit in Liverpool required 11 appliances. Caithness only has five within the county and these stations are not fully staffed on a 24-hour basis. Furthermore, the water supply in Mey is hardly an industrial scale supply. If the fire is not controlled and extinguished promptly, then evacuation is a potential fallback safeguard, however, there is only one main road and the wind would often carry the fire efflux in the direction of any evacuation. Normal safeguards in this scenario would include alternative evacuation routes. Without a comprehensive risk assessment, neither the Council, nor the Scottish Parliament can assess the risk to the population, nor the cost to the public purse of providing safeguards, nor whether they have met their Duty of Care. Mike Grain, Thurso, Highland Double standards The Scotsman reports on Palestinian performances at the Edinburgh Festival that are giving a voice to their struggle (30 July). What is interesting is that Jewish performers at exactly the same festival are being banned as they are deemed 'a risk' to staff at the venues despite the fact they are comedians, not political activists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This demonstrates exactly what is wrong in the UK. One side is vociferous, the other quiet. A clearer example of double standards, emulated all too frequently by many politicians, is hard to find. Why are we allowing the left wing of politics to dominate our way of life to such a great extent? Where are the rights of everyone else? Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Kidnapped Increasingly, we live in a world of placards, pointed, witty, illegal and thought-provoking. An Israeli placard caught my eye this week, protesting that 'Israel is a Country Kidnapped by its Government'. Thirty-one 'kidnapped' Israeli academics and artists have signed a letter deploring the actions of their government in Gaza and the West Bank, which amount to genocide by multiple means. The letter stresses that these war crimes that are being committed are not in their name, nor in the name of a large number of fellow Israelis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It's surely good to know protests are simmering under the surface in Israel, just waiting to boil over. These courageous protesters are surely the ones we should be working with, towards the bright future for Israel, reviving its first socialist principles. This cruel governmen is desperately clinging to power under the autocratic reign of Benjamin Netanyahu. If only the Knesset had the chutzpah to engineer a vote of confidence ro remove his government there would be light at the end of a very dark tunnel. After all, 'kidnapped' Israel proudly claims to be a democracy. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Skewed society The UK population grew by 700,000 in the year to June 2024, a total of just over 2 million in the last three years, mainly fuelled by legal immigration. That same year 221,000 houses were built. Is it any wonder there is a housing crisis and that what houses are available are unaffordable? I can't help thinking the problem would disappear if the roughly 1.4m registered unemployed people already here, or the 9.4m aged 16-64 classed as 'economically inactive' – many either homeless, in unsuitable accommodation or simply unable to afford a house – were either willing or able to take jobs. This would also cut the country's ballooning benefits bill and create more tax revenue. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The above seems blindingly obvious, and when you then hear from friends living in Surrey who have neighbours with second homes here and abroad and also claiming Personal Independence Payments (PIP) 'because we can' you have to wonder why all these ultra left-wing Labour MP 'rebels' voted against reform of the benefits system, a process that could have killed at least two of the above birds with one stone. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Bus problems I am disabled. I can no longer walk. I have a small electric scooter which gives me mobility – it is a lifesaver. With it I can explore new places, accompany my wife and family on walks and (with a few obvious exceptions) live a full life. I now live in London. Here, all the buses have ramps and are equipped for the disabled. I take it for granted that public transport is accessible to me. On my travels I have always found this to be the case throughout England, in France etc. However, when I tried to board a bus in Edinburgh the driver told me scooters were not permitted. I wrote to Lothian Transport and they explained that scooters were not manoeuvrable enough, and (perhaps more importantly) there was no statutory obligation to carry scooters. Yet the one time I was able to use an Edinburgh bus (the driver clearly did not see the memo) I had no problem manoeuvring on and off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I love Edinburgh – it is where I grew up and where I would like to spend more time, but I can't rely on my friends with cars, or afford to take taxis everywhere. Please, Lothian Transport, reconsider your stance on scooters. It would bring the city into line with other more disabled-friendly places, and make it an easier place for me and others in my position to visit. Make it mandatory for buses to carry mobility scooters. David Jeffrey, London I'm with Trump I am glad President Donald Trump has rattled a few cages about the insanity of not exploiting our abundant oil and gas resources. Ed Miliband (and the SNP) don't want to exploit our resources in the North Sea. They would rather that other countries employ people to source oil in their countries and then transport it across the world to ours, creating CO2 and taxable profits, of course. President Trump's comments about the wind turbines destroying the landscape were good. Perhaps it would have helped if he had pointed out that the windmills are unlikely ever to make up for the CO2 created in their manufacture, transport across the world, placement in virgin ground (using 600-1,000 tons of concrete each, producing between 0.8 and 0.9 tons of CO2 per ton), plus 2,000 gallons of oil each, plus 80 gallons each per annum, not forgetting decommissioning. Who pays for decommissing, incidentally? Lots more lovely CO2 there too, of course! Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Let us also not forget the cost of having them not working when it's too windy and not working when the wind doesn't blow. Also, the small matter of paying billions when they don't turn. Let's not forget killing birds. Who thought up the idea of these eyesores anyway? The idea is so batty I expect the person responsible will do something utterly idiotic like suggesting putting solar panels on rich, agricultural farmland, or floating them on lakes. Hang on a second... Andrew HN Gray, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman
BBC News
23-07-2025
- BBC News
Norfolk County Council urges action over battery farm fire fears
Energy secretary Ed Milliband will be asked to fund training and equipment for fire services in areas where large battery farms are County Council voted in favour of asking for government support for emergency services because of concerns they may have to deal with blazes at battery energy storage systems (Bess).A number are planned for Norfolk, and Conservative council leader Kay Mason Billig said she fears "they pose a serious risk", whilst calling for fire services to be consulted on battery farm planning Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said "fires at storage sites in the UK are rare" and "high safety standards" were already in place. Bess are used to stockpile excess energy from sources such as fossil fuels, solar and wind - and then release it when the power is needed electricity is held inside lithium batteries, which are housed in structures similar to shipping are seen as a key part of the government's plan for green power and energy security, with it aiming to increase storage capacity from 4.5 GW in 2024, to up to 27 GW by whilst Bess fires are rare, concerns have been raised about their safety, with Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service describing them as "an emerging risk".There is currently no single authority setting safety standards for them, but they are regulated by the Health and Safety Executive.A growing number of applications have been submitted for Bess sites, although developers recently suspended their plans for a large one at Rushall, near Diss. Mason Billig told a meeting of Norfolk County Council that she was concerned there was no legal requirement for fire services to be consulted on planning applications for Bess for a change in the law she also said she wanted ministers to make sure emergency services were equipped to deal with any fires at them."They present a real challenge to our fire and rescue services who are expected to respond to these highly complex incidents with no additional funding, training or equipment from the government or developers," she Billig added she wanted the government to set national safety standards for battery farms. Catherine Rowett, who leads the council's Green group, said she supported tighter guidelines and fire service funding – but warned against "scaremongering".She said Bess sites where there had been fires – such as one in Liverpool in 2020 – were based on older technology that is now out of use."We should resist the temptation to overstate the risks from Bess installations because local residents are receiving sensationalist misinformation that are causing many to fear for their lives," she councillors voted in favour of Mason Billig's proposals – 11 abstained and none voted against – so she will now write to Milliband.A spokesman for Norfolk's Fire and Rescue Service said it "would welcome closer fire service involvement in these sites as a positive step towards greater public safety in an emerging technology".The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero's spokeswoman said that "every battery storage facility we construct helps protect families from future energy shocks".She added: "Battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK and we already have high safety standards in place to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
STV News
17-07-2025
- STV News
Plans for battery storage site in countryside given go-ahead despite objections
Councillors have backed plans for a battery energy storage site (BESS) in open countryside a few minutes drive from Bathgate and Armadale town centres despite concerns over the fire risks. The Development Management Committee agreed to back the facility in the interests of reducing long-term carbon emissions. However, councillors accepted recommendations that the site's operational lifespan should be only 30 years rather than the 50-year lifespan, which would have seen the facility operating until 2075. In a written objection, Colin Frame of Bathgate questioned whether the fire suppression systems outlined in the plans would be enough. He said: 'Owing to the prevailing south westerly wind, toxic smoke and fumes from a fire at the site would quickly end up over the nearby housing on the west side of Bathgate, not to mention Windyknowe Primary School to the south, putting residents' health at risk. 'The 2020 fire at a Merseyside BESS site took over 50 hours to extinguish. This type of fire is clearly extremely dangerous and difficult for the Fire and Rescue Services to deal with. 'Should the wind be coming from the east, traffic using the A801 would be immediately affected and Armadale residents also at risk.' Planning officers said the rural location of the 'relatively small site' was acceptable. The land is north-west of Middlerigg Farm in between Bathgate and Armadale, just off the A801. The site is around eight acres and will store up to 49.9MW. Planners added: 'The proposal includes the installation of battery energy storage containers, inverter panels (2.0m in height) with transformer and air handling unit panels (both 2.5m in height), a district/customer substation, control room, water tank, security lighting with cctv and a SUDs basin, as well as two swales for surface water drainage.' More than 100 trees, described as mainly roadside shrubbery, will be taken down but the developers promised to plant 200 trees around the site to provide additional screening. In papers to the DMC planners said: 'The land is not, however, classed as prime agricultural land, albeit it is a countryside belt. Given the site's topography, the application site will not be highly visible from main vantage points.' Councillors accepted that the applicants Galileo 10 Ltd had submitted a Fire Safety Plan. Councillor Tony Boyle said: 'Looking at the objection, I am satisfied that Scottish Fire and Rescue has said that it conforms to all standards. Chairing the meeting, Harry Cartmill a Bathgate councillor, said: 'None of us is going to be here in 40 years time but nevertheless we need to get this right, if we are to determine this positively.' Wendy McCorriston, the development management manager, told the meeting: 'I realise our condition suggests 50 years and our applicant has mentioned 40 years. The most recent battery storage site we have approved has been for 30 years. 'Given the potential changes in technology, 50 years would not be appropriate.' She outlined that facilities such as wind turbines had initially been given 20-year lifespans, and some have been extended, while photo-voltaic sites, or 'solar farms,' have been granted 30-year lifespans. Laura Petrie, for the firm, said the 30-year lifespan would be acceptable. Councillor Damian Doran-Timson had raised questions about replacing the storage cabinets on the site. When told that equipment would need to be replaced in 10 to 15 years, the head asked: 'What would be the likely impact of equipment replacement within 10 to 15 years. Would the access be sufficient?' Colin Laverty, an agent for the developers, said: 'Yes, it would.' Mrs McCorriston told the meeting: 'It is a balance and i think in terms of planning policy this is a site that is not readily visible but a distance from main residential areas is acceptable and in terms of the land take it is relatively small .' Bathgate Councillor Pauline Stafford, who had asked for the application to be discussed by DMC, was not at the meeting, but fellow town representative Willie Boyle attended remotely. He told the meeting: 'My concern about this site is simply that what we are granting is a commercial site on agricultural land. 'I understand the locational need. I don't have a great issue with it, but because it is a commercial site the screening is important and I welcome the assurances and I look forward to seeing a copy of the final planting plan, but I am reassured from what I have heard. 'Demand changes, and we have to change with it. Other than that, I'm quite happy to support what's been put forward.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
