&w=3840&q=100)
Myanmar election in December: Junta lifts emergency 4 years after coup against Suu Kyi govt
Myanmar's junta leader General Min Aung Hlaing, who ousted the elected government in a coup on February 1, 2021, presides over an army parade on Armed Forces Day in Naypyitaw, Myanmar, March 27, 2021. (Photo: Reuters)
Four years after taking over the 'country in a coup, Myanmar's military junta has ended the emergency and formed a commission to hold elections in December.
On February 1, 2021, Myanmar's military ousted the country's civilian leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Senior General Min Aung Hlaing assumed power. He declared a state of emergency in the country and detained several civilian leaders. The outrage against the coup led to a civil war that continues to this day.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
After Hlaing on Wednesday said that elections will be held in December, the state media reported on Thursday that the junta has set up an 11-member commission led by Hlaing to hold elections.
While Hlaing has called elections as an offramp in the civil war that has not gone in the junta's favour, critics and opposition groups have slammed elections as sham and announced a boycott. Analysts have said that Hlaing will stay in power after elections either as the head of state or the head of the armed forces.
By all accounts, the civil war has not gone in favour of Myanmar's junta. As per estimates, the junta controls just a fifth of the country and the rest of the country remains in the hands of either the National Unity Government (NUG) of the opposition groups or various ethnic armed groups active in the country.
Myanmar's junta enacts tough election law
Just before the announcement of elections and the setting up of the commission, the junta on Wednesday enacted a law that imposes punishments of up to the death penalty for anyone who opposes or disrupts elections later this year, according to the Associated Press.
The new law says that anyone who speaks, organises, incites, protests, or distributes letters to disrupt any part of the electoral process shall be punished with three to ten years of imprisonment and a fine.
As the junta enacted the law, Hlaing said that 'we have already passed the first chapter' and 'now we are starting the second chapter'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The upcoming election will be held this December, and efforts will be made to enable all eligible voters to cast their ballots,' the state media reported him as saying.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Europe is breaking its reliance on American science
AI generated used for representation European governments are taking steps to break their dependence on critical scientific data the United States historically made freely available to the world, and are ramping up their own data collection systems to monitor climate change and weather extremes, according to Reuters interviews. The effort - which has not been previously reported - marks the most concrete response from the European Union and other European governments so far to the U.S. government's retreat from scientific research under President Donald Trump's administration. Since his return to the White House, Trump has initiated sweeping budget cuts to the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Centers for Disease Control and other agencies, dismantling programs conducting climate, weather, geospatial and health research, and taking some public databases offline. As those cuts take effect, European officials have expressed increasing alarm that - without continued access to U.S.-supported weather and climate data - governments and businesses will face challenges in planning for extreme weather events and long-term infrastructure investment, according to Reuters interviews. In March, more than a dozen European countries urged the EU Commission to move fast to recruit American scientists who lose their jobs to those cuts. Asked for comment on NOAA cuts and the EU's moves to expand its own collection of scientific data, the White House Office of Management and Budget said Trump's proposed cuts to the agency's 2026 budget were aimed at programs that spread "fake Green New Scam 'science,'" a reference to climate change research and policy. "Under President Trump's leadership, the U.S. is funding real science again," Rachel Cauley, an OMB spokesperson, said via email. European officials told Reuters that - beyond the risk of losing access to data that is bedrock to the world's understanding of climate change and marine systems - they were concerned by the general U.S. pullback from research. "The current situation is much worse than we could have expected," Sweden's State Secretary for Education and Research Maria Nilsson, told Reuters. "My reaction is, quite frankly, shock." The Danish Meteorological Institute described the U.S. government data as "absolutely vital" - and said it relied on several data sets to measure including sea ice in the Arctic and sea surface temperatures. "This isn't just a technical issue, reliable data underpins extreme weather warnings, climate projections, protecting communities and ultimately saves lives," said Adrian Lema, director of the DMI's National Center for Climate Research. Reuters interviewed officials from eight European countries who said their governments were undertaking reviews of their reliance on U.S. marine, climate and weather data. Officials from seven countries - Denmark, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain and Sweden - described joint efforts now in the early stages to safeguard key health and climate data and research programs. As a priority, the EU is expanding its access to ocean observation data, a senior European Commission official told Reuters. Those data sets are seen as critical to the shipping and energy industries as well as early storm warning systems. Over the next two years, the senior official said, the EU plans to expand its own European Marine Observation and Data Network which collects and hosts data on shipping routes, seabed habitats, marine litter and other concerns. The initiative was aimed at "mirroring and possibly replacing US-based services," the senior European Commission official told Reuters. Europe is particularly concerned about its vulnerability to U.S. funding cuts to NOAA's research arm that would affect the Global Ocean Observing System, a network of ocean observation programs that supports navigation services, shipping routes and storm forecasting, a second EU official told Reuters. The insurance industry relies on the Global Ocean Observing System's disaster records for risk modelling. Coastal planners use shoreline, sea-level, and hazard data to guide infrastructure investments. The energy industry uses oceanic and seismic datasets to assess offshore drilling or wind farm viability. In addition, the senior EU Commission official said, the EU is considering increasing its funding of the Argo program, a part of the Global Ocean Observing System which operates a global system of floats to monitor the world's oceans and track global warming, extreme weather events and sea-level rise. NOAA last year described the program, in operation for over 25 years, as the "crown jewel" of ocean science. It makes its data freely available to the oil and gas industry, marine tourism and other industries. The United States funds 57% of Argo's $40 million annual operating expenses, while the EU funds 23%. The White House and NOAA did not respond to questions about future support for that program. The European moves to establish independent data collection and play a bigger role in Argo represent a historic break with decades of U.S. leadership in ocean science, said Craig McLean, who retired in 2022 after four decades at the agency. He said U.S. leadership of weather, climate and marine data collection was unmatched, and that through NOAA the U.S. has paid for more than half of the world's ocean measurements. European scientists acknowledge the outsized role the U.S. government has played in global scientific research and data collection - and that European countries have grown overly dependent on that work. "It's a bit like defense: we rely heavily on the U.S. in that area, too. They're trailblazers and role models-but that also makes us dependent on them," Katrin Boehning-Gaese, scientific director of Germany's Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, told Reuters. A number of European governments are now taking measures to reduce that dependence. Nordic countries met to coordinate data storage efforts in the Spring, Norwegian Minister of Research and Higher Education Sigrun Aasland told Reuters. European science ministers also discussed the U.S. science budget cuts at a meeting in Paris in May. Aasland said Norway was setting aside $2 million to back up and store U.S. data to ensure stable access. The Danish Meteorological Institute in February started downloading historical U.S. climate data in case it is deleted by the U.S. It is also preparing to switch from American observations to alternatives, Christina Egelund, Minister of Higher Education and Science of Denmark, said in an interview. "The potentially critical issue is when new observations data stop coming in," the Institute's Lema said. While weather models could continue to operate without U.S. data, he said the quality would suffer. Meanwhile, the German government has commissioned scientific organizations, including the center, to review its reliance on U.S. databases. Since Trump returned to the White House, scientists and citizens worldwide have been downloading U.S. databases related to climate, public health or the environment that are slated for decommissioning - calling it "guerrilla archiving." "We actually received requests-or let's say emergency calls-from our colleagues in the U.S., who said, 'We have a problem here... and we will have to abandon some datasets", said Frank Oliver Gloeckner, head of the digital archive PANGAEA, which is operated by publicly funded German research institutions. About 800 of NOAA's 12,000-strong workforce have been terminated or taken financial incentives to resign as part of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency cuts. The White House 2026 budget plan seeks to shrink NOAA even further, proposing a $1.8 billion cut, or 27% of the agency's budget, and a near-20% reduction in staffing, bringing down the NOAA workforce to 10,000. The budget proposal would eliminate the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, NOAA's main research arm, which is responsible for ocean observatory systems including Argo, coastal observing networks, satellite sensors and climate model labs. It is also reducing its data products. Between April and June, NOAA announced on its website the decommissioning of 20 datasets or products related to earthquakes and marine science. NOAA did not respond to requests for comment. Gloeckner said there were no legal hurdles to storing the U.S. government data as it was already in the public domain. But without significant funds and infrastructure, there are limits to what private scientists can save, said Denice Ross, a senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists, a nonprofit science policy group and the U.S. government's chief data officer during Joe Biden's administration. Databases need regular updating - which requires the funding and infrastructure that only governments can provide, Ross said. Over the last few months, the Federation and EU officials have held a series of talks with European researchers, U.S. philanthropies and health and environment advocacy groups to discuss how to prioritize what data to save. "There is an opportunity for other nations and institutions and philanthropies to fill in the gaps if U.S. quality starts to falter," she said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
38 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Was fighting lunatics like you': Trump hits back at reporter on tariffs
At a White House press briefing on Thursday, US President Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter who questioned the timing of his decision to use a decades-old law to impose wide-ranging tariffs. When pressed on why he waited until his second term to invoke the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Trump called the journalist a 'lunatic'. The confrontation began after the reporter referred to an ongoing appellate court hearing that is reviewing Trump's authority to use the IEEPA to impose tariffs. 'As you know, a federal appellate court today heard oral arguments about whether or not you had the authority to unilaterally impose those tariffs,' the reporter said. He then continued, 'Why didn't you invoke this law in your first term? You could've collected billions upon billions of dollars back then.' Trump responded, 'In my first term, I was busy fighting lunatics like you who were trying to do things incorrectly and inappropriately to a duly elected president.' He defended his tariff actions in office, saying, 'We took in hundreds of billions from China.' Trump stressed that the US had already collected 'hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs' during his first term. Before moving on, he added, 'You people didn't cover it very well.' During his presidency, Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese goods starting in 2018, initially on $50 billion worth of imports, which expanded further in 2019. US court scrutinises Trump's tariff authority Judges from a US appeals court on Thursday raised serious doubts about whether President Trump was legally allowed to use emergency powers to justify his tariff policies. The scrutiny came during a hearing where lawyers representing states and businesses argued that Trump had gone beyond his legal authority, news agency Reuters reported. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, based in Washington, DC, is reviewing the legality of tariffs introduced by Trump in April under a 'reciprocal' trade framework. These duties were applied to a wide group of America's trading partners. The court is also evaluating separate tariffs imposed earlier in February targeting China, Canada, and Mexico. The judges heard arguments in two related lawsuits — one filed by five small US companies and another by a group of 12 US states governed by Democrats. Both suits challenge the President's use of IEEPA to justify imposing tariffs. Judges quiz legal basis for tariffs During the hearing, government attorney Brett Shumate was repeatedly asked to clarify how the 1977 IEEPA — which was mainly designed to let presidents freeze assets or impose sanctions on foreign enemies — could be used to set trade tariffs. Shumate defended the move, saying the law grants the president 'extraordinary' powers during a national emergency, including the ability to block imports entirely. According to him, that same power extends to setting tariffs, since the law allows the president to 'regulate' imports in times of crisis. However, Judge Jimmie Reyna expressed skepticism, pointing out that the law never directly refers to tariffs. 'IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them,' Reyna said. Tariffs on countries set to take effect On Thursday (local time), Trump signed a new executive order imposing tariffs on 68 countries and the European Union. A 50 per cent duty will apply to Brazilian imports, citing Brazil's economic policies and actions against former President Jair Bolsonaro. For India, the rate has been fixed at 25 per cent. The tariffs, effective August 7, are part of Trump's larger trade strategy ahead of upcoming negotiations. Countries not named in the order will face a 10 per cent baseline tariff.
The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
Trump says Canada's Carney reached out but they haven't talked ahead of tariff deadline
'We haven't spoken to Canada today. He's (Carney) called and we'll, we'll see,' Trump told reporters during an event at the White House. Trump has warned that any country that does not strike a deal with the U.S. before Friday will be subjected to higher tariffs imposed on goods, which for Canada could mean a 35% rate on all products not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. By Jasper Ward and Ryan Patrick Jones WASHINGTON/TORONTO (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney reached out ahead of an August 1 tariff deadline, but no conversations between the two took place. Carney's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Canadian leader previously said trade talks with Washington had been constructive, but the talks may not conclude by the deadline. Talks between the two countries were at an intense phase, he added, but a deal that would remove all U.S. tariffs was unlikely. Earlier on Thursday, Trump said it would be 'very hard' for the U.S. and Canada to strike a deal after Ottawa moved toward recognizing Palestinian statehood. He said later on Thursday, however, that he did not view the move as 'a deal breaker' in trade talks. 'Well, they have to pay a fair rate – that's all. It's very simple. They have been charging very, very high tariffs to our farmers, some over 200% and they've been treating our farmers very badly,' Trump said when asked about negotiations. He added that while he loves Canada, it has treated the United States 'very badly' for years. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Canada could avoid the 35% tariff rate if Carney 'starts turning on the charm and if he takes off his retaliation.' (Reporting by Jasper Ward in Washington and Ryan Patrick Jones in Toronto; Additional reporting by David Ljunggren; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Jamie Freed) Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
