Transport Secretary admits she doesn't have ‘expensive' EV – despite trying to convince drivers to make switch
The Cabinet Minister highlighted the difficulties of living in a terraced home and not having a driveway to plug in the motor for charging.
1
Her comments come as £700 million could be on the table offering subsidies to lower the upfront costs of purchasing electric vehicles.
She told the BBC "I don't have an electric car. But I'm like millions of people in this country, I bought a new car about six years ago.
"I'm thinking about the next car I will purchase, and it will definitely be an electric vehicle. I'm not in the habit of changing my car on a yearly basis, expensive as it is."
Electric car sales amounted to 47,000 in June but this is still below the mandated level which states 28 per cent of new car sales and 16 per cent of van sales should be zero emission.
She also committed to giving £25 million to councils so they could adapt paths between a house and the road for cables to be laid.
Ms Alexander said: "We do need to make it easier and cheaper for people to buy an electric vehicle.
"So today we're announcing a really big investment, £63 million in charging infrastructure across the country, £25 million for councils so that people like me, who don't have a driveway.
"I live in a terrace house, if I had an EV, I'd be asking myself questions about how I would get the electric cable across to the car."
Electric car sales amounted to 47,000 in June but this is still below the mandated level which states 28 per cent of new car sales and 16 per cent of van sales should be zero emission.
The transition to electric vehicles comes as new petrol or diesel motors should come to an end by 2030.
Just five years later, all new motors will have to be electric as part of the drive to meet Net Zero targets by 2050.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
KATIE HIND: Tony Blair grasped that working class families like mine want to work hard and get on. After Starmer's attacks on aspiration, I'll NEVER vote Labour again
The day after my 16th birthday in May 1997, I woke up to the news that Tony Blair had won the general election, ousting the who had been in power since before I was born. My head somewhat hazy from the cheeky teenage drinks I'd had with friends the night before, I remember hearing New Labour's anthem, Things Can Only Get Better by band D:Ream, playing on the TV news as footage was broadcast of victory celebrations across the country. (It was a song I was familiar with, having seen the group as a support act to Take That in a concert a few years before.)
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN GLOVER: Rather than sending flunkies to make peace, Harry should say sorry in person to his father for what he's done
What a strange private meeting that took place last week between Prince Harry 's representatives and a senior courtier of the King's in a London club. The purpose, of course, was good – to build bridges within the fractured Royal Family, and ultimately to effect a reconciliation between Harry and Charles.
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Delaying payouts for blood and Post Office victims is scandalous
Tens of thousands of people are thought to have received contaminated blood in the 1970s and 1980s LEON NEAL/GETTY IMAGES The familiar truism that justice delayed is justice denied has taken on a morbid sense of urgency for the many victims of the Post Office and infected blood scandals. Thanks to the courageous persistence of campaigners, public officials have been forced to face up to the moral enormity of these past wrongs: respectively, the most widespread miscarriage of justice, and gravest case of medical malpractice, in recent memory. Yet, those charged with remedying these injustices are continuing to drag their feet in awarding victims due redress. It has been estimated that at least 100 further victims of the infected blood scandal have died in the protracted interim between the conclusion of Sir Brian Langstaff's inquiry last year and being invited to apply for compensation. Likewise, some 345 former sub-postmasters are thought to have died before securing any financial restitution. Those still pursuing claims now find themselves caught in an interminable, tortuous, legalistic wrangle: one that seems cynically designed to delay and minimise the total amount of compensation that will eventually have to be paid out. • Keir Starmer: infected blood victims deserve justice now A report published last week into the human toll of the prosecutions made on the basis of the Post Office's defective Horizon IT system was unsparing in its grim detail. Its author, Sir Wyn Williams, concluded that the scandal had driven 13 people to suicide. Many other lives were blighted by addiction, divorce and financial ruin. Yet, the government's declared determination to correct these wrongs is belied by the gross deficiencies Sir Wyn identifies in the remuneration of those harmed. The Post Office compensation programme is byzantine in its complexity, with four separate schemes running in parallel. 3,700 former subpostmasters are yet to receive any payout. Many are locked in a legal limbo while their claims are subjected to excessively bureaucratic and adversarial scrutiny. Claimants are disadvantaged if they can't produce decades-old forms, often long lost. One sub-postmistress claims to have received a compensation offer worth just 0.5 per cent of her original claim. Sir Alan Bates, who championed his fellow sub-postmasters' cause, has fallen victim to what he describes as a 'quasi-kangaroo court', receiving a 'take it or leave it' quote amounting to less than half his submitted claim. Similarly shameful treatment has been meted out to those survivors among the 30,000 NHS patients infected with HIV and hepatitis by contaminated blood products. Last week, Sir Brian Langstaff warned that this compensation system too is creating 'obvious injustice'. Only 460 people have received full payouts, the result of a dilatory process forcing victims to be invited to make a claim rather than initiate one themselves. • Infected blood victims 'left suicidal' by compensation delays It is clear that government officials and civil servants tasked with disbursing payouts are subjecting comparatively powerless individuals to a level of rigoristic penny-pinching they would not dream of applying elsewhere. When set alongside the kind of financial waste casually tolerated within government, from the eye-watering sums sunk into HS2 to the near £2 billion in 'bounce back loan' fraud complacently written off by the very same department of business overseeing appeals by victims of the Post Office, the contrast is galling. Victims of the infected blood and Post Office scandals have had their right to restitution established by due process. Obstructionist officials should not be allowed to deny them justice.
