CDC official who oversaw COVID vaccine recommendations resigns
"My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role," Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos wrote in her resignation letter obtained by ABC News. In her letter, Panagiotakopoulos said she resigned last Friday.
Reuters first reported her resignation.
MORE: RFK Jr. cuts COVID vaccine recommendation for healthy kids, pregnant women -- and why it matters
Panagiotakopoulos co-led a part of the CDC's independent panel of vaccine advisers to review evidence for recommendations on COVID vaccines. In mid-April, the advisers had discussed the possibility of narrowing the recommendations for who should receive an annual COVID vaccine -- prioritizing those at higher risk such as adults over 65 or those with an underlying condition.
Last week, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the removal of COVID vaccines from the immunization schedule for healthy children and healthy pregnant women.
Later on Friday, the CDC updated the immunization schedule allowing all children to be eligible to receive COVID vaccines, now under a shared clinical decision-making model, which means parents can choose to get their children vaccinated with the advice of a doctor.
MORE: Why healthy children may need vaccination as RFK Jr. cuts COVID shot recommendation for some kids
The mixed messages prompted concern from some medical organizations.
"American families deserve better," the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said, in part, in a statement. "They deserve clear messages from all involved in their health, that are based on facts so they can continue to benefit from the success story of vaccines."
The statement went on to say: "While the shared clinical decision-making model in the updated immunization schedule preserves families' choice, this model has consistently proven challenging to implement because it lacks clear guidance for the conversations between a doctor and a family. Doctors and families need straightforward, evidence-based guidance, not vague, impractical frameworks," the AAP statement added.
Pregnant women were left without a recommendation on the CDC's immunization schedule as to whether or not to receive the COVID vaccine.
Despite the change in recommendations from HHS, "the science has not changed," the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) said in part of a statement. "It is very clear that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy can be catastrophic and lead to major disability, and it can cause devastating consequences for families. The COVID-19 vaccine is safe during pregnancy, and vaccination can protect our patients and their infants after birth," the ACOG statement added.
MORE: Why are more than 300 people in the US still dying from COVID every week?
Federal officials had made the changes to the vaccine recommendations without the input of the CDC's independent panel of vaccine advisers and before their meeting set for late June, according to the public calendar. In the meeting, advisers were set to discuss their recommendation for who should be eligible for COVID vaccines including a vote on whether to narrow the recommendations.
"Governmental guidance about vaccines is an important foundation that enables insurance coverage of—and therefore access to—vaccines, so changing government recommendations about which specific and limited populations should receive COVID-19 vaccines has far-reaching consequences," the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) said in part of a statement.
Some medical and public health organizations had expressed concerns at the officials' change to vaccine recommendations without the input of independent advisers.
"Federal vaccine recommendations have traditionally been developed by medical and public health experts who gather openly to review evidence and receive public input before recommending what vaccines are needed and who should be eligible for them. Conclusions are based on the best available science, and recommendations are communicated with precision and clarity, providing guidance to clinicians to make the best decisions with their patients," part of the IDSA statement read.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House AI czar David Sacks says 'AI psychosis' is similar to the 'moral panic' of social media's early days
The White House AI advisor discussed "AI psychosis" on a recent podcast. David Sacks said he doubted the validity of the concept. He compared it to the "moral panic" that surrounded earlier tech leaps, like social media. AI can create a diet plan, organize a calendar, and provide answers to an endless variety of burning questions. Can it also cause a psychiatric breakdown? David Sacks, the White House official spearheading America's AI policies, doesn't think so. President Donald Trump's AI and crypto czar discussed "AI psychosis" during an episode of the "All-In Podcast" published Friday. While most people engage with chatbots without a problem, a small number of users say the bots have encouraged delusions and other concerning behavior. For some, ChatGPT serves as an alternative to professional therapists. A psychiatrist earlier told Business Insider that some of his patients exhibiting what's been described as "AI psychosis," a nonclinical term, used the technology before experiencing mental health issues, "but they turned to it in the wrong place at the wrong time, and it supercharged some of their vulnerabilities." During the podcast, Sacks doubted the whole concept of "AI psychosis." "I mean, what are we talking about here? People doing too much research?" he asked. "This feels like the moral panic that was created over social media, but updated for AI." Sacks then referred to a recent article featuring a psychiatrist, who said they didn't believe using a chatbot inherently induced "AI psychosis" if there aren't other risk factors — including social and genetic — involved. "In other words, this is just a manifestation or outlet for pre-existing problems," Sacks said. "I think it's fair to say we're in the midst of a mental health crisis in this country." Sacks attributed the crisis instead to the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns. "That's what seems to have triggered a lot of these mental health declines," he said. After several reports of users suffering mental breaks while using ChatGPT, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed the issue on X after the company rolled out the highly anticipated GPT-5. "People have used technology, including AI, in self-destructive ways; if a user is in a mentally fragile state and prone to delusion, we do not want the AI to reinforce that," Altman wrote. "Most users can keep a clear line between reality and fiction or role-play, but a small percentage cannot." Earlier this month, OpenAI introduced safeguards in ChatGPT, including a prompt encouraging users to take breaks after long conversations with the chatbot. The update will also change how the chatbot responds to users asking about personal challenges. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
White House AI czar David Sacks says 'AI psychosis' is similar to the 'moral panic' of social media's early days
AI can create a diet plan, organize a calendar, and provide answers to an endless variety of burning questions. Can it also cause a psychiatric breakdown? David Sacks, the White House official spearheading America's AI policies, doesn't think so. President Donald Trump's AI and crypto czar discussed " AI psychosis" during an episode of the "All-In Podcast" published Friday. While most people engage with chatbots without a problem, a small number of users say the bots have encouraged delusions and other concerning behavior. For some, ChatGPT serves as an alternative to professional therapists. A psychiatrist earlier told Business Insider that some of his patients exhibiting what's been described as "AI psychosis," a nonclinical term, used the technology before experiencing mental health issues, "but they turned to it in the wrong place at the wrong time, and it supercharged some of their vulnerabilities." During the podcast, Sacks doubted the whole concept of "AI psychosis." "I mean, what are we talking about here? People doing too much research?" he asked. "This feels like the moral panic that was created over social media, but updated for AI." Sacks then referred to a recent article featuring a psychiatrist, who said they didn't believe using a chatbot inherently induced "AI psychosis" if there aren't other risk factors — including social and genetic — involved. "In other words, this is just a manifestation or outlet for pre-existing problems," Sacks said. "I think it's fair to say we're in the midst of a mental health crisis in this country." Sacks attributed the crisis instead to the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns. "That's what seems to have triggered a lot of these mental health declines," he said. After several reports of users suffering mental breaks while using ChatGPT, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed the issue on X after the company rolled out the highly anticipated GPT-5. "People have used technology, including AI, in self-destructive ways; if a user is in a mentally fragile state and prone to delusion, we do not want the AI to reinforce that," Altman wrote. "Most users can keep a clear line between reality and fiction or role-play, but a small percentage cannot." Earlier this month, OpenAI introduced safeguards in ChatGPT, including a prompt encouraging users to take breaks after long conversations with the chatbot. The update will also change how the chatbot responds to users asking about personal challenges.
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration halts visas for people from Gaza after conservative activist questions arrivals
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As a result, he said, 'we are going to pause this program and reevaluate how those visas are being vetted and what relationship, if any, has there been by these organizations to the process of acquiring those visas.' Advertisement Loomer on Friday posted videos on X of children from Gaza arriving earlier this month in San Francisco and Houston for medical treatment with the aid of an organization called HEAL Palestine. 'Despite the US saying we are not accepting Palestinian 'refugees' into the United States under the Trump administration,' these people from Gaza were able to travel to the United States, she said. Advertisement She called it a 'national security threat' and asked who signed off on the visas, calling for the person to be fired. She tagged Rubio, President Trump has The State Department on Sunday declined to comment on how many of the visas had been granted and whether the decision to halt visas to people from Gaza had anything to do with Loomer's posts. HEAL Palestine said in a statement Sunday that it was 'distressed' by the State Department decision to stop visitor visas from Gaza. The group said it is 'an American humanitarian nonprofit organization delivering urgent aid and medical care to children in Palestine.' A post on the organization's Facebook page Thursday shows a photo of a boy from Gaza leaving Egypt and headed to St. Louis for treatment and said he is 'our 15th evacuated child arriving in the U.S. in the last two weeks.' The organization brings 'severely injured children' to the United States on temporary visas for treatment they can't get at home, the statement said. Following treatment, the children and any family members who accompanied them return to the Middle East, the statement said. 'This is a medical treatment program, not a refugee resettlement program,' it said. The World Health Organization has repeatedly called for more medical evacuations from Gaza, where Israel's over 22-month war against Hamas has heavily destroyed or damaged much of the territory's health system. Advertisement 'More than 14,800 patients still need lifesaving medical care that is not available in Gaza,' WHO Director-General A WHO description of the medical evacuation process from Gaza published last year explained that the WHO submits lists of patients to Israeli authorities for security clearance. It noted that before the war in Gaza began, 50 to 100 patients were leaving Gaza daily for medical treatment, and it called for a higher rate of approvals from Israeli authorities. The United Nations and partners say medicines and even basic health care supplies are low in Gaza after Israel cut off all aid to the territory of over 2 million people for more than 10 weeks earlier this year. 'Cease-fire! Peace is the best medicine,' Tedros added Wednesday.
