Takeaways from AP's report on creationist beliefs 100 years after the Scopes trial
WILLIAMSTOWN, Ky. (AP) — Some people thought the 1925 Scopes monkey trial marked a cultural defeat for biblical fundamentalism.
But a century after what was dubbed the Trial of the Century, the issue is far from settled. Many American adults still embrace creationism — a belief in the literal truth of the Genesis account of the origins of the Earth and humanity.
To be sure, Tennessee public schoolteacher John Scopes was convicted in 1925 for violating a state law against teaching human evolution. But it appeared to be a pyrrhic victory for creationists.
That's because the star of the prosecution team — populist politician William Jennings Bryan — faltered when he took the stand as an expert witness. He struggled to defend the Bible's miraculous and mysterious stories.
But creationist belief is resilient. Polls generally show that somewhere between 1 in 6 and 1 in 3 Americans hold beliefs consistent with young-Earth creationism, depending on how the question is asked.
That belief is most evident in a region of northern Kentucky that hosts a Creation Museum and a gargantuan replica of the biblical Noah's Ark. They draw a combined 1.5 million visits per year.
This trend alarms science educators, who say the evidence for evolution is overwhelming and see creationism as part of an anti-science movement affecting responses to serious problems like climate change.
An ark in Kentucky
Ken Ham began speaking in support of creationism 50 years ago — halfway between the Scopes trial and today — as a young schoolteacher in Australia. He's expanded that work by founding Answers in Genesis, a vast enterprise that includes books, videos and homeschool curricula.
The organization opened the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky, near Cincinnati, in 2007. Visitors are greeted with a diorama depicting children and dinosaurs interacting peacefully in the Garden of Eden — life-forms that scientists say are actually separated by tens of millions of years. The museum features an array of exhibits, some of them added in recent years, that argue for a literal interpretation of the biblical creation narrative.
Most dramatically, Answers in Genesis opened the Ark Encounter theme park in nearby Williamstown, Kentucky, in 2016. Its main attraction is the massive ark replica — 'the biggest freestanding timber frame structure in the world,' says Ham. It's 510 feet (155 meters) long, or one and a half football fields in length; 85 feet (26 meters) wide and 51 feet (16 meters) high.
Like the museum, the park includes numerous exhibits arguing for the plausibility of the ark — that Noah, his wife, his three sons and their wives had the skill and means to sustain thousands of animals in their care. The park also includes theme-park attractions such as a zoo, zip lines and virtual-reality theater. Similar theaters are planned for tourist hubs Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, and Branson, Missouri.
'The main message of both attractions is basically this: The history in the Bible is true,' Ham says. 'That's why the message of the Gospel based on that history is true.'
Creationist beliefs
Core beliefs of Christian creationism include:
— God created the heavens and the Earth by fiat in six literal days, with humans as the crown of creation.
— The Earth is just a few thousand years old.
— Humans sinned, and that brought death and suffering into the world (and, ultimately, the necessity of salvation through Jesus Christ).
— God drowned almost all people and breathing animals in a global flood because of human wickedness. God spared Noah and his family, instructing him to build a large ark and bring aboard pairs of each animal kind to preserve them from extinction.
— The flood explains geological phenomena such as the Grand Canyon.
Science educators' concerns
According to the vast, long-standing scientific consensus, the above biological and geological claims are absurd and completely lacking in evidence.
The consensus is that the Earth is billions of years old; that humans and other life forms evolved from earlier forms over millions of years; and that mountains, canyons and other geological features are due to millions of years of tectonic upheaval and erosion. A 2014 Pew Research Center poll found 98% of American scientists accept evolution.
'Evolution and the directly related concept of deep time are essential parts of science curricula,' says the Geological Society of America.
Evolution is 'one of the most securely established of scientific facts,' says the National Academy of Sciences. The academy urges that public schools stick to the scientific consensus and that creationism is not a viable alternative. Creationists, it said, 'reverse the scientific process' by beginning with an inflexible conclusion, rather than building evidence toward a conclusion.
Courts of law — and public opinion
Creation and evolution may not be front-burner issues today, but the Scopes trial set a template for other culture-war battles over school books and gender policies. William Jennings Bryan's words from his era would sound familiar at a modern school board meeting: 'Teachers in public schools must teach what the taxpayers desire taught.'
The Scopes case involved the 1925 conviction of schoolteacher John Scopes in Dayton, Tennessee, for violating a state law against teaching in public schools 'any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.'
Tennessee repealed that law in 1967, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1968 that a similar Arkansas law was an unconstitutional promotion of religion. The high court in 1987 overturned a Louisiana law requiring creationism to be taught alongside evolution. A 2005 federal court ruling similarly forbade the Dover Area School District in Pennsylvania from presenting 'intelligent design,' as an alternative to evolution, saying it, too, was a religious teaching. Though distinct from young-Earth creationism, intelligent design argues that nature shows evidence of a designer.
A 2023-2024 Pew Research Center survey found that 17% of U.S. adults agreed that humans have existed in their present form since 'the beginning of time.'
A 2024 Gallup survey found that 37% agreed that 'God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so.'
The differences may be due to the phrasing of the question and the circumstances of the survey.
Both surveys found that majorities of Americans believe humans evolved, and of that group, more believe God had a role in evolution than that it happened without divine intervention.
Catholics and many Protestants and other religious groups accept all or parts of evolutionary theory.
But many conservative evangelical denominations, schools and other institutions promote young-Earth creationist beliefs.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The NASA science missions that would be axed in Trump's 2026 budget
President Donald Trump's fiscal 2026 budget request, if approved by Congress, would kill many of NASA's plans for robotic exploration of the solar system. Gone, too, would be multiple space-based missions to study Earth, the sun and the rest of the universe. Among the planets that would get less attention are Venus, Mars and Jupiter. But the planet facing the biggest drop in scrutiny from space is our own. The Trump budget proposal calls for reducing Earth science funding by 53 percent.


Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
How To Stay Ahead Of AI – The Human Skills Universities Must Teach
Photo credit Some people are concerned that AI will take over the workforce. The reality? While automation and machine learning are reshaping industries, the most valuable skills in today's job market are innately human. AI may be faster than humans, but we hold the edge in critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and adaptability. Those are the qualities that come naturally and can't be replicated by machines. With this shift underway, universities need to rethink traditional education models to better prepare graduates for the new world of work. While AI can process huge amounts of data in seconds, it still relies on human judgment, intuition, and creativity to give that information meaning. Today's professionals must be able to analyze nuance, challenge assumptions, and synthesize complex information to make informed decisions. Universities have a critical role in developing these social skills. That starts with shifting away from passive learning and toward discussion-based, interdisciplinary experiences that mirror the complexity of real-world problems. Case-based coursework, cohort-focused projects, and ethical reasoning exercises help students build the kind of critical thinking skills that technology can't replicate. Institutions that emphasize debate, reflection, and cross-disciplinary exploration are preparing students to lead in environments where sound judgment and the ability to navigate ambiguity are just as important as technical know-how. Soft skills are no longer just nice to have. As AI automates routine tasks, human connection is becoming the primary competitive advantage at work. Employers prioritize emotional intelligence (EQ) because it drives collaboration, leadership, and workplace success. Recent research confirms that employees with high emotional intelligence (EQ) outperform their peers in leadership, teamwork, and overall workplace effectiveness. Emotional intelligence is one of the key elements of authentic leadership – the style of leadership that's most effective in today's complex workplace. To meet this demand, a growing number of universities are exploring ways to integrate emotional intelligence into the student experience. Some are beginning to introduce first-year students to behavioral science concepts that encourage reflection and perspective-taking. Others are piloting programs that promote inclusive dialogue, empathy-building, and real-world communication practice through orientation, residence life, and leadership initiatives. The most effective approaches give students repeated, structured opportunities to develop self-awareness and practice the interpersonal skills that matter most in today's workplaces. These are the skills that AI simply can't replicate. The half-life of skills is shrinking—fast. Research from the World Economic Forum says that by 2027, nearly half of all workers will need reskilling. With industries and job functions evolving rapidly, adaptability is no longer optional—it's essential. At Canisius University in Buffalo, NY, for example, this mindset weaves through both classroom learning and extracurricular activities. Take the university's sports analytics certificate program. It goes beyond teaching AI-driven tools by pushing students to grapple with ethical questions, such as those surrounding sports betting. The program emphasizes the importance of continuous learning and thoughtful decision-making. Danielle Ianni, PhD, Vice President for Enrollment Management at Canisius, encourages students to evaluate higher education choices based on long-term career value, not just degree completion. She explains, 'A Canisius education isn't just about getting a job—it's about preparing for a lifetime of professional growth. We emphasize ethical judgment, creative problem-solving, and leadership development—qualities that remain relevant no matter how industries change.' To future-proof their careers, students must embrace learning as a lifelong pursuit—a mindset that universities can cultivate by offering interdisciplinary courses, experiential learning, and opportunities for adaptability-driven skill development. AI is changing the way we work by pushing us to lean into the social skills that come naturally to us. Critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and adaptability aren't just bonuses anymore; they're at the heart of what makes people indispensable in an AI-infused world. For colleges and universities, there's an opportunity to rethink how these skills are taught and reinforced. For students and professionals, the challenge is to embrace learning that goes beyond technical ability and invests in human capacity. The future of work will undoubtedly be shaped by machines, but people will still lead it. Those who demonstrate their human skills will be able to connect, adapt, and think critically. William Arruda is a keynote speaker, author, and personal branding pioneer. Join him as he discusses clever strategies for using AI to express and expand your brand in Maven's free Lightning Lesson. If you can't attend live, register to receive the replay.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pore no more: US scientists develop real-time defect detection for 3D metal printing
Scientists from the federally funded Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois and the University of Virginia have developed a new approach for detecting defects in metal parts produced by 3D printing. By combining artificial intelligence (AI), X-ray imaging, and thermal imaging, this approach could pave the way for real-time self-correcting systems in the future. 3D printing of metals involves a method called laser powder bed fusion, where you build objects layer by layer by melting metal powder with a laser. However, a big issue in this process is defects, especially keyhole pores, which are tiny holes that form when the laser melts too deeply. These pores weaken the final object, which is a significant concern when printing high-performance parts, such as rocket nozzles or surgical implants. Keyhole pores also pose a significant challenge as they compromise the structural integrity of printed parts. These tiny voids form when excessive laser energy creates deep, narrow holes that trap gas, leading to internal cavities as the metal solidifies. Recurrent microscopic keyhole pores can act as stress concentrators, increasing the risk of cracks or failure under pressure. This is particularly hazardous in critical applications, such as aerospace, automotive and medical devices, where part reliability is crucial. Detecting and preventing keyhole pores is therefore vital in ensuring the performance, safety, and durability of additively manufactured metal components. To help achieve this, researchers developed a method to identify and predict these pores real-time using a combination of thermal imaging, X-ray imaging, and machine learning. This new process utilizes powerful X-rays (from a government laboratory) to capture snapshots of what was happening inside the metal as it was being printed. A camera also recorded thermal images (from the surface) at the same time. Then, a trained AI model was used to teach it how specific surface heat patterns predict pore formation. Once trained, the model could detect when a pore was forming just from the thermal image, with extremely high accuracy and within milliseconds. Thermal cameras are already installed on several 3D printers. However, until now, they couldn't reliably spot internal defects. The new method developed by the collaborative team of scientists utilizes existing cameras and AI to instantly detect flaws, eliminating the need for expensive X-rays every time. "Our approach can readily be implemented in commercial systems. With only a thermal camera, the machines should be able to detect when and where pores are generated during the printing process and adjust their parameters accordingly," said Kamel Fezzaa, a physicist at Argonne and a member of the scientific team. Eventually, this technology could be paired with automatic corrections, such as adjusting the laser or reprinting a layer, to fix problems as they occur. This makes 3D printing more reliable for mission-critical parts. It could reduce waste, save money, and increase safety. "Our X-ray beams are so intense that we can image more than a million frames per second," added Samuel Clark, another physicist at Argonne. "Next, the researchers will develop sensing technologies that can detect other types of defects that occur during the additive manufacturing process. The goal is to create a system that not only detects defects but can enable repairs during 3D printing," a release by the U.S. Department of Energy stated. The study has been published on the website DOE Pages.