Sindh Assembly's historic role in paving the path to Pakistan
The Pakistan Resolution, adopted by the All-India Muslim League in Lahore on March 23, 1940, envisioned a sovereign homeland where Muslims could thrive free from marginalization. Transforming this vision into reality required resolute action, and the Sindh Assembly, with leaders like Sardar Allah Bakhsh Gabol and G.M. Syed, rose to the occasion. In 1943, it became the first provincial legislature to formally endorse the creation of Pakistan, a courageous act that reverberated across British India.
At a time when the future was uncertain, with British colonial rule firmly entrenched and the idea of partition fiercely debated, the Sindh Assembly's resolution was a defiant declaration of intent. Sardar Allah Bakhsh Gabol, as a signatory, lent his voice to a movement that dared to dream of a separate nation. His signature on that resolution was more than a formality—it was a commitment to a future where justice and self-governance would prevail. This historic vote was a roadmap, drawn in the halls of Karachi; it guided the Muslim League's strategy and inspired other provinces to follow.
The Sindh Assembly's pioneering spirit galvanized the Pakistan Movement. Its 1943 resolution emboldened Muslim League leaders in Bengal, Punjab, and beyond, culminating in the overwhelming mandate for Pakistan in the 1946 elections. Sindh's strategic position and vibrant political culture, exemplified by figures like my great-grandfather, made it a linchpin in this struggle. Their foresight turned aspiration into momentum, proving that great nations are built through decisive action at critical junctures.
Today, as we reflect on Pakistan's journey, I am honoured to celebrate the Sindh Assembly's role—and my great-grandfather's contribution—as a testament to unity and determination. Sardar Allah Bakhsh Gabol's legacy, intertwined with this historic resolution, reminds us that Pakistan was forged through the courage of its provinces, with Sindh leading the way. Let us draw inspiration from this moment to strengthen our nation, honouring the vision of leaders like my great-grandfather who dared to sign their names to a dream that became Pakistan.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
DG ISPR dismisses presidency chatter about COAS
RAWALPINDI: Pakistan Army spokesperson Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry has firmly denied the swirling rumours that Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir plans to become the next president of Pakistan, calling them 'completely baseless' in an interview with The Economist. Speaking to the renowned British magazine, the Director General of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) dismissed political speculation that surfaced after the 'Marka-e-Haq', saying such commentary is detached from reality and aims to embroil the military in unnecessary political discourse. Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif made it clear that Field Marshal Asim Munir has shown no interest in the presidency and no such proposal is under consideration. 'These claims are irresponsible and purely fictional. Dragging the military into politics is dangerous and misleading,' he stated. This statement aligns with earlier remarks from Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who had categorically denied any such development. Similarly, PML-N Senator Irfan Siddiqui had clarified that neither Nawaz Sharif nor his party had discussed the idea of making the Field Marshal president. Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi also weighed in last month, saying on social platform X that 'there has been no discussion nor any proposal for the president to resign or the COAS to assume that office.' He suggested that those spreading these rumours are part of a 'nefarious campaign' against top state figures, including President Asif Ali Zardari. It may be recalled that Indian rumour machines started circulating news that Field Marshal Asim Munir would soon take over Pakistan as president. The Indian media frenzy was based on an article in the British magazine The Economist published on August 3, in which Field Marshal Munir's leadership qualities were acknowledged for 'giving a new direction to US-Pakistan relations' and his private meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House on June 18. Pakistan Army chief Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir's leadership has been acknowledged at the global level for his role in improving the country image in the comity of nations and 'strengthening ties with the United States.' When asked about rising tensions with India, DG ISPR warned of a robust and potentially unconventional response if India launches military aggression. 'This time we will start from the east,' he warned, adding that Pakistan would strike deep inside Indian territory. 'India needs to understand that they too can be targeted anywhere.' He said Pakistan would no longer remain reactive and that future provocations from India could be met with preemptive, full-spectrum retaliation. The already strained relations between Pakistan and India worsened after the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam incident, which India blamed on Pakistan without evidence. India retaliated by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, scaling back diplomatic relations, canceling Pakistani visas, and expelling patients undergoing treatment in India. Pakistan responded in kind—declaring the treaty's suspension an act of war, reducing Indian diplomatic staff, closing airspace to Indian flights, and halting all trade. On the night of February 6–7, India launched missile attacks on multiple Pakistani cities, including Kotli, Bahawalpur, Muridke, Bagh, and Muzaffarabad, resulting in 26 civilian deaths and 46 injuries. Pakistan retaliated by shooting down six Indian warplanes, including three Rafale jets. India launched another strike on February 10, targeting three airbases. In response, Pakistan initiated Operation Banyan Marsus (Iron Wall) in the early hours, targeting Indian military infrastructure such as Udhampur, Pathankot, Adampur airbases, and strategic locations like the BrahMos missile storage and S-400 defence systems. A ceasefire was eventually brokered by the Trump administration, although the Indian government has not officially acknowledged the US role. Meanwhile, President Trump has reportedly referenced this ceasefire effort over 30 times in public statements, highlighting the severity of the conflict and the diplomatic efforts required to contain it.
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sindh govt moves to clip powers of education boards
The Sindh government has approved a new steering committee structure aimed at curtailing the autonomy of public education boards in the province. The move comes following recent amendments to the Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act, 1972, which have now become part of the law after being passed by the Sindh Assembly and signed by the acting governor in June. According to official sources, the newly approved steering committee will have administrative and supervisory powers over all education boards. While the structure has been finalised, the actual formation of the committee is still awaited. Under the new arrangement, the Boards of Governors (BoGs) of all educational boards have also been restructured. Chairpersons will no longer be members of their own BoGs. Instead, each BoG will now comprise academicians, civil society representatives, and nominated principals. A maximum of one chairperson may be nominated to serve on another board's BoG. The reconstitution of BoGs has already begun as part of the first phase of implementation. The provincial government is also considering a proposal to downgrade the post of board chairperson from BPS-20/21 to BPS-19/20. As per the working paper prepared for the upcoming Sindh cabinet meeting, the tenure of the chairperson will be three years, extendable by another two years. According to documents seen by The Express Tribune, the new steering committee will be chaired by a nominee of the controlling authority - the chief minister of Sindh - and may be a provincial minister. The secretary of universities and boards will serve as the vice chairperson. Other members of the committee will include secretary college education; secretary school education; special secretary finance; all chairpersons of education boards; chairman of the Sindh Textbook Board; director general of private institutions (Schools and Colleges); a representative each from S&GAD and IBCC; one education policy expert and one technical education expert (to be appointed by the controlling authority); two eminent educationists to be nominated by the chief minister; and two members of the provincial assembly. All ex-officio members will serve a term of two years. Apart from administrative oversight, the committee will also be empowered to issue binding directives to the boards on various operational matters. Sources revealed that under the new policy, the authority of board chairpersons to make postings and transfers of officers above BPS 17 is being withdrawn. Interestingly, a few years ago, a similar attempt was made to place the boards under a central commission, which was met with strong opposition, including strikes and examination boycotts by board employees. That move was eventually shelved. This time, however, the government has quietly passed the amendments with little public attention, and implementation is already underway. Officials claim that the restructuring aims to improve governance, enhance transparency, and ensure greater coordination among the educational boards in Sindh.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Stories of terrorism
Listen to article I was once a graduate student in a Texas university and later for a brief period of time a PhD candidate here at the University of Houston. During lectures and discussion sessions in class, every time the issue of terrorism would come up, people sort of paid attention to what I had to say because the killing of Osama bin Laden had just happened a few years ago. And everyone knew that I was from Pakistan. The leading newspapers at the time dedicated an enormous amount of space to stories of terrorism, Taliban, Al Qaeda, and so forth mostly having a connection with Pakistan. While that reporting has died down with time, what has rather emerged recently is the most bizarre and direct connection that terrorism always has had with either the CIA or the FBI. I have written in this space back in March that the cult leader Charles Manson and the notorious Manson family murders had a CIA connection. The CIA wanted to understand the extent of how much a human being could be converted into a human robot, where it would follow the command to go and kill innocent people without thought or remorse. Theodore John Kaczynski aka Ted Kaczynski aka Unabomber went from being a Harvard genius to a terrorist that killed innocent people because of the extreme methods his mind was subjected to by the CIA as part of what was called Project MKUltra. We all know who the makers of Al Qaeda are and how Bin Laden was treated as a hero while he was fighting against the Soviets in Afghanistan. The 90s decade is very interesting. Sheikh Omar Abdul Rehman, the blind cleric who ran away from Egypt, indoctrinated young Muslims in New York and New Jersey areas, to attack America. Ramzi Yousaf and his friends executed a bomb attack targeting the World Trade Center on February 26, 1993. Two days later, in Texas, the FBI unleashed an attack against a religious cult known as Branch Davidians. At the end of the 51-day siege, the FBI ended up killing innocent people, including 21 children. This Waco siege made one former US soldier, a Gulf War veteran, extremely angry at the federal government for its tyrannical tendencies and actions against private citizens. His name was Timothy McVeigh. He decided to take revenge. Two years after the Waco debacle, McVeigh bombed a federal building in Oklahoma city, killing 168 people. This remains the deadliest act of domestic terror in US history. McVeigh was arrested, tried, and killed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001. That was three months before the most famous terrorist attack of our time. McVeigh's case was handled with sheer alacrity and the case was ended creating a foul smell of a cover-up. There was an accomplice of him, which was never identified or found. It has been 30 years since that deadly terrorist attack and no effort has resulted in unmasking his identity. There is a video of the actual bomb delivery when McVeigh and his accomplice were carrying out the attack. That video has never been shown. It wasn't even shown at the trial of McVeigh. It only makes common sense for an investigative agency to get to the bottom of the story and find all those involved in the most deadly domestic terrorist attack of the nation's history. And that is when it all starts to smell of a cover-up. The Epstein story smells of the same cover-up. The man is said to have killed himself in a jail cell and everything just was accepted on its face. Epstein's brother, however, hired a private investigation, which disagrees with the findings of the government that Epstein hanged himself in his jail cell awaiting trial. I guess we will never know the truth of so many of these things. But in every story of terrorism, people should only look at the CIA and FBI, not just to find the truth and safeguard the nation but also to ask, "Do you have something to do with this one too?"
