
India-US trade deal: Energy, agriculture and tariffs; what will be in the 'very big' pact
US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi (File Image)
NEW DELHI: Trade talks between India and the US appear to be back on track, as President Donald Trump hinted that a "very big" agreement with India will be forthcoming soon.
In a presser at the White House, Trump said, "Everybody wants to make a deal and have a part of it.
Remember a few months ago, the press was saying, 'You really have anybody of any interest? Well, we just signed with China yesterday.
We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we are starting to open up China."
"We're not going to make deals with everybody. Some we are just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much. You are to pay 25, 35, 45 per cent.
That's the easy way to do it, and my people don't want to do it that way. They want to do some of it, but they want to make more deals than I would do," he added.
What impact will be on agriculture, tariff and energy in India?
The trade relationship between India and the United States is expected to transform significantly, might lower tariffs, making US products more competitive in India, particularly in energy, agriculture, defence and aviation sectors. Given India's higher average tariffs compared to the US, the BTA could advantage American exporters, according to the Finance Ministry's Monthly Economic Review.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Rensa dina ådror och lev längre!
Beauty Ideas
Läs mer
Undo
The US implemented a 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian products in April 2025 but suspended it for 90 days from April 10, maintaining a 10% basic duty. Bilateral discussions have accelerated, showing substantial progress in digital trade, market access, customs procedures, and technical standards. A provisional agreement might be reached before July 9, as India seeks complete exemption from retaliatory tariffs.
India-US trade reached $131.84 billion in FY25, establishing India as the US's primary trading partner. CRISIL suggests that while US imports to India might increase under the BTA, Indian exports may see limited benefits, as numerous key exports already enjoy duty-free access to the US market.
India's growing energy requirements, especially for LNG, could create beneficial partnerships with US suppliers. CRISIL highlights LNG's advantages in price stability and long-term contract suitability over crude oil.
Agricultural imports from the US might increase, including walnuts, pistachios and cranberries, although broader access remains disputed.
The defence sector presents significant growth opportunities. Despite India's focus on domestic defence production, it remains a major arms importer. The US, as the world's leading arms exporter, has strengthened defence collaboration with India, including the INDUS-X programme initiated in 2023.
Although India's trade surplus might face pressure, CRISIL identifies growth potential in labour-intensive industries like textiles, gems and jewellery, alongside high-value sectors such as smartphones and pharmaceuticals. The BTA negotiations encompass multiple sectors, with both nations considering it a crucial step towards enhanced economic partnership.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump reached an agreement in February to finalise the initial phase of a bilateral trade deal by autumn 2025, with plans to increase trade to $500 billion by 2030, up from approximately £191 billion in 2024.
India continues to progress in its negotiations with the European Union for a free trade agreement later this year, and has recently completed discussions for a FTA with the United Kingdom. These initiatives aim to diversify trade partnerships in anticipation of possible US policy changes under Trump.
"The ball is now in the US court. India is not for any win-lose trade partnership," stated Ram Singh, who leads the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, a government-supported research organisation.
Data shows India's exports to the US increased to $17.25 billion during April-May, compared to $14.17 billion in the previous year, indicating that the US tariff increases averaging 10% in early April had minimal effect.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
India-China Defense Ministers Hold Strategic Talks In Qingdao
India's Defense Minister Rajnath Singh engaged in diplomatic discussions with his Chinese counterpart, Admiral Dong Jun, during his official visit to the port city of Qingdao on Friday. The meeting took place on the margins of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defense ministers' conference. Singh highlighted the importance of maintaining positive diplomatic trajectory between the two nations while cautioning against introducing fresh complications into their relationship. The Indian Defense Minister characterized their dialogue as "constructive and forward-looking," focusing on strengthening bilateral cooperation. "Both nations must sustain this encouraging momentum and refrain from creating additional complexities in our diplomatic relations," Singh stated following the meeting. During their interaction, Singh presented Admiral Dong Jun with a traditional Madhubani artwork, originating from Bihar's Mithila region, symbolizing cultural bridge-building between the two countries. Admiral Dong had previously welcomed Singh upon his Thursday arrival in China. The meeting occurs against the backdrop of gradual improvement in India-China relations following years of border tensions. A significant milestone was achieved in 2024 when both nations successfully completed military disengagement from the contested Depsang and Demchok areas in eastern Ladakh. Relations received another boost with India's announcement of resuming the Kailash Mansarovar pilgrimage to Tibet after a five-year suspension. The sacred journey, halted in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, will recommence on June 30. The pilgrimage schedule indicates the first group will cross into China through Lipulekh Pass on July 10, with the final group returning to India by August 22. Earlier this week, India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on June 23. Their discussion centered on advancing comprehensive bilateral development, including enhanced people-to-people connections between the two nations. This series of high-level meetings signals both countries' commitment to managing their complex relationship while exploring opportunities for cooperation and stability in the region.

The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How the new U.S. visa rules affect your online privacy
The story so far: On June 23, the U.S. Embassy in India said in an X post, 'Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under U.S. law.' With that update, the process for securing certain types of U.S. visas — including for studying there — has become precarious. How does this affect students' visa applications? While social media vetting for U.S. visas has been in place since 2019, the new announcement signals that foreign students are set to face unprecedented levels of surveillance when travelling to the U.S. for study and/or work. Some of the social media accounts that users will now have to flag on their visa application and make public for inspection include Reddit, Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter (now X), Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube, apart from several Chinese social media platforms and other websites that users may submit independently (such as Threads, Bluesky, unlisted blogging spaces, or personal websites). This means that both personal and professional qualifications, posts, replies, uploaded photos/videos, past comments, tagged pictures/posts, status updates, and even 'liked' content will need to be made visible to U.S. government authorities, where possible. Why are U.S. immigration officers checking social media accounts? In light of pro-Palestinian student protests and anti-ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) demonstrations across U.S. cities, officials likely want to make sure that Indian students coming into the country will not support such activities or express anti-Israeli views during the ongoing conflicts in West Asia. Vetting visa applicants' social media feeds also means that authorities can check if the individual's views align with those of the conservative Trump government that is in power. How long will social media accounts have to be left open? U.S. visa seekers are being asked to list all social media handles they have used in the last five years, and then make them public. Users can first carry out a social media audit to clean up their accounts and remove any sensitive or personal media before opening it up to the public. Minors should carry out this activity with the guidance of a trusted adult. Notifications, app alerts, messaging filters, and parental controls may need to be updated as well, to prevent disruption after the account goes public. No official guidance has been issued as to how long the accounts need to be left open. However, visa applicants who want to play it safe can keep their accounts publicly visible from the time they submit their application up to the time they pass their immigration checks after entering the U.S. However, visa applicants who are not comfortable with keeping all their social media accounts public should contact their relevant institutions or admissions officers in order to learn the latest policies and know when it is advisable to go private again. While deleting social media accounts entirely may sound like a way to avoid this hassle, remember that some tech companies keep even deleted accounts active for several weeks or months. These accounts of yours may still show up in search results when the vetting process begins, possibly jeopardising the visa application. What are the risks of making social media accounts public? Privacy, censorship, and security risks abound. First and foremost, many Indian students who apply for U.S. visas for academic study are usually minors in high-school. For them, keeping their social media accounts set to private is more than just a personal preference; it is crucial for their safety online. Many young users learning to navigate online spaces might post highly personal content or photos and videos across private accounts, secure in the knowledge that only people close to them can see their content. Now, however, those hoping to go to the U.S. for study will either have to make their accounts public or scrub personal content from their channels. The new requirement will also make U.S. visa applicants, and especially children, more vulnerable to digital security crimes such as bullying, hacking, sexual harassment, stalking, blackmail, identify theft, and doxxing. Increased levels of targeted advertising through accounts made public, including advertising aimed at kids, is another potential threat to consider. Is it legal to make visa applicants set their social media accounts to public? Privacy experts have slammed the U.S. government's new social media vetting requirements, likening the country's approach to that of an authoritarian regime. However, they note it is difficult to claim that privacy laws are being broken as visa applicants can choose to ignore the request, though they put their visa application at risk by doing so. Sophia Cope, Senior Staff Attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), an American digital rights group, said there were many valid reasons for people to have private social media accounts, such as wanting to interact and share content only with trusted contacts. 'The U.S. government is endorsing the violation of a fundamental principle of privacy hygiene by asking those seeking student or exchange visas to set their social media accounts to 'public' for the purpose of visa vetting,' said Cope in response to The Hindu. 'Ascribing a nefarious intent and penalizing would-be students or visitors to the U.S. for keeping their online presence shielded from the general public or for not even being active on social media is an outrage. Moreover, government social media surveillance invades privacy and chills freedom of speech, and it is prone to errors and misinterpretation without ever having been proven effective at assessing security threats,' she explained. 'The U.S. must end this dangerous practice.'


Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Rapper 50 Cent offers NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani $258K to get lost: ‘Where did he come from? I'm telling Trump'
American rapper 50 Cent is ready to cough up a big amount to get rid of NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, even offering a one-way, first-class ticket out of the state. The India-origin assemblyman, a vocal left-winger, recently caught heat over his tax-the-rich plan. The Big Apple mayoral hopeful went as far as name-dropping 50 Cent while pushing his agenda. That didn't sit well with the Queens-born rapper, who reposted the clip on Instagram, fired back asking, 'Who is this guy? Where did he come from?' and warned he's 'telling Trump' what this Democrat's up to. The video referenced, comes from The Breakfast Club podcast, where Mamdani pitched taxing corporations raking in millions in profit. Also read: Zohran Mamdani, New York City's next potential mayor, once told mom Mira Nair to direct The Namesake instead of Harry Potter 4 and cast Kal Penn Mamdani, who recently beat Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary, made his podcast appearance earlier this month. There, he spoke about his plan to raise $10 billion for the city by increasing corporate taxes and imposing a 2% tax hike on New York's top 1% earners, meaning all those making over $1 million a year. 'We're talking about corporations that are making millions of dollars, not in revenue, but in profit,' Mamdani said during the June 11 interview. 'And the second is taxing the top 1% of New Yorkers. We're talking about people who make a million dollars a year or more, taxing them just by a flat 2% tax increase,' he said on one of the most listened-to radio shows in the state. Adding that his goal is to 'Trump-proof' NYC by funding things like public transport and small business support, he said, 'I know if 50 Cent is listening, he's not going to be happy about this. He tends to not like this tax policy, but I want to be very clear, this is about $20,000 a year.' Now, weeks later, the rapper clapped back on Instagram. Sharing the video, he wrote, 'Where did he come from? Whose friend is this? I'm not feeling this plan. No. I will give him $258,750 and a first-class one-way ticket away from NY. I'm telling Trump what he said, too!' A post shared by 50 Cent (@50cent) That 'telling Trump' part was a cheeky callback to Jackson's most recent comment about 'ratting' on Diddy to Trump, after reports claimed that the President has not ruled out pardoning Diddy, who's currently caught up in a sex trafficking and racketeering investigation. For the unversed, 50 Cent has been vocal about taxes, and in 2020, even sided with Trump when Biden spoke about tax hikes that would've meant 62% taxes for top earners in NYC. At the time, 50 posted: 'WHAT THE F–K! (VOTE FOR TRUMP) IM OUT. F–K NEW YORK. The KNICKS never win anyway. I don't care Trump doesn't like Black people. 62%—are you out of your f–***ing mind?' Also read: Meet Zohran Mamdani, the Indian-American leading the race to become New York's next mayor Meanwhile, Mamdani is also facing backlash from the Indian diaspora and prominent figures in NYC after his old tweets, taking sharp aim at Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, religion, and Indian democratic institutions, resurfaced. Mamdani, the self-proclaimed democratic socialist, ousted Cuomo after securing 43.5 percent of the vote, with 90 percent of ballots counted. If he wins, he would be New York's first Muslim mayor.