Foreigners pour billions into Taiwan, South Korea stocks on AI, growth optimism
(Reuters) -Foreign investors flocked to Asian stocks for the third straight month in July, with inflows into Taiwan hitting a near two-decade high and Thailand snapping its nine-month losing streak, buoyed by growth and AI prospects as trade worries fluctuate.
Foreign inflows into most Asian equity markets have stabilised over the past three months as countries clinched better trade arrangements with the United States, calming tariff-related volatility and uncertainty in financial markets.
Overseas investors showed strong interest in Taiwan and South Korea for the third straight month in July, pouring $7.78 billion in Taiwan, the highest since the 2008 global financial crisis, and $4.52 billion in South Korea, the most since February last year, LSEG data showed.
The MSCI gauge of equities in Asia excluding Japan rose 2% last month, its fifth consecutive month in green, while benchmarks in Taipei and Seoul advanced roughly 6% each.
Taiwan and South Korea were the top destinations in the region for foreign capital, securing a cumulative $25.7 billion over the past three months as the two dominant Asian tech exporters benefit from a global surge in AI-related investments.
South Korea's shareholder-friendly reforms, political stability, and robust corporate fundamentals lured investors in 2025 after a dreary performance last year, though recent concerns over reforms to tax policy are posing new challenges.
Foreign investors also net bought $499 million worth of Thai equities in July, the first month of inflows since September last year, as they scooped up stocks at relatively cheap valuations after a prolonged period of heavy selling.
Even so, Thailand's uncertain political climate, challenging macroeconomic conditions, and an unnecessarily strong currency that undermines export competitiveness continue to impede any buildup of positions on these equities.
Thailand's benchmark SET index surged 14% in July — its best month since November 2020 — but still not enough to erase steep losses suffered earlier in the year. The index remains 10% in the red, ranking among the region's worst performers.
"We are cautious and underweight on Thailand as it remains in a fairly precarious position: high household debt, limited government spending, an uncertain political environment, and external negative events such as the conflict with Cambodia," said Kenneth Tang, senior portfolio manager at Nikko Asset Management.
"If Thailand can settle these issues, it will clear up the path for its recovery."
Indian stocks experienced sharp outflows of over $2 billion in July, the highest since February this year and snapping a three-month streak of net purchases.
Indonesia and the Philippines also logged net outflows of $570 million and $29 million, respectively, last month, while Vietnam attracted $326 million as investors bet on the country's strong growth prospects after it secured a comfortable tariff rate with the United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Foreign governments bet big to lobby Trump on tariffs. Most came up empty.
Countries across the globe have dropped tens of millions this year on lobbyists with ties to President Donald Trump as they rushed to stave off tariffs that could cripple their economies. In most cases, the spending has gotten them nowhere. As Trump has taken a scattershot approach to setting tariff rates — crafting trade agreements that set a 15 percent tariff on major trading partners while imposing rates that vary between 10 and 41 percent on the rest of the world — traditional lobbying tactics in Washington appear to have had little influence. At least 30 nations hired new lobbyists with connections to Trump since the election. They include major trading partners like South Korea and Japan as well as smaller countries like Bosnia and Ecuador. But employing those lobbyists appeared to bear little relation to whether the countries were able to avoid the most punishing tariffs. 'I think the current leadership in Washington seems to be disrupting the traditional way of doing things. It's not just about the business part, it's about diplomacy, it's about dealing with other nations,' said Mukesh Aghi, the CEO of the U.S. India Strategic Partnership Forum. 'I think the whole old model of trying to influence does not seem to work.' The new model is punishing India. After bringing longtime Trump adviser Jason Miller on board in April, the nation has nonetheless been walloped by Trump over the past two weeks. Tariffs for India are now set to rise to 50 percent, after the country failed to secure a trade agreement and Trump decided to jack up tariffs in response to its purchase of Russian oil. India inked a yearlong contract with Miller worth $1.8 million in exchange for 'strategic counsel, tactical planning and government relations assistance' as well as perception management and public relations, according to documents filed with the Justice Department. He did not respond to a request for comment. The experiences of Canada and Mexico stand out. Canada's provinces stocked up on lobbyists and the country has still been hammered by Trump. Mexico didn't and relied instead on President Claudia Sheinbaum's personal relationship with Trump — a direct approach that worked better. Five of Canada's 10 provinces brought on new lobbying or public relations help in the last year, amid a federal leadership vacuum as the country prepared to elect a new prime minister. Capitol Counsel lobbyists representing Ontario and Alberta set up meetings and calls for provincial officials with more than a dozen Republican members of Congress as well as Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt. Meanwhile, lobbyists at HBW Resources worked to create inroads with Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry on behalf of energy-heavy Saskatchewan and Alberta, DOJ filings show. In February, a federation of Canadian premiers and territorial leaders hired Checkmate Government Relations for assistance arranging a trade mission to Washington. The firm is led by Ches McDowell, a hunting buddy of Donald Trump Jr., and employs the son of Trump's 2024 campaign co-chair. For $85,000, Checkmate got the premiers a meeting at the White House with deputy chief of staff James Blair and director of presidential personnel Sergio Gor. Less than a month later, Canada's D.C. Embassy hired the public affairs firm Signal Group for a crash course and media training on messaging on right-wing media. It included a 'right-wing message analysis' of the Canadian ambassador's recent TV interviews and breakdown of Maslow's hierarchy of needs for the MAGA set. Mexico, by contrast, has just a single lobbying firm, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, on retainer, to provide legal services on trade issues. Yet despite Mexico playing a more direct role in the flow of fentanyl — a top concern of Trump — it was the neighbor to the north that ultimately faced steeper tariffs. Canada now has a 35 percent tariff on its goods, while Mexico has stayed at 25 percent, even though most products are exempt under an existing free trade agreement. Mexico appeared to benefit from what one Mexican official described as personal ties between Trump and Sheinbaum. A Republican lobbyist working on Trump's tariffs suggested that making headway with the president requires a shift in thinking. 'I think what's happened with some of these countries is they felt entitled to the status quo,' the lobbyist argued. 'And they were offended that anyone, even the U.S. president, would suggest changing it at all.' The lobbyist pointed to the success that Sheinbaum has had in wooing Trump. Instead of taking a combative stand, 'the better approach is to look at it from the perspective of: The president wants to redefine the trade relationship between the two countries, and that's his goal, and you have to deal with him on those terms,' the person said. Leader-to-leader calls were particularly valuable in helping countries make their case directly to Trump. 'From my perspective, the best way to lobby President Trump is for the leader to face-to-face lobby him,' Tami Overby, a partner at DGA Group Government who focuses on trade in South Korea. 'It seems President Trump, he always talks about his relationships with other leaders. You know, whether we're in a good spot with that country or not [depending] if he feels like he's got a good relationship. And he sees himself as a deal maker.' Many of the firms enlisted to represent foreign governments before the Trump administration are mainstays of the D.C. lobbying scene, and plenty of countries already had veteran trade lobbyists or lobbyists with ties to Trump on their payrolls before the election. They include Mercury Public Affairs, the former K Street home of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles which signed five new foreign governments since November, including South Korea, Ecuador and Libya. And while South Korea reached an agreement with the White House to set its tariffs to 15 percent in exchange for investments in the U.S. and lower trade barriers, tariff rates increased between April and August for both Ecuador and Libya. In Ecuador's case, it went from being ignored in Trump's first threats of 'reciprocal' tariffs, to facing a 15 percent tariff in August. Mercury also lobbies for the Japanese government, which maintains a roster of more than two dozen lobbying and public relations firms in the U.S. Japan was among the first major trading partners to strike a trade agreement — setting its tariffs at 15 percent, down from a threatened 25 percent. Ballard Partners, the previous home to Wiles and Attorney General Pam Bondi, helped broker a phone call between Trump and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba the day after the election, according to documents filed with DOJ under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Another Trump-linked lobbying firm, BGR Group, has signed six new foreign governments since Trump's win last year. It previously employed Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and is home to Trump adviser David Urban. Some of its foreign clients, like Angola and South Korea, saw their tariff rates drop between April and August. But the firm also lobbies for the Indian government, which paid BGR $300,000 from December through May, though much of that work was related to flaring tensions with Pakistan. Several Southeast Asian economies that have hired help in Washington fared better, with many of them receiving lower rates compared to the initial duties unveiled in April. Their wins were relative, though: The countries' tariff rates are higher than before, and broadly higher than much of the world. In other words, lobbyists might have succeeded in helping their clients avoid the worst case, but the outcomes could hardly be considered triumphs. Countries hired U.S.-based lobbying firms to strengthen ties with the Trump administration, and worked with business groups with ties to lower-level Trump administration officials across the Departments of Commerce and Treasury. Cambodia and Indonesia had their tariff cut to 19 percent, substantially lower compared to rates initially outlined by the president in April. DOJ filings show that Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld reached out to U.S. Trade Representative's Office chief of staff Sam Mulopulos on behalf of the Cambodian government on the same day that Trump announced his so-called reciprocal tariffs. The firm sent Mulopulos multiple follow-up texts over the next few months to coordinate meetings with Cambodia's negotiators and check for updates on the status of tariff negotiations, and organized meetings on the Hill with lawmakers including Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.), according to the filings. In the end, Cambodia saw one of the largest tariff rate declines of any country between April and May, dropping from a threatened 49 percent duty. The Trump administration for its part has portrayed the countries with the most significant declines as cooperative partners that were willing to make the greatest concessions to the president's terms. One former diplomat who worked with governments across Southeast Asia said representatives from Vietnam arranged more than two dozen meetings with government officials, which ramped up days after Trump outlined his April rates. The country secured a modest win as its tariff rate was cut from 46 to 20 percent — though the final figure remains higher than what Vietnam officials say was originally agreed to. One Asian diplomat credited lobbying efforts by countries in the region with helping shift the Trump administration away from its original trade strategy, which aimed to pull regional economies out of China's orbit and prioritize crackdowns on Chinese transshipment and other enforcement measures. 'Some countries need the access that lobbyists can give and an intermediary for backdoor and informal talks,' they said. A number of countries turned to first-time foreign lobbyists who are cashing in on their ties to Trump or his circle. The Pakistani government brought on seven new lobbying firms this year, including Trump's former bodyman Keith Schiller and George Sorial, the Trump Organization's former compliance chief. Neither of them had ever registered as foreign agents before, but Pakistan agreed to pay their firm $50,000 per month, according to a copy of the contract filed with DOJ. Islamabad managed to have its 'reciprocal' tariff rate lowered from 29 percent to 19 percent — a contrast to Pakistan's rival next door, India. Among the foreign governments that signed Continental Strategy this spring were Guyana — which is paying the firm $50,000 per month and saw its tariff rate plunge from 38 percent in April to 15 percent in August — and Japan, which is paying the firm $37,500, DOJ filings show. Continental Strategy is led by Carlos Trujillo, a diplomat who served in Trump's first administration, and Alberto Martinez, a top former aide to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Some countries and industries that have been successful in swaying Trump have later had those advantages neutralized. The 'Big Three' American auto companies — Ford, General Motors and Stellantis — helped convince the administration to create a rebate program, aiding auto producers that rely on the North American supply chain. But as Trump set about crafting trade deals, that advantage was quickly neutralized. Japan, South Korea and the European Union — all trading partners with large auto industries — were able to secure a 15 percent tariff on cars and car parts, undermining the efforts of U.S. automakers to build domestically. Even after this week's tariff implementation kickoff, countries and lobbyists are still holding out hope that they can win exceptions or other helpful provisions. That possibility is sure to keep business booming on K Street, despite its lackluster performance. 'A lot of clients are like, 'Well, is it done? Can we still get our thing in there?'' the Republican lobbyist noted. 'The framework is there, but there's still a lot of blank spaces, and that's where we're seeing a lot of activity.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taiwan Semiconductor Rides AI Wave To Double-Digit Revenue Gains in July
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (NYSE:TSM) on Friday reported consolidated net revenue of approximately 323.17 billion New Taiwanese dollars (roughly $10.66 billion) for July 2025, up 22.5% quarter-over-quarter, backed by the artificial intelligence frenzy. The contract chipmaker's topline rose by 25.8% year-over-year (Y/Y). The company's revenue for January through July 2025 reached 2.1 trillion New Taiwanese dollars (roughly $69.3 billion), rising 37.6% Y/Y. Taiwan Semiconductor stock gained 23% August 7, Taiwan Semiconductor jumped ~5% in overnight trade after Taiwanese officials confirmed the chipmaker is exempt from President Donald Trump's proposed 100% tariffs on semiconductor chips. National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching told parliament that Taiwan Semiconductor qualifies for the exemption because it operates U.S. factories, including fabrication plants in Arizona, under its $165 billion investment commitment. The move eases investor concerns as Taiwan Semiconductor supplies chips to major U.S. clients like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA). CEO C.C. Wei has said U.S. tariffs pose 'indirect headwinds' but noted that demand for AI chips 'consistently outpaces supply,' keeping the company well-positioned despite trade tensions. On July 17, the chipmaker gained over 4% after it reported second-quarter results that exceeded analyst expectations, fueled by strong global demand for its advanced processors used in artificial intelligence. View more earnings on TSM Taiwan Semiconductor reported net sales of $30.07 billion, up 38.6% Y/Y and 11.3% Q/Q, beating its guidance range and topping the $30.04 billion consensus. Net income rose 60.7% Y/Yto $2.47 per share, above the $2.37 estimate. Gross margin expanded to 58.6%, and operating margin climbed to 49.6%, driven by high demand for 3-nm and 5-nm technologies, which accounted for 60% of total revenue. The company guided third-quarter revenue between $31.8 billion and $33.0 billion, with gross margin projected at 55.5% to 57.5% and operating margin at 45.5% to 47.5%, supported by continued strength in leading-edge process technologies. Key revenue drivers included High-Performance Computing (60% of revenue) and Smartphones (27%), with North America contributing 75% of sales. Management also cited positive momentum from the U.S. government easing certain chip export restrictions to China, enabling Nvidia to resume H20 AI chip sales. Chairman C.C. Wei highlighted a $100 billion expansion of U.S. manufacturing investment, adding to a prior $65 billion commitment for three Arizona fabs. However, he cautioned that potential U.S. tariffs on Taiwan could temper fourth-quarter momentum despite no immediate change in customer orders. On August 7, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives called Apple's new $100 billion U.S. investment a strategic move to ease Trump administration tensions and secure long-term growth under tariff pressure. Ives linked the plan to Apple's partnerships with Taiwan Semiconductor and other chipmakers, projecting over 19 billion U.S.-made chips in 2025. He said the initiative strengthens domestic supply chains and boosts Apple's standing with the White House, even as large-scale U.S. iPhone production remains unlikely. Price Action: TSM stock is trading higher by 0.13% to $242.93 premarket at last check on Friday. Photo by Sundry Photography on Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR (TSM): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Taiwan Semiconductor Rides AI Wave To Double-Digit Revenue Gains in July originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Times
17 hours ago
- New York Times
The Contradiction at the Heart of Trump's Trade Deals
As the dust — perhaps — starts to settle after four frenetic months of trade negotiations, the biggest win for America might be a potential windfall of investment from overseas. In an effort to avoid even higher tariffs, Japan, the European Union and South Korea loosely pledged to directly invest a total of $1.5 trillion in the United States, equivalent to what the government spent on Social Security benefits last year. We don't know exactly when the money will arrive, or if some of it simply replaces investments that might have happened anyway. Even with a healthy haircut, the pledges sound impressive, and could be greater than the new global direct investment in the United States over the past six years. Well before President Trump's deal-making, what's officially known as foreign direct investment has played an increasingly important role in America's economy. Today it accounts for about one in 10 American jobs and more than 16 percent of all U.S. manufacturing jobs. It brings technology and expertise (think Arizona semiconductor facilities courtesy of Taiwan) and supports American innovation, accounting for nearly 16 percent of U.S. corporate research and development. (Yes, the United States benefits from technology and knowledge transfers, just like other countries.) And in contrast to fickle stock and bond flows, this capital is sticky; most projects involve multiyear investments that provide a consistent boost to local economies. The need for foreign cash is only going to become more urgent, since U.S. budget deficits will likely limit how much money Washington has to invest. But there's a problem for the administration. An influx of foreign investment will worsen the trade deficit, which is the opposite of Mr. Trump's stated goal. America should nonetheless take that deal. When other countries want to buy U.S. land or buildings or invest in an American business, they need dollars. Selling foreign currencies to buy dollars pushes up the U.S. currency's value. A stronger dollar, in turn, weighs on exports by making them more expensive overseas. All else being equal, that leads to a wider trade deficit. This is a basic economic reality: A country's current account, which includes trade in goods and services, must balance its capital account — the flow of capital across borders, such as financial assets as well as direct investments. A current account deficit necessitates a capital account surplus. Thus, if you want the benefit of foreign investment, you effectively need to accept trade deficits. This is among the reasons it's wrongheaded to focus simply on America's bilateral trade relationships, as the White House seems to, to measure success or failure. The United States attracts hundreds of billions in new foreign investment every year, thanks to its enormous consumer market, a deep, highly skilled labor pool, an innovative culture and an economic growth rate that often dwarfs that of its overseas peers. The advantages are clear. Americans who benefit directly (through jobs created by foreign investment) and indirectly (via returns on their retirement accounts) have more money to spend, some of which goes to imports and contributes to trade deficits. This is the environment the United States has operated in for decades. Germany's BMW first produced vehicles in South Carolina in 1994 with a $600 million investment and 500 jobs. Since then, BMW has put some $14 billion into its South Carolina operations and now employs over 11,000 workers. The state hosts more than 1,100 operations of foreign-affiliated firms. These firms pay American workers and support U.S. G.D.P. American policymakers want to build on this success, especially when it comes to strategic industries that would bolster national security and create manufacturing jobs by returning to the United States. How to achieve these goals isn't obvious — there will always be trade-offs. The Biden administration tried to address this with a focus on carrots in the form of government incentives. It targeted strategically important foreign firms, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, that would support U.S. national security while creating domestic jobs. Mr. Trump has also offered carrots, including tax breaks, less red tape and a plan to fast-track investment from approved companies. But his administration paired those carrots with sticks: higher tariff rates unless countries provided attractive deals for the United States. Countries have responded by opening up their markets to American products and pledging to put more than a trillion dollars to work in the United States. But these wins could prove difficult to sustain if this administration keeps alienating its allies. Consider Canada, the third-largest source of inbound foreign direct investment to the United States last year. An EY survey of dozens of Canadian chief executives released in June showed that 14 percent had stopped planned investments and 58 percent had delayed investments (domestically and abroad) in response to recent developments in geopolitical and trade policy. Britain, another historically important investment partner for the United States, seems to be having similar doubts. A Deloitte survey released in early July found only net 2 percent of chief financial officers at major British firms saw the United States as an attractive place to invest, down from net 59 percent in late 2024. (Instead they became notably more optimistic about investing at home.) This administration wants a manufacturing renaissance. Achieving that goal will be a lot more likely with robust foreign investment. And for that, the United States needs to keep its overseas friends and accept that smaller trade deficits may not be the optimal policy priority. Rebecca Patterson is an economist and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who has held senior positions at JPMorgan Chase and Bridgewater Associates. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
