
Retirement expert issues warning to people paying basic rate of income tax
Income tax rises for Scots in April - how the changes affect you
A finance expert is warning that basic rate taxpayers are being left in the dark on their pension contributions. A survey of 1,000 people by Opinium for Hargreaves Lansdown, suggests that one in four (24%) people don't know how much they and their employer are paying into their workplace pension.
The research also found that people were most likely to say they contribute somewhere between £101-200 per month (17%). Basic rate taxpayers (24%) are significantly more likely to have no idea how much money is being paid into their pension, compared to 12 per cent of higher rate and 2 per cent of top rate taxpayers.
However, 57 per cent of basic rate taxpayers said they were contributing between £1-£300 from their monthly salary towards their retirement savings.
Clare Stinton, head of workplace saving analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Auto-enrolment has got millions more people saving for retirement, but many are doing so blindly - one in four don't know how much they and their employer are paying into their pension. If you don't know what's going in, then how can you possibly know what you'll get out - and crucially, whether it'll be enough to retire on your terms?'
'Basic rate taxpayers are far more likely to be in the dark than higher earners. Yet even one in 10 of those in the 40 per cent tax bracket don't know what they're contributing. For higher earners this lack of awareness could be costly for those who need to actively claim any extra tax relief from HMRC on pension contributions. Failing to do so could mean leaving thousands of pounds on the table unclaimed.
'With fiscal drag pushing more people into higher tax bands, pensions are an increasingly powerful way to reduce your total taxable income and keep more of what you earn. It's no surprise then, that both awareness and contribution levels rise with income. The tax perks of pensions typically get more generous as you climb the income ladder, with tax relief available at your highest marginal rate.'
Ms Stinton continued: 'Let's not forget employer contributions either, if you don't know what's going in, then chances are you don't know what's on offer either. Over half of basic rate taxpayers are contributing less than £300 a month, and for many the rising cost of living may mean that there is little room to stretch further. But it's worth checking if your employer offers salary sacrifice, if they do, you'll save both the income tax and National Insurance on what you pay in.
'For basic rate taxpayers that's a 28 per cent tax saving, meaning every £100 into your pension could cost you as little as £72. Some employers will even boost their contribution, if you increase yours. This is known as an employer match and can really increase the amount going into your pension.'
The finance expert said the the crucial question we all need to ask ourselves is 'am I paying enough into my pension to live the life I want later on?'
She explained: 'There's no one-size -fits-all answer, but the earlier you run the numbers, the greater chance you have to adjust your course. If you can afford to pay in a little more, every pound you pay in now could be the difference between scraping by in retirement or enjoying weekends away and dinners out.
'A pension calculator will do the heavy lifting, just plug in your details, and it'll project what your pot might be worth at your preferred retirement age. These tools can also model the impact of a small increase in contributions. Remember pay can change so it's important to review from time to time and make sure you're still on track.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP errors mean thousands of PIP claimants could be owed more than £5,000
The DWP has made a string of serious administrative errors which have seen PIP claimants wrongly denied vital support or underpaid - and now thousands could be owed over £5,000 Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) blunder could mean thousands of Personal Independence Payment claimants are due more than £5,000 each. A series of administrative errors has left many disabled people either without crucial support or underpaid, with mistakes dating back years. Some claims were incorrectly dismissed from people lacking a National Insurance number, even though it's not a requirement for PIP eligibility. Over the past year alone, the DWP has reviewed 455 such cases, paying out £500,000 in arrears, reports Birmingham Live. Ayla Ozmen, policy director at anti-poverty charity Z2K, cautioned that benefits underpayment errors could inflict "significant financial hardship" on disabled people. "We are calling on the DWP to do everything it can to ensure that these errors are corrected as soon as possible," Ozmen stated. "We are calling on the DWP to do everything it can to ensure that these errors are corrected as soon as possible," Ozmen said. Former Liberal Democrat DWP minister Sir Steve Webb has suggested that the review of social support-related PIP cases "could perhaps have been processed more promptly". He also remarked that addressing all benefits underpayment issues was "the right thing to do". And Ozmen stressed the importance of ministers engaging with disabled people on reforms, stating it was "vital" to avoid "instead of making a bad system even worse". A DWP spokesperson assured that the department is "fully committed to identifying claimants that are owed money and providing the financial support to which they are entitled as quickly as possible". They said the views of disabled people would be central "at the heart of a ministerial review of PIP, to ensure the benefit is fit and fair for the future".


Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
New HMRC service will allow workers to 'take control of their tax'
HMRC has launched a new digital service that will make it much easier for 35 million people to take control of their taxes and the movements of things such as their income and expenses Good news - workers are now able to take control of their tax affairs following the UK government's announcement of a new Pay As You Earn (PAYE) service. Affecting 35 million on PAYE, the new digital system boasts more than 50 new measures, aiming to streamline processes and even cut costs by £50 million through reducing postal correspondence. Available via their Personal Tax account or through the HMRC app, it will now make it 'simpler and easier' for all PAYE taxpayers to check and update their income, allowances, expenses and reliefs, the shared. The new service forms part of HMRC's Transformation Roadmap, which launched on July 21, 2025, with a mission to become a digital-first organisation by 2030 and make 90% of customer interactions digital. Setting up over 50 IT projects, services and measures, it will transform the UK's tax and customs systems, making it easier to pay the tax that is spent towards public services and deliver the UK Government's Plan for Change. Under the digital-first approach, HMRC will offer additional digital self-serving alternatives across various tax regimes and, wherever possible, automate tax. The new PAYE service will also allow the HMRC to save an annual amount of £50 million, equivalent to 1,500 full-time nurses. To do so, they will swap customer letters and reminders to a digital-first approach to minimise the use of paper correspondence by the 2028/2029 tax year. The news follows other plans to incorporate more AI into their services, ensuring all guidance and content is up to date, as well as assisting in identifying fraudulent documents during compliance checks. READ MORE: HMRC alert as 1 million taxpayers 'haven't claimed money they're owed' James Murray MP, exchequer secretary to the treasury, said: 'We are going further and faster to make HMRC fit for the 21st century, including delivering a simpler and easier system for all PAYE workers.' 'By 2030, taxpayers can expect a modern and innovative HMRC with cutting-edge AI, industry-leading customer service practices, and a laser focus on delivering taxpayer value for money by ensuring everyone pays their fair share,' he explained. JP Marks, HMRC's Chief Executive and First Permanent Secretary, also commented: 'The Government's ambition is for a simpler tax and customs system and this roadmap sets out how HMRC will deliver a first-class experience that feels different to their customers.' He added: 'By 2030, UK citizens will experience a tax administration system that is more automated, more focused on self-service, and better set up to get things right first time so they can fulfil their tax obligations.' Other elements in the Transformation Roadmap are currently in progress for further usage, such as expanding the SMS confirmation services to include complaints, Self Assessment appeals, and other PAYE services. Interestingly, in the 2023 to 2024 tax year, HMRC collected 94.7% of the total tax due. Later this year, they will share an update on modernising behavioural penalties.


New Statesman
44 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Can Rachel Reeves avoid a new fiscal crisis?
Photo by Jack Hill -Many British governments enter office vowing 'never again'. In Rachel Reeves' case the promise was that the country would never again endure the economic turmoil that Liz Truss subjected it to. To justify this boast, one of her first acts was to pass a bill strengthening the powers of the (now maligned) Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Yet the charge levelled at the Chancellor is precisely that Britain faces a return to Truss-style instability. This doesn't emanate only from Conservatives desperate for political revenge on Labour. 'Our finances are precarious, we've seen that in the past few weeks,' Gary Smith, the general secretary of the GMB (Reeves' own union), told me when I interviewed him for this week's NS. 'We are beholden to the bond markets; this could unravel very quickly.' Helen Thompson, the Cambridge professor of political economy, who sits on the advisory board of the Labour Together think tank, warns that 'there's a real risk there could be a crisis quite quickly because of the situation with the bond markets'. The air is thick with invocations of 1976 – the year when the plummeting value of the pound forced Jim Callaghan's Labour government to accept a £2.3bn bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Is this justified? Here are the facts: the UK, as the OBR recently warned, has the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among advanced economies. In June, the government recorded the second-highest borrowing figure since monthly records began in 1993 (exceeded only by the pandemic-afflicted month of June 2020). The markets are tolerant of indebted states that have a clear plan to reduce their borrowing. But the question that bond vigilantes are asking is whether Labour does. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe A one-year-old government with a landslide Commons majority has been forced to U-turn on relatively minor savings: £1.5bn from means-testing winter fuel payments and £5bn from cutting health and disability benefits (public spending stands at £1.3trn a year). In these circumstances tax would normally take the strain but Reeves has ruled out raising those taxes that account for two thirds of revenue: income tax, National Insurance (on employees), VAT and corporation tax. This leaves her with a much smaller menu of taxes on wealth – which investors fear will further depress economic growth. Here is the 'doom loop' that critics fear Britain is trapped in. Is there a route out? Reeves is increasingly confident in facing down those who argue that inflexibility is her greatest weakness and that she should loosen her fiscal rules. There is, she recently told the cabinet, 'nothing progressive in paying £1 in every £10 to US hedge funds' (a message she repeated yesterday during her appearance before the House of Lords' Economic Affairs Committee). Reeves' allies argue that her recent tears during Prime Minister's Questions served an inadvertent purpose. 'It was a reminder that she's trusted by the markets for a reason because people think she is sincere about keeping a grip on the finances,' one told me of the negative market reaction to speculation over the Chancellor's future. But continued trust may come at a price: the narrow fiscal headroom of £9.9bn that Reeves maintained last time, bond vigilantes warn, is not enough: they would like something closer to £20bn. Yet Labour aides insist that 'the manifesto stands' and will not be broken in pursuit of this goal. Here, then, is the question that Reeves may be forced to answer at the Budget: what happens when the irresistible force of the markets meets the immovable object of her tax pledges? [See also: Has Zarah Sultana already been sidelined from her new party?] Related