China firm's hybrid EV offers 746 mile range, charges 80% in 30 minutes
The new model promises to offer more range, power, and smart features.
The latest Haval Xiaolong Max follows the brand's 'rhythmic natural aesthetics' design language with a refreshed exterior that gives the SUV a more modern look. Its headlights feature 72 LED elements, delivering up to 4,000 lumens and a lighting range of 190 meters. The model is available in five exterior colors.
The cockpit features a T-shaped layout with a flat-bottom steering wheel, a 12.3-inch digital instrument display, and a 14.6-inch central control screen. On the higher trims, a heads-up display (HUD) is available. The system is powered by the CoffeeOS 3 smart cockpit, which includes voice and facial recognition capabilities.
The advanced driver assistance system uses a visual-based solution for urban and highway autopilot navigation. It is supported by three millimeter-wave radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and seven cameras. Key features include obstacle avoidance, lane change assist, traffic light recognition, and remote parking control.
The Haval Xiaolong Max is equipped with GWM's Hi4 plug-in hybrid system, combining a 1.5L engine with front and rear electric motors. Together, they deliver up to 319 horsepower and 595 Nm of torque. The SUV reaches a top speed of 112 mph and can accelerate from 0 to 62 mph in 6.8 seconds, offering solid performance for a plug-in hybrid in its class.
A full battery and fuel tank allow the Xiaolong Max to cover up to 746 miles before requiring recharging or refueling, and the PHEV system continues to operate as a traditional hybrid once the battery is depleted.
The model offers two lithium iron phosphate battery options: 18.74 kWh and 27.54 kWh, with estimated electric-only ranges of up to 42 miles and 64 miles (CLTC), respectively. Fuel consumption is as low as 0.97L per 62 miles under WLTC standards.
Fast charging from 30% to 80% takes about 20 to 30 minutes, while slow charging takes roughly three to four hours, depending on the trim.
GWM's Haval brand, once the leading SUV brand in China, has been surpassed by BYD as the new energy vehicle (NEV) sector rapidly grows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_laWbMJUfOo&t=50s
Now, with the new Haval models, the brand aims to regain its position in the market, focusing on innovative features and energy-efficient technology to compete in the growing NEV sector. Furthermore, NEVs have been rapidly gaining traction across China's auto industry as Chinese carmakers focus on developing cleaner powertrains.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
This 65-inch Roku TV comes with Mini-LEDs and plenty of gaming features — and just crashed to $599
It seems like every year there are fewer and fewer Roku TVs. These 4K smart TVs make the easy-to-use Roku streaming platform the centerpiece of your viewing experience — no external box or stick needed. Fortunately, Roku TVs are still being made. And in many ways, they've never been better. When I see one of these TVs drop in price, I immediately shoot up a flare for folks shopping for an affordable smart TV with a simple interface. Right now, the 65-inch Roku Pro Series is just $599 at Best Buy. That's a full 50% off its usual $1,199 asking price. The Roku Pro Series is an affordable Mini-LED 4K TV that offers a simple-but-powerful backdrop for all of your streaming needs. Its quantum-dot color and Mini-LED backlighting make this TV a step above most TVs in its price range. Plus, there are enough gaming features here to satisfy both casual and dedicated gamers. Want something a little bigger? In a concurrent limited-time deal, the 75-inch Roku Pro Series is just $799 at Amazon. That's its lowest price to date. Before you write the Pro Series off as just another Roku TV, let's talk about it. Given its performance and added features, there's an argument to be made that it's one of the best Roku TVs ever made. Once upon a time, most Roku TVs paired their simple smart platform with simplistic display hardware. As the name implies, the Pro Series sets itself apart with swankier technology. It blends quantum dot-color with Mini-LED backlighting, the latter of which gives it an edge when it comes to brightness and overall contrast. According to our test results, the Pro Series delivers over 1,200 nits of highlight brightness in HDR. This is plenty bright for daytime viewing, and with the lights off, the Pro Series has the capacity to look downright cinematic. For context, the lower-end Roku Plus Series — which doesn't come with Mini-LED backlighting — tops out at around 450 to 500 nits of HDR brightness. The Pro Series delivers over 1,200 nits of highlight brightness in HDR. If you've ever used a Roku streaming device before, you probably understand the appeal of the platform. Its bold, clean interface is easy to navigate and its app support is among the best in the industry. The TV's built-in Roku features are obviously the main attraction here, but the Pro Series is also a pretty solid gaming companion, too. It arrives with two HDMI 2.1-compatible inputs that support 4K gaming up to 120Hz. That's the maximum 4K spec for current-generation consoles. In addition, the Pro Series supports Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro for ultra-smooth gaming. You can read more about this surprisingly solid mid-range set in our full Roku Pro Series TV review. If you're looking for something a bit bigger than 65 inches, consider this: The 75-inch Roku Pro Series is just $799 at Amazon right now. That's the lowest price the 75-inch model has ever been.
Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
Driverless cars hit a regulator gap
For Silicon Valley, the promise of the second Trump administration is that it would cull all those pesky bureaucrats impeding innovation. But sometimes, a new industry needs bureaucrats to cut red tape. The autonomous vehicle industry could soon face this catch-22. As driverless cars continue to roll out in American cities, AV companies need the help of federal regulators to deal with the landscape of safety rules. Yet my colleague Pavan Acharya reported last week that the Transportation Department's Office of Automation Safety, which helps regulate AVs, is on the verge of becoming a ghost town. The Republican-led Senate Appropriations Committee noted in a report that the office had 'lost almost all of its staff,' and encouraged the department to prioritize hiring. Silicon Valley has generally pooh-poohed regulators as getting in the way of both moving fast and breaking things. However, it's regulators who are trying to work around policies designed for analog cars, so that AVs can start operating legally within the federal highway rulebook. '[The Transportation Department] is taking away existing regulations that would stand in the way of autonomous vehicles,' said Ryan Calo, a University of Washington law professor who specializes in tech policy. 'They're trying to figure out how to revise their own code so that this is possible. Reducing personnel is just stupid.' The Trump administration has been going all out on kneecapping the bureaucratic state, cutting tens of thousands of people from the federal workforce. Tesla CEO Elon Musk's DOGE is central to these efforts, and the tech industry has cheered it on. In fact, Musk is apparently responsible for the exodus of AV regulators. The Financial Times reported in April that DOGE had dismissed about 30 people from DOT's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, many of whom were employed at its Office of Automation Safety. NHTSA has been a cloud over Musk's dream of deploying fully self-driving Teslas, recalling 2 million of its vehicles in 2023 for issues with its autopilot feature. The FT reports that Musk felt regulators were being unfair, though there were also concerns within Tesla that gutting the automation safety office could backfire. (Tesla did not respond to DFD's inquiry.) Those concerns may be merited. The Biden administration launched the safety office in 2023 specifically to help the AV industry overcome regulatory hurdles. It fields petitions from manufacturers for exemptions to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, which sets performance and design requirements for cars operating in the U.S. The industry has long complained that the Transportation Department has been slow to process the petitions. 'It takes a lot of people to work through [exemption petitions] point-by-point,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon professor who has been the architect of industry safety standards for AVs. 'It's just labor intensive.' He cautioned, however, that the department could simply relax the exemption standards to the extent that you'd need just enough staff to press a rubber stamp. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has already broadened exemptions to cover a wider range of AVs. The department just issued its first exemption under the expanded standards last week for Zoox, Amazon's robotaxi subsidiary – but the company is only allowed to test the vehicles. Getting an exemption to sell AVs or charge consumers for their services is a more rigorous process, though Duffy is working to streamline that too. When DFD asked about the Senate appropriations report, NHTSA said in a statement that it has 'aligned resources accordingly, including staff, to add engineers to the Office of Automation Safety.' Another reason why the industry might want the automation safety office to be staffed is that it could help clarify rules around AVs. With the advent self-driving cars, companies face a conundrum when it comes to state versus federal laws. The current paradigm generally has the federal government setting nationwide standards for vehicles themselves. States then determine whether someone is qualified to operate those vehicles by issuing driver's licenses and operating permits. (My colleague Christine Mui recently reported on Tesla's troubles with California permitting.) That regulatory divide gets fuzzier with AVs, especially for interstate travel, since the vehicle's AI becomes the driver. 'The design and construction of an autonomous vehicle, and driver competency is intertwined,' said Michael Brooks, executive director at the Center for Auto Safety. 'You can't really separate it into the traditional areas.' So when companies deploy a federally approved AV for a cross-country road trip, they don't necessarily know whether they're violating a patchwork of state laws. Congress could resolve the ambiguity by passing legislation that empowers the Transportation Department to override state laws, according to Brooks, but there doesn't seem to be much progress on that front. In the meantime, having more federal automation safety staff could help the department proliferate nationwide regulations in a bid to assert its authority over the states. That would give AV companies a bit more legal certainty. To be sure, staffing up the automation safety office wouldn't necessarily be a clear-cut benefit for the self-driving car industry. More regulators in general could mean more requests for data that companies would consider to be trade secrets, and more meticulous investigations of product defects. But looking past the immediate policy barriers, having enough regulators to make sure that AVs are actually safe benefits all parties involved. 'If a driverless car is involved in an accident, people are going to get nervous about them,' said Calo. 'They need a trusted expert body that's impartial, like the Department of Transportation, to be able to look at those situations in a sober ride way and determine [...] what to do about it.' STATE DEPARTMENT GETS INTO THE ONLINE SPEECH ARGUMENT The GOP campaign against social-media moderation has trickled into formal American diplomacy: The Trump administration is now saying human rights in the United Kingdom 'worsened' in 2024 due to speech restrictions, particularly those online, POLITICO's Mizy Clifton reports. The State Department on Wednesday released its annual assessment of countries' human rights practices in which it criticized the U.K. for chilling speech on social media surrounding incidents like the 2024 stabbing of three children in Southport last year. The report also targeted the country's Online Safety Act that rolled out last month, which requires platforms to verify users' ages in an attempt to prevent children from seeing violent or sexual content. The department suggested that the act could lead to 'government regulation to reduce or eliminate effective encryption (and therefore user privacy) on platforms.' The safety act has already drawn criticism for age-gating certain content, such as posts on X about violence in Gaza or Reddit content on cigars. (Wikipedia also lost a case on Monday challenging the act's identity verification rules.) A congressional free speech delegation traveled to meet with U.K. officials about the act late last month. Sen. Ted Cruz pushes for AI sandboxes Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz wants to spur the development of artificial intelligence by exempting the tech from existing regulations, according to details of a draft bill shared with POLITICO's Benjamin Guggenheim and Anthony Adragna. The bill would allow federal agencies to grant temporary waivers on their rules for companies to pilot AI systems. States have previously granted such exemptions for therapy chatbots and diagnostic tools that use the technology — an idea that tech companies love, but which critics say has some real flaws in practice. Cruz prefers a light-touch approach to AI regulation. He was one of the main advocates for including a 10-year state AI law moratorium in the Big Beautiful Bill this summer, though the provision was dropped amid Republican infighting. Cruz's new legislation dovetails with President Donald Trump's call for regulatory sandboxes in his AI Action Plan to 'rapidly deploy and test AI tools.' post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Tom's Guide
2 days ago
- Tom's Guide
This 116-inch TV is the brightest we've ever tested — and it just went on sale
Grab your shades and get your finances in order, because Hisense just made available the brightest TV we've ever tested. It's a 116-inch beast with a brand-new display type, and it'll set you back a whopping $29,999. The announcement comes just a day after the official launch of Samsung's first Micro RGB TV — a 115-inch, $29,999 set that leverages a similar type of display technology. In other words, the competition is heating up. Originally unveiled at CES 2025, the Hisense 116UX launches alongside a slightly smaller (but still huge) 100-inch version, the Hisense 100UX, which carries a $19,999 price tag. But what makes Hisense's RGB Mini-LED technology worthy of this price tag? Among other benefits, its phenomenal brightness is at the top of the list. I recently wrote at length about the Hisense 116UX brightness levels being off the charts, but here's the basic gist: This TV packs better HDR highlight brightness than any commercially available TV we've measured to date. The 116UX RGB Mini-LED exceeds the 5,000-nit mark. While the brand's more accessible Mini-LED flagship, the Hisense U8QG, delivers close to 4,000 nits of HDR highlight brightness, the 116UX RGB Mini-LED exceeds the 5,000-nit mark. That's eye-popping brightness on a gargantuan screen. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. As mentioned, Hisense's RGB Mini-LED technology brings benefits beyond bonkers brightness. Unlike traditional Mini-LED backlights, Hisense's RGB Mini-LED display tech consists of red-, green- and blue-colored LEDs. This allows for more precise color control. Testing bears this out, too. According to our measurements, the Hisense 116UX covers a remarkable 91.14% of the BT.2020 color gamut. That's the best color volume we've seen this year, surpassing the most colorful OLED we've tested, the Samsung S95F. We've not yet tested the slightly smaller-sized Hisense 100UX, but given that it leverages RGB Mini-LEDs as well, I'd have to imagine that its test results are, at the very least, in the 116UX's ballpark. Given the sky-high price point of both TVs, Hisense's new RGB Mini-LED technology is certainly not for everyone. The good news is that the next-best thing might be staring you in the face. The aforementioned Hisense U8QG is still working with the traditional blend of quantum dots and traditional Mini-LEDs, but it's the brightest TV we've tested this year in that class. It's also available in all of the most popular size options — not just 100- and 116-inches. The U8QG isn't quite as bright and colorful as a Hisense RGB Mini-LED TV, but it's still the brightest TV in its class. It also comes with the excellent Google TV smart platform, not to mention a ton of valuable gaming features. Right now, it's on sale for over $600 off. If you've got the means and you're interested in shelling out for the real deal, the Hisense 116UX is available at Best Buy for $24,999. (Hey, that's $5,000 off!) These TVs might be exorbitantly expensive for the time being, but many people — myself included — see these sets as the bridge between the TVs of today and the TVs of the future. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
