logo
Sanjay Raut slams Maharashtra's Public Safety Bill as tool to suppress dissent

Sanjay Raut slams Maharashtra's Public Safety Bill as tool to suppress dissent

The Hindu4 days ago
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut on Sunday (July 20, 2025) launched a blistering attack on the Devendra Fadnavis government over the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, claiming it poses a direct threat to civil liberties and democratic expression in the State.
Writing in his weekly Rokhthok column in the party mouthpiece Saamana, Mr. Raut described the legislation as a tool crafted not for public safety, but to serve political and corporate interests. 'This is not a Jan Suraksha Bill, it is a BJP Suraksha Bill,' he wrote, alleging the government rushed the bill through the legislature without adequate debate.
According to Mr. Raut, the Bill—passed during the recently concluded monsoon session of the Assembly—grants sweeping powers to the police and government to arrest individuals for acts deemed to disturb 'public order,' a phrase he said is deliberately vague and prone to misuse. He warned that NGOs, civil society groups, tribal activists, and those opposing large corporate projects like Gautam Adani's mining operations spread from Chandrapur to Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand forests could now be easily targeted under the new law.
The Maharashtra Assembly on July 10, 2025, passed the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, aimed at preventing 'unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist organisations or similar groups'. The Bill will now be tabled in the Legislative Council.
'I assure the House that we will not allow the misuse of this law. I request the House to pass this Bill unanimously,' Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who tabled the Bill.
Despite opposition from the Communist Party of India (CPI) and objections by other parties, Speaker Rahul Narvekar declared that the Bill, put to vote through a voice vote, was approved by a majority.
With the passage of the Bill in both Houses, Maharashtra will become the fifth State after Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha to enact a public security law. The law will impose punishments ranging from two to seven years in prison for members of unlawful organisations. Offences under the Act will be cognisable and non-bailable in nature, and grant the government the authority to seize and forfeit funds belonging to such groups.
Mr. Raut further criticised the government's intent behind the bill, saying it is aimed at silencing protests in areas such as Dharavi, where residents have been resisting redevelopment and displacement. 'The Dharavi Rehabilitation Project is the world's biggest land scam. The original residents will be uprooted from their rightful place and the leaders who are fighting for their rights will be labelled as 'Urban Naxalites' and imprisoned under the act. If people cannot protest peacefully against injustice, what remains of democracy?' the column said.
Highlighting the double standards of the ruling coalition, Raut questioned why the government was turning a blind eye to hate speeches and violent acts by right-wing elements, while seeking to criminalise dissent from marginalised communities and activists. He also accused the government of using the bill as a pretext to consolidate power before the upcoming civic elections, particularly in Mumbai. 'The law is being used to intimidate those who dare speak against the regime or its business allies,' he claimed.
'Such laws attack the soul of democracy. If this bill becomes law, it will be a dark day for Maharashtra,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sena (UBT) MP seeks relief for Sassoon Dock fishers, meets Union minister
Sena (UBT) MP seeks relief for Sassoon Dock fishers, meets Union minister

Hindustan Times

time10 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Sena (UBT) MP seeks relief for Sassoon Dock fishers, meets Union minister

MUMBAI: As tensions escalate between the fishing community and the port authorities at Sassoon Dock, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Arvind Sawant has stepped in to end the stand-off. Advocating for the Kolis, traders and others involved in the fish trade at Mumbai's largest dock, Sawant met Union minister for ports, shipping and waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal on Wednesday, and pressed for a resolution to the crisis without the fisher folk being evicted. Sena (UBT) MP seeks relief for Sassoon Dock fishers, meets Union minister Also present at the meeting was Sushilkumar Singh, chairperson of the Mumbai Port Authority (MbPA), which is pushing to evict fisher folk from the 60 warehouses it owns at the dock. At the heart of the crisis is a move by the MbPA to charge rent at Ready Reckoner rates, which the community says is out of their reach. Backed by a police team, the MbPA arrived at the dock on Tuesday, to evict the fisher folk but had to retreat due to fierce resistance. In a post on X on Wednesday evening, Sawant shared details of his meeting with Sonwal and Singh. He said, 'In this meeting, I conveyed the ground reality of the fishermen community regarding the unjust actions being taken on the warehouses at Sassoon Dock and other pending matters. I requested that the eviction action against poor fishermen from warehouse number 158 be stopped. The minister agreed to this request. He also assured that the decision taken on June 12, 2015, by the then Union Minister Nitin Gadkari will soon be implemented. This decision will be a great relief and bring justice to the fishing community.' HT was the first to report, on June 28 and July 8, on how the MbPA's ultimatum over rents could see the port authorities evicting the fishing community from its warehouses, which double as critical fish-processing centres before the catch goes out into the supply chain. Calling Wednesday's meeting a significant success, Sawant said he is committed to protecting the interests of those who contribute to the national economy through fish exports and trade. HT reached out to Sawant, but he was unavailable for comment. Koli leaders said Sawant emphasised the non-implementation of a key decision taken in 2015 under the chairmanship of then Union shipping minister, Nitin Gadkari. The decision, taken on June 12, 2015, had mandated the repossession of godowns by rightful tenants. Another key issue raised by Sawant at the meeting was the reinstatement of Godown No 158 and galas to their 'rightful sub-tenants'. Another key issue raised was the steep hike in licence fees by MbPA, which Sawant said contradicted earlier assurances made in a meeting on January 27, 2021. The enhanced fees have led to the closure of several fish auction houses. He urged the Union minister to roll the fees back to their 2001 levels, to between ₹7,000 and ₹8,000 a year. Sawant also requested that construction work on both the new and old jetties be completed by July 31, 2025, to ensure uninterrupted fish trade activities. On the issue of fish trade timings, Sawant urged that early morning trading begin only from 4:30am, as overnight operations are leading to various problems, including safety concerns.

Tejashwi Yadav or Rahul Gandhi? Chirag Paswan says his biggest rival is...
Tejashwi Yadav or Rahul Gandhi? Chirag Paswan says his biggest rival is...

India Today

time30 minutes ago

  • India Today

Tejashwi Yadav or Rahul Gandhi? Chirag Paswan says his biggest rival is...

Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) chief Chirag Paswan launched a sharp attack on the opposition amid the ongoing uproar in Parliament over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound an exclusive interview with India Today, Paswan questioned the opposition's intent, accusing them of stalling proceedings over an issue that fell outside the ambit of the BIHAR ROLL REVISION"The House has been held hostage over an issue where the government has no authority to respond. How can Parliament hold a discussion on a matter involving the Election Commission, which is a constitutionally independent body? Who is expected to answer from the government? Ask Rahul ji, who will respond? Will the Election Commission come to the House and reply? Under which minister does the Election Commission fall that the government should be answerable?" Paswan asked. Calling out the opposition's double standards, Paswan said their position on the matter lacked consistency."The opposition only wants to create a ruckus. It was the opposition that raised the SIR issue in the first place. They claimed there was malpractice in Maharashtra. Now, when the Election Commission is removing duplicate voters based on their concerns, they still have a problem. Names of dead voters are still on the rolls. Infiltrators who are not citizens are also listed as voters. That's why the list is being updated. It's a good move. If infiltrators enter the country, that's wrong," he OPERATION SINDOOR DISCUSSIONOn the demand for a discussion on Operation Sindoor and US President Donald Trump's claims that he helped broker the ceasefire with Pakistan, Paswan dismissed it as "political noise"."They only want to create a ruckus. They are only concerned about what the President of another country is saying about Operation Sindoor," he also responded to the controversy surrounding Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar. "Some issues should be kept away from politicisation. Today, the opposition is suddenly showing love for him. These are the same people who had brought a no-confidence motion against him, and now they are pretending to be the most sympathetic. Their double standards are clearly visible," he PASWAN ON HIS BIGGEST RIVALWhen asked about his biggest political rival - Tejashwi Yadav, Prashant Kishor, or Rahul Gandhi - Paswan struck a composed tone."My history has been marked by internal family disputes. I have love and respect for Pasupati Paras. My fight is over policies, not personal issues. I have never made personal comments on anyone, and I never will. The dignity of my words doesn't allow me to," he ended with a direct challenge to the opposition leadership. "I want to ask my younger brother (Tejashwi), what is your vision? I have a vision, the NDA government has an agenda, and we work together on it. What is your vision? What is the vision of Congress? What is the vision of the RJD?"- EndsMust Watch

Ravi Shankar Prasad: ‘Why is Congress, Opposition shying away from a debate?'
Ravi Shankar Prasad: ‘Why is Congress, Opposition shying away from a debate?'

Indian Express

time40 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Ravi Shankar Prasad: ‘Why is Congress, Opposition shying away from a debate?'

What do you have to say about the Opposition's uproar over Bihar voter rolls revision? The Opposition has got the right to ask questions, including occasionally creating ruckus as well. But how long will it continue? (LoP, Lok Sabha) Rahul Gandhi says he is not being allowed to speak but his party is in the forefront of creating a complete chaos in the House. Why is Congress and the Opposition shying away from a debate on any issue? Today is the third day. We go and sit and come back. It is agonising, painful and disgusting, to say the least. The whole nation watches us. You can question us in any powerful debate and make us uncomfortable, and we are equally competent to reply to all your debates to make you uncomfortable. Why don't you allow the debate to happen? And then you complain — 'meri awaaz shaant ki jaati hai (my voice is being silenced)'. Why is the debate not being taken up? The larger question is: are they interested in debate? Every debate has to be structured as per Parliamentary rules. Has 16 hours not been allocated for the Operation Sindoor debate, with nine hours in the Rajya Sabha? That is the way the House functions. You ask for a debate, it will be accepted, it will be prepared. You unleash a big attack, we will respond… As far as SIR is concerned, I will raise some questions. To be a voter you have to be a citizen of India – can the EC examine it or not? To be a voter you have to be an ordinary resident of an area. Can the EC examine that or not… Today there are lakhs of votes of people who are dead or have migrated to other areas… What is the problem if these things are being examined by the EC? They (Opposition) sometimes claim there is a faulty voter list. And now when revision is being done, they have a problem. Once the draft publication is done, you have a right to file objections, to appeal to the collector, to file a second appeal for revision before the Chief Electoral Officer. So many mechanisms are available. RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav has said the Mahagathbandhan may take a call to 'boycott Bihar polls' in view of the SIR exercise? I believe that is a casual comment. I will only tell him, 'young man, don't shy away from a fight.' As for Rahul Gandhi's venomous attack on the EC, I will say one thing in Hindi: 'Agar aap ko vote nahin milta to hum kya karein (What do we do if people don't vote for you)?' Even JD(U) MP Giridhari Yadav has questioned the SIR exercise… I don't want to make any comments on individual members. I know that Nitish Kumar, the whole JD(U) and the entire NDA is one. Some critics say in a state like Bihar the exercise can be a huge inconvenience and end up disenfranchising many voters… Haven't 98% of people already filled out the form? Or maybe 99%? Just tell me. People know their rights, people know their obligations and they are following it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store