Sanjay Raut slams Maharashtra's Public Safety Bill as tool to suppress dissent
Writing in his weekly Rokhthok column in the party mouthpiece Saamana, Mr. Raut described the legislation as a tool crafted not for public safety, but to serve political and corporate interests. 'This is not a Jan Suraksha Bill, it is a BJP Suraksha Bill,' he wrote, alleging the government rushed the bill through the legislature without adequate debate.
According to Mr. Raut, the Bill—passed during the recently concluded monsoon session of the Assembly—grants sweeping powers to the police and government to arrest individuals for acts deemed to disturb 'public order,' a phrase he said is deliberately vague and prone to misuse. He warned that NGOs, civil society groups, tribal activists, and those opposing large corporate projects like Gautam Adani's mining operations spread from Chandrapur to Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand forests could now be easily targeted under the new law.
The Maharashtra Assembly on July 10, 2025, passed the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, aimed at preventing 'unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist organisations or similar groups'. The Bill will now be tabled in the Legislative Council.
'I assure the House that we will not allow the misuse of this law. I request the House to pass this Bill unanimously,' Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who tabled the Bill.
Despite opposition from the Communist Party of India (CPI) and objections by other parties, Speaker Rahul Narvekar declared that the Bill, put to vote through a voice vote, was approved by a majority.
With the passage of the Bill in both Houses, Maharashtra will become the fifth State after Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha to enact a public security law. The law will impose punishments ranging from two to seven years in prison for members of unlawful organisations. Offences under the Act will be cognisable and non-bailable in nature, and grant the government the authority to seize and forfeit funds belonging to such groups.
Mr. Raut further criticised the government's intent behind the bill, saying it is aimed at silencing protests in areas such as Dharavi, where residents have been resisting redevelopment and displacement. 'The Dharavi Rehabilitation Project is the world's biggest land scam. The original residents will be uprooted from their rightful place and the leaders who are fighting for their rights will be labelled as 'Urban Naxalites' and imprisoned under the act. If people cannot protest peacefully against injustice, what remains of democracy?' the column said.
Highlighting the double standards of the ruling coalition, Raut questioned why the government was turning a blind eye to hate speeches and violent acts by right-wing elements, while seeking to criminalise dissent from marginalised communities and activists. He also accused the government of using the bill as a pretext to consolidate power before the upcoming civic elections, particularly in Mumbai. 'The law is being used to intimidate those who dare speak against the regime or its business allies,' he claimed.
'Such laws attack the soul of democracy. If this bill becomes law, it will be a dark day for Maharashtra,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Trump's tariffs disrupt Parliament proceedings
Legislative business took a backseat in both Houses as the Opposition protested the 25% tariffs plus 'penalty' imposed on Indian exports by US President Donald Trump. Lok Sabha was a complete washout as it saw three adjournments at 11 AM, 2PM and finally at 4:10 PM, failing to conduct any business. In the Rajya Sabha, Leader of the House J.P. Nadda accused the Opposition of 'double standards' as they walked out during Home Minister Amit Shah's address on Wednesday after demanding a discussion on Operation Sindoor. Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge retorted saying that the Home Minister was 'enough to manage them'. Later in the day, Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal delivered a suo moto statement on U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of tariffs and bilateral trade with India. He said that the government has been meeting domestic stakeholders, 'including exporters and industry', to assess the impact of the new tariffs. He asserted that the government is committed to protect and promote the welfare of Indian farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs, and all sections of industries. Defending India's record on trade agreements, he said that in an increasingly protectionist world, India had entered into a number of 'mutually beneficial' trade agreements with the U.A.E., U.K., Australia and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries. However, Mr. Trump's harsh critique of India indicate that serious differences between the two sides exist amid continued talks with U.S. negotiators over a Free Trade Agreement (FTA). Today, Home Minister Amit Shah is slated to move a resolution in Rajya Sabha to extend President's rule in Manipur by six months and the Upper House will consider for debate and passage of the The Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2024. Lok Sabha is slated to consider three Bills for debate and passage - The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2024, The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 and The India Ports Bill, 2025. Catch today's live updates here Until next time.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
India to shoot down F-35 fighter jet deal after Trump's 25% tariff salvo?
Agencies Trump Tariff news The Indian government is evaluating its next steps after US President Donald Trump declared a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, a decision that took policymakers by surprise. The tariffs are set to take effect from 1 in New Delhi were, according to Bloomberg, "shocked and disappointed" by the announcement. But retaliation is off the table, at least for now. Instead, the government is examining trade options to maintain relations with its largest trading partner. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal addressed Parliament, saying, 'The implications of the recent developments are being examined,' and added that the government is working with exporters and industry groups to understand the impact. He assured the House that India will take 'all necessary steps to secure and advance our national interest.'Sources cited by Bloomberg said India is looking at ways to reduce its trade surplus with the US. This may include increasing imports of American natural gas, communication equipment, and gold over the next few years. But the government is not considering any new defence purchases.'Despite considering a boost in purchases of American goods, the Modi government is unlikely to buy additional defense equipments from the US, a key demand from Trump,' Bloomberg quoted officials familiar with the matter as saying. That position directly impacts the US pitch to sell India the advanced F-35 fighter Prime Minister Narendra Modi's February visit to Washington, Trump personally pushed the sale of the F-35A stealth fighter jets. At first, Indian officials did consider the proposal, but eventually turned it conveyed its position to the US, making it clear that it was not interested in off-the-shelf defence acquisitions. Instead, the focus is on co-developing and co-producing defence equipment in India, aligning with the country's long-running Make in India reported that 'the Modi government is unlikely to approve any major new defence deals with the US in the near future.' The US Defence Department has not publicly commented. India's Ministry of Defence also declined to respond to Bloomberg's request. Economic Times could not independently verify these claims. In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump launched a direct attack on India's trade policies. 'India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any country,' Trump said. He also criticised India's defence and energy ties with Moscow, saying, 'They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine — All things not good!'Later, he added, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World.'US officials have blamed India for dragging its feet on trade talks. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC, 'The whole trade team has been frustrated' by India's negotiating stance. He also took aim at India's foreign policy direction, saying it 'has not been a great global actor' because of its closeness to the public criticism, diplomatic channels remain open. India is still preparing to host the next Quad summit, which includes the US, Japan, and commerce secretary Ajay Dua told Bloomberg TV, 'We need to be a little more accommodating in the ongoing negotiations,' though he also noted that India cannot promise major energy imports or outbound investment in the current rejection of the F-35 offer reflects deeper issues in its defence strategy. It has no immediate alternative for acquiring a fifth-generation fighter. The F-35 remains the only combat-proven aircraft in this category currently available on the global market. India's own defence sector has struggled to develop anything close. The Tejas programme, aimed at delivering a fourth-generation fighter, has taken decades and only delivered around 38 aircraft, 17 of which are prototypes. Its limited combat performance has restricted export potential and slowed mass production. Without foreign collaboration, developing a fifth-generation fighter remains out of reach. For now, India is looking to France. By 2028, it plans to begin manufacturing fuselages for Rafale jets at a rate of up to two units per month. That's a long regional security challenges are growing. China has accelerated the production and export of next-gen fighter aircraft. Pakistan, meanwhile, has started inducting new fighters from China, gradually upgrading its air force this context, some experts believe India may still turn to Russia's Su-57, the only other fifth-generation option available. India's military already depends on Russian equipment across its air, land and naval forces. The existing logistics and familiarity could make this a more realistic short-term choice, even as Western ties are tested by broader geopolitical tensions. For now, India is keeping its options open. Officials told Bloomberg that the government is not planning any immediate counter-measures to Trump's tariffs. But it may challenge increased US duties on steel and automobiles at the World Trade Organisation when the timing suits its interests. As it stands, the government wants to avoid escalation while keeping the door open for talks. It has no appetite for a trade war, but it won't be pushed into lopsided defence deals pressure is mounting. But New Delhi seems willing to wait it out, eyes firmly on long-term sovereignty and stability in its economic and strategic choices.(With inputs from TOI, Bloomberg)
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Goa assembly clears bill to regularise pre-2014 unauthorised houses on govt land
Panaji, The Goa assembly has passed the Goa Land Revenue Code Bill, 2025, which will regularise unauthorised houses built on government land before February 28, 2014. Goa assembly clears bill to regularise pre-2014 unauthorised houses on govt land The bill, moved by Revenue Minister Atanasio Monserrate on Thursday, seeks to add a new section — 38A — in the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968, empowering the deputy collector to regularise such encroachments and confer Class I occupancy to eligible applicants. The legislation was passed in the House amidst debate from the opposition, who raised concerns that it would benefit non-Goans. According to the bill, the regularisation of a structure is subject to payment of an occupancy price, which will be notified separately by the government. "It applies only to landless Goan residents who have lived in the state for at least 15 years before the cut-off date and who do not own any other land, house, flat, or ancestral share in property," Chief Minister Pramod Sawant told the House. The bill, however, excludes land falling within protected forests, wildlife sanctuaries, coastal regulation zones, eco-sensitive zones, Khazan lands , road setbacks, and natural water channels. Sawant clarified that such structures will not be covered under the purview of this bill. The bill states that the maximum area eligible for regularisation is capped at 400 sq metres, which includes the plinth area and a two-meter buffer around houses, if available. Any encroached area beyond the prescribed limit must be surrendered to the government as a precondition for regularisation. The bill mandates that applicants file for regularisation within six months of notification of the Act, and the deputy collector will have another six months to dispose of such applications. The legislation also imposes a 20-year restriction on the sale or transfer of the regularised property, except by gift to a family member. "Any false declaration by applicants may lead to cancellation of the regularisation, penal action including imprisonment up to two years, and a fine of up to ₹1 lakh," the legislation states. The bill aims to provide tenure security to long-time occupants while also curbing large-scale encroachments and augmenting state revenue, as per the Statement of Objects and Reasons. There are no financial liabilities to the state under the bill, although it is expected to generate revenue through the occupancy price. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
