AgustaWestland: ED says Christian Michel's plea for release 'misleading'
Special judge Sanjay Jindal was hearing James' plea for release on the ground that he had undergone the maximum period of sentence of seven years for the purported offences.
The EDs in its reply said, "That with respect to the submissions made by the accused Christian Michel James that he has already undergone the period of maximum sentence prescribed for the offences for which he was extradited to India from United Arab Emirates, so, he is entitled to be released by virtue of the provisions of section 436 A of CrPC it is most respectfully submitted that the aforesaid submissions are misleading and devoid of any merits."
Section 436 A of the erstwhile CrPC deals with maximum period for which an under trial prisoner can be detained.
The ED reply said under the prevention of money laundering act provision, the the maximum sentence prescribed for the offence of money laundering was seven years.
"The date of the arrest in the present case being December 22, 2018, the maximum period of imprisonment provided for the offence has yet not expired and therefore the present entitlement sought by the accused under the provisions of section 436A of CrPC is premature and is therefore liable to be dismissed," it added.
On August 4, the ED and CBI opposed the plea of Michel's counsel Aljo K Joseph that he was entitled to be released under provisions of Section 436A of the CrPC.
James was extradited from Dubai in December 2018 and was subsequently arrested by the CBI and the ED.
He was granted bail in the CBI case by the Supreme Court on February 18 this year.
Two weeks later, he was granted bail in the ED case by the Delhi High Court.
Michel, however, has not furnished bail bonds and remains in Tihar prison, awaiting the renewal of his passport.
The ED chargesheet led against James in June 2016 alleged that he received 30 million euros from AgustaWestland.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Lok Nayak Hospital ex-director booked by CBI for irregularities
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a case against Dr Suresh Kumar, former medical director of Delhi government-run Lok Nayak Hospital (LNH), and others for alleged criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, and misconduct by a public servant, officials said on Monday. The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a 2017 open tender floated by LNH on the Delhi government's procurement portal for sanitation consumables and non-consumables. (File photo) The FIR, filed on July 30, comes three years after a preliminary enquiry (PE) was initiated by the CBI in 2022 following reports of administrative lapses during Dr Kumar's tenure. According to officials, the PE has now led to the registration of a regular case (RC) after prima facie evidence was found. 'Prima facie offences under IPC Section 120-B read with Section 409 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act have been disclosed against Dr Suresh Kumar and other former staff,' the FIR stated. HT has accessed a copy of the document. The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a 2017 open tender floated by LNH on the Delhi government's procurement portal for sanitation consumables and non-consumables, including macerators — machines used for hygienically disposing of human waste. The FIR alleges that only one firm was favoured repeatedly over an extended period, from the original contract period in 2017 until 2021, leading to 'undue benefits' to the firm and corresponding losses to the government. Eight macerators of 'inferior quality' were allegedly purchased at inflated prices, despite better-quality alternatives being available at lower costs. 'No fresh open tender was floated during the extended period,' the FIR adds, 'and extensions were granted to the same firm without justification -- from January 29, 2020, to July 13, 2021.' It also notes that the Covid-19 pandemic, often cited for emergency procurement, only began affecting India in mid-March 2020 -- two months after the original tender expired. The PE further flagged violations in medicine procurement norms. Under government policy, generic medicines -- which are more affordable and equally effective -- are to be prioritised over branded drugs. However, the FIR alleges that between April 7 and September 16, 2022, LNH procured medicines worth ₹32.23 crore from a local authorised chemist, of which ₹25.17 crore (approximately 80%) was spent on branded drugs, and only ₹7.05 crore on generic ones. 'This resulted in avoidable expenditure and reduced access to essential medicines for the public,' the FIR states. CBI officials said CCTV footage, procurement records, and other evidence are being examined to identify the officials involved in the decision-making process. So far, no arrest has been made in the case. Dr Kumar has not responded to messages and calls requesting comment on the matter till the time of going to print.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fake ED officers rob trader of Rs 70 lakh, gold
1 2 Vijayawada: In a shocking case of impersonation and organised robbery, four individuals — two of them dressed in police uniform — allegedly posed as Enforcement Directorate (ED) officials and fled with Rs 70 lakh in cash and some quantity of raw gold from a jeweller near Medikonduru on Sunday. The incident came to light after the trader lodged a formal complaint with the local police. According to Medikonduru circle inspector Nagul Meera, the complainant, Mani Jagadeesh, is a resident of Guntupalli in Ibrahimpatnam mandal. He is a recent entrepreneur, who opened a gold and silver testing shop named Sri Swami Samartha Gold & Silver Testing Centre in Vijayawada last month. Prior to this, Jagadeesh worked at a similar shop in Rajamahendravaram, where he came in contact with a person named Ranjith Maruthi Peta. Around 15 days ago, Ranjith contacted Jagadeesh and informed him about the availability of raw gold at Rs 5,000 per gram. Acting on the offer, Jagadeesh purchased five grams of raw gold through an unidentified person, paying Rs 25,000. Satisfied with the initial transaction, Jagadeesh later decided to procure two kilograms of raw gold at Rs 58 lakh per kilogram. For this larger deal, Jagadeesh, along with his friend Praveen from Kakinada, travelled to Rajamahendravaram. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Jolie-Pitt Family Shows Support For Shiloh's Change Drivepedia Undo There, they agreed to pay Rs 70 lakh initially and finalise the remaining payment later. On Sunday, Jagadeesh, Praveen, Ranjith, and a few others began their journey from Palnadu district's Sattenapalli in two vehicles after holding discussions about the gold trade. Jagadeesh's car was intercepted on the outskirts of Medikonduru by people in another vehicle. Four individuals, including two dressed as police officers, confronted the group. Claiming to be ED officials, the impersonators threatened the victims and forcibly took away Rs 70 lakh in cash along with the raw gold that was in Jagadeesh's possession. Following the incident, Jagadeesh approached the local police on Monday and filed a formal complaint. He also reported that Ranjith Maruthi Peta, who facilitated the deal, since went missing and was untraceable. Medikonduru police have registered a case based on Jagadeesh's complaint and have launched a manhunt for the suspects. Efforts are underway to track down the culprits using surveillance footage and mobile data records.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Chhattisgarh High Court acquits man convicted for murdering kin on grounds of ‘legal insanity'
The Chhattisgarh High Court recently acquitted a 25-year-old man who was awarded a life sentence for murdering his father and grandmother, after his counsel was able to prove that the appellant was of unsound mind. Holding that Dhamtari resident Mahesh Verma, who had been convicted for the 2021 double murder, fitted the term legally insane, the court said that the Investigating Officer admitted that during the investigation, he did not procure any documents relating to psychiatric treatment of the accused from his family members. It further said that despite a preliminary report clearly referring to the appellant as a mental patient, no certificate from the treating psychiatrist was obtained, and the trial court merely relied on a report from the inquiry under Section 328 CrPC (which assesses competency to stand trial), not the mental status at the time of the act which is the legally relevant consideration under Section 22 BNS (or section 84 of the IPC referring to an Act by a person of unsound mind – Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law). The HC held that an accused who seeks exoneration from liability for an act under Section 84 has to prove legal insanity and not medical insanity. Legal insanity 'Since the term insanity or unsoundness of mind has not been defined in the Penal Code, it carries different meaning in different contexts and describes varying degrees of mental disorder. A distinction is to be made between legal insanity and medical insanity. The court is concerned with legal insanity and not with medical insanity,' the verdict delivered by Judge Bibhu Datta Guru and Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha said. Mahesh's counsel, Abhishek Sinha, had argued before the High Court that his client was suffering from insanity at the time, and a non-examination of his mental state created a serious infirmity in the case. Mr. Sinha said the accused had suffered a head injury during Covid 19 lockdown, and his mental state was not good, and he had been under treatment for the last year at Raipur Mmental Hospital. The incident On April 13, 2021, at around 11 pm, Mahesh, who was kept locked in his room because he was mentally unstable, demanded that his mother, Rekha, open the door so he could get water. His mother was fearful and did not open the door; she called her husband, Pannalal Verma, who subsequently opened the door. When his family asked him why he was creating a commotion, Mahesh said, 'I am Hanuman ji, Bajrang Bali, and Durga.' He then pushed away his mother and started attacking his father and grandmother, Triveni. His mother went to seek help from the neighbours but by the time she returned, Pannalal and Triveni were dead. The matter went to a Sessions court which convicted Mahesh for double murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment in February 2024.
