logo
Chhattisgarh High Court acquits man convicted for murdering kin on grounds of ‘legal insanity'

Chhattisgarh High Court acquits man convicted for murdering kin on grounds of ‘legal insanity'

The Hindu12 hours ago
The Chhattisgarh High Court recently acquitted a 25-year-old man who was awarded a life sentence for murdering his father and grandmother, after his counsel was able to prove that the appellant was of unsound mind.
Holding that Dhamtari resident Mahesh Verma, who had been convicted for the 2021 double murder, fitted the term legally insane, the court said that the Investigating Officer admitted that during the investigation, he did not procure any documents relating to psychiatric treatment of the accused from his family members.
It further said that despite a preliminary report clearly referring to the appellant as a mental patient, no certificate from the treating psychiatrist was obtained, and the trial court merely relied on a report from the inquiry under Section 328 CrPC (which assesses competency to stand trial), not the mental status at the time of the act which is the legally relevant consideration under Section 22 BNS (or section 84 of the IPC referring to an Act by a person of unsound mind – Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law).
The HC held that an accused who seeks exoneration from liability for an act under Section 84 has to prove legal insanity and not medical insanity.
Legal insanity
'Since the term insanity or unsoundness of mind has not been defined in the Penal Code, it carries different meaning in different contexts and describes varying degrees of mental disorder. A distinction is to be made between legal insanity and medical insanity. The court is concerned with legal insanity and not with medical insanity,' the verdict delivered by Judge Bibhu Datta Guru and Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha said.
Mahesh's counsel, Abhishek Sinha, had argued before the High Court that his client was suffering from insanity at the time, and a non-examination of his mental state created a serious infirmity in the case. Mr. Sinha said the accused had suffered a head injury during Covid 19 lockdown, and his mental state was not good, and he had been under treatment for the last year at Raipur Mmental Hospital.
The incident
On April 13, 2021, at around 11 pm, Mahesh, who was kept locked in his room because he was mentally unstable, demanded that his mother, Rekha, open the door so he could get water. His mother was fearful and did not open the door; she called her husband, Pannalal Verma, who subsequently opened the door.
When his family asked him why he was creating a commotion, Mahesh said, 'I am Hanuman ji, Bajrang Bali, and Durga.' He then pushed away his mother and started attacking his father and grandmother, Triveni. His mother went to seek help from the neighbours but by the time she returned, Pannalal and Triveni were dead. The matter went to a Sessions court which convicted Mahesh for double murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment in February 2024.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Passport case against businessman Sushil Ansal: Delhi court allows AVUT to assist prosecution
Passport case against businessman Sushil Ansal: Delhi court allows AVUT to assist prosecution

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Passport case against businessman Sushil Ansal: Delhi court allows AVUT to assist prosecution

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has allowed the Association of the Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT) to assist the prosecution in a fraud case against businessman Sushil Ansal. Ansal was convicted in the 1997 Uphaar cinema fire , which killed 59 people. The AVUTs chairperson, Neelam Krishnamoorthy, had filed an application to assist the prosecution in the case, raising certain objections in the investigation and filing of the chargesheet. Ansal was booked by Delhi Police's crime branch in 2019 under Section 12 of the Passport Act, which deals with obtaining a passport by suppressing information about nationality. The FIR was also registered under IPC Sections 177 (knowingly furnishing false information to a public servant) and 181 (false statement on oath or affirmation to public servant or person authorised to administer oath) 192 (fabricating false evidence), 197 (issuing or signing false certificate) and 420 (cheating). In an order on August 4, chief judicial magistrate Shriya Agarwal said, "The Association at the instance of which the law was set into motion in the present case ought to get a right of assisting the prosecution, to which there is no bar in law." AVUT, the judge said, was at liberty to assist the prosecution in the present case and no prejudice would be caused to the accused. Senior advocate Vikas Pahwa said the present case was registered through a Delhi High Court order in a writ petition filed by AVUT, and so effective right of participation could be given to the association. Earlier, in its 8-page final report, police claimed Ansal misled the government authority on oath that he has not been convicted in any criminal proceedings by any court. The case was lodged on the direction of the Delhi High Court while hearing a petition by Krishnamoorthy, alleging that Ansal concealed or gave false information to the authorities for renewal of his passport. Ansal, however, surrendered his passport on August 14, 2017 "because he knew that adverse orders against him may well be passed", the final report said. Krishnamoorthy, who lost two children in the tragedy, has been fighting a legal battle on behalf of the victims' families for over two decades. Rules stipulate for a new or a re-issue or a replacement of lost or damaged passport issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, the applicant has to disclose whether he is involved in any criminal case or not and to produce an no-objection certificate from the court concerned in case they are involved in any criminal prosecution. A fire at the Uphaar cinema during the screening of Hindi film 'Border' on June 13, 1997 had claimed 59 lives.

Dharmasthala mass burial probe: 7 FIRs registered after clash near site; YouTubers among complainants
Dharmasthala mass burial probe: 7 FIRs registered after clash near site; YouTubers among complainants

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Dharmasthala mass burial probe: 7 FIRs registered after clash near site; YouTubers among complainants

MANGALURU: At least seven FIRs were registered in connection with the clash that took place at Pangala Cross, under Dharmasthala Police Station limits, on Wednesday evening, according to Dakshina Kannada SP Arun K, of these, four cases were filed at Dharmasthala Police Station and three at Belthangady Police Station. In a complaint, Ajay, a resident of Bantwal and the owner of the Kudla Rampage YouTube channel, alleged about 15 to 50 miscreants attacked him while he was recording a byte of a person at Pangala Cross. The mob allegedly assaulted Ajay, his cameraman Suhas, Santosh from Sanchari Studio, and Abhishek from United Media. The attackers also reportedly damaged their camera, stole the memory card, and issued death threats. A case was registered under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 115(2), 324(5), 352, 307 read with Section 190 of BNS. A suo motu case was filed after approximately 25 to 50 persons allegedly formed two groups at Pangala Cross with the intention of committing a criminal act. Even as the PSI and team from Dharmasthala Police station arrived and asked the crowd to disperse, the groups reportedly obstructed police from performing their duties and clashed with each other. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Is Why Smart People Put Baking Soda in Their Shampoo Read More Undo A case was registered under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 132, 324(6) read with 190 BNS. Another suo motu case was registered at Dharmasthala Police Station after 50 to 100 individuals allegedly gathered unlawfully in front of the police station without permission, thereby violating legal norms. This case was filed under Section 189(2) read with 190 BNS. Pramod Kumar Shetty, 42, a resident of Belthangady, who arrived at the scene after learning of the attack on YouTubers, stated that he was verbally abused and assaulted by a group of 30 to 40 people. He further alleged two vehicles and a camera were damaged. A case was registered under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 115(2), 110, 324(3), 352, 351(2) read with Section 190 BNS. Harish R., 34, a crime reporter from Bengaluru working with a private news channel, filed a complaint stating that when he went a private hospital in Ujire to cover the injured from the Pangala incident, he requested a video byte from Girish Mattannavar. In response, Mahesh Shetty Thimarody and others allegedly abused and assaulted him. Another accused, Sameer Youtubers, allegedly issued life threats. A case was registered at Belthangady Police Station under Sections 189(2), 191(1)(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 read with 190 BNS. In another complaint, Ganesh Shetty, 28, from Belthangady alleged that after bringing victims to the hospital, a reporter and cameramen from a private channel tried to forcibly take statements from Mahesh Shetty Thimarody and Girish Mattannavar. Upon refusal, they were allegedly abused and pushed around. Later, a false report aired on the channel claimed that Mahesh Shetty attacked reporters, he alleged. A case was registered under Sections 126(2), 296, 351 and Section 3(5) of BNS. The Belthangady Police also filed a suo motu FIR after around 50 to 100 people unlawfully gathered near the hospital, raising slogans. The police had reached the spot to maintain order. Despite being told to disperse, the crowd allegedly obstructed police duties. The case, under was registered under Section 189(2) read with 190 BNS.

After ‘Dog Babu' embarrassment, ‘Donald Trump' denied residency certificate in Bihar, FIR registered
After ‘Dog Babu' embarrassment, ‘Donald Trump' denied residency certificate in Bihar, FIR registered

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

After ‘Dog Babu' embarrassment, ‘Donald Trump' denied residency certificate in Bihar, FIR registered

In Bihar's Samastipur district, an application was submitted through the government's RTPS (Right to Public Services) portal seeking a residential certificate in the name of 'Donald John Trump.' The application, dated July 29, listed the applicant's father as 'Frederick Christ Trump,' with the residence address mentioned as Hasanpur, Ward 13, Bakarpur Post, Mohiuddin Nagar Block, Samastipur. The supporting documents included a photograph of US President Trump and a forged Aadhaar card, which immediately raised suspicion upon review, officials said. Upon closer inspection, the Revenue Officer of Mohiuddin Nagar discovered several irregularities, including tampered photo IDs, barcode distortions, and altered personal details, prompting her to reject the application outright on August 4. The bizarre incident surfaced as the latest in a string of dubious requests. Since the beginning of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, there has been a noticeable surge in applications for residential certificates. However, these certificates — a mandatory document required by the Election Commission for voter card verification — have also been attracting illegal applications, officials said. The Samastipur district administration labelled the application as part of a more extensive attempt to undermine the integrity of Bihar's digital governance system and mislead the ongoing electoral roll revision process. Authorities said the use of fraudulent documents, including a fabricated Aadhaar card, appeared to be a clear case of cyber fraud. Misuse of the RTPS system through fictitious applicants and forged documents has become increasingly frequent, they say, with officials now systematically rejecting such applications and registering formal FIRs. An FIR has been lodged at the Samastipur Cyber Police Station under Sections 318(4) and 336(4) of the BNS (pertaining to forgery and use of forged documents), and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (related to identity theft and online fraud), for further investigation. Last month, a similar application was submitted under the name 'Dog Babu' at the Masaurhi Circle Office in Patna. The case went viral after it was revealed that a residence certificate application had been filed using an image of a dog. A full-scale investigation led to the arrest of a staff member of the Circle Office for allegedly submitting the fake application and sharing it online. Other districts have also reported unusual applications in the names of animals and vehicles. Shortly after the Dog Babu case, another application was submitted in Nawada in the name of 'Dogesh Babu,' with 'Dogesh ke papa' and 'Dogesh ki mummy' listed as parents. A probe was ordered in that case as well. Authorities have urged the public to submit genuine and valid documents when applying for public services and warned that 'submitting false information, whether as a joke or with malicious intent, could lead to severe legal consequences, including criminal prosecution.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store