Young Dems blame Biden and their own party for losing in 2024 as they distance themselves from the old-guard
The Democratic Party is finally saying the quiet part out loud: "Biden should not have run again."
Revelations about President Joe Biden's cognitive decline and his administration's alleged cover-up have returned to the national conversation ahead of next week's release of CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Axios political correspondent Alex Thompson's book, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again."
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., a 2024 presidential campaign surrogate for President Joe Biden, and considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate, acknowledged on Wednesday that Biden should not have run for a second term.
And Beto O'Rourke, one of Biden's 2020 Democratic primary competitors and the former congressman from Texas, joined the criticism this week, accusing Biden's re-election campaign of failing future generations of Americans.
Rep Ro Khanna Tees Up 2028 Rivalry During Pointed Speech In Jd Vance's Home State
When pressed by Martha MacCallum on "The Story" on Wednesday about campaigning for Biden in 2024, Khanna said he hadn't had the full picture of Biden's health and mental acuity ahead of his disastrous debate performance, but he admitted, "We should be honest as a party that we made a mistake."
Read On The Fox News App
Dem Rising Star Eyes Vance As Key Long-term Threat: 'Needs To Be Defeated'
"I do think it's important that, given what has come out, that we take accountability," Khanna said. "Obviously, he should not have run," Khanna said.
Responding to a series of interview clips from early 2024, when Khanna affirmed Biden's intention to run for re-election and described the president as "fully coherent," Khanna said he had been telling the truth.
"Of course, I didn't have the full picture," Khanna added.
O'Rourke took Khanna's call for Democratic accountability a step further on "Pod Save America" this week, calling Biden's decision to run for re-election in 2024 a "terrible mistake."
"Just to be clear: Biden should not have run again. And to be even more clear: He failed this country in the most important job that he had," O'Rourke said.
"In fact, the entire rationale for his presidency the first time, and the rationale he tried to sell us on for his attempt to run for re-election, 'Only I can stop Donald Trump.' And he failed to do that, and it's not just you and me, but our kids and grandkids and the generations that follow that might have to pay the price for this. We might very well lose the greatest country that this world has ever known," O'Rourke said.
An excerpt from Tapper and Thompson's book released by Axios this week revealed that Biden's declining health was "so severe that there were internal discussions about putting the president in a wheelchair, but they couldn't do so until after the election."
In hindsight, Khanna and O'Rourke agreed that Democrats should have had an opportunity to launch their own presidential bids. And now that President Donald Trump has returned to the White House, and an already crowded field of potential 2028 Democratic candidates are mulling presidential campaigns, they said it's important to take accountability for 2024.
"Obviously, there should have been an open primary. And, I don't think that's very difficult that Democrats should just be straight up that he should not have run, now that we have all the facts. There should have been an open primary. I think to move on and move forward, it's important to take accountability and be straightforward with the American people," Khanna said.
O'Rourke said America's future could be in the balance "in part because of the decision that Biden, and those around him, made to run for re-election instead of having an open primary where the greatest talent that the Democratic Party can muster could be on that stage to have a competition of ideas, and track-record and vision and really excite, not just Democrats, but the people of this country who did want change. I mean, if anything was clear coming out of 2024, they wanted change."
The once-2020 Democratic presidential candidate, who is 52 years-old, said the Democrat's Biden failure creates a credibility problem.
"I think that credibility problem is going to persist up until when Democrats say, 'We f---ed up, and we made a terrible mistake,'" O'Rourke said.
Despite O'Rourke's comments this week, he said in an email to supporters through his voting rights organization, Powered by People, last February that, "Donald Trump is the single greatest threat to our democracy. Our best chance to defeat him is to support Joe Biden in this election."
"Amy and I voted for him in the Texas primary . . . and are looking forward to voting for him again in November," he added. "This president has done an extraordinary job of improving our economy, confronting the climate crisis, reducing childhood poverty and fending off the very worst of Donald Trump and the Republican Party's mounting attacks on our most fundamental freedoms."
Another young Democrat and Biden's former National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, continued to defend his former boss at Politico's Security Summit on Thursday, dismissing an allegation that Biden had forgotten his name, and defending his leadership as commander-in-chief.
Click To Get The Fox News App
"What happened in that debate was a shock to me," Sullivan admitted. "I think it was a shock to everybody."
A Biden spokesperson did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report. Original article source: Young Dems blame Biden and their own party for losing in 2024 as they distance themselves from the old-guard
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Will GOP senators save Biden's energy tax credits?
Moderate House Republicans failed last month when the chamber voted to gut the clean energy tax credits that they had spent months urging their leaders to save. Now the fight is getting real in the Senate, where Republicans unhappy with the cuts have the leverage to reshape President Donald Trump's megabill — if they choose to, writes Kelsey Brugger. GOP Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia — to name but a few — all told Kelsey they will seek significant changes to the budget reconciliation package ahead of their party's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Senate Republicans can afford to lose only three votes without tanking the bill. The party-line bill that the House passed May 22 would dramatically roll back Biden-era incentives for wind, solar, hydrogen and other clean energy sources. The cuts are expected to render useless hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits from Democrats' 2022 climate law, even though they benefit many Republican-held districts. 'Every one of [the credits] is going to have some sort of extension' in the Senate version, Tillis told Kelsey. GOP House members who tepidly and unsuccessfully opposed the tax rollbacks lent their support to the new effort. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense,' a group of 13 representatives wrote in a letter to Senate leaders urging them to 'substantially and strategically' fix the House-passed language. Conservatives were quick to respond. 'You backslide one inch on those [Inflation Reduction Act] subsidies, and I'm voting against this bill,' said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), one of the far-right House Freedom Caucus' most vocal members. That could be fatal for the bill when it returns to the House, where the vote last time was 215-214. The conservative Club for Growth has been taking out ads against some Senate Republicans, accusing Murkowski and Jerry Moran of Kansas of falling for a 'big liberal mistake' in seeking to preserve some of the Biden-era policies, and even accusing Kevin Cramer of North Dakota of 'betraying' Trump. How senators ultimately treat Biden's clean energy tax credits will be included in the Senate Finance Committee's section of the bill, which might not emerge until next week. It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Tune in! At 8 a.m. ET Tuesday, White House officials, congressional leaders and energy experts will explore the strategic choices shaping America's energy future under the Trump administration at POLITICO's Energy Summit. You can find more details about the event here and watch live here. Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Matt Daily breaks down how Republicans' mega reconciliation bill would almost certainly hurt Tesla's lesser-known yet growing solar and battery division. Power Centers Trump purges federal heat expertsTop heat experts are no longer at their government posts at the start of what promises to be a brutally hot summer, raising questions about the nation's ability to cope with extreme temperatures, writes Ariel Wittenberg. The entire staff at the climate office within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was laid off. And across other agencies, heat specialists have accepted deferred resignation offers. Some were fired because their work involved racial equity issues. Still others, after being ordered to cut communication with the public about the health risks of heat, decided they could help more people if they retired early. Trump sits out ocean protection talks French President Emmanuel Macron announced Monday that implementation of an international agreement to protect the world's oceans can begin now that enough countries have 'formally committed' to ratifying the High Seas Treaty, writes Leonie Cater. The news came at the third United Nations Conference on the Oceans in Nice, France. The United States did not participate, an absence that did not go unnoticed. A State Department spokesperson said the conference is 'at odds' with positions held by the current U.S. administration. In Other News Public health: This group is the most vulnerable to heat-related illnesses by far. River life: How climate change is reshaping life on the Mighty Mississippi. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. The Trump administration is poised to release the first two rules in a high-stakes series of proposed Clean Air Act rollbacks that aim to dismantle Biden-era controls on power sector pollution. Solar analysts are lowering growth estimates significantly for the U.S. industry over the next five years as a 'perfect storm' threatens projects. A crew member died last week while aboard a vessel working on Empire Wind 1, an offshore wind project near New York. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
California Labor Leader Charged With Felony After ICE Protest
California labor leader David Huerta has been charged with a federal felony, accused of interfering with law enforcement after joining a protest against immigration arrest operations in Los Angeles that set off days of unrest. Huerta leads the Service Employees International Union 's United Service Workers West, which represents more than 45,000 workers including janitors, security officers and airport staff. He is also president of SEIU's California chapter.
Associated Press
37 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Hearing held for judge accused of allowing immigrant to escape ICE custody
BOSTON (AP) — A hearing began Monday for a Massachusetts judge facing civil charges over allegations that she allowed an immigrant in her court to evade an immigration enforcement agent. The case stems from a 2018 incident in which Shelley Joseph, a district court judge, is accused of colluding with the immigrant's attorney and a court officer to allow him escape out a back door of the courthouse after a hearing on charges that included drug possession. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer had been waiting outside the courtroom to detain the defendant, Jose Medina-Perez. 'This case is about the integrity, impartiality and independence of the Massachusetts judiciary and the appearance of the integrity, impartiality and independence every judge must uphold,' Judith Fabricant, special counsel for the commission, told the hearing. A lawyer for Joseph, Elizabeth Mulvey, said the case had been distorted over time and that everyone had come to believe that her client 'let an illegal immigrant out of the door' with half of those people believing she should be jailed and the other half calling her a 'folk hero.' She argued Joseph had been vilified in the media and people were giving the impression that 'dozens of people' had seen Joseph 'get off the bench, escort the defendant to the door, give him a hug and wish him god speed.' 'Today in this court room and we are going to have opportunity to hear all the evidence,' Mulvey said. The case is similar to a Milwaukee judge accused in April of helping a man evade immigration authorities. The case has escalated a clash between the Trump administration and local authorities over the Republican president's sweeping immigration crackdown. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan is accused of escorting the man and his lawyer out of her courtroom through the jury door after learning that immigration authorities were seeking his arrest. The man was taken into custody outside the courthouse after agents chased him on foot. In the Massachusetts case, federal obstruction of justice charges against Joseph were dropped in 2022 after she agreed to refer herself to a state agency that investigates allegations of misconduct by members of the bench. That agency, the Commission on Judicial Conduct, concluded last year that Joseph 'engaged in willful judicial misconduct that brought the judicial office into disrepute, as well as conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and unbecoming a judicial officer.' Denis McInerney, the hearing officer assigned to the case by the Supreme Judicial Court, said he will hear the evidence and then make a recommendation afterward based on whether he find Joseph violated the Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct. The hearing is expected to last about a week. Much of the first day was dominated by the first witness, lawyer David Jellinek, who told the court he had been hired that day to represent Medina-Perez and had been granted immunity by federal prosecutors. Along with the drug charges, Medina-Perez was in court on a warrant out of Pennsylvania. After doing some research, Jellinek believed his client wasn't the same person wanted on the warrant. 'I was worried they were going to take a US citizen into custody,' he told the court. 'I was quite concerned for my client.' Jellinek failed to convince the ICE agent that they had the 'wrong guy' so he came up with a plan to release Medina-Perez out the back door. Fabricant argued that Joseph signal her approval for the plan - including an off the record conversation during a side bar — when she appeared sympathetic to Jellinek's desire for his client to avoid ICE. But another attorney for Joseph, Thomas Hoopes, suggest that Jellinek might have misinterpreted Joseph's comments when she raised the possibility that Medina-Perez could be detained, rather than be released. The prosecutor had agreed Medina-Perez wasn't the man wanted in Pennsylvania and moved to drop the fugitive from justice charge. She also wasn't seeking bail on the drug charges so he was free to go. Much will hinge on what was said during that off the record conversation, which lasted only 52 seconds and is being disputed by both sides.
