Runners of the Week: OD6 Metals, Mount Ridley Mines, ActivePort & ETM
Perth-based lithium giant Pilbara Minerals saw its share price surge nearly 22 per cent on news that global battery heavyweight CATL had closed some of China major mines.
Australian employment data came back better than expected, cracking a low 4.2 per cent unemployment rate with 25,000 jobs added last month. The positive numbers were mostly due to population figures decreasing -and not because Australians are having fewer babies.
The solid numbers slashed hopes for a September rate cut to a mere 35 per cent, and unfortunately, United States data also came back with higher-than-expected inflation. This led to the inevitable 'this is not a time for investors to panic but rather focus on fundamentals' calls from the wealth management big wigs. Anything to keep the funds in their pockets and our fees turning over, I guess.
The real fireworks this week – and over the month - came from the white-hot Aussie critical minerals sector, in particular, rare earths.
After Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King last week suggested floating price floors to rival the US's US$110 a kilogram neodymium and praseodymium benchmark, Australia's rare earths stock continued their tear to taking out three of the top four spots in this week's Runners list. And blue chips Lynas Rare Earths and Iluka Resources both saw their share price rise more than 50 per cent on the month.
However, this week's Runner of the Week was taken out by a recently dormant rare earths giant lingering near Western Australia's south coast.
OD6 METALS LIMITED (ASX: OD6)
Up 250% (3c – 10.5c)
Bulls N' Bears' ASX Runner of the Week is Aussie rare earths renegade OD6 Metals, which joined the critical minerals chorus this week with a transformational saleable product produced at its mammoth clay-hosted Splinter Rock rare earths project near Esperance on Western Australia's south coast.
The company unveiled a high-quality mixed rare earth carbonate product, which comes in at a promising 56 per cent total rare earth oxides (TREO). It has also produced a mixed rare earth hydroxide at about 59 per cent TREO.
The company produced the rare earths with the help of industry leader ANSTO using a much-simplified scalable heap leach process, which will drastically reduce the operational costs and capex of its final clay processing facilities.
OD6 says its new plant flowsheet will slash hydrochloric acid use from 37.12 kilograms per tonne to 7.12kg/t, while boosting recoveries to an impressive 79 per cent TREO.
By ditching costly tank leaching for a heap leach pad, the company has eliminated complex steps such as clay washing, using energy-intensive filters and recycling about 80 per cent of its acid, which is its most costly operational input.
OD6 says its product should fetch a premium thanks to its high percentage of the magnet rare earths neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium. It also has ultra-low levels of impurities uranium and thorium.
The company's share price rocketed 250 per cent on Wednesday and Thursday to peak at 10.5 cents from last week's 3c close, fuelled by a massive $5 million in stock traded.
OD6 will now court off-take partners across North America, Europe and Asia for its massive 682 million tonne resource at 1338 parts per million (ppm) TREO.
With the talk of price floors and a massive slashing in costs at Splinter Rocks, OD6 has catapulted itself back into the Australian rare earths fray, closing the week in a trading halt ahead of raising funds for a renewed clay hosted rare earths push at its monster WA project.
MOUNT RIDLEY MINES LTD (ASX: MRD)
Up 250% (0.2c – 0.7c)
Snagging silver this week is OD6's Esperance neighbour, Mount Ridley Mines, which rode the rare earths coat tails of its dazzling big brother in the region to see its share price also surge 250 per cent on the week. Mount Ridley's stock rose from 0.2c per share last week to a high 0.7c on Thursday.
Given Bulls N' Bears doesn't do draws, and on the basis of it releasing no news, Mount Ridley took a backseat to the OD6, which is doing a lot of heavy lifting in the complex chemical processing department.
Mount Ridley's eponymous project is just a stone's throw from Splinter Rock and hosts its own smaller, but still considerable, 168-million-tonne clay-hosted resource grading at 1201ppm TREO.
The company says mineralisation at the project is highly analogous to OD6's clays and that previous hydrochloric acid leaching tests positions it as a dark horse to compete on the same field as its more advanced sibling.
Mount Ridley kicked off its own capital raise on the week, spelling out a $830,000 raise and rights combo to advance its metallurgical testwork with ANSTO, mirroring OD6's heap leach innovations.
The project's proximity to Splinter Rock and shared geological traits have given it a second chance at life. For now, this Esperance underdog is riding the sector's tailwinds, but with the world eager to get its hands on a Western rare earths supply, there looks to be plenty of upside left in this $3 million market cap minnow.
ACTIVEPORT GROUP LTD (ASX: ATV)
Up 200% (1.1c – 3.3c)
Charging late to claim the final podium place on Bulls N' Bears Runners is AI solutions co-ordinator Activeport Group, after it launched Australia's first private cloud superhighway Private-Cloud Connect.
The fibre service offers variable bandwidth for private cloud operators and demand inflow, allowing it to deliver a flexible premium service at a reduced cost.
Private-Cloud now hosts three big customers DigiCo, Equinix and NextDC, which are tapping into Activeport's software-orchestrated network for secure and scalable connectivity.
With the Australian artificial intelligence market projected to hit $22 billion by 2030, at a staggering 17 per cent annual growth rate, Activeport says its platforms are cornering a market niche linking private businesses to high-powered data centres.
The market certainly lapped it up, with pundits piling into the stock on Thursday's ASX announcement. The company's share price rocketed to close the week at 3.3c today, up 200 per cent from 1.1c last week, on more than $9 million in stock traded.
The company's ability to scale for heavy workloads, such as data migrations, while optimising daily operations costs has got the sector talking.
Activeport's rapid customer uptake signals it as a strong market fit, allowing Private-Cloud Connect to leverage Australia's growing colocation infrastructure. The company's early dominance has its eyeing partnerships to scale its network into Asia and beyond. With the ASX buzzing over tech innovators, some Aussie darlings are seemingly showing their metal.
ENERGY TRANSITION MINERALS LIMITED (ASX: ETM)
Up 180% (5.5c – 15c)
Closing out the Runners list this week is another rare earths hopeful in Energy Transition Minerals (ETM), which last week strategically scooped up its Penouta tin-tantalum-niobium mine in Galicia, Spain, for €5.2 million (A$9.2m) through an insolvency process. Surprisingly, that wasn't why the company's share price was running.
Despite its promising new project, a feature story on Channel Nine's 60 Minutes program on Sunday really got ETM's stock going. Company management rather cheekily suggested on air that there were billions to tens of billions of dollars' worth of value in the ground at its Kvanefjeld rare earths project in southern Greenland, which is owned through an ETM subsidiary.
This was followed by a quick retraction followed on Monday, but the company's share price was already humming. It shot from 5.5c to 15c intraday on a massive $13 million in stock traded.
As the 60 Minutes' segment highlighted, Greenland is now and has long been opposed to mining, which might be why ETM added its Penouta project to the fold last week.
The tin mine looks an absolute steal and has a shot at operating in the near term. Its existing infrastructure includes a new 1-million-tonne per annum gravity processing plant, which is primed for a restart, pending Spanish regulatory approvals.
Acquired at a steep discount from its €28 million ($49.5 million) historical cost, Penouta's sunk capital and recent operation has ETM saying it offers a low-risk bet in a promising tin market experiencing its own supply squeezes.
Penouta has a 1.1-billion-tonne rare earths resource, which complements its near-term cash flow potential. Additionally, ETM is freshly cashed up to navigate the project's regulatory approvals process and any permitting hurdles. One thing's for sure, if it can use its Spain proceeds to pull off its mammoth mine in Greenland, ETM will be on its way to becoming a powerhouse rare earths provider on a global scale.
Is your ASX-listed company doing something interesting? Contact:
matt.birney@wanews.com.au
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
34 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
This couple spent $500 trying to buy their dream home. They never stood a chance
Clutching a bright yellow bidding panel, amid a crowd of onlookers stretched across a concrete driveway, Rebecca Borkman was quietly hopeful she was about to secure her dream home. Advertised at just $700,000, the two-bedroom townhouse in the Sydney suburb of Bankstown was within the budget of Borkman and her partner, Byron Tolley, with $150,000 to spare. The couple were so serious about the home that they had shelled out more than $500 to obtain pest, building and strata reports in preparation, and discussed bidding tactics. But it soon became clear they never stood a chance. What Borkman, 33, didn't know when she arrived at the auction was that the reserve price for the property was $850,000, more than 20 per cent above the advertised guide. The sale had lured 18 registered bidders, and the townhouse sold for $896,000. 'As soon as that auction started, we were wondering why we even bothered showing up or getting excited,' Borkman said. 'If they let us know that the reserve was anywhere even around $800,000, we wouldn't have put so much time and money into it. But they [the agent] were firm on the $700,000 guide.' Scenes like this are repeated at weekend auctions across the country. In response to an online survey, almost 5600 people told this masthead's Bidding Blind investigation that they had spent money and time investigating properties that they would later discover they could not afford. A separate data analysis of more than 36,000 auction listings reveals that more often than not Sydneysiders and Melburnians are being misled by advertised price guides. That means Australians are forking out thousands of dollars on multiple pest and building inspections, contract reviews and strata reports during extended property hunts, only for the homes they had fallen in love with to sell hundreds of thousands of dollars above the guide. Several Victorian buyers said they had recently paid for a building inspection on homes advertised within their budget. Then, even though auction bidding surpassed the top end of the sale guide – sometimes by hundreds of thousands of dollars – the home was passed in because it didn't meet the vendor's reserve. 'Agents often argue that it's the buyers and auctions that drive up the price, but conversations with the agent often indicate early on that the buyer wants a much higher rate than advertised,' said one of these prospective buyers. Another buyer looking in Sydney's inner west, a hotspot for underquoting complaints, said it felt like they were being constantly scammed. 'We are often lied to about vendor expectations and then spend money on building reports, contract reviews by lawyers ... We recently had an experience where the auction guide was $1.7 million and the reserve was closer to $2.2 million.' Following the Bidding Blind investigation, the Victorian and NSW governments are facing pressure from industry groups, consumers and opposition parties to stem the tide of wasted cash by overhauling underquoting laws. Victoria's peak real estate lobby group announced it would support the mandatory pre-auction disclosure of reserve prices by sellers, a significant policy shift for a group long resistant to such a proposal. Key real estate industry leaders in NSW have also backed that model, with both state governments promising to seek advice or continue consultation on potential solutions. Another idea to stem the cost of inaccurate price guides is to require vendors to provide prospective purchasers with free building and pest inspections before auction, as is the case in the ACT. 'There will still be buyers who will want to get their own independent report, but this removes the cost and the double up for a large portion of buyers, and it would directly remove the financial harm of underquoting,' said Consumer Policy Research Centre chief executive Erin Turner. In NSW, agents are required to provide prospective purchasers with a contract of sale and disclose issues such as whether the property has been subject to recent flooding, has any external combustible cladding or has been the scene of a murder or manslaughter in the past five years. In Victoria, sellers are legally required to provide a 'section 32 vendor's statement', which details information about any easements, zonings, strata scheme management and fees and whether a property is in a bushfire-prone area. However, buyers in both states are encouraged to seek their own building inspections, which usually cost between $300 and $1000 depending on the size of the property and whether a pest inspection is included. Contract reviews, also recommended, will generally cost $200 or $300. And in NSW, buyers have to pay a fee to access strata reports. 'It's not unusual to get 30 or 40 people through a home … let's just say half of them [arranged inspections and other due diligence] – there's 15 grand down the toilet,' said buyers agent Paul Mulligan. Loading 'There are a lot of gutted buyers out there, and what ends up happening is even worse than the cost [because] they go out and then they buy a place out of frustration, and potentially overpay or buy a lemon. It's huge. It's a huge consumer cost, emotionally and financially.' Victorian buyers advocate David Morrell, who described underquoting as 'cheating', said the practice came with an 'opportunity cost' for prospective buyers who missed out on properties when they didn't obtain access to enough pre-approved finance due to misleading price guides. 'If the agent hadn't lied to you at the start, you'd be living in your favourite home,' Morrell said. As a former property manager at a real estate agency, Rebecca Borkman felt like she should have been in a better position than most to navigate the auction process when she was searching for a home in Sydney last year. But the human resources professional said her experience was so painful that she eventually refused to consider buying any property that was being auctioned. Borkman and her partner instead bought a home in Carlingford, in Sydney's north-west, through a private sale. 'If something came up for auction, we would immediately write it off the list, no matter how much it suited our needs, because it was so damaging to our bank account, to our self-esteem and to our emotional wellbeing,' she said. 'If even I, with that experience [of being a property manager] in my past, feel almost scammed, then what's someone who has no idea what they're getting themselves into meant to do?' Borkman said the reason they had fallen in love with the Bankstown townhouse, with its front and back garden and 297-square-metre block, was because it had been undervalued by the $700,000 auction guide. 'The minute that we showed up there and looked at the property, I thought, 'This is so far beyond anything else that we had seen within that price range' … as it turns out, we were looking at a property that was worth $900,000.'
Sydney Morning Herald
34 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Helicopter parent? Yep. Hypocrite? For sure. Why more and more of us are tracking our kids
I slipped into the Apple Store furtively, not quite sure what I was doing was right. My child would soon be walking to school on her own, I said. And I wanted to track her. The shop assistant met my query with total approval. As though what I was seeking – to digitally surveille my own kid – was perfectly normal. So I bought the AirTag, which would nestle into her school backpack and assure me that she had arrived at school safely. Electronic stalking of children by their parents is increasingly common. And it's a controversial topic. Is it a valid and respectful way to ensure our children's safety? Or is it an invasion of privacy which is contributing to the anxiety epidemic among kids who have only ever known a world dominated by the smartphone? The phenomenon brings to mind comedian Tina Fey's quip about using Photoshop to digitally alter images: 'it is appalling and a tragic reflection on the moral decay of our society … unless I need it, in which case, everybody be cool'. Whether it's right or wrong, a bias towards surveillance is clearly the prevailing parental sentiment – this week the California-based family tracking app Life360 reported its half-yearly earnings, which showed record revenue growth. The business is worth $9.5 billion, and is expanding into the tracking of ageing relatives and family pets. In Australia, use of Life360 has surged from 1.9 million monthly active users in 2023 to 2.7 million in 2024. 'We're seeing the rise of what we call the anxiety economy – a shift where families are making more values-based decisions and prioritising peace of mind in how they spend,' said the company's newly announced chief executive, Lauren Antonoff. 'I think of us as the antidote for the anxiety. We're not telling people that there's danger around every corner, but we know that people think about this stuff.' The company recently released an advertisement that went viral, which satirised the very parental anxiety it monetises. The ad featured a mother singing a Disney-style song to her teenage daughter called I think of you (dying) in which the mother voices her catastrophic thoughts about the fatal disasters that could befall her child while she's out of sight. They include getting stuck in a mine, being kidnapped by bandits and bleeding out on the street.
The Age
34 minutes ago
- The Age
The problem with taking advice from ‘finfluencers'
For better or worse, now when people go looking for life advice or want to find answers to burning questions, the place we increasingly turn to is social media. And sure, there are a lot of areas in our lives where this can be great. Suggestions on how to use up half a can of chickpeas or learning how to braid your hair is one thing. But when it comes to things like our health and finances, the risks associated with getting advice from unqualified influencers are exponentially higher. That's one of the reasons that I was happy to see that the Australian Securities and Investments Commissions recently took part in a global crackdown on financial influencers, also known as 'finfluencers', along with regulators from the United Kingdom, Italy, Hong Kong, Canada and the United Arab Emirates. Following the crackdown, ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland explained: 'It's important that consumers separate fun from fact when it comes to influencer content. Popularity doesn't equal credibility.' In other words, a finfluencer might have 100,000 people eager to listen to what they have to say, but that doesn't mean they have the qualifications, expertise or a legal right to be saying it in the first place. In the UK alone, the regulator issued 650 requests for content to be removed from social media, 50 takedown requests to websites being operated by influencers, and seven cease and desist letters. The regulators also invited four influencers in for interviews, and made three arrests. In Australia, though, the fallout was much smaller, with ASIC issuing just 18 warning notices to financial influencers suspected of providing unlicensed financial advice and/or unlawfully spruiking high-risk financial products. Loading As tempting as it might be to think that our markedly smaller numbers are a sign of Australian finfluencers being better, more honest people than those in other nations, that's not quite it. The main reason for our A+ performance is a thing called INFO 269, which are guidelines ASIC issued in 2022 specifically outlining the rules and regulations for social media influencers offering financial advice. In addition to breaking down the legal standards influencers are required to meet before discussing or promoting stocks, financial products or investment funds, the guidelines also make the consequences of breaking any rules crystal clear: up to five years in jail, or fines of over $1 million. These threats aren't idle, either. In 2021, ASIC successfully filed a lawsuit against Tyson Scholz, an Australian finfluencer who dubbed himself the 'ASX Wolf'. At the time, Scholz was offering stock tips via paid online subscriber groups to his Instagram followers, which sat at well over 100,000 people. At the time, though, Scholz did not hold a valid financial services licence, meaning his advice specifically on what stocks to buy was against the law. By 2023, he was facing bankruptcy over a $450,000 court-imposed debt from the regulator. And it's not just finance influencers who are being closely watched and regulated, either. In 2022, the Therapeutic Goods Administration announced restrictions on how influencers post about products such as vitamins, protein powders, supplements, sunscreen, medical devices and medicines. These changes mean influencers must clearly disclose if they are in partnership with a brand, and they also cannot share their personal experience with therapeutic products.
