Pakistan's much hyped JF-17 fighter jet with Chinese frame and Russian engine costs..., much cheaper than India's...
New Delhi: Tensions between India and Pakistan are at an all-time high following the ceasefire. During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan attacked several Indian border towns with drones and missiles. India also retaliated strongly and destroyed many Pakistani targets.
In the meantime, there is a lot of discussion about India's Rafale fighter jet and Pakistan's JF-17 Thunder fighter jet. India has purchased Rafale from France, while the JF-17 Thunder has been jointly developed by China and Pakistan. There is a significant price difference between the two. Rafale is considered the second most expensive fighter in the world after the F-22, while the price of JF-17 Thunder is comparatively much lower.
The JF-17 Thunder is considered the backbone of Pakistan's Air Force alongside the F-16 fighter. It was built by the Chinese company Avic Chengdu Aircraft Co Ltd. Shares of this company rose by 53 percent in five days during the conflict.
The JF-17 Thunder is a fourth-generation lightweight, single-engine multirole fighter. It has been jointly developed by Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) and China's Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC).
The JF-17 can be used for multiple roles, including interception, ground attack, anti-ship, and aerial reconnaissance. The JF-17 can deploy diverse ordnance, including air-to-air, air-to-surface, and anti-ship missiles, guided and unguided bombs, and a 23 mm GSh-23-2 twin-barrel autocannon. Powered by a Guizhou WS-13 or Klimov RD-93 afterburning turbofan, it has a top speed of Mach 1.6. The JF-17 was inducted in the PAF in February 2010.
Although a lot of makeshift technology has been used in this fighter, it features a Chinese airframe, a Western avionics system, and a Russian engine. Its biggest advantage is that it is very cheap. This is why countries that cannot afford expensive fighters like Rafale, F-16, and Eurofighter Typhoon opt for JF-17 Thunder. These include Azerbaijan, Myanmar, and Nigeria.
According to media reports, the price of one unit is 25 million dollars, which is about 2.13 billion rupees, while the price of Rafale is around 135 million dollars or 11 billion rupees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
11 minutes ago
- News18
Can China Weaponise Brahmaputra Waters Against India?
After the Pahalgam terror attack, India paused the Indus Waters Treaty, demanding action from Pakistan on cross-border terror. Now, a top Chinese policy adviser has issued a veiled warning over India's control of the Brahmaputra. Could China trigger a water war? Tune in to News18 Explainers for the full breakdown.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
India's long game to end Pakistan's short wars: The postscript of Op Sindoor
The era of running a short war and finishing with a scratch or two is over read more Once the war was over and the fog had cleared, the ruins emerged from behind an ebbing curtain of smoke. The picture revealed was different from the one accompanying the noise during the skirmish. It unravelled the context behind the conflict and explained the dismantling of Rahim Yar Khan, Noor Khan airbases and the megalomania of Pakistani generals. Outside the warzone, the fog of war is known to claim the uninitiated and the fantasists. There is another ready victim: the eternally complexed. An affliction so rooted in wars with India over the years, this inadequacy had refused to leave the imagination of Pakistani generals who remain hopelessly obsessed with their neighbour. And for that reason alone, they embraced short wars that increased their whimsies of dabbling in false claims. This time, the Rawalpindi generals once again hoped to fight a war and claim victory, which they did. But they were not quite prepared for India's military and political response. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Provocation and Response Let's begin with Pakistan's historic lack of appetite for sustaining a conflict once begun. In 1965, Ayub Khan and Zulfiqar Bhutto asked the Chinese if a short war was possible with India. When Zhou Enlai told them to be prepared to lose cities in a war, they balked at the thought. Eventually, they fought a short war, and stopped when Indian forces were a few miles away from Lahore. Pakistan argued that though it did not lose Lahore, it kept India from winning outright. In 1971, they could have again fought a war short of ruin, with the US ready to intervene. However, India's lightning campaign in East Pakistan put paid to those plans and thus, Pakistan lost its eastern part. For a long time thereafter, General Zia-ul Haq found a way forward: he thought up a devious but effective plan of engaging vulnerable Indian states through low intensity conflicts and stayed under the radar. The approach served Pakistan well in Punjab and later, in Kashmir. During the cold war era, insurgency in Punjab kept India domestically occupied. In fact, when India's army chief Gen Sundarji launched Exercise Brasstacks in the 1980s, a rattled Zia, worried about Pakistan being severed, flew to Jaipur to discuss peace with Indian PM Rajiv Gandhi. Zia understood the benefits Pakistan could accrue through a low intensity war. Pakistan was not nuclear-ready then. Zia's 'thousand cuts policy' for India was predicated on the assumption that a low intensity conflict could continue without escalating into a full-blown war. There was a notion that persevering with continued attacks would elicit a similar response from India: a counter militancy campaign and a strong diplomatic rebuttal. The nuclearisation of Pakistan helped Rawalpindi to browbeat the world into submission through the threat of the bomb. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Each time the ISI worked with terrorist organisations using them as a proxy, the Pakistani army got away with an excuse, and often, an indifference built on arrogance. Over two decades, India sent to Pakistan 20 letters, dossiers, DNA samples of terrorists involved in 26/11, Pathankot, Pulwama, and Nagrota. After the Pathankot attacks in 2016, a Pakistani team arrived in India, conducted interviews with 16 witnesses and were given DNA samples of four terrorists. However, Islamabad chose to discard the evidence and mocked India's claims. A Uniqueness of Op Sindoor A rogue government thrives on being unpredictable. Each time, the Pakistani generals flaunted their first mover unpredictability, India responded like a reasonable but firm neighbour. Each time, India responded diplomatically. And then, followed the quick military strikes in the last few years. This time when terrorists struck Pahalgam, Pakistan expected the Indian government to respond similarly, albeit with an aggression they sensed this government could muster. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What Pakistan did not quite expect was the scale of response alongside the speed and the precision with which India struck to raze the terrorist bases with its first round of strikes. By taking out Abdul Rauf Azhar, Jaish e Mohammed associates of Masood Azhar and hitting army bases deep inside Pakistan, India achieved five things. One, it had taken out a terrorist who had killed a high-profile Western journalist of a global media house: Daniel Pearl. The parallels were unambiguous: Osama bin Laden was once a guest in Pakistan till the US took him out. Similarly, Azhar was a guest in Pakistan till India eliminated him. Two, more importantly, Pakistan as the guarantor failed to protect its protégé, the underwriter crashed its credibility and the confidence of Rawalpindi, that once stood on the construct of a nuclear bulwark, appeared shaken. The arrogance, an unwilling accomplice, sought to test the Indian appetite for escalation. Three, India showed the ability to strike American assets, nuclear gateways and Chinese HQ9s that presented a worrying proposition for Pakistan's sponsors. India struck ammunition dumps and bases in Rafiqui, Murid, Chaklala, Rahim Yar Khan, Sukkur, Chunian, Pasrur, and Sialkot that upset American calculations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Fourthly, in a controlled manner, India became a rare nuclear state to wage a successful war short of the nuclear threshold. Fifthly, India showed that while Americans deployed yesterday's weapon systems – expensive and large – in today's wars, India was using today's weapons for battlefields of tomorrow. SCALP, Harop, Schilka, loitering kamikaze drones ran Pakistani defences ragged and disembowelled any pretences. India showed how much its weapons technology had progressed. The Akash missile system, a DRDO product, neutralized aerial threats up to 25-30 km and created a dome that intercepted Pakistani missiles. Then, there was the D4 Anti-Drone detection system, Dhanush Howitzer, a modern version of Bofors, and the ATAGS (Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System). These five outcomes were too much to swallow for stakeholders in the west that believed in setting the rules and controlling their outcomes. Reactions to Indian Response We all know what happened next. Initially, the Pakistani social media assault blinded the western media into publishing incorrect versions indicating a favourable performance of the air defences. A few mischievous media platforms even published salivating inaccurate stories, their writing led by insincere journalism and a compromised conscience. With that, it was quickly assumed that India had lost the information war. Then, the fog lifted and satellite pictures of damages to the Pakistani military bases, AWACs, hangars, air bases emerged. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Global analysts such as Tom Cooper, John Spencer and Bruce Reidel called out the destruction of Pakistani assets as evidence of how deep India could strike into Pakistan, and the whole picture changed. Tom Cooper said that India's retaliation to Pakistani aggression following Operation Sindoor was a 'clear-cut victory'. Jennifer Zeng, member of the international press association, wrote how India carried out a series of precise strikes that destroyed Pakistan's air defence systems and military bases. John Spencer said Operation Sindoor 'exceeded its strategic aims' and showcased India's military dominance. Japanese strategic expert Satoru Nagao from the Hudson Institute described India's response as a 'responsible and proper' one against Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism. On the other hand, a well-known New York publication tried to downplay the Pakistani damage, but to no avail. Satellite pictures from neutral agencies lifted the veneer of hypocrisy hiding a biased western media, long cultivated by a cohort of manipulative deep state agencies, the American arms industry and others. These news agencies were cleverly staffed by Pakistani reporters and cunningly positioned as 'the brand of truth.' Pakistan has spoken about the downing of India's Rafales but could never produce proof whereas India produced satellite images of dismantled sites, extracted from Maxar Technologies. Though India's Chief of Defence Staff, in a recent interview, did allude to India losing aircraft but that statement doesn't deviate from the final outcome, reflected in the images of neutralised Pakistani targets. In fact, the Pakistani Prime Minister admitted to Indian strikes hitting inside Pakistan. Reality has edged closer to the truth, and so has the narrative. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Discovering a Field Marshal Realising that the ground was slipping away from beneath their feet, Pakistan decided to play the domestic card (remember that the Pakistani army is likely to have initiated the entire mess to keep itself in power and deny Imran Khan domestic leverage). A victory was declared to prevent national embarrassment due to the revealed pictures of wrecked assets and army bases. The Pakistani air force had also wrested the 'centre of gravity' (reassigning PAF Air Vice Marshal and spokesperson Aurangzeb Ahmed's frivolous expression) from the all-powerful Pakistani army in this conflict. Air Chief Marshal Babar Siddhu and the PAF spokesman garnered limelight, which sidelined General Asim Munir. A knee jerk response followed: Munir was catapulted into a manufactured phenomenon bigger than either Zia or Musharraf, despite the more illustrious records of the two generals. Munir was promoted to the rank of a Field Marshal, spawning memes aplenty. The eternally complexed Pakistani army now had a new arch rival – the Pakistani air force. By their own admission, the Pakistanis believed the air force did well, while the army had a minor role. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Long Game: Mind and Matter In the aftermath of the conflict, Indian defence stocks surged up to 39 per cent. India's indigenous systems such as drones, electronic warfare systems showed that private manufacturers can play a big role in national security, and indigenously-developed platforms showcased their central utility in an operation, significantly boosting investor sentiment. The BrahMos supersonic missile witnessed an increase in orders from Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have shown an interest in BrahMos. Chengdu Aircraft also gained 36 per cent as Chinese military platforms received increased orders from Pakistan. On the other hand, Lockheed Martin's stock (LM) has been experiencing a downturn, partly due to concerns about the future of America's F-35 programme. These are material indicators of the performances of weapons. That also has explained President Donald Trump's exaggerated and somewhat comical haste to appropriate America's role in defusing the conflict. Aside from Pakistan, the other loser was America as its weapon systems did not perform to expectations. India, on the other hand, has traditionally had issues of disagreement as a democracy. This time, a team of politicians cutting across parties jointly presented India's case to the world. In Op Sindoor, a jointness among India's military forces showed the way in the war. After the war, a well thought out political jointness in its outreach to the world has shown the way forward. Messrs Jay Panda, Ravishankar Prasad, Shashi Tharoor, Shrikant Shinde from India's global outreach team have footslogged their way across countries to articulate India's case. The impact is telling: despite India taking the initiative to strike military targets inside Pakistan, none of the nation states, barring the usual supporters of the Pakistani government, have criticised India's action. Colombia, which sided with Pakistan on its comments on the conflict, reversed its decision soon. The era of running a short war and finishing with a scratch or two is over. According to Tom Cooper, Pakistan's nuclear warheads were rendered undeployable after India struck the nuclear storage facility at Kirana Hills. Using compellence as a strategy, the information war is underway, the red line of India's patience altered and the costs of waging future conflict imposed on Pakistan. It is a war intended to render undeployable Pakistan's capacity to continue a long war – economically and militarily. The writer is the author of 'Watershed 1967: India's Forgotten Victory over China' and 'Camouflaged: Forgotten Stories From Battlefields'. His fortnightly column for Firstpost — 'Beyond the Lines' — covers military history, strategic issues, international affairs and policy-business challenges. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. Tweets @iProbal.
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Rupee falters as bullish exits, dollar strength collide
MUMBAI, June 4 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee slipped on Thursday as a combination of bullish position unwinding and dollar strength pushed the local currency to near the 86 level against the U.S. dollar. The rupee slipped to 85.9125 against the U.S. dollar before paring losses to an extent. It was last quoted at 85.85, down 0.3% on the day. The currency is now on track for its sixth decline in seven sessions, having hit 84.78 last Monday. "The market is backing off earlier long rupee bets," said a currency trader at a bank. "You can see that in the price action. Its not helping that the dollar overall has found a bit of footing and we are seeing equity outflows.' Foreign investors pulled out more than $300 million from domestic equities on Wednesday, according to preliminary data, adding to outflows of more than $1 billion in the previous three sessions. Meanwhile, the dollar index inched higher, extending Tuesday's advance that was underpinned by an unexpected rise in U.S. job openings. More labour market data is due through the week, with the key highlight being Friday's non-farm payrolls report for May — a key input for assessing the Federal Reserve's interest rate path. Asian currencies were mostly weaker, with sentiment dominated by developments around trade negotiations between the U.S. and its partners. The Trump administration has set a Wednesday deadline for countries to submit their best trade offers. President Donald Trump is expected to speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping this week, according to the White House. The call comes amid renewed tensions, with both sides accusing each other of breaching last month's agreement to roll back certain tariffs. (Reporting by Nimesh Vora; Editing by Janane Venkatraman)
