
$14 billion in clean energy projects have been cancelled in the US this year, analysis says
More than $14 billion in clean energy investments in the US have been cancelled or delayed this year, according to an analysis released Thursday, as President Donald Trump's pending megabill has raised fears over the future of domestic battery, electric vehicle and solar and wind energy development.
Many companies are concerned that investments will be in jeopardy amid House Republicans' passage of a tax bill that would gut clean energy credits, nonpartisan group E2 said in its analysis of projects that it and consultancy Atlas Public Policy tracked.
The groups estimate the losses since January have also cost 10,000 new clean energy jobs.
The tax credits, bolstered in the landmark climate bill passed under former President Joe Biden in 2022, are crucial for boosting renewable technologies key to the clean energy transition. E2 estimates that $132 billion in plans have been announced since the so-called Inflation Reduction Act passed, not counting the cancellations.
Last week's House bill effectively renders moot many of the law's incentives. Advocacy groups decried the potential impact that could have on the industry after the multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package passed.
"The House's plan coupled with the administration's focus on stomping out clean energy and returning us to a country powered by coal and gas guzzlers is causing businesses to cancel plans, delay their plans and take their money and jobs to other countries instead," E2 executive director Bob Keefe said.
The Senate is now reviewing the bill with an informal July 4 deadline to get it to the president's desk.
What has been canceled Some of the most recent cancellations include the Kore Power battery factory in Arizona and BorgWarner's closure of two EV manufacturing sites in Michigan. Bosch suspended a $200 million investment in a hydrogen fuel cell factory in South Carolina, citing changes within the market over the past year in a statement to The Associated Press.
Tariffs, inflationary pressures, nascent company struggles and low adoption rates for some technologies may also have been reasons for these companies' plans changing. For instance, the battery storage and electric vehicle sectors have seen the most impact in 2025, with the latter especially having had had a difficult past few years. Several projects spurred by the IRA were also canceled prior to 2025.
Of the projects canceled this year, most, more than $12 billion worth, came in Republican-led states and congressional districts, the analysis said. Red districts have benefited more than blue ones from an influx of clean energy development and jobs, experts say.
Georgia and Tennessee are particularly at risk because they are highly invested in EV and battery production, said Marilyn Brown, an energy policy professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology who was not involved in the analysis.
"If all of a sudden these tax credits are removed, I'm not sure how these ongoing projects are going to continue," said Fengqi You, an engineering professor at Cornell University who also was not involved.
A handful of Republican lawmakers have urged the continuation of energy tax credits, with some saying in an April letter to Senate majority leader John Thune, R-SD that a repeal could disrupt the American people and weaken the county's position as a global energy leader.
The US and the global stage The Trump administration has sought to dismantle much of Biden's environmental and climate-related policy - what he calls the Democrats' "green new scam" - withdrawing again from the Paris climate agreement, rolling back countless landmark pollution regulations and environmental initiatives, reconsidering scientific findings supporting climate action, blocking renewable energy sources and more in an effort to bolster a fossil fuel-led "American energy dominance" agenda.
Meanwhile other countries are proceeding with green investments. The European Parliament is committing to the European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a policy meant to prevent "carbon leakage," or companies moving production to countries where climate policies are less strict. And the International Maritime Organization is moving toward a global carbon tax on shipping.
In a sign that not all hope is lost for the future of renewables in the US, April alone saw nearly $500 million in new development, with Japanese manufacturing company Hitachi's energy arm building out transmission and electrification operations in Virginia and materials and technology company Corning investing in solar manufacturing in Michigan.
Still, $4.5 billion in development was canceled or delayed last month, according to E2's tally.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump, Putin hint at US-Russia trade revival, but business environment remains hostile
Moscow, Hundreds of foreign companies left Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including major US firms like Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Co. But after more than three years of war, President Donald Trump has held out the prospect of restoring US-Russia trade if there's ever a peace settlement. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has said foreign companies could come back under some circumstances. 'Russia wants to do large scale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic bloodbath' is over, and I agree,' Trump said in a statement after a phone call with Putin. 'There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.' The president then shifted his tone toward Putin after heavy drone and missile attacks on Kyiv, saying Putin 'has gone absolutely crazy' and threatening new sanctions. Recent comments from Putin warning Western companies against reclaiming their former stakes seemed to reflect reality more accurately — that it's not going to be a smooth process for businesses going back into Russia. That's because Russia's business environment has massively changed since 2022. And not in ways that favor foreign companies. And with Putin escalating attacks and holding on to territory demands Ukraine likely isn't going to accept, a peace deal seems distant indeed. Here are factors that could deter U.S. companies from ever going back: Russian law classifies Ukraine's allies as 'unfriendly states' and imposes severe restrictions on businesses from more than 50 countries. Those include limits on withdrawing money and equipment as well as allowing the Russian government to take control of companies deemed important. Foreign owners' votes on boards of directors can be legally disregarded. Companies that left were required to sell their businesses for 50% or less of their assessed worth, or simply wrote them off while Kremlin-friendly business groups snapped up their assets on the cheap. Under a 2023 presidential decree the Russian government took control of Finnish energy company Fortum, German power company Unipro, France's dairy company Danone and Danish brewer Carlsberg. Even if a peace deal removed the US from the list of unfriendlies, and if the massive Western sanctions restricting business in Russia were dropped, the track record of losses would remain vivid. And there's little sign any of that is going to happen. While the Russian government has talked in general about companies coming back, 'there's no specific evidence of any one company saying that they are ready to come back,' said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. 'It's all at the political narrative level.' Russia's actions and legal changes have left 'long-lasting damage' to its business environment, says Elina Ribakova, non-resident senior fellow at the Bruegel research institute in Brussels. She said a return of US businesses is 'not very likely.' In a meeting at the Kremlin on May 26 to mark Russian Entrepreneurs Day, Putin said that Russia needed to throttle large tech firms such as Zoom and Microsoft, which had restricted their services in Russia after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, so that domestic tech companies could thrive instead. 'We need to strangle them,' Putin said. 'After all, they are trying to strangle us: we need to reciprocate. We didn't kick anyone out; we didn't interfere with anyone. We provided the most favorable conditions possible for their work here, in our market, and they are trying to strangle us.' He reassured a representative from Vkusno-i Tochka — the Russian-owned company that took over McDonald's restaurants in the country — that Moscow would aid them if the US fast food giant tried to buy back its former stores. Asked for comment, McDonald's referred to their 2022 statement that 'ownership of the business in Russia is no longer tenable.' On top of Russia's difficult business environment, the economy is likely to stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military, economists say. 'Russia has one of the lowest projected long-term growth rates and one of the highest levels of country risk in the world,' says Heli Simola, senior economist at the Bank of Finland in a blog post. 'Only Belarus offers an equally lousy combination of growth and risk.' Most of the opportunity to make money is related to military production, and it's unlikely US companies would work with the Russian military-industrial complex, said Ribakova. 'It's not clear where exactly one could plug in and expect outsize returns that would compensate for this negative investment environment.' Some companies, including Renault and Ford Motor Co, left with repurchase agreements letting them buy back their stakes years later if conditions change. But given Russia's unsteady legal environment, that's tough to count on. The Russian purchasers may try to change the terms, look for more money, or ignore the agreements, said Weafer. 'There's a lot of uncertainty as to how those buyback auctions will be enforced.' But what about the oil and gas? Multinational oil companies were among those who suffered losses leaving Russia, so it's an open question whether they would want to try again even given Russia's vast oil and gas reserves. US.. major ExxonMobil saw its stake in the Sakhalin oil project unilaterally terminated and wrote off $3.4 billion. Russia's major oil companies have less need of foreign partners than they did in the immediate post-Soviet era, though smaller oil field services might want to return given the size of Russia's oil industry. But they would have to face new requirements on establishing local presence and investment, Weafer said. According to the Kyiv School of Economics, 2,329 foreign companies are still doing business in Russia, many from China or other countries that aren't allied with Ukraine, while 1,344 are in the process of leaving and 494 have exited completely. The Yale School of Management's Chief Executive Leadership Institute lists some two dozen US companies still doing business in Russia, while some 100 more have cut back by halting new investments. EU sanctions could remain even if US open US sanctions are considered the toughest, because they carry the threat of being cut off from the U.S. banking and financial system. But the EU is still slapping new rounds of sanctions on Russia. Even if U.S. sanctions are dropped, EU sanctions would continue to present compliance headaches for any company that also wants to do business in Europe. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
From TACO to FAFO, investors love parodies of Trump acronyms
Four months into President Donald Trump's second term, market observers have taken a cue from his fondness for condensing slogans into catchy acronyms like MAGA, DOGE and MAHA, and devised a few of their own that have been spreading across trading desks. Even those acronyms that do not directly reflect a specific trading strategy, still capture factors that traders say are important in Trump-era markets, such as volatility and uncertainty, that investors need to consider when making decisions. Some of the new labels are associated with investment strategies that aimed to capitalized on Trump's economic and trade polices, and international relations goals. Others riff off economic implications or his abrupt U-turns as markets and trade partners react to his proposals. The "Trump Trade" that played on the Make America Great Again theme in the wake of his November election victory and January inauguration, and contributed to record highs on Wall Street in February, is hardly discussed now that stocks, the dollar and Treasury bonds have succumbed to worries about his tariff polices. "Post the election, we heard a lot about YOLO (You Only Live Once), which seemed to promote taking outsize risks in a concentrated investment theme," Art Hogan, strategist at B. Riley Wealth, said. YOLO, is an acronym used to describe the tendency that was part of that Trump trade to chase high momentum strategies such as cryptocurrency. "While the term YOLO was popular for a period of time, it goes against all traditional advice," Hogan said. Here are of few more acronyms that have gotten play in the investment world in recent weeks: ** TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) - This one coined by a Financial Times columnist, has been used as a way to describe Trump's to-ing and fro-ing on tariffs in the wake of his April 2 "Liberation Day" speech. When asked about TACO in a recent press conference, the president lashed out, calling the question "nasty" "Where we end up might not be too far from what he promised on the campaign trail. So, does he always chicken out? I wouldn't go as far as to say that," said Christian DiClementi, fixed income portfolio manager at AllianceBernstein. "I think that he wants to rebalance the economy without pushing it off a cliff. And we're watching that being executed in real time. I think some of the ideas are thought out and some of them change on the fly." ** MEGA (Make Europe Great Again) - Mega first coined last year to address European competitiveness, resurfaced this Spring as a way to describe the flurry of investor interest in and flows into European markets. MEGA hats, spoofing their MAGA counterparts, are easily purchased online It's been revived by investors and traders in light of the outperformance European stocks in the immediate aftermath of Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs bombshell. ** MAGA (Make America Go Away) - While the original Trump Trade was also known as the MAGA trade, this variation cribbed the president's motto, first appearing in response to Vice President JD Vance's brief and unfruitful visit to Greenland, the autonomous territory of Denmark, which Trump has expressed interest in annexing. At least one Canadian investor says that quip is making the rounds of trading desks in Toronto and Montreal and sparking "wishful thinking" about simply boycotting U.S. investments. ** FAFO (Fuck Around and Find Out) - Although the acronym also came into being well before Trump's inauguration, it is being heard with increasing frequency in trading desk conversations. It is used to capture the financial market's volatility and chaos that Trump's policymaking process has created. Mark Spindel, chief investment officer of Potomac River Capital LLC, described the market as being caught in a "pinball machine as a result of that policymaking process." When reached for comment, White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an email "these asinine acronyms convey how unserious analysts have consistently beclowned themselves by mocking President Trump and his agenda that've already delivered multiple expectation-beating jobs and inflation reports, trillions in investment commitments, a historic UK trade agreement, and rising consumer confidence."

Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Wall Street's macro traders get schooled in Trump-Era turbulence
For anyone on Wall Street still clinging to a time-honored macro-investing playbook, Trump 2.0 has been a source of endless punishment. ADVERTISEMENT Market narratives keep shifting faster than traders can adjust positions. Tariffs are on, tariffs are off — then they're on again. One minute it's 'Sell America,' the next 'buy the dip.' Old-school fiscal anxieties land, just as Nvidia Corp. sells a vision of AI-driven productivity nirvana. To cap it off, President Donald Trump's unpredictability — trade, foreign relations, taxes and so on — is making life brutal for institutional pros paid to predict the market cycle. And the numbers show it: macro hedge funds are off to their worst start to a year in at least two decades. That confusion was on full display this week. As the US commander-in-chief fumed over the 'Trump Always Chickens Out' jab, and again as a legal ruling threatened his signature tariff weapon, some on Wall Street braced for retaliation. Yet in the end — buoyed by signs of still-solid corporate earnings and bets on economic resilience — Trump's combative posture failed to scare off risk-loving S&P 500 closed up almost 2% this week, notching a 6% gain overall in May, its best monthly performance since late 2023. High-yield bonds also climbed in May, with an index posting its highest return in 10 months.'Macro trading, which has never been easy, has just taken on a whole other difficult dimension,' said Priya Misra, portfolio manager at JP Morgan Asset Management. 'You can still position for a macro trend but you have to absolutely prevent getting whipsawed.' ADVERTISEMENT Nothing this week inspires much confidence that the rally is built to last. Traders still see the economy sputtering enough to warrant two Federal Reserve rate cuts this year, while the inflation risk from tariffs remains as uncertain as the same time, policy flip-flops, data head-fakes, and the White House's reactive posture have made macro forecasting a bitter exercise. In just six months since Trump's re-election, markets have priced in everything from an economic boom and resurgent inflation to outright recession. ADVERTISEMENT These fast-moving narratives are confounding the macro set, including trend-following quants, futures speculators and managers trying to stay ahead of shifting data. The HFRX Macro/CTA Index is down 4.3% this year through Wednesday, the worst start since at least 2004.'It's been very hard to filter the noise and get to the signal,' said James Athey, a portfolio manager at Marlborough Investment Management Ltd. 'Many systematic strategies have probably struggled, forced to derisk into falling markets, only to find they had low net and gross risk levels when the market turned so they missed the recovery.' ADVERTISEMENT May will go down as a stretch when defensive strategies adopted in the April chaos backfired with rare force. Pain hit value stocks, bearish options, fixed-income havens, trades tied to stagflation — in short, anything premised on the idea that April's volatility would linger or fell as traders questioned the sustainability of US debt. An ETF tracking long-dated bonds (TLT) trailed the S&P 500 by the most since 2022. ADVERTISEMENT Playing it safe in equities proved costly, too. Defensive shares lagged their cyclical counterparts by 10 percentage points, the second-widest gap since the start of the 2009 bull run. Betting on stagflation-like outcomes — slowing growth and strong inflation — misfired. A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. stock basket wagering that scenario tumbled for the worst month in two defensiveness quickly turned into a liability. Two of the largest ETFs linked to the Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX each slumped at least 25%, a moment of reckoning for those who have piled into these protective funds this popular buffer funds such as the FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) — a darling trade of 2025 that limits downside risk while capping the upside — underperformed. So did derivative-powered ETFs like the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) — strategies favored by income-seeking investors that attracted billions this the twists and turns, retail investors who stayed the course are having a moment of quiet vindication. After a record pace of dip buying in April, $10 billion has since flooded the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), a favored destination of retail many investors, the best strategy has been to do nothing, rather than venture into the almost impossible task of figuring out the next Trump turn. Since election day, the S&P 500 is up 2% overall — masking how vicious the whiplash has been, with stocks sinking to the brink of a bear market before a powerful comeback. Another way to frame the market-timing challenge: If you missed the worst five days, you're up over 20% now. If you missed the best five, you're down 16%.To Ed Al-Hussainy, a rates strategist at Columbia Threadneedle, the mistake traders keep making is underestimating the economy's natural resilience. Amid the turbulence, his team is pulling back from aggressive positions. 'There's a great quote that I think comes from the army: 'slow is smooth, and smooth is fast,'' he said. 'They use it to train military recruits. Applies to macro traders as well.' (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)