Pennsylvania man charged with beheading father says he was trying to perform a citizen's arrest
DOYLESTOWN, Pa. — The Pennsylvania man charged with fatally shooting then beheading his father and posting it on YouTube said on the stand Wednesday that the killing was 'Plan B' after trying to arrest his father for what he called false statements and treason.
Justin D. Mohn, 33, took the stand in a suburban Philadelphia courtroom on the third day of his trial on murder and other charges stemming from the Jan. 30, 2024, homicide of his father Michael F. Mohn.
Mohn, dressed in a blue sport coat, shirt and tie, with his arms shackled to his waist, spoke clearly without any apparent emotion for more than two hours of direct testimony and cross examination.
Responding to questions from his attorney, Steven Jones, Mohn said he shot his father in the bathroom of the family's Levittown home after telling him he was going to arrest him. Mohn said his father, who he said was an experienced martial artist, told him he would kill him before he let that happen and reached for the gun.
'Unfortunately, he resisted,' Justin Mohn said, adding: 'I was hoping to perform a citizen's arrest on my father for, ultimately, treason.'
He described a list from his notebook, shone during the trial, that had the lines 'Boom' and 'Slice' as his 'Plan B,' and said he expected his father to go along with the citizen's arrest.
He said he differed politically from his parents, describing them as on the left. He told the court he believed his father wanted to stop him from becoming a politician similar to President Donald Trump and that his father gave false statements in an unrelated civil case Justin Mohn brought in federal court.
Asked why he beheaded his father, he said he wanted to send a message to federal government workers to meet his demands, which included their resignation as well as the cancellation of public debt, among other things. He said he didn't do it out of hatred for his father or to cause trauma to his family. His mother, Denice Mohn, cried in court at the end of the direct questioning from his attorney.
'I knew something such as a severed head would not only go viral but could lessen the violence,' Justin Mohn said.
Prosecutors said Mohn shot his father with a newly purchased pistol, then decapitated him with a kitchen knife and machete. The 14-minute YouTube video he posted was live for several hours before it was removed.
Mohn was arrested later that day after scaling a fence at Fort Indiantown Gap, the state's National Guard headquarters. He said in court he knew it was wrong to jump the fence at the site. Prosecutors said he called for others to join him in attempting to overthrow the U.S. government.
Mohn had a USB device containing photos of federal buildings and apparent instructions for making explosives when he was arrested, authorities said.
He also expressed violent anti-government rhetoric in writings he published online, going back several years. Earlier in the trial, the judge heard from Justin Mohn's mother, who said police came to the house he shared with his parents and warned him about his online postings before the killing.
Denice Mohn testified that she and her husband had been offering financial support and guidance as Justin Mohn looked for a job.
Prosecutors described the homicide as 'something straight out of a horror film.' They said Justin Mohn killed his father — who had been an engineer with the geoenvironmental section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Philadelphia District — to intimidate federal workers, calling it a 'cold, calculated, organized plan.'
The YouTube video included rants about the government, immigration and the border, fiscal policy, urban crime and the war in Ukraine.
In court, Michael Mohn was remembered as a good neighbor and supportive father. In the video posted on YouTube, Justin Mohn described his father as a 20-year federal employee and called him a traitor.
During a competency hearing last year, a defense expert said Mohn wrote a letter to Russia's ambassador to the United States seeking to strike a deal to give Mohn refuge and apologizing to President Vladimir Putin for claiming to be the czar of Russia. The judge ruled Mohn was competent to stand trial.
Evidence presented at the trial included graphic photos and the video posted to YouTube. The judge warned members of the public at the trial about the images and said they could leave before the photos were shown. The proceedings are known as a bench trial, with only a judge, not a jury.
Mike Catalini, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. judge orders temporary halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre
A protester stands outside the migrant detention dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Facility, Saturday, July 12, 2025, in Ochopee, Fla. (AP Photo/Alexandra Rodriguez) MIAMI — A U.S. federal judge on Thursday ordered a temporary halt to construction at an immigration detention centre — built in the middle of the Florida Everglades and dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' — as attorneys argue whether it violates environmental laws. The facility can continue to operate and hold detainees for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but workers will be barred from adding any new filling, paving or infrastructure for the next 14 days. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the ruling during a hearing and said she will issue a written order later Thursday. Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe have asked Williams to issue a preliminary injunction to halt operations and further construction. The suit claims the project threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals and would reverse billions of dollars' worth of environmental restoration. Plaintiffs presented witnesses Wednesday and Thursday in support of the injunction, while attorneys for the state and federal government were scheduled to present next week. Following Thursday's testimony, Paul Schwiep, an attorney for the environmental groups, asked Williams to issue a temporary restraining order that would at least prevent any new construction at the site while the preliminary injunction was argued. Williams asked Florida attorney Jesse Panuccio if the state would agree to halt construction so that she wouldn't need to issue the restraining order. She pointed out that anything built at the site would likely remain there permanently, regardless of how the case was ultimately decided. Panuccio said he couldn't guarantee that the state would stop all work. This sparked an hour-long hearing about the temporary restraining order, which will be in place for the next two weeks while the still ongoing preliminary injunction hearing continues. The crux of the plaintiffs' argument is that the detention facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of major construction projects. Panuccio said during the hearing that although the detention centre would be holding federal detainees, the construction and operation of the facility is entirely under the state of Florida, meaning the NEPA review wouldn't apply. Schwiep said the purpose of the facility is for immigration enforcement, which is exclusively a federal function. He said the facility wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the federal government's desire for a facility to hold detainees. Williams said Thursday that the detention facility was at a minimum a joint partnership between the state and federal government. The lawsuit in Miami against federal and state authorities is one of two legal challenges to the South Florida detention centre which was built more than a month ago by the state of Florida on an isolated airstrip owned by Miami-Dade County. A second lawsuit brought by civil rights groups says detainees' constitutional rights are being violated since they are barred from meeting lawyers, are being held without any charges, and a federal immigration court has canceled bond hearings. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Aug. 18. Under the 55-year-old federal environmental law, federal agencies should have examined how the detention centre's construction would impact the environment, identified ways to minimize the impact and followed other procedural rules such as allowing public comment, according to the environmental groups and the tribe. It makes no difference that the detention centre holding hundreds of detainees was built by the state of Florida since federal agencies have authority over immigration, the suit said. Attorneys for federal and state agencies last week asked Williams to dismiss or transfer the injunction request, saying the lawsuit was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. Even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's southern district is the wrong venue for the lawsuit since the detention centre is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's middle district, they said. Williams had yet to rule on that argument. The lawsuits were being heard as Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis ′ administration apparently was preparing to build a second immigration detention centre at a Florida National Guard training centre in north Florida. At least one contract has been awarded for what's labeled in state records as the 'North Detention Facility.' David Fischer, The Associated Press
CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
Bombardier to grow private jet aftermarket service across U.S.
A plane is seen at a Bombardier facility during a federal election campaign stop, in Dorval, Que., Thursday, April 24, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christopher Katsarov Bombardier said on Thursday it would expand existing service centres and likely open new ones in the United States to drive higher revenues, as the Canadian business jet maker meets higher customer demand for its aftermarket care. The expansion is expected to roll out over the coming years and will focus on both regions where the company currently operates as well as new ones, Bombardier said in a statement, without disclosing the names of the areas. The planemaker, which has service centers in Dallas, Tucson, Hartford, Wichita and Miami, is now focusing its global aftermarket growth strategy on the United States, the world's largest market for private jets. More than half of the fleet of 5,100 aircraft operated by Bombardier customers are located in the U.S. An April statement by a Connecticut state lawmaker said Bombardier was planning to expand its facility in Hartford, which provides about 300,000 service hours annually, allowing the company to nearly double the workforce of about 220 employees. Bombardier said on Thursday that discussions are ongoing over its expansion across multiple states. Aftermarket services, which generated more than US$1 billion for Bombardier during the first half of 2025, remain a critical revenue stream for the pure play maker of Global and Challenger business jets. The expansion comes during a time of strained relations between Canada and the United States after U.S. President Donald Trump recently increased tariffs on Canadian goods to 35 per cent from 25 per cent on all products not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. Montreal-based Bombardier can export its business jets without tariffs to the U.S., due to the trade deal signed by Trump during his first term as president. Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters on Tuesday that the first review of the USMCA deal will begin between the three parties in about nine months. (Reporting by Allison Lampert in Montreal and Aatreyee Dasgupta in Bengaluru. Additional reporting by David Ljunggren in Ottawa. Editing by Shilpi Majumdar and Nick Zieminski)
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump's tariffs are bringing in tens of billions of dollars a month. What's the government doing with all that money?
President Donald Trump pauses while speaking during an announcement about Apple with Apple CEO Tim Cook in the Oval Office, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Hardly a day goes by without U.S. President Donald Trump boasting about the record tariff revenue the US government has been collecting since he ratcheted up taxes on almost every imported good. 'We have a lot of money coming in, much more money than the country's ever seen,' Trump said over the weekend, referring to tariff revenue. Trump's right: The US government collected nearly $30 billion in tariff revenue last month, according to the Treasury Department. That's a 242% jump in tariff revenue compared to last July. Since April, when the president began imposing a 10% tariff across nearly all goods, among several other steeper levies that followed, the government collected a total of $100 billion in tariff revenue, three times the amount collected during the same four months last year. So what exactly is the government doing with all this money? Trump has floated a combination of two options: paying down the government's multi-trillion debt and sending 'tariff rebate checks' to Americans. 'The purpose of what I'm doing is primarily to pay down debt, which will happen in very large quantity,' Trump said Tuesday. 'But I think there's also a possibility that we're taking in so much money that we may very well make a dividend to the people of America.' Neither has occurred – at least not yet. So it might appear to many Americans that the billions upon billions of dollars flowing in from tariffs, coming primarily out of the pockets of US businesses footing the initial bills to import foreign goods, are collecting dust. But there's much more going on behind the scenes. Donald Trump tariff news A cargo ship is unloaded at Port Liberty in New Jersey. President Donald Trump's tariffs have brought in record levels of revenue. (Gary Hershorn/via CNN Newsource) What happens to tariff revenue Any revenue the government collects, through ordinary taxes or tariffs, goes into a general fund managed by the Treasury Department. The Treasury refers to that fund as 'America's checkbook,' because it's used to pay the government's bills, such as Social Security payments. When the amount of revenue the government takes in falls short of its bills, meaning it runs a budget deficit, it borrows money to make up the difference. In total, the government is on the hook to repay more than $36 trillion, an amount that has been steadily growing, raising alarm bells among many economists claiming it's weighing on economic growth. That's because, like any American borrowing money, the government has to pay interest on its loans. The more the government borrows, the more interest it has to repay, which is yet another expense the government has to pay that doesn't go toward public-good investments, such as improving highway roads. While the tariff revenue being collected isn't sufficient to wipe away the $1.3 trillion budget deficit the government's running for the current fiscal year, tariff collections have caused that figure to shrink. That means the government doesn't have to resort to borrowing as much money as it otherwise would without the tariff revenue. 'It's not like there's a better use for the money,' Brett Ryan, senior US economist at Deutsche Bank, told CNN, referring to tariff revenue. What about 'tariff rebate checks'? If Congress gets behind Trump's idea to redistribute tariff revenue to Americans in the form of 'rebate checks,' which Republican Sen. Josh Hawley introduced a bill for last week, it would cause the deficit to widen, said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale and a former economist in the Biden White House. 'They're the wrong policy to pursue right now,' he added, saying that it could cause inflation to spike. White House officials did not respond to CNN's inquiry. Tariffs could still come back to bite Americans Even though tariff revenue may help the government's financial situation on paper, it's not necessarily coming pain-free. Businesses have, for the most part, been absorbing the higher costs without raising prices. But that's not the case for every business. Appliances, toys, consumer electronics tariffs and other goods that are sensitive to tariff changes are getting more expensive, recent inflation reports published by the government show. And many companies, including Walmart and Procter & Gamble, are warning of forthcoming price hikes. The uncertainty tied to tariffs has also caused businesses to put off hiring more workers, leading to fewer job openings, several economic surveys indicate. 'Tariffs are going to have a negative economic effect on the American economy,' Tedeschi told CNN. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that Trump's tariffs will shave half a point off US gross domestic product this year and next. 'That's going to partly but not fully offset the amount of revenues that we raise from tariffs. Because if your economy is growing less than you thought, then, yeah, you raise this tariff revenue, but maybe you raise a little bit less in income taxes and payroll taxes as a result.' Trump and his administration see it differently, however, arguing that the recently enacted mega tax cuts and spending bill, combined with the tariff revenue, will supercharge the US economy over time. Elisabeth Buchwald, CNN
