Evanston mayor breaks tie to OK appointee to Land Use Commission
Councilmembers Tom Suffredin (6th), Clare Kelly (1st), Parielle Davis (7th) and Matt Rodgers (8th) voted 'no' to Lutheran Grace Church Lead Pastor Luke Harris joining the Land Use Commission. Councilmembers Shawn Iles (3rd), Jonathan Nieuwsma (4th), Bobby Burns (5th) and Juan Geracaris (9th) voted to approve the mayor's pick.
In Evanston, the mayor is responsible for appointing members to the city's Boards, Commissions and Committees. Those appointees are then voted on by the City Council, and need a simple majority of votes to join a board.
Before casting their votes, city councilmembers gave their opinion on their vote.
'I have never had the privilege of being able to be underqualified for a position. I've never gotten a position over someone else who had higher credentials, and so I'll say that this is a soft spot for me,' Davis said. 'Quite frankly, I find this appointment to some degree insulting,' she said, because of Harris' lack of experience compared to other applicants to the commission.
Previously, Biss allowed former Commissioner George Halik's term to expire in order to create a vacancy on the Land Use Commission. Biss also attempted to appoint to the commission an affordable housing expert who specializes in low income housing tax credits, but the appointee was met with significant pushback following the discovery of her social media posts that critics said were ageist and biased in favor of making Evanston more dense.
Iles, the Overnight Shelter Director for Interfaith Action of Evanston, was under fire by some public commenters and Kelly who speculated that because of his employment and Lutheran Grace Church's ties to Interfaith Action, he could not cast an impartial vote to approve Harris to the Land Use Commission.
Iles checked with Corporation Counsel Alexandra Ruggie to ask whether his vote would meet the city's standard of a conflict of interest.
Ruggie said Iles' vote would not be considered a conflict of interest under the city's ethics code.
'It's just not there,' Ruggie said. 'It's just too far removed.'
Lutheran Grace Church is one of 40 churches that provide funding to Interfaith Action, but a large portion of funding comes from individual donors, Iles said.
Iles commented, 'He (Harris) has direct experience with affordable housing. I find him to be a passionate, informed, thoughtful member of our community. I think he can serve us well both as a younger person and as a renter,' he said.
Rodgers said prior to the meeting, he met with Harris over coffee to discuss his interest in being on the commission. 'I was impressed with his commitment to affordable housing in Evanston, and making sure it's some place that people can move to and live.'
'However, I do have a number of reservations about his overall qualifications for this position,' he continued. 'Outside of recommending for the comprehensive general plan and the zoning ordinance, affordable housing is a very small part of what Land Use does.'
'I mentioned to the mayor in my letter to him that if Mr. Harris was nominated to (the) Housing and Community Development (Committee), I would be 100% supportive of that. I think that's a great place for them to do the work they are interested in doing and accomplishing great things for Evanston,' Rodgers said.
Burns commented on the city's form of council-manager government, which some on the council have described as a 'weak mayor' government because the mayor does not vote or make motions, and does not typically give their opinion on agenda items during a council meeting.
'The one area where the mayor does have some influence, and obviously what you're seeing here today still needs to be confirmed by this council, is appoint people to BCC's (Boards, Commissions and Committees),' Burns said. 'In my opinion, that is the way a mayor with a limited influence in this form of government can try to think about how to compose a BCC in a way that helps to deliver on the things that he told his constituents in the community were important to him, important to them, etc.,' he said.
'I don't think there's anything improper with that. That's just to me the way that it works when you have that ability as a mayor,' Burns said. 'As council, up here, we have to use our own lens whether or not we feel we agree with that composition.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers advance bill supporting legality of corner crossing
CHEYENNE – The ongoing conversations concerning corner crossing in Wyoming continued Tuesday as a state legislative committee narrowly voted to continue pursuing a bill to decriminalize it. The corners in question refer to the intersection of publicly and privately owned lands, and whether members of the public, often hunters, fishers and hikers, are allowed to cross diagonally between public lands at their intersection with private property. Discussions around this topic heated up in 2021 when a group of four Missouri hunters were sued by a ranch owner in Carbon County for corner crossing between public lands that intersected with his property. He alleged more than $7 million in damages and appealed the initial court decision. Some members of the Wyoming Legislature's Joint Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee wanted to wait until a decision comes from the U.S. Supreme Court in reconsideration of the lower federal court's ruling that found their actions to not be trespassing. The nation's high court hasn't announced whether it will hear this appeal, however. Corner crossing graphic The appeals court used this graphic to depict corner crossing. Other committee members, however, thought it would be prudent to at least continue advancing the bill draft for further consideration to be proactive in identifying a solution to the problem. 'This is exactly why we have interims. This is why this committee exists. This is our job. We're taking up an issue that is going to be here for quite some time to come,' said Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper. But Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, he said he felt there are too many unresolved details that could cause issues further down the line, including additional litigation. He said the current bill draft doesn't properly address things like what is legally considered a cornerstone that marks the intersection of properties, and the use of the word 'authorizes' in the draft, asking whether that meant individuals are authorized by law or must seek authorization to cross corners from a separate entity. Ryan Semerad, the attorney representing the Missouri hunters, said the primary benefit of this bill is not that it answers every single question, but that it transfers violations from criminal to civil court. 'I don't think there is a person who believes that someone should be taken off the public lands in handcuffs because they stepped on the wrong blade of grass,' he said. He added that current enforcement of this issue further burdens law enforcement and the judicial system. 'I think this bill is appropriate, because it takes the conversation into the appropriate arena and outside of that (criminal) arena, where the stakes are much higher, where if a landowner thinks corner crossing is a crime, they might bring force to bear, they might respond in a much more aggressive fashion,' he said. Hicks asked how long it could take for the judicial appeal process to play out for the existing case. Semerad said the Supreme Court could receive the case as early as Sept. 17 and the file could be distributed to justices on Oct. 1. After that, he said the court could decide in the coming weeks whether to hear the appeal. If they decide to hear the case, Semerad estimated a decision could come by next June. Representatives from associations representing private property owners opposed consideration of the bill, calling it both incomplete and unnecessary to consider before a decision from the Supreme Court. Brett Moline, policy advocacy director for the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, said his main problem with the bill is that it still allows for property damage. As not all intersections have visible cornerstones, and some GPS systems may be inaccurate, even by a few meters, this could cause someone to walk through private property, even unintentionally. Though Semerad said it is just a matter of someone stepping on the wrong blade of grass, Moline argued this could cause serious damage if hundreds of hunters are doing this, potentially forming a trail through someone's private property. Wyoming Stock Growers Association Executive Vice President Jim Magagna echoed these concerns, urging lawmakers to be advocates of private property rights and hash out decisions once a final judicial ruling comes. Rep. Karlee Provenza, D-Laramie, said her reasoning for support of this draft legislation is to represent the people of Wyoming. 'I don't know if anybody was awake in June or July, but the amount of people that showed up (in support) for public lands was astronomical,' she said, referencing an event she hosted on the steps of the Wyoming Capitol where around 500 residents showed up to protest potential loss of public lands. 'Committee, I'm going to ask you not to get bogged down in the details. Don't get sold on what needs to be a perfect bill. The goal here today is to represent Wyoming. And if there's one thing that is broadly supported here, it's that I want to go and step foot on my public land.' With a 7-6 vote in favor, the committee will continue the discussion of the bill draft at its next meeting in Casper in November. No formal amendments were proposed during Tuesday's meeting, but several were discussed that may intend to clear up some of the details that several members thought were left unclear. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Columbus City Schools eyes staff cuts, school closings to make $50 million in reductions
The Columbus City school board has voted to cut $50 million annually from its budget to deal with a growing financial crisis, with additional school closures and staffing cuts a possibility. At an Aug. 13 special meeting, a joint committee of board members and committee members approved a recommendation to cut the $50 million, moving the recommendation to the school board. For 2026, the district has a $1.8-billion budget. On Aug. 19, the board voted to approve making the cuts and directed the superintendent to present a plan by the end of November for what the cuts should look like. Board President Michael Cole said that the cuts will be challenging, but added that "first and foremost," they will be in "the best interests of our children." "It's not a comfortable conversation, it's not one that's easy, but I can say that this is one that we're equipped for and this is what folks elected us to do — to make these tough decisions," Cole said. District facing financial headwinds Last week, The Dispatch reported that the district will begin deficit spending this year and will be out of cash by fiscal year 2029 under current projections. Presently, the district has more than $300 million in reserve cash. The discussion around budget cuts comes amid a variety of pressures on the district, including a recent reduction in funding from the state, federal funding uncertainty and inflation. The district also faces a growing penalty from the state for noncompliance related to the transportation of charter and nonpublic students. In fiscal year 2025, the penalty is projected to be assessed at $10 million, and from fiscal year 2026 to 2029, the transportation penalty is projected at $15 million, according to data presented on Aug. 13. And on Aug. 14, the Columbus Education Association, which represents teachers and other faculty, voted to approve a new contract with the district that includes 2.25% raises for members of the union, which the board approved at the Aug. 19 meeting. Personnel costs make up over 83% of the district's budget, according to district data. Cole said that the reality is that personnel expenses are "a significant portion of our budget." "It's important to identify where we can have the most minimal impact on that space," Cole said. "Without jumping in front of things, I want to make sure we do the proper work necessary to ensure kids have what they need to succeed in the district." John Coneglio, president of the CEA, said that budget cuts "will fall heavily on the teachers and support staff." "That's a concern of mine, and as we go through this process, we're going to make sure that all of our teachers are supported and the process is done correctly," Coneglio said. More school closures could be coming The board also discussed revamping school closings in the context of the threat to the district's financial solvency. The CCS board voted in December 2024 to close Broadleigh Elementary, Buckeye Middle School, Moler Elementary and the building that houses Columbus Alternative High School. The board also voted to close West Broad Elementary — under the condition that the board can secure funding to replace the school building on the site — and to close the Downtown board office building at 270 E. State St. Columbus City Schools Superintendent Angela Chapman said that clearing up some expenses on the operations side of maintaining and operating "legacy" buildings could afford the district the ability to invest in classrooms. "We're also looking at our operations, and looking how we can provide services leaner and make ways that are more efficient so we can redirect some of the dollars on the operation side of the classroom to help close some of those gaps," Chapman said. Marielle Henault, a member of Pint-Sized Protestors and the Columbus Education Justice Coalition, said during public comment that the board needs to create a community-centered approach that "would truly involve the communities that could be impacted." "We can see all the numbers we want, but at the end of the day, our kids are not numbers and their communities aren't squares on a game board that can be moved around at someone's whim," Henault said. Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@ or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: CCS board approves $50 million in cuts, details could come by November Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a human smuggling case against him, saying the government was prosecuting the Maryland construction worker to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador. Their motion filed in court said attempts to dismiss indictments on the grounds of 'selective or vindictive prosecution' are infrequent and rarely succeed, 'but if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case.' The attorneys said senior cabinet members, Justice Department leaders and President Donald Trump mounted unprecedented public attacks on Abrego Garcia and that 'vindictiveness is clear from the record.' Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia is in jail, said in an email prosecutors would have no other comment beyond what they file in response to the motion. No prosecutor motion was filed as of late Tuesday. Abrego Garcia became a prominent face in the debate over Trump's immigration policies following his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador in March. Trump's administration violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shields Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador because he likely faces threats of gang violence there. The administration claimed Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, although he wasn't charged and has repeatedly denied the allegation. Facing mounting pressure and a U.S. Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in June to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Tuesday's motion alleged the government was trying to paint Abrego Garcia as a criminal to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador and to avoid 'the embarrassment of accepting responsibility for its unlawful conduct." The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia's deportation. Abrego Garcia's attorneys asked the court at least to order a hearing on the government's motives. The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on. A federal judge in Maryland last month prohibited the Trump administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail. The judge ordered the government to provide three business days notice if Immigration and Customs Enforcement intends to initiate deportation proceedings against him.
