
Employer slammed for restricting helper's phone use to just 2 hours a day
Posting anonymously in the 'Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic helper' Facebook group on Tuesday (Jul 22), the employer wrote, 'As agreed with helper, she can only use the phone between 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. at night. Should I keep her phone with me after 11 p.m., or should I request her to put the phone in the living room after 11 p.m.? Thanks! If I keep her phone, she will only be able to get it from me after 9 p.m. and use (it) for two hours.'
Her post quickly drew flak from netizens, many of whom felt the restriction was overly controlling and dehumanising.
One commenter, who claimed to be a former helper, wrote, 'Strict phone rules like this can feel very controlling and unfair. We are human too — with emotions, families we miss, and personal lives outside of work. After a long, tiring day, having a phone helps us feel connected and cared for.'
Another questioned the legality and ethics of the practice, saying, 'The MOM (Ministry of Manpower) allowed you to keep her phone? How (will) she communicate to her family and friends if you give only two hours to use her phone? Your helper is so poor. If I were your helper, I would run away and lose you.'
Others pointed out the double standards, highlighting how even employers use their phones during working hours. 'This is an electronic era, we ourselves cannot part with our phone, how can we expect others to do it? We also use our phone during work. Helpers also need to communicate with their family,' one said.
Another added, '2025 still have this kind of employer. OMG pity the helper.'
A third shared, 'My employer lets me use my phone anytime… give privacy to your helper. Don't be the reason your helper is unhappy to work for you.' Employer claps back at critics
Not one to sit quietly, the employer later edited her post and clapped back at critics, saying that too many 'self-entitled helpers' and 'so-called employers' had overreacted.
She clarified that she hadn't confiscated her helper's phone and was simply asking whether she should keep it after 11 p.m.
The employer also defended her decision to restrict phone use to just two hours per day, arguing that many helpers today are 'addicted' to their phones. As proof, she pointed out that numerous helpers were replying to her post at 3 p.m., which, to her, was a clear sign that they were using their phones during working hours instead of focusing on their tasks.
'It makes me wonder if their employers even know they could be phone addict, e.g., using social media instead of looking after children/elderly, doing food prep for dinner, or any other tasks given for the day?' she wrote.
'I pity their employers, as I am not so tolerating when it comes to phone usage. Seeing how so many helpers mentioned that their employers do not mind their phone usage, but they remained anonymous in their replies, makes me really wonder if their employers truly don't mind or unaware? My break time for the helper will be her lunch time and one short afternoon nap,' she added. What can employers do?
Ms K Jayaprema, president of the Association of Employment Agencies (Singapore), encourages employers to have open and respectful conversations with their helpers regarding phone use. If there are concerns about overuse, particularly during rest periods or working hours, she advises addressing them directly.
'It's wise to advise your MDW (migrant domestic worker) against excessive phone use, especially addictive social media habits. For instance, using the phone late into night can affect her sleep and health. Inadequate sleep may jeopardise her safety at work,' she said, responding to a query about phone usage on the MOM's website.
She also recommended that employers establish clear and reasonable house rules, such as turning off the phone during working hours unless an urgent call is expected, or refraining from phone use after bedtime to ensure adequate rest.
Read also: Man works 20 hours a day with one day off a week to chase financial freedom, asks locals, 'Is this sacrifice really worth it?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
02:25:25 Min
From the opening bell across markets in Southeast Asia and China, to the biggest business interviews and top financial stories, tune in to Asia First to kick-start your business day.


CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Singapore faces medium risk of severe transboundary haze in 2025: Report
Singapore faces a higher risk of severe haze for the rest of this year, compared with last year. Going by a traffic light system, the Singapore Institute of International Affairs has given the risk an amber rating, which is more serious from green last year. It cited a rise in Indonesia's deforestation as a reason. As burning is the main cause for transboundary haze, SIIA said that Singapore may easily be affected since it is close by. SIIA chairman Simon Tay shared how a higher demand for palm oil could drive more deforestation.


Independent Singapore
7 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Drink stall chain allegedly makes staff pay for incorrect orders, says part-time worker
Photo: Freepik/zinkevych (for illustration purposes only) SINGAPORE: A part-time worker has publicly criticised a 'drink stall chain' in Singapore for making her and other employees pay for any incorrectly made beverages. In a post on the r/SGexams subreddit, the worker wrote that she found the policy both 'unnecessary' and 'unreasonable,' especially since they are only paid S$9 per hour. 'It is already barely enough to make ends meet,' she said. 'It's hard to justify this kind of policy. I mean, yeah, a drink is just four dollars and everybody just needs to fork out a dollar to pay for it, which isn't that much, but I don't understand why employees should be held financially responsible when the drink can simply be remade or the order voided, with the reason written on the receipt.' She went on to ask fellow Redditors whether it was truly fair for management to impose such penalties on workers already earning minimum wage, just because of what she called 'a puny mistake.' While she didn't reveal the company's name, she hinted that 'it's not a small business' and that it has 'multiple branches' across the city-state. 'This practice is likely illegal & unethical.' Under her post, several Redditors urged the worker to report the company's policy to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM). One wrote, 'Illegal deductions are only permissible after the employer conducts a proper investigation to determine who is at fault. Keep track and ask the owner to pay back when quitting, or report to MOM.' Another said, 'Document it in writing and file report to MOM. Plus the cost of the drink definitely isn't worth 4 dollars.' A third wrote, 'This practice is likely illegal & unethical. Report to MOM.' A fourth shared, 'Nope. Usually, they will give it to the staff as a free drink/toss it away/if the next order is coincidentally the same drink. I have never heard of this. Not common when I work in F&B or juice bars.' Employers must hold an inquiry before deducting wages According to the Ministry of Manpower, employers are permitted to deduct an employee's salary 'for damage or loss of money or goods,' but only under specific conditions. They must first carry out a proper inquiry to determine whether the employee is directly responsible. The employee must also be given an opportunity to explain the circumstances before any deductions are made. If the employer decides to proceed, the deduction must not exceed 25% of the employee's monthly salary and must be made as a one-time lump sum. Read also: Woman says her brother keeps falling into debt chasing 'fast money,' and their mum always bails him out () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });