logo
Indiana House committee hears testimony on bill that would direct referendum funds to charters

Indiana House committee hears testimony on bill that would direct referendum funds to charters

Chicago Tribune06-03-2025

More than 50 Indiana residents spoke on a Senate bill targeting public schools, requiring funds from a school corporation referendum to be shared with local charter schools.
A majority of speakers at the Wednesday House Ways and Means committee meeting spoke against the bill, saying it would lead to less resources for Indianapolis Public Schools, the state's largest school district.
Speakers in defense of the bill said it would allow charter schools to have adequate funding and similar resources to public schools.
Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, authored Senate Bill 518, which would require corporations to share funds with charters within their attendance boundaries as of May 2025 if 100 or more students leave the district for charters. Virtual charters would not qualify in the latest version of the bill.
Urban communities with several charters, including Gary, will be impacted if the bill passes, according to Post-Tribune archives. The bill stipulates that Gary School Community School Corporation would be exempt from revenue sharing until 2028 due to its distressed status.
Rogers testified at Wednesday's hearing, explaining why charter schools need more funding and how the bill would help.
'When it comes to fiscal performance of charters, in addition to an audit by the State Board of Accounts, charter schools are required to have a third-party audit completed every year,' Rogers said. '(The audit) adds a cost to the charter, unlike district public schools, which are only audited by the State Board of Accounts every year and are much less rigorous.'
Multiple Democratic representatives had questions for Rogers about the bill, including concerns about charters closing mid-year or how students are accepted into the schools. Democrats have criticized Senate Bill 518, saying it would cause public schools to cut their budgets further.
Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis, said Senate Bill 518 is not needed because charter schools already receive funding through the state and federal sources. According to Chalkbeat Indiana, charter schools receive an additional $1,400 per student for operational costs to make up for their lack of local property tax revenue.
'I don't know of any other (public) institution in this state … that is told to give money to a private enterprise and is mandated by the General Assembly,' DeLaney said. 'Why not order to give through the YMCA? It's a very worthy cause. … It would be equally unfair and inconsistent with our democratic society.'
Districts would also be required to share with charters a portion of debt service levy, which is used to pay off long term projects.
Keegan Williams, a student at Shortridge High School in Indianapolis, testified on behalf of public schools. Shortridge is one of IPS' multiple high schools.
Williams will graduate this year and plans to go to the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He credits his acceptance to IPS and courses he could take through the district's International Baccalaureate program.
'The programming at Shortridge has given me the tools to make myself competitive as if I went to a private school,' Williams said. 'I would just hate to see a place like Shortridge be the first state public high school to have resources diminished, to be threatened by this bill. It threatens our history, and it threatens the very reason why I'm here.'
Hilari Vargo, an IPS parent, also spoke against the bill, saying that in an effort to help charter schools more, both school types will suffer. She focused on resources that will diminish, including transportation.
'How is (Senate Bill 518) the answer?' Vargo said. 'How is that going to provide transportation? IPS will also not have transportation next year for the students out of district.'
Multiple representatives from IPS, including Superintendent Aleesia Johnson, spoke against Senate Bill 518.
Johnson said that if Senate Bill 518 and Senate Bill 1 — which address property tax reform — are both passed, it could 'cause significant disruption' to the school district. The loss of funding would require the district to close schools, reduce transportation and eliminate jobs.
'The question I continue to wrestle with, and the question that remains unanswered, is 'Then what?'' Johnson said. 'Then what for families who have experienced changes and disruption time and time again? Then what for our most vulnerable students in schools…?'
IPS has multiple charter schools within its district that would also lose funding if Senate Bill 518 is passed, Johnson said, because the schools are part of a public district.
About 30 charter schools partnered with IPS would be penalized through Senate Bill 518, Johnson said.
A similar measure has been in effect in Marion, Lake, Vanderburgh and St. Joseph counties since 2023.
Multiple commenters spoke in favor of Senate Bill 518, including charter school teachers, students, parents and leaders. All explained charter school benefits, including more time focused on students and increased opportunities.
Those in favor of charter schools said the institutions have less available resources than public schools.
Dave Ebersol, a teacher at South Bend Career Academy, which is a tuition-free, public charter school. Ebersol said charter schools are intentionally different from public schools and provide 'real-world learning.'
Charter school families are already making sacrifices, Ebersol said, with students receiving about $3,000 less than those in public schools.
'This inequity is even greater because local tax dollars follow students in traditional school districts, but not when they choose to go to a public charter school,' Ebersol said. 'Instead, those dollars stay with a district that is no longer educating them. Our families are already making sacrifices because they believe in our schools.'
Jean Hitchcock, executive director of Signature School in Evansville, also spoke in support of Senate Bill 518. Signature School connects students with opportunities they might not get at public schools, Hitchcock said, including some who might be the first in their families to attend high school or college.
The Evansville school receives about $2,000 less per student, Hitchcock said, and they have less access to technology than public schools, including laptops.
'Fifty percent of Signature students have access to a classroom laptop, whereas most Indiana schools already have one-to-one laptop initiatives in place,' Hitchcock said. 'We're exploring the possibility of opening a middle school, but we are held back because of concern over adequate funding.'
Rep. Sheila Klinker, D-Lafayette, asked how students receive transportation to and from school, a concern of various representatives in the Ways and Means committee.
Signature School doesn't provide transportation, Hitchcock said, but students can take the Evansville city buses or carpool.
Brandon Brown, CEO of the Mind Trust — which invests in public education and advocates for charter schools — also spoke in support of Senate Bill 518. Within IPS' district, about 60% of students attend charter schools, which include a vast majority of Black, Hispanic and low-income students, Brown said.
'When we talk about ensuring that our marginalized students have access and resources, that's exactly what this bill does,' Brown said. 'We think it'll be transformative for tens of thousands of students across our state. … The majority of students who attend charter schools, those students will make significantly more progress than their peers.'
Brown said the $1,400 per student is appreciated in charter schools, but for IPS it's 'a drop in the bucket.' IPS has had its local tax receipts more than double since 2018, receiving almost $9,000 per student in local property taxes, Brown said.
The Ways and Means committee is expected to vote on Senate Bill 518 at a later date before it advances to the Indiana House floor.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill to amend medically assisted suicide law draws emotional debate from Maine lawmakers
Bill to amend medically assisted suicide law draws emotional debate from Maine lawmakers

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill to amend medically assisted suicide law draws emotional debate from Maine lawmakers

Jun. 9—AUGUSTA — A proposal to allow doctors to waive the waiting period for terminally ill patients who want to be given life-ending drugs drew an emotional debate from lawmakers in the Maine Senate Monday before it was rejected by one vote. The fate of the bill is unclear after the Senate voted the proposal down 18-17. It passed 74-64 in the House of Representatives last week and faces another round of votes in each chamber before it could be sent to Gov. Janet Mills for her signature. The bill would amend a 2019 law known as the Death with Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide in Maine. It allows certain terminally ill patients to have the option to receive life-ending medication so they have control over their death. Maine's law currently requires a 17-day waiting period from when a person requests the medication to when they can receive the prescription. The change under consideration, LD 613, would allow a doctor to waive all or a portion of the waiting period if they determine it would be in the patient's best interest. Mills supported the original Death with Dignity Act, but it's unclear if she would support the change. Spokespeople for the governor did not respond Monday to questions about whether she has taken a position on the bill. The proposal allowing for the waiting period to be waived drew emotional debate from lawmakers who spoke about how they've personally been affected by illness and death. "This is not an abstract issue for me," said Rep. Kathy Javner, R-Chester, who has metastatic breast cancer, during last week's House debate. "I am living this reality and stand before you today, not in despair, but in hope that we can preserve the dignity and meaning of life, even in the shadow of death." Javner, who was against the change, said removing the waiting period would take away the time that families and physicians currently have to reflect and consider alternative options. "Let us not respond to suffering with surrender," Javner said. "Let us respond with compassion, with presence, with resources for pain management, with palliative care, with love." Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart, R-Presque Isle, talked about his mother, who died at age 50 from colorectal cancer, during Monday's Senate debate. Stewart said his mother "broke out" of hospice care in order to be at home with her family at the end of her life. "I will always be grateful for that extra month we got," Stewart said. "I worry about the scenarios about what if they don't get it right and what opportunities are we forestalling through this," he added. "This was the promise that was made originally with this policy, that there wouldn't be that knee-jerk opportunity because of this protection." Maine is among 10 states and Washington, D.C., where physician-assisted suicide is legal for people with terminal illnesses, according to Death With Dignity, an organization in Portland, Oregon, that advocates for the laws as a means of improving how people with such diagnoses die. Waiting periods for medication vary state to state and can range from one day to more than two weeks, according to Death With Dignity. Some states do allow waiting periods to be waived if the patient is unlikely to survive. Maine's Death with Dignity Act has been used by 218 people since it was enacted, according to Michele Meyer, D-Eliot, the sponsor of LD 613. But another nine people have died during the waiting period because their illnesses progressed too rapidly, Meyer said last week. She said the bill does not change the law's criteria that the patient be terminally ill with a six-month prognosis confirmed by two doctors and that they have the capacity to make informed decisions. "This is simple and straight forward," Meyer said. "It corrects a rare situation that never should have existed in the first place. Some of us will not know the gift of a long, healthy life. ... Medical aid in dying offers decisionally capable adults an option to avoid prolonged suffering." In the Senate Monday, Sen. Tim Nangle, D-Windham, talked about his father's lung cancer and the pain he suffered. Nangle said he didn't know if his father, who lived in another state, would have used the Death with Dignity Act, but he said the option for the time waiver should be there. "This is about their choice," Nangle said. "What do they want to do?" Copy the Story Link

In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public
In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public

In the on-going Battle of Los Angeles, California governor Gavin Newsom may have the law on his side – but his adversary president Donald Trump has the most powerful imagery. The conflict began in Los Angeles on Friday, when mobs of protestors attacked agents of the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who were trying to serve warrants on specific illegal immigrants at a Home Depot and also at a clothing store. On Saturday, during a protest in front of a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office, members of the crowd lit fires and threw rocks at federal officers, who defended themselves with tear gas and non-lethal ammunition. Later that day, president Trump authorised the deployment of 2000 members of the National Guard to protect the federal ICE agents; since then 700 American Marines have been added to the federal force. Governor Newsom and other leaders of the Democratic-dominated California have claimed that Trump's actions were not needed because local and state authorities had the situation under control. And yet on Sunday, following three days of violence and arrests, the Los Angeles Police Department declared downtown Los Angeles an 'unlawful assembly' area. And on Monday the state of California sued the Trump administration, claiming that Trump 'illegally acted to federalise the National Guard,' in the words of Newsom. Typically a governor requests a president to federalise and mobilise the National Guard to deal with riots or natural disasters. For example, consider the Los Angeles riots of 1992. It was sparked by the acquittal of four white police officers who beat a black motorist named Rodney King and it led to more than fifty deaths and a billion dollars of damage; in response a Republican California governor Pete Wilson asked a Republican president George HW Bush to federalise the National Guard. Not since 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators, has a president sent troops without a governor's request. While California officials might be able to make a legal case against the Trump administration, the state and the Democratic party risk losing in the court of public opinion. Viral photographs show masked rioters waving Mexican flags in front of burning cars and debris, supporting the Trump White House's inflammatory claims about an immigrant invasion. In a shrewd public relations move, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released mug shots under the heading: 'ICE Captures Worst of the Worst Illegal Alien Criminals in Los Angeles Including Murderers, Sex Offenders, and Other Violent Criminals.' The rogues' gallery contains illegal immigrants from a number of countries including Vietnam, the Philippines, and Mexico, charged with offenses including attempted rape, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft larceny, distribution of heroin and cocaine, wilful cruelty to a child and other serious crimes. Democrats recently succeeded in reversing the allegedly unlawful deportation to El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who was granted the right to remain in the US by a federal immigration judge. But on his return he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of being an MS-13 gang member who has smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants, drugs, and firearms in the US. Democratic strategists might ask whether someone like Abrego Garcia should be the face of the Democratic party. At least, unlike some of the rioters cavorting in front of burning wreckage in LA, he does not wear a mask. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

GOP House Homeland chairman Green to retire from Congress early

timean hour ago

GOP House Homeland chairman Green to retire from Congress early

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The House Homeland Security Committee's chairman, Republican Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, announced Monday that he will retire from Congress once the House votes again on the sprawling tax and budget policy bill backed by President Donald Trump. In a statement, Green said he was offered a private sector opportunity that was 'that was too exciting to pass up' so he informed House Speaker Mike Johnson on Monday of his retirement plans. The move comes more than a year after Green announced he wouldn't run again in 2024, but changed his mind when fellow Republicans implored him to stick around. Green's next election would have been in 2026. Green voted for Trump's sweeping legislation when it passed the House last month. The bill is now in the Senate's hands, and would need to return to the House for agreement on any changes. Trump wants the bill on his desk for his signature by July 4. Green's delayed departure could help with the GOP's narrow margins in the House. Republican leaders need every vote they can get on their big tax bill, which they managed to pass last month by a single vote and will have to pass again once changes are made in the Senate. They now have a 220-212 majority. 'It was the honor of a lifetime to represent the people of Tennessee in Congress," Green said. "They asked me to deliver on the conservative values and principles we all hold dear, and I did my level best to do so.' Green's seat will be decided in a special election. The timing will depend on when he leaves office. Ahead of his 2024 reelection, Green had announced that February 2024 he would not run again. The decision was revealed a day after the impeachment of then-President Joe Biden's Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. But many fellow Republicans had called on him to reconsider, and he jumped back into the running just two weeks later. He was unopposed in the Republican primary and then defeated Democrat Megan Barry — the former Nashville mayor who resigned in 2018 in scandal — by more than 21 percentage points in November 2024. Green, 60, has served since 2019 in the 7th Congressional District, which was redrawn in 2022 to include a significant portion of Nashville. The city was carved up three ways in the 2022 redistricting so Republicans could flip a Democratic district in Congress that had covered Music City, which they successfully did. Green previously served as an Army surgeon and in the state Senate and is from Montgomery County. Green flirted running for governor in 2017, but suspended his campaign after he was nominated by former President Donald Trump to become the Army secretary. He later withdrew his nomination due to criticism over his remarks about Muslims and LGBTQ+ Americans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store