
I have a secret urge to throw a good portion of my young children's ‘art' in the bin
parents
, I was recently inundated with my young children's artwork, projects and crafts from the classroom as the school year ended for summer.
Like many parents, I love and treasure my five- and eight-year-old children's sweet pictures and paintings. I have a growing pile on my bedside table with my most precious pieces. The ones with misspellings such as 'mamé' and 'luv'. The ones drawn super enthusiastically with buckets of innocent love that have unintentionally inappropriate anatomy. They never cease to make me smile. Seriously, who needs a trip over to the Tate Modern when you've got small kids who love to paint and draw? I give you the whole family looking like wonky potatoes on cardboard, or have you seen the critically acclaimed headless dad who appears to have three legs on lined copybook paper? Spellbinding.
However, like many parents, as much as I adore my small children's art, I also have the secret urge to throw a good portion of it in the bin. Yes, I said it. Welcome to the 'getting satisfaction out of throwing your children's artwork in the bin club'. Pull up a seat, this is a safe space, and no one is going to judge you. No one is going to label you a monster or accuse you of not loving and treasuring your children's artwork here, not on my watch.
As parents of young children, we know the truth; there is a fine line between those genuine heartfelt drawings (which we of course keep and cherish) and every single messy line scrawled on a scrap of paper that is sent home as 'art'. And let's face it, at this time of year, looking at much of what came home from creche or school by now, it feels a little like teachers were just cleaning their workspace rather than anything else.
READ MORE
The guilt in binning is huge, however, and feels fiercely controversial, but you're not alone folks. There's an utterly relatable scene in BBC's
Motherland
, where the mums are presented with their children's science projects at the school gates. Each parent comments on 'how wonderful' it is before proceeding to chuck each one casually in the wheelie bin, rather than have to bring them home. I've been that soldier, and let me tell you I should have taken a leaf out of their book. Rather than haul home my eldest's makeshift tornado in the plastic water bottles that leaked weird blue water all over the car on the journey home, I should have put it in the bin.
It's not just your child's classroom art that starts to pile up either, their at-home output can be even more staggering. If your young child catches you trying to sneak some of their 'Van Goghs' into the bin, well God help you, as you try to come up with some excuse about what you are doing.
'Mummy, you're not throwing that in the bin, are you?' quizzed my five-year-old the other week using a tone similar to that of a senior counsel cross-examining a nervous witness, motioning to the dog-eared piece of paper with three random lines scrawled on it that had been balled up under his bed for about two months.
[
Raising money-smart kids: How you can teach them from aged three to teens
Opens in new window
]
'Er ... no. Of course not,' I said. 'I was just bringing it over to the window so I could get a better look at it.'
Worse still is when they actually find their artwork in the bin. That's the sort of Michael Corleone/Fredo level of betrayal that runs deep. I can remember my dad unknowingly hurling a beloved framed painting of mine in a skip as a young child and, let's just say, it still gets brought up from time to time.
It's only now that I'm a parent myself I get it. As much as you adore those drawings your small children bring you, you don't realise the sheer volume they can produce and how they can take over every surface of your home.
With my seemingly heartless throwaway attitude, you might be surprised to hear that I still have hoarder-level amounts of my kids' artwork in the attic, in bags, in drawers, shoved in beside the microwave or down the back of the cabinets. Every kitchen cupboard and wall downstairs is adorned with their creations. You could re-seed a sizeable portion of a rainforest with it all.
I can't possibly keep it up, and as much as I love hanging them on every surface in the house, I would also like a bit of space that is mine. As scarily savvy as ever, my social media algorithm is on the case, feeding me ads for seemingly genius extra-deep picture frames that allow parents to keep filling them with their children's works of art. It might be worth a punt, but the amount I'd have to shove in them would probably break the hinges.
[
Where Irish artists make their art: 'There is inspiration everywhere here'
Opens in new window
]
I have tried lots of other creative ways to put my children's paintings and drawings to good use. Turning them into birthday or Christmas cards is a lovely thing to do or even into wrapping paper, at a stretch. I rotate the gallery as often as I can and sometimes try to sit them down and ask if there's any they'd like to get rid of. There rarely is.
[
How to be a children's book illustrator: Go on an adventure with endless possibilities
Opens in new window
]
If all else fails and the guilt is eating you alive, you can embrace technology and snap a picture of their art and store it in your cloud before you bin it. If you're anything like me, however, that digital copy will only add to your already bursting-at-the-seams photo cloud clutter that's filled with endless pictures of, yes, your kids.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Baby joy for Calvin Harris and Vick Hope
DJ Calvin Harris has welcomed his first child with his wife, BBC radio presenter Vick Hope, and described his wife as a "superhero". The 41 year-old One Kiss musician, shared the news on social media that their son, Micah, was born on July 20. The DJ posted a series of photographs on Instagram on Monday along with the caption: "20th of July our boy arrived. Micah is here!" The Summer musician added: "My wife is a superhero and I am in complete awe of her primal wisdom! Just so grateful. We love you so much Micah." The comments section was flooded with congratulations from fans around the world as well as fellow musicians including Jade Thirlwall and Craig David. Some comments expressed surprise at the choice of photographs the DJ shared which included what appears to be the before and after shots of the placenta, the organ which forms in the womb during pregnancy, before it was steamed, dehydrated and ground into pills to be consumed. Consuming one's own placenta, known as placentophagia, remains a debated practice with some claiming it offers health benefits. Among the supporters was singer Becky Hill who posted in the comments: "Love to see the placenta!! Amazing we grow a whole new organ to provide life! Good job not wasting it either, that's some goddess magic right there!" Hope, 35, is best known for presenting the BBC Radio 1 drivetime show Going Home. She reportedly married the Dumfries-born DJ in 2023. He is behind the hit number one songs Sweet Nothing, Summer, and Promises.


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
South Park isn't letting go of Donald Trump's hambone any time soon
'I don't know what more we could possibly say about Trump ,' Trey Parker, one of the creators of South Park, told Vanity Fair shortly before the US presidential election of 2024. The magazine took this to mean the series was 'about done with satirising the Republican candidate'. If that was the team's intention, then intervening events have brought about a change in strategy. The candidate became president again. The president flailed like a maniac. Some of the metaphorical broken crockery belonged to South Park's corporate master. The Comedy Central satire has rarely been so explicit in its attacks on an individual as it was on Trump in the first episode of the 27th season. Broadcast on July 23rd, Sermon on the 'Mount – a reference to both its guest star Jesus Christ and Paramount, the cable channel's parent company – began with a characteristic double-edged dig at Trump's war on the liberal media. READ MORE Eric Cartman, perennially bigoted id-monster, is outraged that the administration has cancelled his favourite show on National Public Radio. We are encouraged to believe South Park's creators are equally appalled at this curtailment of cultural expression, but most of the laughs come from Cartman, hitherto a hate listener, ranting about the unintentionally hilarious enemies he will no longer get to snort at. The show is, he explains, 'where all the liberals bitch and moan about stuff'. Jesus turns up to evangelise at South Park Elementary. The town's residents wonder if that is strictly constitutional. 'I didn't want to come back,' the risen Lord eventually mutters fearfully to assembled multitudes. 'But I had to because it was part of a lawsuit and the agreement with Paramount.' This references Trump's recent suit against Paramount over an episode of the news show 60 Minutes, broadcast on the conglomerate's CBS network, and allows wider connection to be made with capitulations to the president's legal Panzerkorps elsewhere in the media. [ Maureen Dowd: CBS caving to Trump is sickening. At least South Park will still hold people accountable Opens in new window ] All of that was typically bold – The Simpsons' erstwhile digs at its own Fox network were generally more playful – but it was the depiction of Trump himself that really got media-watchers gasping. Like their version of Saddam Hussein, he is seen cosying up to a giant, oddly sensitive Satan, who expresses himself unimpressed by the imperial crown jewels. 'I can't even see anything, it's so small,' the Lord of the Flies says of Trump's penis. At the close, now bespectacled and talkative, the first member dangles from a hyperrealistic, AI-generated version of the naked Trump. How do we know this attack struck home? Because the White House said it didn't. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' a hopelessly needy White House statement whined. 'No fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' Asked, at the Comic-Con event in San Diego, what he made of the response, Parker, sitting beside his collaborator Matt Stone, did not break a smile before snapping: 'We're terribly sorry.' The reply needed no ironic intonation to confirm its insincerity. And they are not finished. There was no episode this week, but a teaser trailer for next Wednesday's outing has Trump feeling up Satan's leg at a public event. South Park isn't loosening its jaws from this hambone. Why does this matter more than the countless volleys that have come Trump's way over the past decade? A glance (just a glance, I promise) at the increasingly feeble Saturday Night Live gives a few clues. The sheer flaccidity of the sketch show's satire is one factor. Another is that sense of us knowing which wet-liberal safe house the SNL team emerge from each miserably predictable weekend. These skits are not intended to irritate the Maga base. They are there to comfort those already certain of their own cosy opposition. Remember the execrable 'cold open' that had a white-clad Hillary Clinton – in the supportive form of Kate McKinnon – warble Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah to a blubbing audience straight after the real Hillary lost to Trump? Such obsequiousness towards a politician (any politician) would be inconceivable on South Park. Over the past 28 years Stone and Parker have made a virtue of wrong-footing those who think they have the team's politics nailed down. Way back in 2005, scores of leftish critics raged that Team America: World Police, their now-classic 'Supercrappymation' feature, spent as much time slagging off liberal celebrities as attacking the administration. 'People assumed that Trey and I were going to devote every frame to bringing down George Bush,' Stone, laughing, told me at the time. One side has never forgiven them. The other may not forget their current jihad against Trump. But that uncertain political territory is the best place for satirists to pitch base camp. Nobody should feel safe. They could be after your penis next.


Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Kamala Harris and Stephen Colbert symbols not so much of a vanished time as a lost US future
Time moves differently in Donald Trump 's presidency, so the effect of seeing Kamala Harris back on television screens was like the shock return of a once prominent but long vanished character from Dynasty or Falcon Crest, or any of the stars from the classic era of US soap operas that outlasted the rise and fall of several presidencies. The defeated Democratic candidate is in the public eye again to publicise 107 Days, her account of her belated, doomed attempt to resuscitate her party's hopes in the 2024 presidential race after Joe Biden 's candidacy became untenable. She was appearing on the The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a flagship talkshow that CBS has decided to cancel once the season ends in May. The decision to end Colbert's run generated delight on the Republican right, not least from Trump, who is frequently in the firing line of Colbert's brand of slick, savagely funny satire. That CBS needed approval from the Trump administration for its sale to Skydance to go through, and that its parent company, Paramount, recently settled a spurious $16 million lawsuit with the president, was lost on nobody. David Letterman, the original host of the show, from 1993-2015, described the CBS decision as 'gutless' and 'pure cowardice'. READ MORE Ironically, the Trump lawsuit was framed around a charge that an interview Harris had given to 60 Minutes during last year's election campaign had been edited to her advantage. Cancelling Colbert was just the icing on the cake for Trump. And it was also a reflection of the fast-changing broadcast news and talkshow landscape. Letterman had the undivided attention of late-night America but the culture, and options, have changed enormously since then. CBS issued a bland statement thanking Colbert and leaked remarks to the effect that a staff of 100 and a bill of a $100 million for a dwindling audience had become impossible to maintain. The Ed Sullivan Theater, where The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is recorded live, in midtown Manhattan. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty So when Harris and Colbert sat down, a desk between them, both seemed like symbols not so much of a vanished time as a lost future. It will be impossible for Americans to ever see Harris and wonder what the road not taken in 2024 might have looked like. The stark numbers of the election are worth repeating. Although Harris and the Democrats were trounced on the big blue and red electoral college board, in actual human votes, Trump won 77,303,568 (49.8 per cent) and Harris 75,019,230 (48.3 per cent). Some 2,284,338 votes separated them: a significant number of people but not so much that Harris and her supporters won't always imagine a different outcome. As Colbert mentioned, she looked rested. She revealed that she spent much of the past six months in restorative mode – 'lots of cooking shows'- and that, no, she had not watched much current affairs. 'I'm not into self-mutilation,' she said in a rare moment of sharpness. [ From the archive: It's a do-or-die moment for Kamala Harris. She needs to assert herself Opens in new window ] That acidic edge was a reminder of what Harris often seemed to lack during those 107 days when she sought to persuade Americans that she was a better alternative to Trump. She had the extraordinary rise from modest west coast immigrant home, a natural telegenic appeal and, when she permitted herself, came across as warm and authoritative. There was no menace. But there was too often a blurriness about what she might do. And even in Thursday night's harmless and friendly theatre in New York, her fatal conservatism remained intact. She brought no gossip or intrigue or fresh revelation, nothing to excite the hopes of the millions of lost Democrats out there. For six months, Trump has talked and talked and talked, as though the Oval Office is his psychologist's couch and the people of the United States his listener. It may be bewildering and contradictory and frightening. But it has the world's attention. [ US AI policy risks disaster because of Trump Opens in new window ] Harris teased an anecdote featuring Doug, her husband, and a missed birthday of hers in the days before the election but when Colbert teed her up, she broke into laughter and said, 'you have to read the book'. A mildly exasperated Colbert mimicked flicking through the pages. It's the golden rule of these shows followed by any celebrities there to sell a film or a biography: the host says lovely things about you and in turn, you tell a few self-deprecating yarns and everyone is happy. Even now, Harris held back. Six months in, Trump's second term has, for now, confounded the doom sayers. The markets continue to thrive despite the tariff upheaval. However, Friday's August deadline was accompanied by reports of a weakening labour market and a dip in markets. He has, as promised ended border immigration but the Ice deportation campaign continues to horrify many Americans. His vow to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict has not been fulfilled. The situation in Gaza has become even more horrifying that it was under Biden. [ Justine McCarthy: Keir Starmer and Donald Trump looked ready to put a ring on it. No wonder Melania stayed at home Opens in new window ] Already, the Democrats are nearing the point where potential challengers to the next Republican candidate will have to step into the bright lights. Many have interpreted Harris's decision not to run for governor of California next year as an intention to put herself forward as a presidential candidate in 2028. To Colbert's army of night-watchers who flicked off the TV for the night, it will take a lot of convincing by Harris if she is to catapult from her place as the face of calamitous disappointment for Democrat voters to their best future hope.