logo
Defence Minister Richard Marles can't answer important China question four months on from unprecedented 'show of force' in Australia's backyard

Defence Minister Richard Marles can't answer important China question four months on from unprecedented 'show of force' in Australia's backyard

Daily Mail​5 hours ago

Anthony Albanese 's right-hand man has declined to say whether China poses a military threat to Australia - just days after the Prime Minister also dodged the same question.
Defence Minister Richard Marles was quizzed on the threat China poses in the Indo-Pacific at Newscorp's 'Defending Australia' summit on Monday.
'In conventional terms, unquestionably, (China) is at the heart of the complex strategic circumstances that we face,' the Deputy Prime Minister said.
However, Marles stopped short of naming China as a military threat, instead saying it was not providing reassurance to other countries around its intentions regarding its biggest military expansion since the Second World War.
'(China) is engaging in a military build-up of that scale... without strategic reassurance.'
'Every country has a right to properly invest in its own defences, but what's really important is that you provide strategic reassurance to your neighbours and to the world about what that's about, as we have done with AUKUS,' he added.
The Prime Minister was similarly guarded last week when asked at the National Press Club in Canberra if China was a threat.
'I think that our engagement with the region and the world needs to be diplomatic, needs to be mature and needs to avoid the, you know, attempts to simplify what are a complex set of relationships,' he said.
This is despite the Chinese navy conducting live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea in February, without giving prior notification to the Australian government.
The alert was first picked up on the 121.5 MHz emergency radio channel by a Virgin Australia pilot, later prompting 49 commercial flights to reroute.
The naval fleet of four vessels, including a cruiser, a frigate, a supply tanker and possibly a submarine, then circumnavigated Australia's coastline in an unprecedented move that most defence analysts interpreted as a show of force.
It comes after Albanese was last week urged to boost Australia's defence spending or risk being stranded in 'no-man's-land' with a 'paper IDF'.
A report from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute praised the Labor government's commitment to long-term defence projects, such as the AUKUS submarine deal, but warned it was not doing nearly enough in the immediate future.
'That slow pace risks leaving the ADF ill-prepared for current threats and unable to keep pace with future challenges, creating a 'no-man's-land' of preparedness,' the report's author and former Home Affairs deputy secretary Marc Ablong wrote.
'The timelines for major acquisitions, especially the nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS partnership, extend well into the next decade and beyond.
'While those future capabilities are strategically important, they offer little immediate enhancement, thus creating a 'paper ADF' that lacks readiness for near-term conflict scenarios.'
US President Donald Trump has called on Australia to boost its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP - up from the current rate of around 2.3 per cent.
The US administration has also launched a 30-day review of the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal.
The pact between Australia, the US, and the UK is aimed at countering China's expanding presence in the Indo-Pacific.
But the Pentagon review will assess whether the deal meets Trump's 'America First' objectives.
Albanese is expected to meet Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada later this week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump: It's a mistake not to have Putin at G7
Trump: It's a mistake not to have Putin at G7

Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump: It's a mistake not to have Putin at G7

Donald Trump said it was a mistake to have expelled Russia from the G8 group of leading nations. The US president also floated the idea that China should be admitted to the exclusive club as he joined other world leaders in Canada for this year's G7 summit. The Canadian organisers have gone out of their way to shape an agenda that will avoid Mr Trump's wrath. But a sign of his unpredictable nature came almost immediately ahead of his first meeting on Monday morning. 'The G7 used to be the G8,' Mr Trump told his travelling press pool ahead of his meeting with Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister. 'Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in, and I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in. 'And you wouldn't have a war right now if Trump were president four years ago. But it didn't work out that way.' Russia was expelled in 2014 when Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea. European and other officials want to use the summit to nudge Mr Trump to take a tougher line on Moscow and will be disheartened by those initial comments. However, the US president did go on to say it would be a mistake to have Mr Putin at the summit in Kananaskis, situated in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies. 'I'm not saying he should at this point, because too much water's gone over the dam,' he said, as Mr Carney looked on. Instead, he said he saw a potential role for China as the world's second biggest economy. 'Well, it's not a bad idea. I don't mind that. If somebody wants to suggest China coming in…' he said. 'But you want to have people that you can talk to. You know, they don't talk.' With the session turning into a Trump press conference, Mr Carney stepped in. 'If you don't mind I'm going to exercise my role, if you will, as G7 chair,' he said, silencing a hubbub of shouted questions. 'Since we have a few more minutes with the president and his team, and then we actually have to start the meeting to address some of these big issues.'

Aberdeen University plans to open new campus in India
Aberdeen University plans to open new campus in India

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Aberdeen University plans to open new campus in India

The University of Aberdeen is planning to open a campus in India, it has institution has been granted permission by the Indian government to take forward proposals in Mumbai.A business case will go before the university's governing court for consideration next University of Strathclyde's Business School previously had an operation in India, but no longer has a presence. The new venture would initially offer courses in subjects including computing and data science, AI, business, and economics. The target launch date for the plans is September next year. Prof Siladitya Bhattacharya, vice-principal of global engagement at the university, said India had long been a "priority area" for its includes student recruitment and research added: "We are looking forward to collaborating with our Indian partners to bring this vision to life and further bolster ties between Scotland and India through education and research".Aberdeen is currently one of a number of Scottish universities looking at ways of tackling financial pressures.

What weapons does Iran have and how long can it attack Israel?
What weapons does Iran have and how long can it attack Israel?

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

What weapons does Iran have and how long can it attack Israel?

The vast and limitless potential of Iran's capacity to strike Israel would soon become clear. Any previous attacks on the old enemy had merely been 'minor demonstrations' before Tehran's war machine swung into full gear. That, at least, is what Hossein Salami, the architect of Iran's missile programme, would have had us believe before the tumultuous events of the past five days. Yet the regime's response to Israel's operation, Rising Lion, has underscored the limitations of Tehran's missile programme. Many of its missile sites were destroyed before Iran even fired a shot in response. What was left has so far been used with devastating effect, levelling apartment blocks and killing at least 24 people over three days in a series of strikes that have pierced Israel's much-vaunted protective shield, the Iron Dome defence system. Iran, however, cannot maintain the intensity of these attacks which, in turn, have little to no impact on Israel's ability to strike back at will. Israel estimates Tehran has launched about 300 missiles so far, while an undisclosed but probably significant number were destroyed in air strikes and sabotage operations during the first few hours of the war. Tehran has been left with little way to defend its missile sites from airstrikes and the production of new weapons will be difficult as the stockpile dwindles by the day. Western intelligence had estimated before the war that Iran possessed about 2,000 to 3,000 missiles capable of reaching Israel. Tzachi Hanegbi, Israel's national security adviser, said Iran still had 'thousands' more missiles at its disposal, suggesting previous estimates might have been an underestimation. The arsenal that we know about includes the hypersonic Fattah 1 and 2, which Iran claims are manoeuvrable in flight and can carry a warhead of up to 450kg. The larger Emad, which has an advertised range of just over 1000 miles, can carry a warhead of almost 800kg. The regime can also field its satellite-navigated Kheibar Shekan and possibly its recently announced Qassem Bassir, a missile purportedly equipped with defence-evasion capabilities. Days before the war, Iran had unveiled a two-tonne warhead it said could be fitted on to its existing missiles. Even if Iran's arsenal is larger and more sophisticated than previously thought, the regime knows it has entered an unsustainable war of attrition against a superior enemy. And, even if President Trump is reluctant for the US to take a greater role and provide 'bunker-buster' bombs to destroy Tehran's nuclear sites, there is little chance of Israel running out of weapons thanks to its stockpiles. Indeed, one western diplomat suggested that the intensity of Iran's attacks had already 'peaked'. That will remain to be seen. The response so far, however, is likely to have appeased regime hardliners who have for months clamoured for massive strikes against Israel. The humiliation of watching high-profile targets destroyed across Iran, and the deaths of senior figures within the regime, is likely to mean that the missiles will keep being fired, even if the present pace of the onslaught is not sustainable. Iran has already learnt it cannot overwhelm Israeli defences — the Iron Dome is still intercepting almost all the projectiles fired — despite Iran's claims that it has discovered a strategy to pierce the defences. 'The problem is the level of retaliation expected,' said Farzan Sabet, managing researcher at the Global Governance Centre. 'If Iran conducts a strike, it's not able to destroy [Israel's] retaliatory capability, but its enemy is capable of destroying its retaliatory capability.' He said this takes the Middle East down a 'path of a conflict which inevitably draws in the US'. Tehran's only hope is to strike Israel as hard as it can in an attempt to increase pressure on Israel to end the conflict before it draws in the entire region, including Iran's proxies in Iraq and Yemen. 'Iran's strategy, because it has a limited supply of missiles, is to inflict as much damage [as possible] to raise alarm in the international community and wear Israel down,' said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House. 'Iran will certainly be looking for a climbdown but has conditioned it on Israel also drawing back its military operations.' For now, there seems to be little appetite in Israel for any kind of slowing down. The deaths in the past 24 hours will only increase the public clamour for action. The Israel Defence Forces said on Monday it would continue to 'push east' to target Iran's missile and nuclear programmes. 'More than 50 fighter jets and aircraft carried out strikes and destroyed over 120 surface-to-surface missile launchers,' said Brigadier General Effie Defrin, the military spokesman. 'This amounts to one third of the surface-to-surface missile launchers possessed by the Iranian regime.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store