Fed's Barkin says tariffs will push up inflation
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond President Thomas Barkin said on Thursday tariffs are very likely to push inflation up over coming months, in remarks that said U.S. central bank policy is where it needs to be to deal with what lies ahead.
'I do believe we will see pressure on prices,' Barkin told a gathering of the New York Association for Business Economics.
When it comes to tariffs and their impact on price pressures, 'to date, these increases have had only modest effects on measured inflation, but I anticipate more pressure is coming,' amid comments from businesses that they expect to pass at least some of the rise in import taxes imposed by President Donald Trump.
'That said, I don't expect the impact on inflation to be anywhere near as significant as what we just experienced' during the pandemic and there are signs that consumers will try to move away from tariffed goods, which could limit some of the upsides for higher inflation.
Last week, the Fed's most recent gathering of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee saw officials leave their overnight target rate unchanged at between 4.25% and 4.5%. Uncertainty over the outlook is keeping the central bank on the sidelines amid expectations the tariffs will push up inflation this year while depressing growth and hiring.
In his remarks, Barkin noted the Fed is facing risks on both its job and inflation mandates. Citing the uncertainty of the outlook, Barkin declined to say where monetary policy is heading, while cautioning there are a number of scenarios in play for the central bank's interest rate target and the exact timing of a rate move matter much less than many expect.
While most Fed officials are in a wait-and-see mode and Fed Chair Jerome Powell reiterated that message this week in testimony before Congress, some officials on the Board of Governors have said they view tariffs as a one-time price increase and are open to cutting short-term interest rates at the late July FOMC meeting.
Futures markets believe the Fed will cut rates at the September FOMC meeting. Barkin told reporters after his speech that policymakers should never take any action off the table, while adding he's still seeking data to know what to do with interest rate policy.
'Given the strength in today's economy, we have time to track developments patiently and allow the visibility to improve,' Barkin said, adding, 'when it does, we are well positioned to address whatever the economy will require.'
Barkin also said that given inflation had been on a cooling trend at the onset of the tariff regime, hiking rates to contain price pressures 'doesn't seem like the topic of the day.'
Barkin said that as the economy now stands things look pretty good and recent inflation data was 'encouraging.' He said job growth has been 'healthy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump says 'big, beautiful' bill 'must' meet deadline as some Republicans waver
House Republicans are growing increasingly wary of the self-imposed July 4 deadline to get President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" to the White House, as the president warns that the bill "must" be ready for his signature by then. "I think it's more important to get the bill correct than it is to get it fast," Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., a former House Freedom Caucus chairman, told Fox News Digital. "I'm interested in a great deliverable product, and spending the time and the resources necessary to get that, whatever they may be." It's a thought shared by members outside of the conservative rebel group as well – Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., who represents part of New York City, said Fourth of July is a "realistic" goal, but not one she was married to. "I'm not set on getting this done by July 4th. I know that's a goal, it's a nice soundbite, doing this on Independence Day and celebrating America," Malliotakis said. "But at the end of the day, we've got to do it right. And I'd rather take a few more days, a few more weeks, to make sure we can deliver a good product for the American people." Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters on Friday that it was "possible" the deadline could slip, "but I don't want to even accept that as an option right now. We want to try to push this." The vast tax and immigration bill is currently in the Senate, where lawmakers are still working through several key issues on Medicaid and state and local tax (SALT) deductions among other details. An earlier version passed the House by just one vote in late May. Now, several House Republicans are balking at proposed changes in the Senate – though there's still no final product – and warning that the bill could lose their support when it returns to the House. Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., who leads the Doctors Caucus, told Fox News Digital he had issues with the Senate version's comparably harsher cuts to federal Medicaid funding. "There is uniform agreement amongst many, many members in the House - if there's a change in the [federal Medicaid assistance percentage], we're not voting for it. It would remove the Medicaid expansion of North Carolina. I won't stand for that," he said. Asked about the feasibility of a July 4 deadline, Murphy said, "I've been a surgeon all my life … if I plan things, I'm used to having them given up in case a patient needs me for emergencies and things like that." Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., a moderate, said "there might be some prudence" in letting go of the July 4 deadline. Conservative Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, was more optimistic. "I think it's more worth it to get the bill right, but that's not to say we won't get it done by then," he said. Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Pa., suggested the timeline will rely heavily on Trump. The Senate is expected to work through the weekend to pass the bill. Johnson told House Republicans, meanwhile, to be flexible next week when they're expected to be home in their districts. Sources have told Fox News Digital that House GOP leaders have offered varying estimations of when lawmakers will have to be back in Washington, from Tuesday through Thursday. And the House is up against at least one real-world deadline – the U.S. is expected to run out of cash to pay its debts by the summer, according to multiple projections. Republicans have made raising the debt limit a priority in the bill. Trump, for his part, wrote on Truth Social Friday, "The House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th – We can get it done." He said during a press conference earlier in the day, "We can go longer, but we'd like to get it done by that time, if possible."
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Fearing Tax Increases and Trump, G.O.P. Toils to Pass a Bill With Plenty to Hate
As Congress inches toward final action on the sweeping domestic policy package that President Trump is calling the 'big, beautiful bill,' it has come down to this: Republicans are preparing to back a measure that they fear gives their constituents little to love and lots to hate. The struggle Republicans are experiencing in securing votes for the legislation emanates from the fact that they are being asked to embrace steep cuts to the government safety net that could hit their states and districts hard — all in the service of extending existing tax cuts that don't offer much in the way of new benefits for most Americans. The heart of the legislation — $3.8 trillion in tax cuts — is already in place, enacted eight years ago during the first Trump administration. The measure simply extends those tax breaks, leaving Republican lawmakers unable to trumpet generous new tax savings for Americans. On the other hand, the bill would scale back popular health and nutrition programs to pay for part of the enormous cost of keeping the tax rates that are already in place. Reductions to Medicaid, SNAP and other safety net programs are not the only elements dividing the party. Republicans in states that have new clean energy projects started under a Biden-era program want those projects protected, while others want them ended immediately. A proposal to sell off public lands in the West has split Republicans from the region. A ban on states regulating artificial intelligence for 10 years is in dispute. Hard-right Republicans want much deeper cuts across the board. At the same time, the bulk of new spending in the legislation goes to the Pentagon and border security, two areas where Americans won't feel any boost in their own bank accounts. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Engadget
27 minutes ago
- Engadget
Trump ends trade talks with Canada over a digital services tax
President Donald Trump said the US is ending trade talks with Canada, effective immediately, over a tax on digital services that will impact American tech companies. He also pledged to announce further tariffs on Canada within the next week, adding in a Truth Social post that "they will be paying to do business with the United States of America." Canada's digital services tax (DST) is set to take effect on June 30, though it will be applied retroactively. According to The New York Times , US companies are preparing to pay around $2.7 billion to the Canadian government to cover a three percent tax on revenue they generated from users in the country. Companies including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb are subject to the levy, as things stand. In his post on Friday, Trump called the DST "a direct and blatant attack on our country." Amid trade talks with the US, Canada's finance minister, François-Philippe Champagne, said this month that the country had no plans to hit the pause button on the DST . Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney previously said they aimed to reach a trade deal by around July 20. Since taking office in January, Trump has been using tariffs as a negotiating tactic with other nations. The US reached a trade deal with China over rare earth minerals this week, and it is soon set to reimpose some of the levies that were put on hold in April for 90 days . The DST has been a bone of contention between the US and Canada for years. The Biden administration formally challenged the levy last year under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Other jurisdictions have considered or enacted a similar tax. It was reported in May that Germany is mulling a 10 percent levy on platforms such as Google and Facebook.
