
New Zealand Parliament suspends 3 Māori Party lawmakers for haka protest
WELLINGTON, New Zealand — New Zealand legislators voted Thursday to enact record suspensions from Parliament for three lawmakers who performed a Māori haka to protest a proposed law.
Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke received a seven-day ban and the leaders of her political party, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, were barred for 21 days. Three days had been the longest ban for a lawmaker from New Zealand's Parliament before.
The lawmakers from Te Pāti Māori, the Māori Party, performed the haka, a chanting dance of challenge, in November to oppose a widely unpopular bill, now defeated, that they said would reverse Indigenous rights.
The protest drew global headlines and provoked months of fraught debate among lawmakers about what the consequences for the lawmakers' actions should be and the place of Māori culture in Parliament.
Why the punishment was so strict
A committee of the lawmakers' peers in April recommended the lengthy bans. It said the lawmakers were not being punished for the haka, but for striding across the floor of the debating chamber toward their opponents while doing it.
Judith Collins, the committee chair, said the lawmakers' behavior was egregious, disruptive and potentially intimidating.
Maipi-Clarke, 22, rejected that description Thursday, citing other instances when legislators have left their seats and approached opponents without sanction. The suspended legislators said they are being treated more harshly than others because they are Māori.
'I came into this house to give a voice to the voiceless. Is that the real issue here?' Maipi-Clarke asked Parliament. 'Is that the real intimidation here? Are our voices too loud for this house?'
Why this haka was controversial
Inside and outside Parliament, the haka has increasingly been welcomed as an important part of New Zealand life. The sacred chant can be a challenge to the viewer but is not violent.
As Māori language and culture have become part of mainstream New Zealand in recent years, haka appear in a range of cultural, somber and celebratory settings. They also have rung out in Parliament to welcome the passage of high-profile laws.
Some who decried the protest haka in Parliament cited its timing, with Maipi-Clarke beginning the chant as votes were being tallied and causing a brief suspension of proceedings. She has privately apologized for the disruption to Parliament's Speaker, she said Thursday.
A few lawmakers urged their peers to consider rewriting rules about what lawmakers could do in Parliament to recognize Māori cultural protocols as accepted forms of protest. One cited changes to allow breastfeeding in the debating chamber as evidence the institution had amended rules before.
Who approved the suspensions
Normally the parliamentary committee that decides on punishments for errant lawmakers is in agreement on what should happen to them.
But panel members were sharply divided over the haka protest and the lengthy punishments were advanced only because the government has more legislators in Parliament than the opposition.
One party in the government bloc wanted even longer suspensions and had asked the committee if the Māori party lawmakers could be jailed. Most in opposition rejected any punishment beyond the one-day ban Maipi-Clarke already served.
Speaker Gerry Brownlee urged lawmakers last month to negotiate a consensus and ordered a free-ranging debate that would continue until all agreed to put the sanctions to a vote.
But no such accord was reached after hours of occasionally emotional speeches in which opposition lawmakers accused the government of undermining democracy by passing such a severe punishment on its opponents.
While the bans were certain to pass, even as the debate began Thursday it remained unclear whether opposition lawmakers would filibuster to prevent the suspensions from reaching a vote. By evening, with no one's mind changed, all lawmakers agreed the debate should end.
Every government lawmaker voted for the punishments, while all opposition members voted against them.
The law that prompted the protest
Thursday's debate capped a fraught episode for race relations in New Zealand, beginning with the controversial bill that the Māori Party lawmakers opposed.
The measures would have rewritten principles in the country's founding document, a treaty between Māori tribal leaders and representatives of the British Crown signed at the time New Zealand was colonized.
The bill's authors were chagrined by moves from Parliament and the courts in recent decades to enshrine the Treaty of Waitangi's promises. Opponents warned of constitutional crisis if the law was passed and tens of thousands of people marched to Parliament last November to oppose it.
Despite growing recognition for the treaty, Māori remain disadvantaged on most social and economic metrics compared to non-Māori New Zealanders.
Charlotte Graham-mclay, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Residents plan human chain to protest Dresden landfill development
Opponents of a landfill that's slated to open next to the community of Dresden are planning to form a human chain on Sunday to show just how close the dump is to the community. One organizer estimates they'll need at least 400 people to do it. "It's right across the road from some of the houses, and it's also only 800 metres, I believe, from the high school," said co-organizer Jodi-Lynn Janess. She hopes the hour-long event, which starts at 1 p.m., will see people joining hands and praying for the land and for the water, she said. The human chain is the latest in a series of actions taken by community members in and around Dresden to protest the development by York1. The site, which was once a landfill, has been idled for decades. They say they're concerned about the possibility of asbestos blowing in the air, toxins leaching into Molly's Creek and the Sydenham River and heavy trucks damaging the roads around the community. Ontario over-reliant on U.S. landfills, premier says The company proposes expanding the landfill site to cover 25 hectares and receive 6,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste each day. It told CBC in a June statement it plans to use the site to turn clean wood into mulch, compost, and raw materials for particleboard and paper manufacturing; to turn mixed wood waste into alternative low-carbon fuels; and to prepare rock and rubble for use in cement and concrete production, aggregate replacement in construction, base for sports fields or running tracks and decorative use in landscaping. Premier Doug Ford says his government is committed to the project because of an over-reliance on U.S. landfills at a time of deteriorating Canada-U.S. relations. The Ford government passed Bill 5 in June, which exempts "specified activities relating to the Chatham-Kent waste disposal site" from the need for an environmental assessment. The protesters are calling for the repeal of Bill 5 and the reinstatement of the environmental assessment process for the project. "This is 6,000 tonnes of garbage coming a day from Toronto — 700 trucks, which our infrastructure cannot hold," said human chain co-organizer Luanne Deline. "We have trouble now with our farms and our tractors and wagons coming out just to get on the highway to get to the mills. … We cannot handle another 700 trucks a day, 24 hours a day, every day. And because there's not a lot of insight, and there won't be now without an environmental assessment, we don't know what's really going on there. No one knows." A spokesperson for the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks told CBC in a statement the project "will still undergo extensive environmental processes and remain subject to strong provincial oversight and other regulatory requirements." Those, it said, include environmental compliance approvals (ECA) under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) and the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA). "Ontario exports nearly 40 per cent of its waste to the United States, and it is anticipated our landfills, as they stand, will be full within the next decade," the statement read. "The York 1 waste project, located just outside of Dresden, presented a unique opportunity to increase internal waste management capacity, ensure long-term stability, and reduce reliance on international systems - as it is an active landfill site and already has waste permissions." Asked whether the battle against the landfill is a lost cause given that the province has already passed Bill 5, human chain co-organizer Wendy Vercauteren said she's an optimist. "It is not unheard of for bills to be repealed because of public outcry," she told CBC's Windsor Morning. "Until the project is actually started, we're not giving up the fight." Deline pointed to the government's reversal on developing the Greenbelt lands near Toronto as an example of a successful public campaign. "There's no point in giving up," she said.


Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
Advance voting set to start as Poilievre eyes byelection 2nd chance
Voters in the federal Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot can head to the polls in byelection advance voting as early as Friday, Elections Canada says. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is eyeing a return to Parliament after he lost his previous riding of Carleton in April's federal election. Poilievre will be up against more than 200 people who are registered to run in the byelection, which is being held on Aug. 18. The list of candidates include Poilievre, Liberal candidate Darcy Spady, the NDP's Katherine Swampy, independent candidate Bonnie Critchley and dozens more sponsored by the Longest Ballot Committee, a protest group bringing attention to the issue of electoral reform. Advance polls will be open from Friday, Aug. 8, to Monday, Aug. 10., the election body said in a press release. Story continues below advertisement Polls will be open from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. local time on each of the four days of advance voting. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Voters can vote at their assigned polling stations and they can find out the address of their polling stations by reading the back of their voter information card, by visiting and entering their postal code or by calling 1-800-463-6868. 1:55 Byelection called for Battle River-Crowfoot, Poilievre seeks path back to Parliament Voters can also vote early at the local Elections Canada office in Battle River–Crowfoot until Tuesday, Aug. 12, 6 p.m. local time. They can also vote early by mail, by applying online by Tuesday, Aug. 12, 6 p.m., and returning their special ballot by mail. If the return envelope is addressed to the local Elections Canada office, they can also drop off their ballot in person at that office before polls close on election day. Story continues below advertisement Voters in the upcoming Battle River-Crowfoot byelection in eastern Alberta will be required to write out the name of their preferred candidate, Elections Canada said, because of the unusually high number of people running and past challenges with long ballots. The advocacy group Longest Ballot Committee also targeted Poilievre's former Ottawa riding of Carleton in the April general election, which he lost, registering some 91 candidates. — with files from Canadian Press


Calgary Herald
11 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Danielle Smith's environment boss tells Carney to hurry up — the clock ticks
Carney instead of getting rid of bad laws hurting investment cooks up another law where a select number of so-called nation-building projects will be hand-picked to go around those bad laws. By the way, Alberta wants a bitumen pipeline to the B.C. port of Prince Rupert. Of course, the obvious question is asked by the Alberta government. Why not, for starters, just get rid of the emissions cap on oil and gas and the net-zero power regulations and do a monster makeover of the No More Pipelines law so it becomes the More Pipelines law? Carney allowing certain projects to work around bad laws shows they are bad laws. Schulz circles back to Carney. The man sure talks a lot. Maybe he thinks his words somehow speak louder than actions. 'He's going to have to abandon these bad laws that stifle investment. Unfortunately we've seen a lot of lip service. It's time for the prime minister to be the prime minister. He needs to move fast. He needs to show Canadians and Albertans he's heard their concerns.' Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks with reporters during a news conference in Ottawa, Wednesday, July 30, 2025. Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press We are told to wait for the federal politicians to come back to Ottawa in the fall. 'But I would say we don't need Parliament to sit for Mark Carney to stand at a podium. He could do it tomorrow. He could stand at a podium and say: I've heard Albertans, I've heard Canadians. We are not moving forward with an oil and gas emissions cap.' Come to think of it, why doesn't he stand at the podium and announce that decision? Headline writers are standing by. Schulz has a few words for Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi who has accused the Smith government of picking fights and fuelling Alberta separatism. Schulz believes Nenshi is not listening to Albertans and that's why he is 'tanking in the polls.' Where do we go from here? At the Alberta Next gatherings, Schulz says they hear a lot of support for Alberta having 'more sovereignty' within Canada and not having a federal government infringing on the province over and over again. Schulz speaks of cautious optimism facing the future while knowing there is 'a real risk of a national unity crisis' if things don't turn out well. 'I'll be honest. Every day that goes by, that optimism starts to fade. The ball is in Carney's court.'