logo
Vietnam celebrates 50th anniversary of victory over US

Vietnam celebrates 50th anniversary of victory over US

Gulf Today02-05-2025
Vietnam celebrated the 50th anniversary of the victory of then communist North Vietnam over the United States, in which 3 million Vietnamese and 60,000 Americans had died. It was the defining war of the Cold War, which was an overt rivalry between democracies ostensibly led the United States and communism symbolised by the Ho Chi Minh-led North Vietnam.
Of course, then Soviet Union, now Russia, and China had supported the communist government in North Vietnam. It was a war that the Americans did not win. It took another 15 years for communism to collapse in Russia and in Eastern Europe.
But Vietnam remains defiantly communist. Like China, Vietnam does not follow the old communist-style ideology. Vietnam had embraced market economy, shook hands with old foe United States and it has prospered. Even as Vietnam staged a spectacular victory parade in Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon, in which Vietnamese, Chinese, Cambodian and Laotian soldiers participated, Vietnam Communist Party chief To Lam described the victory as a nationalist triumph of the Vietnamese nation.
There is of course the irony in the fact that orthodox communists do not believe in nationalism, but both Vietnamese and Chinese leaders take immense pride in their respective nationalisms.
Vietnamese Communist Party General-Secretary To Lam described the Vietnamese victory as 'a victory of faith', and cited Ho Chi Minh's motto, 'Vietnam is one, the Vietnamese people are one. Rivers may dry up, mountains may erode, but that truth will never change.'
Saigon fell on April 30, 1975 to the Vietnamese communist forces. The city which served as the capital of then South Vietnam government supported by Americans, was renamed Ho Chi Minh city, the legendary Communist Party leader of Vietnam.
And two parts of the country, North and South Vietnam, were united two years later. The united post-war Vietnam established diplomatic relations with the United States in 1995, and it had also become the strategic partner of the US in 2023.
The trade and economic relations between the former ideological rivals had become close, and Vietnam is today one of the prosperous economies in the region and in the world.
The Vietnamese have stuck to the single party rule of the Communist Party but they have opened up their economy, and they did not hesitate to forge economic ties with the United States. The reason for the resilience of the Vietnamese Communist Party is the gratitude of the people that it stood up to the might of the then superpower, the United States, and it did not allow the country to split.
Vietnam could have ended up like Korea, divided into communist North Korea and generally democratic South Korea. But they remain separated. North Vietnam could have struck a deal with United States and settled for a divided Vietnam, where the communists remained in power in the north and the American-supported regime in the south.
But the Vietnamese communists stuck to the principle and idea of a united Vietnam, and did not pause until they had achieved it. The victory of the Vietnamese over the Americans was seen as that of David against Goliath, the small nation against the big one.
But the Vietnamese soon realised that there in no point in gloating over victory once victory was achieved. They changed tracks quickly enough and looked to the future prospects of the country.
They realised that the future could be bright only with a strong and vibrant economy, and they unhesitatingly embraced the market economy and capitalism. They did not let ideological blinkers come in the way. Americans might argue that they might have lost the war, but they won the war of ideas. And the Vietnamese can justifiably claim that they preserved the unity of their country which was the most important challenge.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indonesia cannot claim solidarity with Palestine while sending students to Israel
Indonesia cannot claim solidarity with Palestine while sending students to Israel

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Indonesia cannot claim solidarity with Palestine while sending students to Israel

In April, I warned that Indonesia's quiet pipeline of students into Israeli institutions was not just diplomatically incoherent, it was morally indefensible. That pipeline remains open, even as Indonesia amplifies its support for Palestine at the United Nations, sends thousands of tonnes of humanitarian aid and stages massive protests across the country. This contradiction is no longer subtle. It is a full-blown alarm. In late July, another group of Indonesian agriculture students from East Nusa Tenggara departed for Israel as part of a nearly year-long internship at the Arava International Centre for Agricultural Training (Aicat). This is not a fringe programme. It is part of a formal agreement signed in 2014 between Chinese-Indonesian businessman Agus Suherman and the Israeli-based training centre. A total of 100 Indonesian students were enrolled in the 2024-2025 cohort. The Indonesian government may not officially recognise Israel, but this programme is recognition by another name. These students enter on Israeli visas, train at Israeli institutions and work on Israeli land - even as Palestinians are starved, bombed, displaced and imprisoned by the same state. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters This is not an agricultural exchange but complicity masquerading as pragmatism. Hollow stance On 3 August, thousands of Indonesians gathered at Jakarta's National Monument, waving Palestinian flags and holding placards demanding justice for Gaza. The protest was peaceful yet powerful - a collaboration between civil society groups and the Indonesian Ulama Council, supported by thousands of ordinary citizens. A day earlier, demonstrators had rallied outside the Egyptian embassy, calling for the opening of the Rafah crossing. No amount of rice or aid Indonesia contributes can offset the political damage done by sending even a single student to Israel These rallies were not symbolic acts. They reflected real rage, grief and solidarity. And yet, they also revealed something deeply uncomfortable: that even as Indonesians mobilise in the streets, the country's institutions are quietly undermining that resistance - making decisions that normalise and legitimise the very regime responsible for Gaza's devastation. Indonesia has sent substantial amounts of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people. Just last week, Foreign Minister Sugiono announced an additional 10,000 tonnes of rice, along with a long-term cultivation initiative in Sumatra and Kalimantan to support Palestinian food security. These are meaningful contributions. But no amount of rice can offset the political damage done by sending even a single student to Israel. It is impossible to condemn apartheid while enrolling in its institutions, or wave the Palestinian flag in Jakarta while validating the systems that trample Palestinian lives. These contradictions do not cancel each other out but instead expose the entire framework of Indonesia's pro-Palestine stance as hollow. Whitewashing apartheid Some argue that academic exchange programmes are apolitical, and that students are simply there to learn agriculture, not endorse an apartheid regime. But that is a fiction. War on Gaza: Universities that resist BDS are at risk of losing legitimacy Read More » Israeli agricultural "advances" are not developed in a vacuum. They are achieved on stolen land, with stolen water and through an economy built on occupation. While Indonesian students irrigate crops in the Arava desert, Palestinian farmers watch their orchards wither under blockade and bombardment. Education, in this case, is not neutral. It is a tool of whitewashing. Moreover, Aicat is not a Unesco facility. It is a cog in a machine built to showcase Israel's technological prowess while obscuring the brutality of its policies. Every Indonesian student who participates becomes - knowingly or not - a testimonial: proof that even critics of Israel are willing to engage, given the right incentives. What otherwise would have been a knowledge exchange is simply a trade of principle for access. No excuse Indonesia's policy of non-recognition was never just bureaucratic. It was a moral line that has been crossed, marked not by headlines but by quiet departures to Tel Aviv airport and internships stripped of political context. This is how normalisation happens: not through embassies, but through loopholes, internships and the slow erosion of outrage by routine. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of Israel's genocide in Gaza Indonesia has alternatives. If the goal is agricultural advancement, countries such as Japan, South Korea, India, Turkey and Brazil offer high-tech training without compromising their values. There is no excuse for choosing a country that demolishes homes in Jenin, bombs hospitals in Rafah, and jails children from Hebron to Nablus. Palestine does not need charity from Indonesia. It needs solidarity, and solidarity requires sacrifice Palestine does not need charity from Indonesia. It needs solidarity, and solidarity requires sacrifice - even if that means giving up access to cutting-edge irrigation systems, especially when that technology is soaked in injustice. Indonesia must decide: is Palestine a political cause or a branding tool? Is the occupation a red line or a grey area? Is the suffering in Gaza just another headline - or a moral call to action? If Indonesian leaders want their protests to matter, their donations to mean something and their statements at the UN to carry weight, then the country must stop enabling a system it claims to oppose. No more students should be sent to Israel - not now, not ever, not under any excuse. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Israeli army unit 'tasked with smearing and targeting Palestinian journalists in Gaza'
Israeli army unit 'tasked with smearing and targeting Palestinian journalists in Gaza'

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israeli army unit 'tasked with smearing and targeting Palestinian journalists in Gaza'

Israel's army has a special intelligence unit dedicated to smearing and targeting Palestinian journalists in Gaza, according to a new investigation by Israeli-Palestinian magazine +972. Referred to as the 'Legitimisation Cell', the unit was formed in October of 2023 at the onset of the genocide that Israel is waging in the Gaza Strip. The +972 investigation, which interviewed three intelligence sources, revealed that the unit was meant to portray Palestinian journalists in Gaza as 'as undercover Hamas operatives, in an effort to blunt growing global outrage over Israel's killing of reporters'. The report comes days after the Israeli military assassinated Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif in an air strike, following a months-long campaign seeking to portray the journalist as a military operative in an attempt to justify his targeted killing. The attack on Sunday night also targeted and killed Al Jazeera correspondent and Middle East Eye contributor Mohammed Qreiqeh, alongside camera operators Mohammed Noufal, Ibrahim Zaher and Moamen Aliwa, and freelance journalist Mohammed al-Khalidi. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The Legitimisation Cell has played the role of a public relations body meant to declassify and produce counter-narratives when media criticism of Israel is heightened, a source told +972. This information has subsequently been shared with media outlets and 'also passed regularly to the Americans through direct channels', the report added. The report revealed several ways in which the unit has operated to manufacture doubt against the credibility of Palestinian narratives. For instance, on 17 October 2023, an explosion hit Al Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City. The Gaza health ministry said it was caused by an Israeli air strike and killed more than 500 Palestinians, while Israel blamed a misfired Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket. The following day, the Legitimisation Cell released a phone call recording of so-called 'Hamas operatives' suggesting that the explosion may have been caused by a misfire from the Palestinian group. Palestinian colleagues pay tribute to six journalists murdered by Israel Read More » However, according to +972, the speaker quoted in the phone call recording was a Palestinian human rights activist who 'insisted he had never been a Hamas member', and was having a 'benign conversation with another Palestinian friend.' A 2024 investigation by Forensic Architecture investigating the cause of the strike disputed Israel's claim, instead finding that the explosion was likely caused by an Israeli interceptor rocket. Israel has systematically targeted and struck Gaza's healthcare infrastructure since October 2023. On Wednesday, a Doctors Without Borders (MSF) staff member stated that there is 'not one fully functioning' state hospital left in Gaza. In October 2024, the Israeli military named six Palestinian journalists in Gaza as targets, claiming they were involved in militant groups. The list included Sharif and another prominent Al Jazeera journalist, Hossam Shabat, who was assassinated in March of 2025. Israel has targeted and killed at least 238 Palestinian journalists in Gaza since October 2023, according to local authorities.

Trump and Putin to spar over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit
Trump and Putin to spar over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit

Al Etihad

time12 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

Trump and Putin to spar over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit

15 Aug 2025 08:58 MOSCOW (REUTERS)Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin hold talks in Alaska on Friday, with the US President's hopes of sealing a ceasefire agreement on Ukraine uncertain, but with a last gasp offer from Putin of a possible nuclear deal that could help both men save meeting of the Russian and US leaders at a Cold War-era air force base in Alaska, their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House, comes amid Ukrainian and European fears that Trump might sell Kyiv who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, said on Thursday the three-and-a-half-year conflict had proven a tougher nut to crack than he had said if his talks with Putin went well, setting up a subsequent three-way summit with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy - who was not invited to Friday's meeting - would be even more important than his encounter with is pressing for a truce to bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize, something he has made clear is important to and its European allies were heartened by their conference call on Wednesday in which they said Trump agreed Ukraine must be involved in any talks about ceding land. Wednesday's call eased their fears of a Trump-Putin deal that would leave Ukraine under pressure to make territorial and other concessions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store