Vietnam celebrates 50th anniversary of victory over US
Vietnam celebrated the 50th anniversary of the victory of then communist North Vietnam over the United States, in which 3 million Vietnamese and 60,000 Americans had died. It was the defining war of the Cold War, which was an overt rivalry between democracies ostensibly led the United States and communism symbolised by the Ho Chi Minh-led North Vietnam.
Of course, then Soviet Union, now Russia, and China had supported the communist government in North Vietnam. It was a war that the Americans did not win. It took another 15 years for communism to collapse in Russia and in Eastern Europe.
But Vietnam remains defiantly communist. Like China, Vietnam does not follow the old communist-style ideology. Vietnam had embraced market economy, shook hands with old foe United States and it has prospered. Even as Vietnam staged a spectacular victory parade in Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon, in which Vietnamese, Chinese, Cambodian and Laotian soldiers participated, Vietnam Communist Party chief To Lam described the victory as a nationalist triumph of the Vietnamese nation.
There is of course the irony in the fact that orthodox communists do not believe in nationalism, but both Vietnamese and Chinese leaders take immense pride in their respective nationalisms.
Vietnamese Communist Party General-Secretary To Lam described the Vietnamese victory as 'a victory of faith', and cited Ho Chi Minh's motto, 'Vietnam is one, the Vietnamese people are one. Rivers may dry up, mountains may erode, but that truth will never change.'
Saigon fell on April 30, 1975 to the Vietnamese communist forces. The city which served as the capital of then South Vietnam government supported by Americans, was renamed Ho Chi Minh city, the legendary Communist Party leader of Vietnam.
And two parts of the country, North and South Vietnam, were united two years later. The united post-war Vietnam established diplomatic relations with the United States in 1995, and it had also become the strategic partner of the US in 2023.
The trade and economic relations between the former ideological rivals had become close, and Vietnam is today one of the prosperous economies in the region and in the world.
The Vietnamese have stuck to the single party rule of the Communist Party but they have opened up their economy, and they did not hesitate to forge economic ties with the United States. The reason for the resilience of the Vietnamese Communist Party is the gratitude of the people that it stood up to the might of the then superpower, the United States, and it did not allow the country to split.
Vietnam could have ended up like Korea, divided into communist North Korea and generally democratic South Korea. But they remain separated. North Vietnam could have struck a deal with United States and settled for a divided Vietnam, where the communists remained in power in the north and the American-supported regime in the south.
But the Vietnamese communists stuck to the principle and idea of a united Vietnam, and did not pause until they had achieved it. The victory of the Vietnamese over the Americans was seen as that of David against Goliath, the small nation against the big one.
But the Vietnamese soon realised that there in no point in gloating over victory once victory was achieved. They changed tracks quickly enough and looked to the future prospects of the country.
They realised that the future could be bright only with a strong and vibrant economy, and they unhesitatingly embraced the market economy and capitalism. They did not let ideological blinkers come in the way. Americans might argue that they might have lost the war, but they won the war of ideas. And the Vietnamese can justifiably claim that they preserved the unity of their country which was the most important challenge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Asian markets extend gains as China-US talks head into second day
10 June 2025 08:33 Hong Kong (AFP) Asian stocks squeezed out more gains Tuesday as the latest round of China-US trade talks moved into a second day, with one of Donald Trump's top advisers saying he expected "a big, strong handshake".There is optimism the negotiations -- which come after the US president spoke to Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping last week -- will bring some much-needed calm to markets and ease tensions between the economic advances in Asian equities built on Monday's rally and followed a broadly positive day on Wall Street, where the S&P 500 edged closer to the record high touched earlier in the week's meeting in London will look to smooth key issues on the agenda at the talks are expected to be exports of rare earth minerals used in a wide range of things including smartphones and electric vehicle batteries."In Geneva, we had agreed to lower tariffs on them, and they had agreed to release the magnets and rare earths that we need throughout the economy," Trump's top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, told CNBC on even though Beijing was releasing some supplies, "it was going a lot slower than some companies believed was optimal", he he said he expected "a big, strong handshake" at the end of the talks."Our expectation is that after the handshake, any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume," Hassett also said the Trump administration might be willing to ease some recent curbs on tech president told reporters at the White House: "We are doing well with China. China's not easy."I'm only getting good reports."Tokyo led gains in Asian markets, with Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Seoul, Singapore, Taipei, Wellington and Jakarta also well up."The bulls will layer into risk on any rhetoric that publicly keeps the two sides at the table," said Pepperstone's Chris Weston."And with the meeting spilling over to a second day, the idea of some sort of loose agreement is enough to underpin the grind higher in US equity and risk exposures more broadly."Investors are also awaiting key US inflation data this week, which could impact the Federal Reserve's monetary policy amid warnings Trump's tariffs will refuel inflation strengthening the argument to keep interest rates on it also faces pressure from the president to cut rates, with bank officials due to make a decision at their meeting next week. While recent jobs data has eased concerns about the US economy, analysts remain cautious. Stock Markets Continue full coverage
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
Diplomats Seek Breakthrough in London Trade Truce
Top-level officials from Washington and Beijing convened at London's historic Lancaster House to try to uphold a fragile trade truce. The US team—led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer—pressed China to lift export restrictions on rare earth minerals, a linchpin in sectors from electric vehicles to semiconductors. China's delegation, headed by Vice‑Premier He Lifeng and joined by Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and vice‑minister Li Chenggang, emphasised sustaining the state‑driven economic model while seeking concessions on US visa rules and technology access. Talks resumed for a second day, with a declared focus on export‐control mechanisms that threaten to unravel the Geneva‐brokered tariff truce agreed on 12 May. That earlier pact suspended punitive levies exceeding 100 percent for 90 days, offering markets a brief reprieve. The inclusion of Howard Lutnick underscores the significance of rare earths, as Washington eyes relief from export curbs imposed this year. Economic data highlights the toll of stifled trade: China's exports to the US plunged 34.5 percent year‑on‑year in May—the steepest decline since early 2020—driven by both tariff escalation and export restrictions. In the US, while inflation remains subdued and employment resilient, early indicators hint at a cooling economy amid these disruptions. ADVERTISEMENT Diplomatic momentum emanates from a phone call between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping on 5 June—their first such exchange since Trump's inauguration—where Xi reportedly signalled Beijing's willingness to resume shipments of rare earths. Trump later described the discussion as yielding 'very positive' outcomes and claimed he was 'only getting good reports' from the London delegation. US National Economic Council Chairman Kevin Hassett offered further assurances, stating the administration was preparing to ease certain high‑tech export restrictions and expecting China to significantly ramp up rare earth shipments. Chinese officials upheld their stance on economic self‑reliance, under Xi's 'dual‑circulation' policy, signalling reluctance to overhaul structural economic controls. Analysts suggest Beijing may exchange modest export concessions for US rollbacks on visa limits for Chinese nationals and access to cutting‑edge semiconductor technology. Despite the diplomatic overtures, analysts caution that ambitions for sweeping reform are unlikely. The US retains a hawkish posture and is pursuing broader decoupling from China on strategic supply chains, reducing the odds of a comprehensive agreement. Eurasia Group chief Ian Bremmer warned there was 'little prospect for the bilateral relationship to become constructive' amid entrenched structural differences. European manufacturers, notably German automakers, have raised alarm over supply bottlenecks from China's rare earth export licensing regime, implemented in April, citing risks to global production schedules. The talks have therefore resonated well beyond the bilateral agenda, prompting heightened interest from supply‑chain dependent nations. UK officials, though officially not party to the negotiations, provided logistical support and voiced encouragement. Chancellor Rachel Reeves met with both delegations on the sidelines, while Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds engaged with Chinese counterparts. British leaders clearly signalled a preference for diplomacy, stating that a trade war 'is in nobody's interests'. Institutionally, this dialogue reflects the newly established China‑US economic and trade consultation mechanism, replacing previous multi‑track platforms and underscoring a shift towards direct and high‑level engagement. Legal complications persist in Washington: the Trump administration is appealing a federal ruling that its tariff actions exceed presidential authority. A decision from the appellate court, possibly extending to the Supreme Court, could determine whether tariffs remain in force during the review process. Markets responded with tentative optimism: global equities recovered a significant portion of pre‑talk losses following the Geneva truce and subsequent London announcements. However, investors remained cautious, aware the staged progress may not translate into lasting reform. The London round, stretching into Tuesday, is shaped by urgency driven from both capitals. Washington seeks tangible actions: resumed access to rare earths and easing of advanced technology curbs. Beijing aims to protect its economic model while negotiating incremental gains, such as improved visa issuance and broader recognition of Chinese tech firms. This high‑stakes diplomacy marks a pivotal moment in a wider geopolitical contest for economic supremacy. Whether the Lancaster House talks blossom into a durable détente or merely delay the next escalation depends on bridging both substantive and strategic divides.
Gulf Today
13 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Reclaiming the US Flag for ‘No Kings Day'
Paul Loeb, Tribune News Service Will marchers carry flags on "No Kings Day"? On June 14, more than 1,000 local demonstrations will challenge President Donald Trump's North Korean-style military parade for his birthday with our defense of democracy. The 14th is also Flag Day and the 250th anniversary of the US Army. The flag can't replace protest signs. But it complements and amplifies them. The demonstrations send a message that even as Trump and his allies wrap themselves in their flags, they are betraying the best of America. They highlight a culture of corruption where the only Americans who matter are allies of Trump at the top and persons or institutions who would challenge this become subjects of attacks. Our flags make clear, in contrast, that we are defending Americans' fundamental right to speak out, without which all other rights become meaningless. They're a message to all who agree with us but also to all those Americans who voted for Trump or stayed home, rejecting both candidates. Because to change the direction of our country, the support of at least some of these people will be essential. As "No Kings Day" reminds us, 'The flag doesn't belong to Donald Trump. It belongs to us.' But at most anti-Trump protests, flags have been absent or marginal. I counted one when several thousand people marched in Seattle this past May Day, plus scattered Uncle Sam and Statue of Liberty images. That may be because carrying the flag feels uncomfortable, a false embrace for many who've marched to challenge American wars, call out racial injustice, or push back against corporate power. But the flag also stands for legacies of courage and sacrifice that should give us all hope and strength, like the classic World War II image of GIs raising it over Iwo Jima. The flag represents the imperfect but essential mechanisms of democracy that Trump's regime so profoundly threatens, ones that allow us to keep working for justice. In defending these mechanisms and the rule of law, Thomas Jefferson condemned the very Alien and Sedition Acts whose remnants Trump is now abusing. These acts created the power of kings, Jefferson warned, writing of threats to the 'constitutional rights and liberties of the States and by the suspicions of the President, or be thought dangerous to his or their election, or other interests, public or personal.' These acts first targeted 'the friendless alien,' Jefferson wrote, but 'the citizen will soon follow.' Flags have long been part of the protest tradition and may have even more impact when those speaking out are being marginalized or attacked. American labor activists from the radical IWW union carried them at the Lawrence Textile 'Bread and Roses' Strike. They fly next to Martin Luther King Jr. in photos from the 1963 March on Washington and his talks at anti-war rallies. This year, demonstrators who helped defeat South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's dictatorial power grab waved South Korean flags along with their signs. Some recent anti-Trump rallies have featured them. But they need to become protest staples to help take the flag back. A recent Vietnam trip reminded me of the power of national pride. Americans are welcomed now, even as museums, statues, and street names commemorate heroes in what they call 'the American war,' and the related fights against the Japanese and French occupations. But Vietnam also honors 13th, 15th, and 16th-century kings who resisted and eventually defeated repeated invasions by the Chinese and Mongols. The country's leadership could have dismissed them as the embodiment of now-discarded feudalism. Instead, they present their stories as part of a continuing story of resistance, a history they highlighted during the war as Ho Chi Minh and other leaders talked of fighting for their country, not communism. Whatever the limits of Vietnam's current regime in terms of democracy, this worked because the roots of national patriotism ran deeper than any particular ideology. The threat to American democracy that those of us marching address is internal, of course (with help from white South African billionaires Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and David Sacks). But the lesson of patriotism and national pride as a wellspring of resistance still holds true. I've learned to appreciate those who bring flags to social justice protests. And I finally bought my own the other week at my local hardware store to complement a 'Don't Putinize America' sign I plan to carry. The young woman at the counter's initial look seemed to mark me, an older white man, as a likely Trump supporter. When I said I was buying it for the Trump protest, 'No Kings Day,' she broke into a grin. No matter our anger or disappointment for America failing to achieve much of what it should be, we need to defend what we have had and the possibility of what could be. Making the flag our own helps us do that.
