
Big Tech's spend on generative AI still a staggering shot in the dark
tech
giants leading the rush into generative
AI
are in rude financial health. But strong as their latest earnings performance may look, not much can be directly attributed to generative AI.
Nor is it entirely clear how they will ultimately justify the massive increase in capital spending to build and deliver the technology.
After
Alphabet
last week, that was the message again as
stellar results
from
Microsoft
and
Meta
lifted tech stocks across the board on Thursday.
At Meta, AI is certainly having an impact, bringing improvements in advertising efficiency and better personalisation of content. But this reflects an earlier investment in a different form of AI, not the generative kind.
READ MORE
Talking to Wall Street, chief executive Mark Zuckerberg was clear that his sights are on the horizon: Meta doesn't expect generative AI to have much impact on revenue for at least the next couple of years.
That makes the $100 billion (€87.7 billion) or so it is planning to plough into new facilities and equipment in 2026 – close to 50 per cent of its entire expected revenue for the year – a staggering shot in the dark.
Microsoft's booming spending on AI is on more solid ground. The $30 billion it expects to spend on capex in the current quarter is more than it spent in the whole of 2023. A burgeoning backlog of business and shortage of data centres means much of this new capacity is already spoken for.
But the centrepiece of its latest results – a 34 per cent surge in its Azure cloud platform – owed much to other factors, such as a general move by companies to the cloud, rather than to generative AI. While many customers are piloting the new form of AI in their businesses, few have put it into full-scale use.
If the biggest tech companies are ploughing deeper into generative AI regardless, it is due to two beliefs. One is that the technology is about to reach a level where it is truly useful, and though they may not have all the answers yet about how it will ultimately be used, they are best placed to figure it out.
[
Don't be fooled: AI is a long way from being able to think for itself
Opens in new window
]
Zuckerberg has described this as the coming of superintelligence, echoing the quasi-mystical belief in some corners of Silicon Valley that AI is about to accelerate past some critical threshold and leave humans in the rear-view mirror.
There is no objective measure for comparing overall machine and human intelligence. But while at risk of inflating the hype, his comments point to a wider belief in the technology reaching a new level of usefulness.
Zuckerberg wrote last week of trying to build a 'personal superintelligence' for all Meta users that will help people to 'achieve your goals'. The implication: Meta is joining the race to create all-purpose, personalised AI agents to run your life, in competition with companies such as Google and OpenAI.
The vagueness leaves many questions about what form these services will take, and how they will be monetised.
The general message from the tech giants is that this doesn't matter: they have the audience, they're creating the infrastructure, they'll eventually figure it out.
Moving fast, however, will be critical. Companies like OpenAI are making the technology generally available, empowering a new generation of tech start-ups with their own ideas for disruptive AI services.
A second belief is that big tech companies alone have the financial wherewithal to build and deliver generative AI and, at this stage in the game, none of them want to risk getting left behind by underinvesting.
For now, they have been able to take the financial strain. Microsoft's capital spending has jumped 130 per cent in the past two years to $66.5 billion. But its free cash flow still advanced 20 per cent, and it didn't need to interrupt the $40 billion or so it pays out each year in dividends and stock buy-backs.
[
McKinsey bars China practice from generative AI work amid geopolitical tensions
Opens in new window
]
With 2026 shaping up to be another big year of investment, the spending will start to weigh more on profits. Wall Street analysts had been anticipating an earnings slowdown for Big Tech. Burgeoning depreciation charges will add to the pressure: Meta and Microsoft cautioned that their latest wave of investment is heavily concentrated in equipment such as servers – short-lived assets that hit the income statement more quickly.
The
DeepSeek shock this year
was a warning that smaller, cheaper AI models, made widely available, could pose serious competition. Big Tech may be basking in Wall Street's approval this week, but the urgency to show a payback from generative AI spending will only intensify. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Is Dublin one of the most dangerous cities in Europe? No.
Pat Leahy and Harry McGee join Hugh Linehan to look back on the week in politics: Fox News and its standard of journalism were highlighted during an episode of Will Cain Show this week that featured media commentator and author Douglas Murray talking about open borders migration. During the segment Murray claimed Dublin had gone from being one of the safest cities in Europe to one of its most dangerous. His basis for this was a survey conducted by the Online Betting Guide (OLBG) entitled European Nightlife Index Casinos. In it, Dublin was ranked ninth in Europe with Birmingham, Naples and Paris placed among the most dangerous cities. A group of 16 members of the House of Representatives have sought to exert pressure on Ireland's Government by writing to US treasury secretary Scott Bessent to request he consider adding Ireland to a list of countries boycotting Israel if the proposed Occupied Territories Bill is passed. Billionaire businessman Dermot Desmond feels Artificial Intelligence will make Dublin's planned MetroLink obsolete and has urged the Government to shelve the €10 billion project. And Independent ministers are not happy with the current rules around inheritance tax . Plus, the panel picks their favourite Irish Times pieces of the week: Diarmaid Ferriter and Stephen Collins on the legacy of Daniel O'Connell, Cliff Taylor on how Ireland's economy still remains suspended between Boston and Berlin, and Sonia Harris Pope on Jewish identity in Ireland at the moment.


RTÉ News
33 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
OpenAI launches GPT-5 as AI race accelerates
OpenAI has launched its GPT-5 artificial intelligence model, the highly anticipated latest installment of a technology that has helped transform global business and culture. OpenAI's GPT models are the AI technology that powers the popular ChatGPT chatbot, and GPT-5 will be available to all 700 million ChatGPT users, OpenAI said. The big question is whether the company that kicked off the generative AI frenzy will be capable of continuing to drive significant technological advancements that attract enterprise-level users to justify the enormous sums of money it is investing to fuel these developments. The release comes at a critical time for the AI industry. The world's biggest AI developers - Alphabet, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft, which backs OpenAI - have dramatically increased capital expenditures to pay for AI data centers, nourishing investor hopes for great returns. These four companies expect to spend nearly $400bn (€342bn) this fiscal year in total. OpenAI is now in early discussions to allow employees to cash out at a $500bn (€428bn) valuation, a huge step-up from its current $300bn (€257bn) valuation. Top AI researchers now command $100m (€85m) signing bonuses. "So far, business spending on AI has been pretty weak, while consumer spending on AI has been fairly robust because people love to chat with ChatGPT," said economics writer Noah Smith. "But the consumer spending on AI just isn't going to be nearly enough to justify all the money that is being spent on AI data centres," he added. OpenAI is emphasizing GPT-5's enterprise prowess. In addition to software development, the company said GPT-5 excels in writing, health-related queries, and finance. "GPT-5 is really the first time that I think one of our mainline models has felt like you can ask a legitimate expert, a PhD-level expert, anything," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said at a press briefing. "One of the coolest things it can do is write you good instantaneous software. This idea of software on demand is going to be one of the defining features of the GPT-5 era," he added. In demos yesterday, OpenAI showed how GPT-5 could be used to create entire working pieces of software based on written text prompts, commonly known as "vibe coding". One key measure of success is whether the step up from GPT-4 to GPT-5 is on par with the research lab's previous improvements. Two early reviewers said that while the new model impressed them with its ability to code and solve science and math problems, they believe the leap from the GPT-4 to GPT-5 was not as large as OpenAI's prior improvements. Even if the improvements are large, GPT-5 is not advanced enough to wholesale replace humans. Mr Altman said that GPT-5 still lacks the ability to learn on its own, a key component to enabling AI to match human abilities. On his popular AI podcast, Dwarkesh Patel compared current AI to teaching a child to play a saxophone by reading notes from the last student. "A student takes one attempt," he said. "The moment they make a mistake, you send them away and write detailed instructions about what went wrong. The next student reads your notes and tries to play Charlie Parker cold. When they fail, you refine the instructions for the next student. This just wouldn't work," he said. More thinking Nearly three years ago, ChatGPT introduced the world to generative AI, dazzling users with its ability to write humanlike prose and poetry, quickly becoming one of the fastest growing apps ever. In March 2023, OpenAI followed up ChatGPT with the release of GPT-4, a large language model that made huge leaps forward in intelligence. While GPT-3.5, an earlier version, received a bar exam score in the bottom 10%, GPT-4 passed the simulated bar exam in the top 10%. GPT-4's leap was based on more compute power and data, and the company was hoping that "scaling up" in a similar way would consistently lead to improved AI models. But OpenAI ran into issues scaling up. One problem was the data wall the company ran into, and OpenAI's former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever said last year that while processing power was growing, the amount of data was not. He was referring to the fact that large language models are trained on massive datasets that scrape the entire internet, and AI labs have no other options for large troves of human-generated textual data. Apart from the lack of data, another problem was that 'training runs' for large models are more likely to have hardware-induced failures given how complicated the system is, and researchers may not know the eventual performance of the models until the end of the run, which can take months. At the same time, OpenAI discovered another route to smarter AI, called "test-time compute," a way to have the AI model spend more time compute power "thinking" about each question, allowing it to solve challenging tasks such as math or complex operations that demand advanced reasoning and decision-making. GPT-5 acts as a router, meaning if a user asks GPT-5 a particularly hard problem, it will use test-time compute to answer the question. This is the first time the general public will have access to OpenAI's test-time compute technology, something that Altman said is important to the company's mission to build AI that benefits all of humanity. Mr Altman believes the current investment in AI is still inadequate.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Intel chief hits out at ‘misinformation' after Trump calls on him to resign
Intel's chief executive Lip-Bu Tan has hit out at 'misinformation' over his career after Donald Trump alleged the semiconductor industry veteran was 'highly conflicted' and should resign. In a letter to Intel staff published late on Thursday, Mr Tan said that Intel was 'engaging' with the Trump administration 'to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts'. 'There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles . . . I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40 years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem – and I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards,' Mr Tan wrote. Mr Tan's move to reassure staff at Intel, the only US-headquartered company capable of manufacturing advanced chips, came hours after Mr Trump had demanded his resignation in a post on Truth Social. READ MORE Mr Trump did not detail Mr Tan's alleged conflicts of interest but the US president's broadside followed a letter from Tom Cotton, the Republican head of the Senate intelligence committee, to Intel's chair expressing 'concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations' and Mr Tan's ties to China. Mr Tan has been a prolific investor in Chinese tech companies through his San Francisco-based venture capital firm as well as companies based in Hong Kong. His past investments have included Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp, China's largest chip manufacturer. Before being appointed Intel chief earlier this year, Mr Tan ran California-based Cadence Design Systems, which last week admitted to violating US export controls by selling its chip design tools to a Chinese university with close ties to the military. Since taking the top job, Mr Tan has launched a major cost-cutting programme and last month warned that Intel might be forced to abandon development of its next-generation manufacturing technology if it could not secure a large customer. In the letter, Mr Tan said that Intel's board was 'fully supportive' of 'the work we are doing to transform our company'. He added that he 'fully share[s] the President's commitment to advancing US national and economic security'. 'The United States has been my home for more than 40 years. I love this country and am profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me. I also love this company,' Mr Tan noted. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025