Stolen From Buddhist Monks, Sacred Painting Is Returned by Chicago Museum
For years, guilt and anguish haunted the temple's abbot, Ham Tae-wan. Two of the stolen paintings were eventually recovered in 2014 after an extensive search in South Korea, and the thieves were prosecuted. But the trail of the last two paintings ran cold. More years passed, and the abbot became despondent.
'I have blamed myself for failing to safeguard these Buddhist paintings that are objects of faith in Korea,' he wrote in a letter. 'Not just art.'
Then, in 2023, Korean government officials discovered something surprising: One of the missing paintings appeared in the online collections database for the Smart Museum of Art at the University of Chicago, listed under the wrong title. Officials alerted the monks.
In August of that year, the museum received a letter from Jinwoo, president of the Jogye Order, Korea's largest sect of Buddhism. 'I hope that the museum will work with us amicably on this matter so this sacred Buddhist painting can be returned,' the president said.
It is never a positive story when a stolen religious object from Asia is discovered in a Western museum. But the tale of the painting's return is an example of how Western cultural institutions can sometimes use the repatriation process to mend relationships with cultural and religious groups in other parts of the world.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Historic former dormitory building collapses in a giant dust cloud in Russia
Dramatic footage from Ufa, Russia, shows a former student dormitory collapsing in a thunderous heap of bricks and debris on July 30. Once home to generations of students and recognized as a cultural heritage site, the building's fall has triggered an urgent investigation into possible preservation failures.
Yahoo
27-07-2025
- Yahoo
Crashed Jeju Air jet still had working engine, probe update says
STORY: ::File South Korean investigators have suggested that the Jeju Air plane involved in December's deadly crash could have continued flying for longer, despite damage to its engines due to a bird strike. :: Lee Geun-young That's according to their latest progress report seen by Reuters. Instead, the Boeing jet belly-landed at Muan airport on December 29 and slammed into an embankment. All but two of the 181 people on board were killed. The July 19 update was not publicly released after the victims' families complained, saying parts of it were misleading and appeared to blame the pilots without exploring other factors. The five-page report is not yet final, but contains details about the plane's two engines. :: Lee Geun-young According to the update, the left engine was less damaged than the right after the bird strike. But it was shut down 19 seconds after it was hit. The remaining, right engine was more badly damaged. Still - the update said - it was "confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight". A source had told Reuters on Monday, the probe found the pilots had shut off the less-damaged engine after the bird strike. But the newly emerged details raise the possibility that the remaining engine, despite the damage, could have kept the plane aloft for longer. However - the update did not say what level of performance it still had. Or what options that might have given to the plane's crew, before the jet landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan without its landing gear down. The probe is expected to last months, as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. The investigation board did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
27-07-2025
- Yahoo
Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says
By Lisa Barrington, Heekyong Yang and Dan Catchpole SEOUL (Reuters) -A Jeju Air plane that crashed in December during an emergency landing after a bird strike could have kept flying on the damaged engine that was still working after pilots shut down the other one, according to an update from South Korean investigators. The Boeing 737-800 instead belly-landed at Muan airport without its landing gear down, overshot the runway and erupted into a fireball after slamming into an embankment, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. Investigators have not yet produced a final report into the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil, but information about the plane's two engines has begun to emerge. According to a July 19 update prepared by investigators and seen by Reuters but not publicly released following complaints from victims' family members, the left engine sustained less damage than the right following a bird strike, but the left engine was shut down 19 seconds after the bird strike. The right engine experienced a "surge" and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it "was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight," in the five-page update, which included post-crash photos of both engines. No reason for the crew's actions was given and the probe is expected to last months as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. MORE QUESTIONS So far, public attention has focused on the possibility that the crew may have shut down the less-damaged engine, rekindling memories of a 1989 Boeing 737-400 crash in Kegworth, England, where pilots shut down a non-damaged engine by mistake. The disaster led to multiple changes in regulations including improvements in crew communication and emergency procedures. A source told Reuters on Monday that the South Korea-led probe had "clear evidence" that pilots had shut off the less-damaged left engine after the bird strike, citing the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a switch found in the wreckage. But the latest update on the crash also raises the possibility that even the more heavily damaged engine that was still running could have kept the plane aloft for longer. It did not say what level of performance the operating engine still had, nor what extra options that might have given to the plane's emergency-focused crew before the jet doubled back and landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan with its landing gear up. Both engines contained bird strike damage and both experienced engine vibrations after the strike. The right engine showed significant internal damage, the Korean-language update from South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) said, but it did not describe the damage found in the left engine. The update did not say how the left engine was operating nor the state of systems connected to either engine, said former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigator Greg Feith when shown the document translated by Reuters. It contains some new facts but omits far more, resulting in a "cryptic" document, he said. ARAIB, which plans to issue a final report next June, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Safety experts say it is common for early reports to contain sparse facts and limited analysis while investigations continue. A preliminary report released in January said feathers and blood stains from ducks were found in both engines. The engines - made by CFM International, jointly owned by GE and France's Safran - were examined in May and no defects or fault data were found beyond the bird and crash damage, the report said. Families of those who died in the disaster were briefed on the engine findings but asked investigators not to release the July 19 report, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other factors. The report was withheld but Reuters and South Korean media obtained copies. Boeing and GE referred questions about the crash to ARAIB. Safran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jeju Air has previously said it is cooperating with ARAIB and is awaiting publication of the investigation. Under global aviation rules, civil air investigations aim to discover crash causes without assigning blame or liability. The Jeju Air pilots' union said ARAIB was "misleading the public" by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given that bird remains were found in both. A source who attended the briefing told Reuters that investigators told family members the left engine also experienced a disruptive "surge," citing black box data. The pilot union and representatives of bereaved families have asked that evidence be released to support any findings. Relatives say the investigation also needs to focus on the embankment containing navigation equipment, which safety experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll. Global aviation standards call for any navigation equipment in line with runways to be installed on structures that easily give way in case of impact with an aircraft. South Korea's transport ministry has identified seven domestic airports, including Muan, with structures made of concrete or steel, rather than materials that break apart on impact and has said it will improve them. Designs for the new structures are in progress, a ministry official told Reuters last week. Solve the daily Crossword
