logo
Mayor signals DC will rename Black Lives Matter Plaza after GOP lawmaker threatens federal funding

Mayor signals DC will rename Black Lives Matter Plaza after GOP lawmaker threatens federal funding

Yahoo05-03-2025
The mayor of Washington, D.C. signaled Tuesday that the mural marking Black Lives Matter Plaza in view of the White House will likely be painted over after a Republican lawmaker introduced a bill threatening the District's federal funding if it fails to change the name.
Black Lives Matter Plaza is marked with a mural of its name in bright-yellow letters along a two-block pedestrian stretch of 16th Street NW in downtown D.C.
Mayor Muriel Bowser, the second Black woman to serve as D.C. mayor, addressed wiping out the name in a post on X and in a news release titled 'The Evolution of Black Lives Matter Plaza' a day after the proposed legislation was introduced.
She wrote that the plaza would become part of a citywide project in which students and artists would create new murals on the street to celebrate the country's 250th birthday.
'The mural inspired millions of people and helped our city through a very painful period, but now we can't afford to be distracted by meaningless congressional interference. The devastating impacts of the federal job cuts must be our number one concern,' Bowser wrote.
'Our focus is on economic growth, public safety and supporting our residents affected by these cuts,' she added.
Bowser arranged to have the mural painted the morning of June 5, 2020, just days after federal authorities used chemical spray and smoke grenades to clear protesters from the area so that President Trump could walk to a historic church near the White House and pose for photographs holding a Bible.
Activists across the nation during that time were protesting the death of George Floyd while in Minneapolis police custody.
Trump, who was rushed one night to the White House bunker with First Lady Melania Trump and their son, Barron, amid protests, attacked Bowser as 'incompetent' for renaming the plaza.
The plaza bill, HR 1774, introduced by Georgia Republican Rep. Andrew Clyde, seeks to withhold federal funding unless the city 'removes the phrase Black Lives Matter from the street symbolically designated as Black Lives Matter Plaza ... in addition to government websites, documents and other material under Washington, D.C. jurisdiction.'
The bill calls for the area to be redesignated as 'Liberty Plaza.'
The bill is currently in committee and has no cosponsors.
It was not immediately clear if the mayor will rename the area 'Liberty Plaza.'
The plaza will still be part of the city's 250 mural project in honor of the country's birthday next year, Bowser said. Students and artists will be invited to create new murals across all eight wards of the area, which will include Black Lives Matter Plaza.
Bowser has been treading carefully since Trump's re-election. Last month, the president suggested the federal government should take over the District of Columbia, which is currently overseen by Congress, as established in the Constitution.
About $1.5 billion in federal grant funding is slated for the city's 2025 fiscal year operating budget, according to the D.C. Policy Center.
Washington, D.C. is expected to lose $1 billion over the next three years, largely due to federal layoffs expected to throw the area into a recession, the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute reported this week.
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spearheaded by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has eliminated thousands of federal government jobs. Approximately 13 percent of the city's population has been employed by the federal government.
The Fiscal Policy Institute predicts the revenue drop will disproportionately harm Black workers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justice Department Takes Revenge on One of Trump's Top Enemies
Justice Department Takes Revenge on One of Trump's Top Enemies

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Justice Department Takes Revenge on One of Trump's Top Enemies

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into New York State Attorney General Letitia James, in an apparent act of Trumpian retribution. Two grand jury subpoenas were issued to James's office, requesting information pertaining to the Attorney General's previous investigations into the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, reported CNN. The subpoenas are related to Trump's bank fraud case, which James won against Trump in 2024, forcing him to cough up $454 million for his family's faulty business practices. Sources that spoke with the network also revealed that a grand jury investigation has been opened in Albany, examining whether James violated Trump's constitutional rights in taking legal action against him. James's office vehemently rejected the accusations, underscoring its efforts to hold Trump accountable. 'Any weaponization of the justice system should disturb every American,' a spokesperson for the New York state attorney general told The New Republic. 'We stand strongly behind our successful litigation against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, and we will continue to stand up for New Yorkers' rights.' James's attorney Abbe Lowell went a step further, telling CNN that the Trump administration's investigation into James's closed case 'has to be the most blatant and desperate example of this administration's carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' 'Weaponizing the Department of Justice to try to punish an elected official for doing her job is an attack on the rule of law and a dangerous escalation by this administration,' Lowell added. 'If prosecutors carry out this improper tactic and are genuinely interested in the truth, we are ready and waiting with the facts and law.' New York's top cop has become one of the president's chief legal adversaries since the civil fraud case. In April, the Trump administration launched an investigation into her personal finances, accusing the attorney general of lying on her bank statements in order to obtain better mortgage rates. At the time, Trump referred to James as a 'totally corrupt politician' and a 'wacky crook,' and accused New York's first Black woman in statewide office of being 'racist.'

Blair Effron: How CEOs Are Navigating Trump-Era Policies
Blair Effron: How CEOs Are Navigating Trump-Era Policies

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Blair Effron: How CEOs Are Navigating Trump-Era Policies

Despite President Trump's tariff policies, America's top CEOs have adapted quickly by embracing AI and making nimble business decisions. Centerview Partners Blair Effron warns that structural issues like the ballooning federal debt and high urban taxes, especially in places like New York, pose long-term risks if left unaddressed. He argues that both political parties must move beyond ideological extremes and focus on practical solutions that support growth, affordability, and broad-based opportunity. (Source: Bloomberg)

Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.
Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.

Texas' new map aims to add five additional Republican-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election. The debate surrounding the Texas decision to draw new House district boundaries in advance of the 2026 midterm elections has escalated into a national conversation surrounding gerrymandering, with Republicans and Democrats accusing each other of being the problem. The truth is that both Republicans and Democrats are flagrant offenders in the arena of districting. Nobody has their hands clean when it comes to gerrymandering. Even so, by deciding to redraw their boundaries mid-decade, Texas has kicked off a potential arms race ahead of the midterms. Republicans started this new fight. Opinion: Texas Democrats look bad in redistricting fight. Republicans look even worse. Democrats and Republicans both gerrymander Gerrymandering is the term for an old practice in which those drawing the borders of electoral districts strategically design them to favor their own electoral chances. They can do so by packing voters of the opposing party into a few sacrificial districts or by spreading them out across many districts. The result is states like Illinois, in which only 3 of 17 House Seats are held by Republicans, despite 43.8% of voters breaking for President Donald Trump in 2024. So, as much as Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker wants to bash Texas Republicans, he signed into law his state's heavily slanted map. Opinion: Supreme Court could end race-based voting districts. Good. They're antiquated. Of the states given a failing grade by Princeton's nonpartisan Gerrymandering Project, nine have a partisan advantage toward Republicans and four toward Democrats. Texas hasn't made it worse. Texas scheme escalates the problem – and rallies Democrats What Texas Republicans are doing is new, in a sense. Redistricting typically occurs in response to significant demographic changes, often highlighted by the census at the beginning of every decade. Texas has decided to redraw its boundaries midway through the decade, with President Donald Trump's endorsement. Texas' new map aims to add five additional GOP-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election for them. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Texas' decision to redraw its boundaries has nationalized the conversation around districting and opened the doors for similar attempts from Democratic states. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to fight fire with fire and match Texas' actions in his own state, as has Pritzker in Illinois. Democrats are framing this as a pure response to Republican actions, but the reality is that they've been gerrymandering themselves for years. Regardless, Texas' actions worsen the matter because they are the first shot in this particular battle. Both sides have their hands dirty, but Texans will be the ones bearing the blame for what unfolds next. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store