logo
Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.

Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.

USA Today6 hours ago
Texas' new map aims to add five additional Republican-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election.
The debate surrounding the Texas decision to draw new House district boundaries in advance of the 2026 midterm elections has escalated into a national conversation surrounding gerrymandering, with Republicans and Democrats accusing each other of being the problem.
The truth is that both Republicans and Democrats are flagrant offenders in the arena of districting. Nobody has their hands clean when it comes to gerrymandering.
Even so, by deciding to redraw their boundaries mid-decade, Texas has kicked off a potential arms race ahead of the midterms. Republicans started this new fight.
Opinion: Texas Democrats look bad in redistricting fight. Republicans look even worse.
Democrats and Republicans both gerrymander
Gerrymandering is the term for an old practice in which those drawing the borders of electoral districts strategically design them to favor their own electoral chances. They can do so by packing voters of the opposing party into a few sacrificial districts or by spreading them out across many districts.
The result is states like Illinois, in which only 3 of 17 House Seats are held by Republicans, despite 43.8% of voters breaking for President Donald Trump in 2024.
So, as much as Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker wants to bash Texas Republicans, he signed into law his state's heavily slanted map.
Opinion: Supreme Court could end race-based voting districts. Good. They're antiquated.
Of the states given a failing grade by Princeton's nonpartisan Gerrymandering Project, nine have a partisan advantage toward Republicans and four toward Democrats.
Texas hasn't made it worse.
Texas scheme escalates the problem – and rallies Democrats
What Texas Republicans are doing is new, in a sense. Redistricting typically occurs in response to significant demographic changes, often highlighted by the census at the beginning of every decade.
Texas has decided to redraw its boundaries midway through the decade, with President Donald Trump's endorsement. Texas' new map aims to add five additional GOP-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election for them.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
Texas' decision to redraw its boundaries has nationalized the conversation around districting and opened the doors for similar attempts from Democratic states. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to fight fire with fire and match Texas' actions in his own state, as has Pritzker in Illinois.
Democrats are framing this as a pure response to Republican actions, but the reality is that they've been gerrymandering themselves for years. Regardless, Texas' actions worsen the matter because they are the first shot in this particular battle. Both sides have their hands dirty, but Texans will be the ones bearing the blame for what unfolds next.
Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist
Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist

Billionaire Illinois Dem Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday ripped socialist New York City mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani's contention that people of his net worth shouldn't exist. 'Look, how much money you have doesn't determine what your values are,' Pritzker fired back on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Mamdani had declared shortly after his shock Democratic primary win in June that he that he doesn't want Americans to be allowed to amass billion-dollar fortunes. Advertisement 3 Illinois Dem Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday defends his progressive bona fides despite being a billionaire. NBC 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' he told 'Meet the Press' at the time. But Pritzker, an heir to the Hyatt hotel fortune, Sunday rattled off his beliefs in universal healthcare, free public education, democracy and opposition to 'MAGA Republicans' as evidence that he is a legit Democrat. Advertisement 'It does not matter what your income level is. What matters is what your values are. And that's what makes me a Democrat,' the ultra-wealthy pol contended. 3 Leading Big Apple mayoral contender Zohran Mamdani has ripped into the notion that billionaires even exist. James Keivom Pritzker, who has led Illinois since 2019 and is one of the richest politicians in the country, has an estimated net worth of about $3.6 billion, according to Forbes. His fortune stems almost entirely from his family's wealth from its ownership of the Hyatt hotel chain, which was founded by his late uncle, Jay. Some of the gov's wealth comes from other investments, such as the Pritzker Group. Advertisement The Pritzkers have been a fixture on Forbes' 'America's Richest Families' for decades. The Illinois Democrat has donated heavily to the party throughout the years and tapped into his deep pockets for his own runs, having spent an estimated $323 million on his two campaigns for governor. Now he's gearing up to seek a third term — although he hasn't ruled out a 2028 presidential run. 3 Mamdani once floated the idea of the government seizing means of production. James Keivom Advertisement Mamdani's campaign did not respond to a Post request for comment. As with many top Democrats, Pritzker has refrained from backing Mamdani outright. The governor has meanwhile made headlines for welcoming Texas Democrats to Illinois in a bid to disrupt GOP redistricting efforts in the Lone Star State. Pritzker shrugged off Republican attacks on him for being hypocritical, given that his state has one of the most heavily gerrymandered maps in the country. 'What Texas is trying to do is, again, violate the Voting Rights Act. We didn't,' Pritzker claimed. 'We held public hearings, legislative hearings. People attended them. They spoke out. There was a map that was put out. There were actually changes made to the map.' Democrats control 14 of Illinois' 17 congressional seats — or 82%. Former Vice President Kamala Harris won the state in November with 54% of the vote. By comparison, Republicans have 26 of the 38 congressional seats in Texas — or 68%. President Trump won Texas in November with 56% of the vote. Trump is hoping to squeeze another five seats out of Texas through the proposed mid-decade redistricting. Texas Democrats have held up the redistricting effort so far by fleeing the state to stop the state legislature from passing it.

Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'
Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday shrugged off the idea of Vice President Vance being the likely Republican frontrunner for the 2028 presidential elections. 'Neither Trump, nor he nor the Republicans of today have anything of significance to say to working class people,' he said on CNN's State of the Union with Dana Bash. 'Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he added. President Trump said on Tuesday that Vance would be the 'most likely' successor of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) Movement in 2028. 'So it's too early to talk about it, but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point,' Trump said. Bash reminded Sanders that Vance is from a working-class family in Ohio and could appeal to many voters in red states, but Sanders shrugged off the idea that the vice president could be a threat to Democrats in 2028. 'What they are trying to do is divide us up, 'you're a Muslim, you're undocumented, you're black, you're gay, let's divide everybody up so the rich can become richer'. Our job is to bring people together. Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he continued. Trump also said Tuesday that he would 'probably not' try to bridge a third term and touted the idea that Secretary of State Marco Rubio could run alongside Vance as vice president in 2028. In February, Vance was already seen as a favorite successor to Trump in a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) poll. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they would support Vance as the future of the Republican party. Other Republican politicos and media personalities have been rumored to be thinking about campaigning in 2028, including Secretary Rubio, right-wing influencer Steve Bannon and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store