logo
How clean energy needs, new tech shape mineral governance in India

How clean energy needs, new tech shape mineral governance in India

Indian Express5 days ago
— Renuka
In a significant policy move, the Ministry of Mines has reclassified minor minerals Barytes, Felspar, Mica, and Quartz as major minerals. These minerals are essential for various new technologies, energy transition, spacecraft industries, the healthcare sector, etc.
This reclassification, announced through a Notification dated February 20, 2025, aligns with the government's recent push under the National Critical Mineral Mission, which aims to secure critical and strategic mineral resources for India's clean energy and technological future.
It also draws attention to a largely overlooked area in India's mineral governance – the regulation of minor minerals. But what are minor minerals, and how are they regulated? Let's explore.
Minor minerals are defined under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Act, 1957, as building stones, gravel, ordinary clay, and ordinary sand. The term 'minor minerals' is often understood to imply a lesser quantity of significance.
However, in the Quarry Owners Association vs State of Bihar (2000) case, the Supreme Court clarified that the classification of minerals as major or minor under the MMDR Act is determined by their end use and local importance, rather than by their volume, availability or production levels.
The classification is also for the purpose of administrative convenience: while the Central Government retains control over major minerals with national and strategic relevance, like coal, iron ore or bauxite, the regulation and management of minor minerals fall under the purview of state governments.
The Central Government also has the authority to declare any other mineral to be a minor mineral. It has thus far notified around 31 minerals as minor minerals such as Gypsum, Mica, Quartz, Clay-based minerals, Sand, etc.
Minor minerals play a crucial role in infrastructure, manufacturing and local economies. They are primarily sourced from riverbeds, floodplains, hills, coastal areas, deserts, and open quarries across various states.
Extraction typically takes place on a small to medium scale and is governed by state authorities. Silica-rich minerals like Quartz and Silica sand are commonly found in riverbeds and desert regions. They are used extensively in glassmaking and electronics. Sand is a vital component of concrete, mortar, and asphalt, making it essential for buildings, roads, and other infrastructure.
Feldspar, Mica, and Kaolin are mostly used in ceramics, paints, and rubber industries. Similarly, limestone derivatives like Calcite, Gypsum and Lime kankar are essential for construction and chemical processing. The barytes, recently classified as a major mineral, is primarily used in oil and gas drilling.
These minerals, though locally sourced and often extracted on a small scale, are vital to India's construction boom and industrial growth. However, their unchecked extraction, especially in ecologically sensitive areas, raises serious concerns around sustainability, environmental impact and regulatory oversight.
Under the Indian Constitution, states are vested with the power to make laws on mines and minerals under List II (State List) of the Seventh Schedule. However, under List I (Union List), the Central Government can also make laws on the regulation of mines and minerals by declaring it in the public interest.
Exercising this authority, the Central Government enacted the MMDR Act in 1957 – a key legislation regulating the mining sector. The Act classifies the minerals into two categories: major and minor and provides the legal framework for the grant of mining leases, royalty collection, and overall management of major mineral resources.
Section 15 of the Act delegates the rule-making power to the state governments in relation to minor minerals. It empowers states to frame rules for granting leases, issuing permits, and fixing and collecting rent and royalties from the holders of mining leases and permits.
This delegation of rule-making power ensures that states can design regulatory mechanisms to suit local needs. Further, given the significant environmental impact, the minor minerals are also regulated under laws related to pollution, wildlife and biodiversity protection, etc.
On the policy front, the Central Government has historically prioritised major minerals, while minor minerals have largely been governed through state-specific policies and rules. However, growing environmental concerns – particularly related to sand mining from rivers and floodplains – have prompted central intervention.
In response, the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC) issued Sand Mining guidelines in 2016 and 2020, and the Ministry of Mines released a Sand Mining Framework in 2018.
The Supreme Court, High Courts and the National Green Tribunal have played a pivotal role in regulating the mining of minor minerals, especially by mandating Environmental clearances for extracting minor minerals.
In the landmark case of Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana (2012), the Supreme Court took notice of the unscientific and illegal mining of minor minerals and made it mandatory for all mining operations, even below five hectares, to obtain environmental clearances from the appropriate authority.
The court also recommended a compulsory mining plan before granting environmental clearance. Notably, through various judgements, the Supreme Court has emphasised the need for the sustainable extraction of minor minerals.
Following the apex court's decision in Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana (2012), the MoEFCC in 2013 notified that the river sand mining project with a lease area of less than five hectares should not be considered for environmental clearance. However, the notification was declared invalid by the National Green Tribunal in Himmat Singh Shekhawat vs State of Rajasthan (2014).
Similarly, in Satendra Pandey vs the Union of India (2018), the NGT struck down a notification dated January 15, 2016 on the ground that it diluted the environmental clearance procedure for mining of minor minerals in areas below 25 hectares. The notification exempted such projects from public consultation and environmental impact assessment prior to granting environmental clearance.
Despite state regulations and judicial oversight, the mining sector continues to grapple with widespread issues, particularly illegal and unscientific mining. States like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Madhya Pradesh have become the hotspots of illegal sand mining.
It is causing severe environmental degradation, such as lowering of groundwater levels in riparian areas, pollution in nearby areas, and disruption of the aquatic ecosystem. Sand and gravel extraction from rivers is one of the leading reasons behind the declining population of the Gharial and Ganges River dolphins.
Apart from this, excessive mining of clay from agricultural fields leads to loss of soil fertility and long-term land degradation. Mining has also become a law-and-order issue due to rampant illegal extraction, violent clashes between miners and law enforcement, as well as threats and attacks on activists, journalists and officials attempting to curb the practice.
Given the ecological importance of minor minerals, there is an urgent need for strong political and bureaucratic will to ensure their sustainable management. Upholding the Public trust doctrine, the state needs to act as a trustee of these resources and ensure the leasing of mines serves the public interest.
Strict law enforcement, adoption of sustainable construction practices and promotion of viable alternatives to natural resource extraction are significant. A comprehensive model regulatory framework across states is needed to harmonise laws, ensure transparency and integrate environmental safeguards with development goals.
What are minor minerals, and how are they regulated in India?
What is the constitutional division of powers between the Centre and states on the regulation of minerals?
How has intervention, particularly by the Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal, shaped the regulatory landscape for minor mineral mining?
What are the ecological consequences of unregulated sand and clay mining, and how effective have existing regulations been in addressing these challenges?
How does minor mineral extraction impact biodiversity, particularly endangered aquatic species such as the Gharial and Ganges River dolphin?
(Renuka is a Doctoral researcher at Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla.)
Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with ashiya.parveen@indianexpress.com.
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CAG report flags discrepancies in the Centre's fiscal math
CAG report flags discrepancies in the Centre's fiscal math

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

CAG report flags discrepancies in the Centre's fiscal math

India's national auditor, Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), has flagged several fiscal inconsistencies in the Union government's compliance with the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, including a substantial ₹ 21.3 trillion in unrealized tax revenues at the end of 2022-23. The CAG's latest report, presented in Parliament on Monday, comes at a time when the government has committed to reducing India's fiscal deficit to below 4.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2025-26, as reiterated in recent medium-term fiscal policy statements. However, the audit observations suggest gaps in transparency and data consistency that may undermine its fiscal credibility. The CAG's Report No. 3 of 2025, which assesses compliance with the FRBM Act for the year 2022-23, was earlier presented in the Rajya Sabha on 4 April. The FRBM Act, enacted in 2003 to ensure inter-generational equity in fiscal management and maintain macroeconomic stability, mandates the CAG to carry out an annual compliance review. According to the report, the amount of tax revenue raised but not realized rose by ₹ 5.47 trillion in 2022-23 over the previous year to ₹ 21.30 trillion. Of the ₹ 5.47 trillion, a staggering ₹ 5.28 trillion is not under dispute (meaning it was collectable but had not been recovered), suggesting weak tax enforcement or inefficiencies in recovery processes. A query sent to the spokesperson of the finance ministry did not elicit a response till press time. The CAG audit report also pointed to inconsistencies in key fiscal indicators. For instance, the fiscal deficit figure published in the Union government finance accounts (UGFA) for 2022-23 was ₹ 17.56 trillion, while the budget at a glance (BAG) for 2024-25 cited a lower figure of ₹ 17.38 trillion—a discrepancy of ₹ 18,000 crore. Similar variations were observed in statements on arrears of interest, loans and advances, and fiscal projections published in the half-yearly and medium-term fiscal policy statements, the CAG report highlighted. The amount of arrears of interest shown in the D2 Statement, ₹ 30,735.89 crore, varied from the amount reflected in the UGFA, ₹ 31,226.74 crore, resulting in a difference of ₹ 490.85 crore. The amount of loans to foreign governments in the receipt budget was ₹ 16,489.13 crore, whereas the UGFA showed ₹ 16,353.89 crore, a difference of ₹ 135.24 crore. For loans to states and Union territories, the receipt budget recorded ₹ 2,70,439.38 crore, and the UGFA recorded ₹ 2,70,367.60 crore, a difference of ₹ 71.78 crore. The fiscal deficit (budget estimates) in the medium-term fiscal policy statement was ₹ 16,61,196 crore, whereas in the annual financial statement, it was shown as ₹ 16,61,196.21 crore. Despite these shortcomings, the CAG report acknowledged positive signals on the debt front. Central government debt, which had peaked at 61.38% of GDP in 202-21 due to pandemic-related spending, declined to 57.93% by 2022-23. The CAG, in its report, noted that the pace of debt accumulation in recent years has been lower than GDP expansion, and the debt sustainability indicator for 2022-23 was positive. The ratio of interest payments to revenue receipts—an indicator of fiscal strain—rose marginally to 35.35% in 2022-23, after declining from a peak of 38.66% in 2020-21. The CAG audit report also found that additional guarantees issued by the Centre remained within the legal ceiling of 0.5% of GDP in 2022-23.

Fall in coal imports in FY25 led to forex savings worth ₹60,681 crore, says coal minister
Fall in coal imports in FY25 led to forex savings worth ₹60,681 crore, says coal minister

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Fall in coal imports in FY25 led to forex savings worth ₹60,681 crore, says coal minister

India's coal imports in 2024-25 fell nearly 8% to 243.62 million tonnes, leading to foreign exchange savings of over ₹ 60,681.67 crore, said G. Kishan Reddy, the Union minister for coal and mines, on Monday. In a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha, the minister noted that the imports stood at 264.53 million tonnes in 2023-24. 'During 2024-25, India imported 243.62 million tonnes of coal, compared to 264.53 million tonnes in 2023-24. Due to the reduction of around 20.91 million tonnes in coal imports, there has been a forex savings of around ₹ 60,681.67 crore during 2024-25 compared to 2023-24,' Reddy said. The fall in imports comes amid the rise in domestic production. India's coal production reached 1.047 billion tonnes in the last fiscal year, nearly 5% higher than 997.83 million tonnes in 2023-24. The minister said most of the country's coal requirement is currently met through indigenous production and supplies. The ministry of coal has set an ambitious domestic coal production target of about 1.5 billion tonnes by 2029-30. The focus of the government is on increasing the domestic production of coal and reducing non-essential coal imports. The ministry of coal launched the Coal Logistics Plan and Policy in February 2024 to develop infrastructure for efficient coal evacuation, considering increased coal production projection by 2029-30," he said. The minister also outlined steps taken by the Centre to increase domestic coal production. He noted that, in addition to regular reviews by the coal ministry to expedite the development of coal blocks, the government has taken several regulatory measures in the past few years, including the enactment of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2021. State-run Coal India Ltd (CIL) has adopted a number of measures to increase coal production, including the adoption of new and modern technologies like mass production technologies (MPT) with the deployment of continuous miners, longwalls, and highwalls wherever feasible, he said, adding that digital transformation has been implemented on apilot scale in seven of its mega mines.

Market fraud caution: Sebi reiterates dabba trading is unlawful, warns investors to remain alert
Market fraud caution: Sebi reiterates dabba trading is unlawful, warns investors to remain alert

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Market fraud caution: Sebi reiterates dabba trading is unlawful, warns investors to remain alert

Markets regulator Sebi has once again warned investors against dabba trading, calling it illegal and urging the public to remain alert and avoid dealing with entities offering such unauthorised trading services. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In a statement issued on Monday, Sebi said, 'It is reiterated that dabba trading is illegal, and Sebi is committed to safeguarding investor interests through regulatory enforcement, awareness, and coordination with law enforcement agencies. Investors are advised to remain vigilant and not to deal with any entity offering illegal trading services.' Dabba trading refers to off-market trades that take place outside recognised stock exchanges and regulatory supervision. According to Sebi, such activities violate provisions of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, the Sebi Act, 1992, and the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, PTI reported. The fresh advisory comes after Sebi took serious note of an advertisement in a daily newspaper last week that promoted dabba trading. Following this, Sebi, along with the National Stock Exchange ( ), initiated multiple actions. Sebi issued a formal communication to the newspaper expressing concern over the ad's promotion of illegal trading and its potential to mislead investors. The regulator has also filed a complaint with the cyber police seeking legal action against the entity behind the ad and other involved parties. The matter has also been referred to the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) to examine possible violations of advertising norms and take corrective steps. Separately, NSE issued an investor caution alert highlighting the risks of dabba trading and warning the public against dealing with the entities mentioned in the ad. The exchange reiterated that investors should only trade through Sebi-registered brokers and recognised stock exchanges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store