Latest news with #Renuka
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Entertainment
- Hindustan Times
Renuka Shahane speaks out on Marathi-Hindi row in Maharashtra: 'Slapping people will not help the language'
Actor Renuka Shahane has weighed in on the ongoing language debate in Maharashtra, urging people to respect local languages and cultures while firmly opposing any form of aggression in the name of linguistic pride. Speaking on the podcast InControversial with Pooja Chaudhri, the actor, who hails from Maharashtra herself, shared her thoughts on the tensions that have emerged between Hindi and Marathi speakers in the state. Renuka Shahane stressed the importance of understanding local culture and avoiding violence. Renuka on respecting the local culture 'If you've been living in a place for a long time, it's a good thing to understand the local language, culture and be more respectful than anything else. It's not about the speaking of it, much more than the intention of wanting to, you know, respect it. I do not like people who do not feel the necessity to be accommodating of the local language and local culture." Renuka said. 'I do not like violence at all, you know; I do not like the fact that people can be rude about it. Going into a place where Marathi is not spoken and just slapping two or three people, it's not going to help the language in any way. We have to find ways to get across the language to people in a way that people would find it convenient and accept it happily. Language is not something that should is forced. That is why I was against the forced addition of Hindi from a very early stage in Maharashtra. I think it should be something of a choice, which I also had growing up." Renuka added. During a recent interaction with ANI, Renuka's husband, actor Ashutosh Rana also addressed the issue. 'Bhasha samwaad ka vishay hoti hai, vivaad ka nahi. Bharat samwaad mein vishwas rakhta hai, vivaad mein nahi (Language is a topic of discussion and not controversy. India believes in talks and not controversy)," Ashutosh said, emphasising that language should be a tool for dialogue, not division. Marathi-Hindi language row Renuka and Ashutosh's comments come amid growing tensions in Maharashtra around language identity. The debate reignited in April 2025, after the state government announced — and then quickly rolled back — a decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in schools. Since then, several confrontations have been reported where individuals allegedly linked to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) have clashed with people for not speaking Marathi in public.
News18
6 days ago
- Entertainment
- News18
THIS Bollywood Actress Worked With Shah Rukh Khan Before Becoming Salman Khan's 'Bhabhi'
Last Updated: This Bollywood actress worked with Shah Rukh Khan in the 1989 popular TV show Circus. Any guesses? Actress Renuka Shahane gained widespread recognition after starring in the 1994 film Hum Aapke Hain Koun. While many know Shahane as Salman Khan's beloved bhabhi in the movie, few remember that she also shared screen space with Shah Rukh Khan in his early television days. SRK and Renuka co-starred in the 1989 popular TV show Circus. Recently, Renuka appeared on the podcast 'InControversial with Pooja Chaudhri', when she recalled working with SRK and said, 'His attitude towards work is absolutely fabulous. Actually, Shah Rukh is the kind of professional that everybody should dream to be…And second is his treatment of everybody on the set. He's such a gracious person. He makes no distinction between a spot person and a producer or a director, actor – nothing. His relationships on the set are on that equal level, when the star does that, the entire set feels invigorated." When Shah Rukh Khan Called Renuka His 'Pehli Heroine' Interestingly, Shah Rukh Khan also teased Renuka as his 'pehli (first) heroine" in 2023 when the actress went to watch the movie Pathaan with her husband, Ashutosh Rana. Back then, Renuka took to his X handle to share pictures with Rana from the screening of the movie and wrote, 'Finally going to watch #Pathaan. Mausam bilkul sahi hai, kursi ki peti baandh li hai (The weather is good, have fastened the seat bealts). With Col Luthra ji." Reacting to it, Shah Rukh Khan said, 'Col Luthraji ko bataya aapne ki aap meri pehli heroine hain (Did you tell Col Luthra that you are my first heroine)!! Or should we keep it a Top Secret otherwise he may fire me from the agency!!!" Finally going to watch #Pathaan ❤ Mausam bilkul sahi hai 😁 kursi ki peti baandh li hai 💃💃😁 with Col Luthra ji 😊😊🙏🏾 — Renuka Shahane (@renukash) February 5, 2023 Renuka also responds to SRK, saying, 'Hahaha unsey koi baat chhupti kahaan hai? Aaphi ne unhe antaryaami kaha hai. Aur chaahey jo ho jaaye, woh aapko fire nahi kar saktey kyunki jo kaam aap kartey hain woah koi aur nahi kar saktaa (Can anything be hidden from him? You only have called him all-knowing. And whatever might happen, he can't fire you because nobody can do the work you do)." First Published: July 17, 2025, 14:03 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
16-07-2025
- Business
- Indian Express
How clean energy needs, new tech shape mineral governance in India
— Renuka In a significant policy move, the Ministry of Mines has reclassified minor minerals Barytes, Felspar, Mica, and Quartz as major minerals. These minerals are essential for various new technologies, energy transition, spacecraft industries, the healthcare sector, etc. This reclassification, announced through a Notification dated February 20, 2025, aligns with the government's recent push under the National Critical Mineral Mission, which aims to secure critical and strategic mineral resources for India's clean energy and technological future. It also draws attention to a largely overlooked area in India's mineral governance – the regulation of minor minerals. But what are minor minerals, and how are they regulated? Let's explore. Minor minerals are defined under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Act, 1957, as building stones, gravel, ordinary clay, and ordinary sand. The term 'minor minerals' is often understood to imply a lesser quantity of significance. However, in the Quarry Owners Association vs State of Bihar (2000) case, the Supreme Court clarified that the classification of minerals as major or minor under the MMDR Act is determined by their end use and local importance, rather than by their volume, availability or production levels. The classification is also for the purpose of administrative convenience: while the Central Government retains control over major minerals with national and strategic relevance, like coal, iron ore or bauxite, the regulation and management of minor minerals fall under the purview of state governments. The Central Government also has the authority to declare any other mineral to be a minor mineral. It has thus far notified around 31 minerals as minor minerals such as Gypsum, Mica, Quartz, Clay-based minerals, Sand, etc. Minor minerals play a crucial role in infrastructure, manufacturing and local economies. They are primarily sourced from riverbeds, floodplains, hills, coastal areas, deserts, and open quarries across various states. Extraction typically takes place on a small to medium scale and is governed by state authorities. Silica-rich minerals like Quartz and Silica sand are commonly found in riverbeds and desert regions. They are used extensively in glassmaking and electronics. Sand is a vital component of concrete, mortar, and asphalt, making it essential for buildings, roads, and other infrastructure. Feldspar, Mica, and Kaolin are mostly used in ceramics, paints, and rubber industries. Similarly, limestone derivatives like Calcite, Gypsum and Lime kankar are essential for construction and chemical processing. The barytes, recently classified as a major mineral, is primarily used in oil and gas drilling. These minerals, though locally sourced and often extracted on a small scale, are vital to India's construction boom and industrial growth. However, their unchecked extraction, especially in ecologically sensitive areas, raises serious concerns around sustainability, environmental impact and regulatory oversight. Under the Indian Constitution, states are vested with the power to make laws on mines and minerals under List II (State List) of the Seventh Schedule. However, under List I (Union List), the Central Government can also make laws on the regulation of mines and minerals by declaring it in the public interest. Exercising this authority, the Central Government enacted the MMDR Act in 1957 – a key legislation regulating the mining sector. The Act classifies the minerals into two categories: major and minor and provides the legal framework for the grant of mining leases, royalty collection, and overall management of major mineral resources. Section 15 of the Act delegates the rule-making power to the state governments in relation to minor minerals. It empowers states to frame rules for granting leases, issuing permits, and fixing and collecting rent and royalties from the holders of mining leases and permits. This delegation of rule-making power ensures that states can design regulatory mechanisms to suit local needs. Further, given the significant environmental impact, the minor minerals are also regulated under laws related to pollution, wildlife and biodiversity protection, etc. On the policy front, the Central Government has historically prioritised major minerals, while minor minerals have largely been governed through state-specific policies and rules. However, growing environmental concerns – particularly related to sand mining from rivers and floodplains – have prompted central intervention. In response, the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC) issued Sand Mining guidelines in 2016 and 2020, and the Ministry of Mines released a Sand Mining Framework in 2018. The Supreme Court, High Courts and the National Green Tribunal have played a pivotal role in regulating the mining of minor minerals, especially by mandating Environmental clearances for extracting minor minerals. In the landmark case of Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana (2012), the Supreme Court took notice of the unscientific and illegal mining of minor minerals and made it mandatory for all mining operations, even below five hectares, to obtain environmental clearances from the appropriate authority. The court also recommended a compulsory mining plan before granting environmental clearance. Notably, through various judgements, the Supreme Court has emphasised the need for the sustainable extraction of minor minerals. Following the apex court's decision in Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana (2012), the MoEFCC in 2013 notified that the river sand mining project with a lease area of less than five hectares should not be considered for environmental clearance. However, the notification was declared invalid by the National Green Tribunal in Himmat Singh Shekhawat vs State of Rajasthan (2014). Similarly, in Satendra Pandey vs the Union of India (2018), the NGT struck down a notification dated January 15, 2016 on the ground that it diluted the environmental clearance procedure for mining of minor minerals in areas below 25 hectares. The notification exempted such projects from public consultation and environmental impact assessment prior to granting environmental clearance. Despite state regulations and judicial oversight, the mining sector continues to grapple with widespread issues, particularly illegal and unscientific mining. States like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Madhya Pradesh have become the hotspots of illegal sand mining. It is causing severe environmental degradation, such as lowering of groundwater levels in riparian areas, pollution in nearby areas, and disruption of the aquatic ecosystem. Sand and gravel extraction from rivers is one of the leading reasons behind the declining population of the Gharial and Ganges River dolphins. Apart from this, excessive mining of clay from agricultural fields leads to loss of soil fertility and long-term land degradation. Mining has also become a law-and-order issue due to rampant illegal extraction, violent clashes between miners and law enforcement, as well as threats and attacks on activists, journalists and officials attempting to curb the practice. Given the ecological importance of minor minerals, there is an urgent need for strong political and bureaucratic will to ensure their sustainable management. Upholding the Public trust doctrine, the state needs to act as a trustee of these resources and ensure the leasing of mines serves the public interest. Strict law enforcement, adoption of sustainable construction practices and promotion of viable alternatives to natural resource extraction are significant. A comprehensive model regulatory framework across states is needed to harmonise laws, ensure transparency and integrate environmental safeguards with development goals. What are minor minerals, and how are they regulated in India? What is the constitutional division of powers between the Centre and states on the regulation of minerals? How has intervention, particularly by the Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal, shaped the regulatory landscape for minor mineral mining? What are the ecological consequences of unregulated sand and clay mining, and how effective have existing regulations been in addressing these challenges? How does minor mineral extraction impact biodiversity, particularly endangered aquatic species such as the Gharial and Ganges River dolphin? (Renuka is a Doctoral researcher at Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla.) Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
News18
02-07-2025
- Entertainment
- News18
Renuka Shahane On Bollywood's ‘Entourage Obsession': 'It's A Matter Of Comfort'
Last Updated: Renuka Shahane talks about the film industry's shift from the 1990s to today, noting higher costs and larger entourages. Her third film, Loop Line, screened at the 2025 NYIFF. Veteran actress and filmmaker Renuka Shahane has opened up about the stark difference in how the film industry operates today compared to the 1990s. Reflecting on the rising cost of actors and the large teams that accompany them, the 'Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!' actress pointed out how stars in the 90s managed their careers without elaborate entourages. She believes the culture has shifted significantly, with today's actors relying on multiple managers, stylists, and social media teams—adding to the overall production cost. Renuka told IANS, 'I think the culture has changed because there are so many mediums and media today to kind of explore yourself as an actor. So, if you are a huge star, for instance, then there are people who are managing your social media. There are people who are separately managing your social media ads, separately managing your proper TVC ads. Then there are others who are managing your costumes and, you know, that kind of collaboration." 'And that's why, you know, there's a division of labor. Therefore, there are that many people. And those many people can only exist if it's commercially viable for the people paying." Renuka went on to explain, 'So, it's not as if one fine day the star gets up and says, Oh, I need ten people instead of one. If there are ten people with the star and if the producer has, you know, feels that it is important that the star feels comfortable and I'm willing to pay that much for the star's entourage, then they'll invest in it or they'll compromise and say that, Listen, we can only handle five people on the set, not more than five. So, I think that, you know, it's not something that someone is doing it forcefully." 'If you can afford it, then they are doing it. Those who can't afford it—if you can't afford it, the star might put their foot down and say, Listen, I'd rather not do your project because I need my staff with me. Or they'll say, Okay, I'll compromise for this project, or I'll do it." 'You know, so I think that one should judge people that, oh, such a big entourage used to manage before. There weren't so many avenues that used the star, you know, in terms of the commercial prospects. So, I feel that one should also be more kind. You know, we generally judge that they have a lot. So, we are quick to judge. But I think that it's a matter of comfort," the actress further mentioned. Work-wise, Renuka Shahane's third directorial venture, a Marathi animated short titled 'Loop Line," was screened at the 2025 New York Indian Film Festival on June 21. The film explored the emotional neglect and silent battles faced by Indian housewives trapped in traditional, patriarchal households.
Time of India
02-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Renuka Shahane opens up on the entourage obsession of Bollywood stars: ‘If you can afford it, then they are doing it'
The entourage debate is one of the most talked about discussions in the last few years. Many people have criticised the costs involved as Bollywood stars bring in their entourage for every project. John Abraham had once called it 'mental' that a stlyist gets paid Rs 2 lakh per day. As this debate grows, now Renuka Shahane of 'Hum Aapke Hai Koun..' has also reflected on it. She believes that it happens only when a producer has agreed and can afford it. Or else, the producer can always say no and the star can decide if they want to still do the film. She said in an interview with IANS, 'I think the culture has changed because there are so many mediums and media today to kind of explore yourself as an actor. So, if you are a huge star, for instance, then there are people who are managing your social media. There are people who are separately managing your social media ads, separately managing your proper TVC ads. Then there are others who are managing your costumes and, you know, that kind of collaboration. " She added, 'And that's why, you know, there's a division of labor. Therefore, there are that many people. And those many people can only exist if it's commercially viable for the people paying." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Affordable Car Insurance Rates shriramgi Get Quote Undo Renuka who has also turned director, further explained, 'So, it's not as if one fine day the star gets up and says, Oh, I need ten people instead of one. If there are ten people with the star and if the producer has, you know, feels that it is important that the star feels comfortable and I'm willing to pay that much for the star's entourage, then they'll invest in it or they'll compromise and say that, Listen, we can only handle five people on the set, not more than five. So, I think that, you know, it's not something that someone is doing it forcefully." She added, 'If you can afford it, then they are doing it. Those who can't afford it—if you can't afford it, the star might put their foot down and say, Listen, I'd rather not do your project because I need my staff with me. Or they'll say, Okay, I'll compromise for this project, or I'll do it." Shahane mentioned further, 'You know, so I think that one should judge people that, oh, such a big entourage used to manage before. There weren't so many avenues that used the star, you know, in terms of the commercial prospects. So, I feel that one should also be more kind. You know, we generally judge that they have a lot. So, we are quick to judge. But I think that it's a matter of comfort.' Renuka's latest work is 'Loop Line' which is an animated Marathi short film.
