logo
What does Thames Water's £3 billion rescue loan deal mean for customers?

What does Thames Water's £3 billion rescue loan deal mean for customers?

Independent18-02-2025

Thames Water's plans for a £3 billion loan have been approved by a judge, designed to prevent it from going bust in the near future.
The deal was approved in the High Court on Tuesday, which would give bosses at the London water company time to find a permanent source of funding.
But why does it need the emergency money, and what does it mean for consumers?
– What happened?
After weeks of hearings in the High Court, a £3 billion funding plan for Thames Water has been approved as part of a loan deal agreed internally last year.
The utility company supplies about 16 million households across London and the South East.
But it has at least £16 billion of debt, and had previously warned it only had enough money to keep running until March 24.
The new financing is designed to stop it from going bust, albeit temporarily.
– Why are people angry about Thames Water?
Thames Water has been at the centre of a growing scandal in the wider water industry.
Bills will climb steeply over the coming years, while privately-run water firms are still pumping raw sewage into rivers and waterways.
That is despite a succession of penalties from regulators Ofwat and the Environment Agency.
Meanwhile, many bosses, including those at Thames Water, have still been given large bonuses in the last year.
Thames Water also requested last week that Ofwat allows it to raise consumer bills over the next five years by more than the 35% it previously granted.
– Why does Thames Water need this emergency money?
The company's debts are so high and its cash reserves are so low that it would have gone out of business in March.
The taps in people's homes would still work – but it would be damaging for the big finance firms to which Thames owes billions of pounds.
Many of them would have seen those debts written off, resulting in hefty losses.
Thames Water would instead come under temporary government control until a new buyer is found.
Labour previously said it wants to avoid that scenario, citing extra costs to taxpayers of running the water company.
-So what happens next?
The £3 billion is thought to be enough to last Thames Water for about one year.
It buys bosses some more time to find a permanent source of funding, which will likely come by selling the company.
Potential suitors are lining up, with four bidders understood to have thrown their hat in the ring to buy Thames.
One is Castle Water, a firm owned by the Conservative Party treasurer Graham Edwards.
Another is investment firm Covalis Capital, which would bring in French utility giant Suez to run Thames day-to-day.
– What's the catch?
The new loan is being provided by Thames' creditors – namely companies it already owes about £11.5 billion.
They are mostly made up of hedge funds and other big finance firms, including Abrdn, M&G and others.
They are charging an unusually high interest rate of 9.75%, plus fees.
Over the 2.5-year life of the loan, and including fees, that could mean about £800 million in interest payments, experts have said.
Earlier this year, a group of MPs said it would force households to pay an extra £250 over the next five years to cover the costs.
Currently, about 28% of Thames' bills service its debts, a figure which is expected to rise to 31% this year.
– How did things get this bad?
When Thames Water was privatised in 1989, it had no debt.
It has had a succession of different owners since then, including an Australian investment bank called Macquarie.
In December 2005, before Macquarie bought the utility, Thames Water's net debt was £2.4 billion.
When Macquarie sold it around a decade later, the debt pile had ballooned to more than £10 billion.
The other problem is that interest payments on much of its debts rise with inflation, which has been high in recent years, adding to the pressure.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rangers will never suffer Crystal Palace UEFA sweat as SFA chief makes dual ownership rules clear
Rangers will never suffer Crystal Palace UEFA sweat as SFA chief makes dual ownership rules clear

Daily Record

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Rangers will never suffer Crystal Palace UEFA sweat as SFA chief makes dual ownership rules clear

Mike Mulraney explains that Ibrox takeover as well as Hearta and Hibs deal meet key criteria set by Hampden beaks Mike Mulraney insists the SFA would never allow dual ownership where it could cost clubs a place in Europe. Co-Leeds United investor, the 49ers group, has just bought a minority share in Rangers, similar to Brighton owner Tony Bloom at Hearts and Bournemouth's holding company Black Knight who have put money into Hibs. ‌ SFA chiefs have given these deals the green light but only because they are minority investments in the Scottish clubs. ‌ English FA Cup winners Crystal Palace are sweating on their European inclusion for next season because they also have control of French side Lyon. Mulraney said: 'We make sure if ever there is a contention about a dual-ownership model whereby the Scottish club would be seen as subordinate, that cannot be. You can't get investment rights unless you agree the Scottish club is never subordinate. 'In the event UEFA said, 'these two clubs can't play in the same competition, we've changed the rules', nobody really thought about it. The SFA ensures that the Scottish club is never subordinate.'

French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion
French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion

Fashion United

time16 hours ago

  • Fashion United

French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion

The French Senate is due to vote Tuesday on a bill to regulate the fast fashion industry, by sanctioning companies and banning advertisements. The bill is targeted at Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which has a reputation for selling lower quality clothes at a very low price. Easy to order and replace, fast fashion items are exported to France on a large scale, causing pollution and saturating markets. Adopted by the lower house National Assembly in March 2024, the bill will be voted on by the Senate later on Tuesday and is expected to pass, with backing from the government and widespread support in the chamber. The vote is not the final legislative hurdle: a joint committee of senators and lower house deputies is expected to meet from September to produce a joint text, prior to the final adoption of the law. The text plans to "reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry", said Anne-Cecile Violland, the centre-right member of parliament who proposed the bill. Fast fashion is a growing market in France and between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised products grew from 2.3 billion euros to 3.2 billion euros. Around 48 clothing items per person are released into the French market each year, and 35 are thrown away every second in the country, according to the state environmental agency Ademe. Fast fashion poses a "triple threat", said the minister for ecological transition, Agnes Pannier-Runacher. "It promotes overconsumption, causes ecological disaster and threatens our businesses," she said. Slamming an "invasion" of products that "do not last", the minister expressed hope it would help change things in Europe. Once adopted in France, the European Commission will be notified to ensure it complies with European law according to Pannier-Runacher. Targeting fast fashion The Senate, dominated by the right, modified the bill to target "ultra" fast fashion companies, such as Asian websites Shein ou Temu. The Senate's amendments plan to leave out French and European brands that may be affected by the bill, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. The fashion giants will still be obliged to notify their customers about the environmental impact of their products, according to the new bill. "I have no intention of making French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality pay a single euro," said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast fashion companies by scoring their "environmental communication". This "eco-score" will affect all fast fashion companies, Pannier-Runacher said. Those with the lowest scores will be taxed by the government up to 5 euros per product in 2025 and up to 10 euros by 2030. This tax cannot go beyond 50 percent of the price of the original product. Advertisement ban The bill would impose sanctions on influencers who promote such products and ban fast fashion advertisements. The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed with a "collective effort", and not by targeting "a single actor," Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on Monday. According to Ruffat, the law will add "a tax of 10 euros per sold item of clothing by 2030" and "impact the purchasing power" of French people. Environmental organisations are also worried that the law may be misinterpreted. Debates may amount to an interesting framework which still lacks substance, according to Green Senator Jacques Fernique. On Monday, the Textiles Industry Union (UIT) recognised the bill as "a first step" and hoped for its "rapid adoption ... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations".(AFP)

The 'nuclear gold rush': What could Sizewell C bring to coastal community?
The 'nuclear gold rush': What could Sizewell C bring to coastal community?

ITV News

time17 hours ago

  • ITV News

The 'nuclear gold rush': What could Sizewell C bring to coastal community?

Ten miles down the road from Britain's biggest building site lies the market town of Bridgwater. A historic centre of trade at the mouth of Somerset's chief river, it is famed for hosting the UK's oldest carnival celebrating Guy Fawkes' failed plot to blow up the Houses of Parliament in 1605. Now there is a boom going on - but not everybody is feeling the benefit. Hinkley Point C, where construction work on the two giant nuclear reactors is about to reach its peak, has brought thousands of workers to the local area. Bridgwater high street is often awash with high-vis. The bed-and-breakfasts' midweek trade has been revitalised. If you're looking for a haircut, a bet, a takeaway or a pint, you've got plenty of options. Becky Webber has run The Fountain Inn for 14 years. The 'Hinkley effect' means it is as busy as ever. "The town's booming with people now," she says. "It does have a massive impact having Hinkley down here. "It does help us hugely, especially after Covid as well. If we didn't have that extra group we would have struggled." In a cafe overlooking the River Parrett, I'm pointed in the direction of Alan. He came here to work on Hinkley Point A in 1963 and has stayed ever since. But he insists the town hasn't seen the benefits it could have from its nuclear neighbour. The pensioner is being served by 28-year-old Josh. He still lives with his parents - trying to buy his first home is proving difficult and the 'Hinkley effect' means renting is out of the question. "People are constantly coming and going," he says. "Landlords are just looking to rent out to these Hinkley workers where they can charge a lot of money and get a lot of money in. "The houses go so fast now. They can be up for sale and go within a week because people see it as a goldmine. It's made the housing market difficult for first-time buyers, for sure." So what happens when the workers disappear? That's a question posed by Roy Pumfrey. He's been campaigning against Hinkley Point C since before I was born. Sporting a Panama hat and showing off a car registration plate that reads 'N002 HPC', Roy tells me can see the cranes of Hinkley from his bedroom window in nearby Cannington. "If you've jumped aboard the gravy train and are part of the golden side of the gold rush economy then you're getting a once-in-a-lifetime boost to your salary," he says. "But it won't last." EDF, the French firm behind Hinkley, disagrees. "There is an amazing legacy from this project," says Andrew Cockcroft, the company's head of stakeholder relations and social impact. "Hinkley Point C is a driver of growth and productivity here. We've seen thousands of people locally get trained into higher skilled, higher paid jobs." EDF's annual 'socio-economic impact' report is packed with numbers. It says Hinkley Point C is supporting 26,000 jobs across Britain. More than £5bn has been spent with local businesses. There are 4,600 British firms in the project's supply chain. And more than 1,500 apprentices have been trained - people like 22-year-old Megan Ellicott. She grew up in Bridgwater and is coming to the end of a three-year pipe-fitting apprenticeship. "I hope to stay here," she says. "But, possibly in the future, there will be other power stations like Sizewell. Hopefully over time I'll be able to move and go there." Sizewell C will be an "exact replica" of Hinkley C, says Mr Cockcroft. "A replicated project, making no changes, reduces cost and increases efficiency so we can make sure that the nuclear of the future is cheaper and also faster to build," he no doubt, those in Suffolk who've had one eye on Somerset will have a list of questions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store