Give us voter list and poll footage first, then we'll meet EC: Congress's Pawan Khera
New Delhi [India], June 26 (ANI): Congress leader Pawan Khera on Thursday said the party has been demanding the machine-readable, digital voter list of Maharashtra and polling day video footage from Maharashtra and Haryana since 2024.
He added that there was a five-month gap between the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections in Maharashtra, during which 40 lakh new voters were added, raising serious concerns.
Khera said the Congress will meet the Election Commission and share its analysis after receiving the requested data.
Speaking to ANI, Pawan Khera said, 'We have been saying since 2024 that we need both the digital machine-readable voter list of Maharashtra Lok Sabha elections and the digital machine-readable voter list of Maharashtra Assembly elections. There was a gap of 5 months between these two elections. In these 5 months, 40 lakh new votes have been added, so first, give us the digital machine-readable voter list. Give us the video footage of Maharashtra Assembly elections and Haryana Assembly elections, we are ready to come after that...'
After the Election Commission invited Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi for talks over his allegations regarding the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly polls, the Congress party on Thursday responded through a letter.
The Congress party has urged the Election Commission to share a digital, machine-readable copy of the Maharashtra voter list and polling day video footage from both Maharashtra and Haryana within a week, saying they will meet the EC and present their analysis once the data is received.
In the letter, the Congress party wrote, 'We request you to provide us with a machine-readable, digital copy of the Maharashtra voter lists and video footage of the polling day of Maharashtra and Haryana within a week from the date of this letter. This has been a long-standing request that should be easy for the EC to comply with. The Congress party leadership will be happy to meet with the EC soon after we have received these. In that meeting, we will even present our analysis findings to you.'
Leader of Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi had earlier called upon the Election Commission to publish consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra, saying that 'telling the truth' will protect the poll panel's credibility.
Khera also hit back at Union Minister Amit Shah's remarks, calling the comments cowardly and accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of lacking the courage shown by former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi during the 1971 war.
He said Indira Gandhi stood up to global powers like the US, while PM Modi is afraid of China and America, giving them a 'clean chit' and pulling back the army instead of taking strong action.
'This is a cowardly comment... They will not talk about 1971, which is a proud moment for the country. During Operation Sindoor, it was Indira Gandhi and not PM Narendra Modi who was trending... In 1971, the country was not as strong as it is today, yet Indira Gandhi had the courage to look into Nixon's (former US President) eyes. He (PM Modi) is afraid of China, gives them a clean chit, is afraid of America, and withdraws the army. If he were not afraid of America, the army would have achieved a lot,' Khera said.
Earlier on Wednesday, Union Home Minister Amit Shah addressed a gathering at the first-ever event organised to commemorate 25th June as 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' (Constitution Killing Day), pointing out that the Emergency was imposed on the day.
Terming the imposition of Emergency in India for 21 months from 1975 to 1977, the Home Minister said, 'Bad incidents usually should be forgotten in life. And it is correct, but when it relates to social life and national life, then bad incidents should be remembered forever, so that the youth and teenagers of the country are cultured, organised, ready to defend, and ensure that such bad incidents are never repeated again.' (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
42 minutes ago
- India.com
Days after Operation Sindoor, bad news for Pakistan as China rejects request for hypersonic missiles due to...
China has reportedly refused to supply hypersonic missiles to Pakistan. (File) China Hypersonic Missiles: In another major setback for Pakistan's military ambitions after the drubbing it received at the hands of Indian armed forces during Operation Sindoor, China, its 'all-weather ally' and largest weapons' supplier, has reported turned down Islamabad's request for the supply of Chinese-made hypersonic missiles, and transfer of technology for indigenous manufacturing of the same. Why China turned down Pakistan's request for hypersonic missiles? According to media reports, China fears that Pakistan could allow Western experts to examine Chinese-made advanced missile systems, amid the Islamabad's recent bonhomie with the West, especially the United States. Another reason is the concern over the poor performance of Chinese-supplied weaponry by Pakistan in the recent India-Pakistan conflict. Citing sources, defense website Indian Defence Research Wing (Idrw) said that China has informed Pakistan that its has not developed export variants of its hypersonic missiles, nor are the existing ones– such as the DF-17 equipped with hypersonic warheads– cleared for export, which makes the technology off-limits, at least for the time being. Beijing has also rejected Pakistan's transfer of technology request for hypersonic missiles, which would have allowed Pakistan to indigenously manufacture these advanced missiles, reducing the country's dependence on defense imports, the report said. China's hypersonic technology is meant for strategic deterrence Notably, China manufactures dedicated export variants for most of its defense products, including fighter jets, air defense systems, and missiles, but has not done so yet for its advanced hypersonic missiles. Currently, China has no downgraded or export variant of its hypersonic missile systems, which aligns with Beijing's broader policy of restricting the proliferation of its most advanced strategic weapons, especially those that could have the capability to alter regional or global power dynamics. China is among the few nations to have developed and mastered hypersonic technology, and sees it as a critical component of its strategic deterrence, particularly against the United States and its allies. Experts believe that China refuses to export these strategic weapons, even to a close ally like Pakistan, as it could invite international scrutiny and escalate tensions with rival powers. Its also been suggested that China's hypersonic capabilities are still in its nascent stages, and needs more development before its ready for mass production and deployment. Pakistan wants hypersonic tech to counter India Meanwhile, Pakistan is rapidly expanding its weapons' arsenal, especially its missile systems to counter India's rapid advancement in missile technology, especially the development of indigenous hypersonic and ballistic missile systems. By acquiring Chinese hypersonic missiles, Pakistan wants to close the technological gap with India, which has developed domestic hypersonic capabilities like the Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle (HSTDV). According to a recent US intel report, Pakistan's military power and economy are completely dependent on China, which is a major concern for South Asia as Beijing is likely to use any future India-Pakistan conflict as a testing ground for its weapons, such as fighter jets, air defense systems, and missiles. Around 80 percent of Pakistan total defense imports come from China, the report said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Russia says remaining two S-400 squadrons will be delivered by 2026-27
NEW DELHI: Russia on Thursday assured India it will deliver the two remaining squadrons of the S-400 Triumf surface-to-air missile systems, which played a crucial role during Operation Sindoor against Pakistan last month, by 2026-27. The delivery of the fourth and fifth squadrons of the S-400 air defence systems, which has been hugely delayed due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, figured in the bilateral meeting between defence minister Rajnath Singh and his Russian counterpart Andrey Belousov on the side-lines of the SCO defence ministers' meet at Qingdao in China, sources told TOI. 'We had insightful deliberations on boosting India-Russia defence ties,' Singh posted on `X'. Under the $5.43 billion (Rs 40,000 crore) contract inked with Russia in 2018, India was slated to get all the five squadrons by end-2023. Each S-400 squadron has two missile batteries with 128 missiles each, with interception ranges of 120, 200, 250 and 380-km, as well as long-range acquisition and engagement radars and all-terrain transporter-erector vehicles. The IAF has deployed the first three S-400 squadrons in north-west and east India to cater for both China and Pakistan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute Navy Quest Undo 'As per Russia, the fourth squadron will now come next year, and the fifth in 2027,' a source said. During the intense cross-border hostilities with Pakistan from May 7 to 10, Pakistan had claimed it successfully bombed the Adampur air-base and destroyed a S-400 battery deployed there. But PM Narendra Modi visited the air-base on May 13, and posed with an all-terrain transporter-erector-launcher vehicle of the S-400 system in the background to reject the claim. The S-400 batteries, which can detect and destroy hostile strategic bombers, jets, spy planes, missiles and drones at a range of 380-km, constitute the outermost layer of India's integrated air defence system and is fully plugged into the IAF's integrated air command and control system (IACCS). The DRDO, on its part, is also developing an air defence system with a 350-km interception range under the ambitious Project Kusha. With the defence ministry in Sept 2023 approving the 'acceptance of necessity' for the procurement of five of its squadrons for the IAF at a cost of Rs 21,700 crore, India plans to operationally deploy this system by 2028-2029, as was first reported by TOI.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Rahul Gandhi may be wrong on Maharashtra poll fixing, but EC must come clean with data
The credibility of India's electoral democracy hangs in delicate balance as the Congress and the Election Commission (EC) engage in a high-stakes confrontation over the fairness of the Maharashtra assembly elections last year. While Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's allegations of electoral manipulation suffer from selective data interpretation, the EC's dismissive responses equally fail to address legitimate concerns with substantive evidence. This impasse threatens the very foundation of public trust in India's electoral June 26, the Congress escalated its demands, calling for the EC to provide 'digital, machine-readable' copies of Maharashtra's voter lists from both the 2024 Lok Sabha and assembly elections, along with CCTV footage from polling day. This demand came through the EAGLE (Empowered Action Group of Leaders and Experts) team, established specifically to coordinate electoral matters between the Indian National Congress and the Congress letter to the EC came in response to the poll body's June 12 invitation to Rahul for a discussion aimed at resolving confusion over the assembly poll has consistently claimed that the assembly elections in Maharashtra were rigged in favour of the BJP-led alliance, using a mix of voter roll manipulation and last-minute turnout spikes to tilt the scales. In a June 7 newspaper column, he laid out his case, citing a sharp and sudden rise in voter registrations in constituencies where the BJP had fared poorly in the Lok Sabha elections, and an unusual jump in turnout after 5 pm on polling day. The EC dismissed the charges as misleading and invited Rahul for a discussion, but the Congress has refused to engage unless the requested voter data and footage are the core of Rahul's argument is the claim that the number of registered voters in Maharashtra jumped from 92.9 million in May 2024 (Lok Sabha elections) to 97 million by November 2024 (assembly elections)—an increase of 4.1 million in just five months, following a five-year increase of only 3.1 million since 2019. This acceleration in voter registration, Rahul argued, appeared suspiciously historical data (see table: Maharashtra Voter Trends) reveals that such surges are not unprecedented. During Congress rule in 2004, voter registration increased by 32 per cent in the five months preceding assembly polls. The 2009 elections, also under Congress governance, witnessed a 30 per cent jump. Most dramatically, 2019 recorded an 84 per cent surge in the final five months before elections. In this context, the 2024 increase of 49 per cent appears substantial but not historically anomalous. More specifically, Rahul alleged that new voter registrations were concentrated in approximately 12,000 of Maharashtra's 100,000 booths, primarily in 85 constituencies where the BJP had underperformed in the Lok Sabha elections. The Kamthi constituency served as his primary case study: while the Congress maintained roughly similar vote totals between the Lok Sabha (136,000) and assembly elections (134,000), the BJP's tally surged from 119,000 to 175,000, an increase of 56,000 votes that Rahul attributed to the 35,000 newly registered voters in the statistical analysis reveals the limitations of this argument. The BJP's 2024 vote-share of 54 per cent represented a recovery to its 2014 levels (exactly 54 per cent) after a dip to 44 per cent in 2019. The party has consistently won this seat since 2004, making its performance less exceptional than Rahul suggests. While the concentration of new voters warrants investigation, attributing voting patterns solely to new registrations oversimplifies electoral Rahul's most provocative claim concerned the mathematical impossibility of Maharashtra's voter registration exceeding its adult population. He cited 'government estimates' showing the state's adult population at 95.4 million compared to 97 million registered voters. The 2019 Population Projections for India and States report, by the National Commission on Population, places Maharashtra's adult population at 91.4 million in 2021, projected to rise to 98.1 million by 2026. A midpoint estimate for 2024 would be around 95.3 million, below the voter roll these are projections, not exact figures, and similar discrepancies have occurred elsewhere. For instance, in the Karnataka assembly polls in 2023, 52.1 million voters were registered despite the state's 2023 projected population being just 50.1 million. The number of registered voters even exceeded the 2026 projection of 51.9 million. The Congress won that election without raising concerns about inflated voter most intriguing allegation—and the one most difficult to verify through public data—concerns the dramatic increase in voter turnout after official polling hours. On polling day, the provisional turnout at 5 pm stood at 58.22 per cent. By the next morning, it had risen to 66.05 per cent, a jump of 7.83 percentage points or roughly 7.6 million votes. Rahul claims this swing exceeds patterns (see table: Maharashtra Turnout) from previous Maharashtra elections and, therefore, has demanded access to CCTV footage and digital voter lists to probe it. Here, the EC's defensiveness is troubling. On the CCTV footage request, the EC cited privacy concerns and voter security, arguing that footage could enable identification of voters and expose them to potential intimidation. Intriguingly, on May 30, a week before Rahul's article was published, the EC revised its guidelines, reducing the retention period for election footage from varying periods up to one year to a uniform 45 days after result declaration, citing 'recent misuse' of such materials. It also clarified that such recordings were only internal management tools, not a legal voter lists, the EC maintained that the Congress already possessed the rolls, having received draft lists in August 2024 and final versions in late August or September. The EC noted that of 19,27,508 claims and objections received during the revision process, only 89 appeals were filed against additions or deletions, suggesting minimal concerns at the the Congress now demands—and what the EC has yet to provide—are machine-readable, digital versions of both the 2024 Lok Sabha and assembly voter lists to enable systematic comparison. As the Congress letter of June 26 articulated: 'To investigate this thoroughly, any rational person would agree that the starting step is to compare the final electors list for Maharashtra 2024 Lok Sabha elections and final electors list for Maharashtra 2024 Vidhan Sabha elections.'advertisementWhile the Congress's allegations suffer from selective data interpretation and fail to account for historical precedents, the EC's reluctance to provide comprehensive, verifiable data undermines its credibility as an impartial arbiter. The EC bears a higher burden of proof precisely because it serves as the guardian of electoral no political party, including the Congress, should be permitted to erode public confidence in the electoral process through unverified or anecdotal claims. If the election process was fair and above board, it is in the interest of Indian democracy and the EC's own credibility to counter the charges with evidence-backed, data-driven clarity, not just indignation. Let the facts speak louder than to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
