DWP State Pension Age could rise more quickly after review
New analysis today also reveals a stark a 48% gender pensions gap in private pension wealth between women and men.
A typical woman currently approaching retirement can expect a private pension income worth over £5,000 less than that of a typical man (just over £100 per week for a woman compared to just over £200 a week for a man).
While the introduction of Automatic Enrolment increased the numbers saving, saving levels have often remained low. Around 1-in-2 workers in the private sector only save around the minimum contribution level (8% or less of earnings).
Philly Ponniah, chartered wealth manager and financial coach at Philly Financial, says that "while auto-enrolment was a great start, it's not a full solution".
She continues: "Yes, it's brought millions into pension saving, but most are stuck at the minimum 8%, and that's simply not enough for a comfortable retirement.
"Employers are under pressure, too, and it's understandable that many can't stretch contributions further right now, especially with higher national insurance costs. But that makes personal awareness even more important. People need to know what 8% really gets them, and why it matters to put more aside for the future.
'The shift from Defined Benefit to Defined Contribution means the risk and responsibility now sits with the individual. Without better education on investing and understanding risk, many will unknowingly fall behind. It's not just about saving more, it's about making what you do save work harder. Otherwise, we risk creating a generation that thinks they're doing the right thing, while falling short.'
Scott Gallacher, director at Rowley Turton, said the government set the bar too low: "When the government introduced auto-enrolment, they took the easy way out by setting the bar too low.
"The qualifying earnings threshold hits part-time workers hardest, especially those in retail and hospitality, sectors dominated by women.
Recommended reading:
'In my view, this structure amounts to a form of indirect sex discrimination and I've never understood how it was allowed to happen. I raised the potential for indirect sex discrimination with the government at the time, but never got a straight answer.
"If we're serious about closing the gender pensions gap and improving retirement outcomes, fixing these flaws in auto-enrolment must be a priority.
"That said, fixing it now, during a time of economic pressure, is a tough ask. But if we don't address these structural flaws soon, we'll be locking in poor retirement outcomes for millions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits warned over 'simple mistake' after pension pot is hit by £80,000 blow
Brits have been warned to avoid making a particular mistake when it comes to their pension, as one man found out that it could lose him £80,000 UK households have been warned against making a simple error that cost one pension pot £80,000. Whilst it may be appealing to reduce expenses on pension services, this is one area where financial advisers are urging people not to economise. Scott Gallacher, director at Rowley Turton, said: "Cutting costs by skipping financial advice can be a false economy." Explaining why it's crucial to ensure all your details are accurate, Mr Gallacher recounted the story of a client who missed out on tens of thousands simply for ticking the wrong box. It comes after news of a £200 payment for state pensioners born before 1959 to be made soon. He revealed: "One DIY client ticked the wrong box when accessing his pension and lost £200,000 of tax-free cash – an £80,000 tax hit." "This was a few years ago. He had an old occupational scheme but transferred benefit not as a 'wind up' or 'buddy transfer', and lost scheme-specific tax-free cash entitlement and was then limited to 25%. Another refused to pay our £500 fee for help encashing an offshore bond, only to lose £1,500 in unnecessary tax." MrGallacher added: "Retiring without advice can mean missing out on enhanced annuities, costing up to 10% of your retirement income for the sake of 1% in fees. Clients also regularly overpay on mortgages by not using a broker, or stick with poor-value pensions and investments with high fees. The cost of advice is often dwarfed by the long-term value it adds – or the disasters it prevents." The Money and Pensions Service reports that over 45 million individuals in the UK have private pension funds, with varying amounts set aside for their retirement. However, it seems future retirees may not have it as good as today's pensioners. Those retiring in 2050 are projected to have £800 or 8% less private pension income than those retiring today, according to the report. It was also found that four in 10 people are currently not saving enough money for their retirement. For those looking to start saving for their retirement years, the earlier, the better. This will give the money enough time for it to grow, leading to a larger pension pot in retirement. Tony Redondo, founder of Cosmos Currency Exchange, warned: "Shortcuts often lead to bigger bills. Skimpy insurance policies may not cover damages, leaving you to pay big out-of-pocket costs."
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
22-07-2025
- The Independent
How much should you be saving each month at 30, 40 and 50 years old?
SPONSORED BY TRADING 212 The Independent Money channel is brought to you by Trading 212. Building a savings pot can help provide an important safety net to cover unexpected expenses or even for key money milestones. A savings pot can come to the rescue if you need cash to cover emergencies such as home repairs or you could use it to work towards a goal such as a holiday or a dream car. It can be hard to know how much you should save though as everyone will have different goals and there are different factors at play such as your income and even your age. One common savings mantra is the 50/30/20 rule, where you spend half your salary on expenses, 30 per cent on wants and put 20 per cent in savings. Rachel Springall, finance expert at said: 'Everyone will have their own goals and aspirations when it comes to their savings pots which will change as people progress through their adult lives.' The right amount to save depends on your stage of life and what gives you peace of mind, says Philly Ponniah, chartered wealth manager at Philly Financial. 'Factors like job security, dependents, insurance, and access to other savings all play a role,' she explained. 'As with all personal finance, it's personal, the right safety net is the one that helps you feel financially secure.' There are a various ways to save, from high-interest easy access accounts that let you withdraw your funds when you need them, to cash ISAs where your returns are tax-free. However you put money aside, here is how much you should save based on your age. How much should you save in your 30s? By the time you reach age 30, you will most likely have finished studying and may have a student loan to repay, while you could also have left your childhood home and be balancing paying rent and saving for a deposit to buy your first property. There may even be plans to get married. That is a lot to put money aside for. The median salary for someone age 30 to 39 is £39,988, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which would mean saving £7,997.60 annually or £666.47 on a monthly basis based on putting aside 20 per cent. However, Springall said: 'Typically, those in their 30s should be saving slightly more than 20 per cent, aiming for 25 per cent of their disposable income. They must also ensure they are contributing a fair portion of their salary into their pension and be sure to have some cash stashed away to have a holiday or pay for any hobbies to take care of their wellbeing.' How much should you save in your 40s? ONS figures suggest those in their 40s typically earn £42,796 per year. That would mean putting aside £8,559.20 a year or £713.27 per month. But by the time you reach your 40s, you may have even more financial challenges such as paying a mortgage, running your own business and even bringing up a family or caring for older family members. Springall added: 'It's no wonder then if some have forgotten to put a little bit of cash to one side. 'The general budgeting rule applies here, where 20 per cent of any disposable salary saved to cover costs, and ensure pension provisions are not neglected when other life events take centre stage. Those feeling the strain would be wise to set up a pot that's quick to access, in case of emergencies.' How much should you save in your 50s? In an ideal world, someone in their 50s would be close to paying off their mortgage, which should free up some savings and mean more money can be put towards retirement in hopefully the near future. ONS data suggests that median salaries drop once people are in their 50s, as some may slow down at work later into the decade. The typical salary for someone age 50 to 59 is £40,456 so putting aside 20 per cent would mean saving £8,091.20 per year or £674.27 a month. Springall suggests the lack of other financial commitments can hopefully free up a decent portion of someone's net income at this age but it would be wise to start thinking about funding your retirement. She said: 'People are working longer, and living longer, so that means they need to put even more money away into their pension to fund their retirement. 'The first question someone should ask is whether they will be able to retire 'comfortably' or not. If no, then they must prioritise building their savings, or relinquish assets to cover the cost of care and comforts. This is where advice is critical.'
North Wales Chronicle
22-07-2025
- North Wales Chronicle
State pension age review needed to ensure system ‘affordable'
The Government review is due to report in March 2029 and Ms Reeves said it was 'right' to look at the age at which people can receive the state pension as life expectancy increases. The state pension age is currently 66, rising to 67 by 2028 and the Government is legally required to periodically review the age. The Chancellor told reporters: 'We have just commissioned a review of pensions adequacy, so whether people are saving enough for retirement, and also the state pension age. 'As life expectancy increases it is right to look at the state pension age to ensure that the state pension is sustainable and affordable for generations to come. 'That's why we have asked a very experienced set of experts to look at all the evidence.' The review was announced by the Department for Work and Pensions on Monday and will involve an independent report, led by Dr Suzy Morrissey, on specified factors relevant to the Review of State Pension Age along with the Government Actuary's Department's examination of the latest life expectancy projections data. Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'There will be many factors that need to be assessed during this review of the state pension age. 'One of the most important will be healthy life expectancy which according to the latest data hovers in the early 60s. 'This means the reality is that many people will face real difficulties in continuing to work until their mid-to-late 60s and could face a sizeable income gap while they wait to receive their state pension.' Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, said: 'An ageing population places an increasing burden on taxpayers, with state pension costs rising and fewer working-age taxpayers to cover the cost. 'Future governments will hope that an improved economy and growing tax receipts will help alleviate some of the pressure. But that can't be guaranteed and there needs to a be a credible plan for maintaining affordability.'
