Repairs start on Grade II listed bandstand
The Grade II listed structure, in Sunderland's Roker Park, was closed for safety reasons in 2021.
Work to bring it back to its former glory were approved last year.
David Laws, who has lived in the area for 40 years, said he "almost had a tear" in his eye when he saw scaffolding going up on Thursday.
"I was over the moon," the 76-year-old said.
Mr Laws said he remembered brass bands playing at the bandstand on Sundays.
"I felt disgusted that it was being left to go to rack and ruin and not being looked after," he said.
"It's part of our heritage. It should be looked after and passed on to the next generation."
The bandstand dates back to 1880 and is recognised for a range of features, including its ornamental railings and central cupola.
Sunderland City Council said repairs will help make the most of the area, with other improvements - including restoring the boating lake and a new cafe - also being made at the park.
Back in early 2023, plans were approved for amphitheatre seating near the bandstand to restore it to being the "beating heart of the park once again", the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.
Kevin Johnston, cabinet member for housing, regeneration and business, said: "The work on the repair, restoration and conservation of the bandstand and former park keeper's lodge will allow us to complete the current £1.6m regeneration of Roker Park, as well as helping to make the most of the area around the historic bandstand and maximise its use as a performance space."
It has not been confirmed when the work to the bandstand will be finished.
Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Bandstand set for repairs after plans approved
Music-themed artwork installed in city park
Sunderland City Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Internet Is Floored By This Woman Who Is Demanding Her Husband Be The Sole Breadwinner So She Can Become A Tradwife
The trad-wife lifestyle has gone viral, and it's affecting real-life marriages. A Reddit user on the r/amitheasshole subreddit recently went viral for sharing a story about their wife of 15 years demanding they become the sole breadwinner so she can live her tradwife dreams. Here's the full story: "I'm 35 and my wife is 40. We've been together 15 years. The last couple of years, she's really fallen down the trad wife black hole, and it's driving me crazy. At first, it started off with her saying she doesn't want to work anymore, and lately it has escalated to saying men who make their wives work are abusive." "We both have well-paid jobs. I'm a self-employed builder with a team and earn around £100k a year. She works in management for the NHS and earns around £50k a year. We both work (I guess I should say worked for her) really hard and have no kids, and three years ago managed to pay our mortgage off and lived in a nice enough area where I would have happily stayed forever." "She, however, suddenly wanted a massive house that we didn't need. I should have seen what was coming. She was looking at £700k houses, which would require a mortgage of £500k after we sold our house." "I gave in and we bought a house. She then wanted a new car which again I caved to and she got a car that is worth more than she earns a year. She then decided she didn't want to work anymore. She said her job was crap and I said, 'take a lower paid one then that you'll enjoy more.' She said no. She just doesn't want to work full stop." "She also doesn't want to give up anything she has. Over the past couple of years, it has been obvious she is trying to lose her job without leaving despite me saying that I can't afford the house, car, and holidays on my own." "She started bringing this trad wife crap up, but said she'd want to hire a cleaner as the house is too big for her to clean alone, and she prefers my cooking to hers, so I'll still do all the cooking! So I said, 'You basically want to dress up pretty and bake the odd cake.' She stormed off and said I don't get it." "She again brought it up yesterday, and I said fine, she can do it, but she's got to get up before me and make sure my breakfast is ready, like in the videos she watches. She's got to be dressed as a sexy version of a '50s housewife, like in the videos she watches from the moment I open my eyes to the moment I close them. The house must be spotless at all times, like in the videos she watches." "I want huge packed lunches for work like in the videos she watches. I want to come home and have beautiful pies and cakes ready for pudding, like in the videos she watches. I want a bath ran for when I get in and then come down to a proper meal every night like in the videos she watches. I then want a foot rub while I eat the cakes and pies she makes, like in the videos she watches. I also want sex on demand, how I want it when I want it, like in the videos she watches." "She called me abusive, a user, sexist, etc, and stormed out to her equally delusional sister's house (don't get me started on her). I'll be honest, I'm ready for a divorce if this carries on. Am I the asshole?" Pretty much everyone online is on the husband's side, that he is NOT the asshole. "Not the asshole. If she wants to be a trad wife, then she has to be one all the way, and not only when it benefits her," user Upbeat_Afternoon_621 wrote. "Also, it's very selfish in my opinion to add more financial weight, knowing she wants to quit her job and live off of only your income. And I say this as a woman who is more traditional as well." "She doesn't want to be a trad wife, she wants to enjoy early retirement on someone else's dime…I (f) had a partner (m) like that too. He just stopped working and pretended to look for work while I paid everything, for years," originalbrainybanana wrote. "He then told me I was sexist because if he had been a woman and I was a man, it would be 'normal', or so he claims (we don't have children either)." "Anyway, it got complicated, but I managed to end things and kick him out. Don't be like me and don't tolerate the lack of active participation in the household for even 1 minute, as it gets much harder and more expensive to end things later on." "This trad wife content is the female redpill version of Andrew Tate for men. It's time everyone understands that in 2025, it takes two regular human incomes to support a household," user feuwbar wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Explained: How much is the government paying to house asylum seekers in hotels?
Anti-immigration protests have surged in recent weeks, with some targeting hotels used to house asylum seekers, sparking violence and prompting multiple arrests. Amid the demonstrations, misleading claims about the cost of accommodating migrants have been spreading widely online. But what does it actually cost to house asylum seekers in hotels — and how are false figures shaping public anger? Misleading figures spread online One focal point has been the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, East London, which has witnessed clashes between anti-immigration protesters and anti-racism demonstrators, leading to the arrest of two people on 8 August. Social media posts and viral messages have claimed that housing asylum seekers in hotels costs the government between £200 and £500 per night. However, there is no evidence to support these figures. One expert claims these kinds of falsehoods are 'most likely spread with a strategic purpose in mind'. The real cost The Home Office told The Independent that the Britannia Hotel costs £81 per night to house asylum seekers. In March 2025, the average cost per night for a hotel room used to accommodate asylum seekers was £118.87 — down from £162.16 in March 2023. Across all hotels, this equates to around £5.77m per day, down from £8.3m per day the previous year. Stephan Lewandowsky, Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of Bristol, told The Independent that false information spreads because divisive posts attract more attention from readers. He said: 'Social media algorithms favour information that is outrage-evoking because it generates more audience engagement – hence making more money for the platforms – and in consequence disinformation often has an advantage over factual content and spreads faster and further. On top of that, the goal is, of course, to incite hatred and what better way to do that than to spread outrageous falsehoods.' These misleading claims are not just a matter of numbers. Experts warn they could amplify public anger and stoke already high tensions. 'There is now very clear and strong evidence that online misinformation can cause real-world harms. For example, last year's riots in the UK targeted mosques based on the false rumour that the perpetrator of a heinous crime was a Muslim refugee – he was not, he was a native-born British citizen,' Mr Lewandowsky said. Court ruling piles pressure on Starmer Pressure is mounting on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after Epping Forest District Council secured an interim High Court injunction to ban migrants from being housed at The Bell Hotel after weeks of protests at the site. The council argued the site had become a 'feeding ground for unrest' following a spate of violent protests that left several police officers injured. On 4 August, Starmer condemned the violence as 'far-right thuggery' and warned that those responsible would face the 'full force of the law.' For now, one of many challenges for ministers will be to ensure the facts about the costs of asylum hotels are reaching the public.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Antrim and Newtownabbey Council probes hotel being used for asylum seekers
A local council in Northern Ireland has started a probe into a hotel being used to house asylum seekers. Antrim and Newtownabbey Council confirmed that an enforcement investigation has commenced. It is understood it is into the legal planning status of the hotel in Co Antrim being used to house asylum seekers. A council spokesperson said they have no further comment to make at this time. It comes after Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court on Tuesday which blocks asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Current residents are to be removed by September 12. DUP South Antrim MLA Trevor Clarke welcomed the move by Antrim and Newtownabbey Council concerning the Chimney Corner Hotel. Mr Clarke said he had written to the head of planning enforcement at the council querying whether any change of use had been sought for the hotel. 'The High Court decision makes it clear that housing asylum seekers in hotels without first securing a 'change of use' through the proper planning process (from hotel to hostel or immigration centre accommodation) constitutes a breach of planning regulations,' he said. 'No-one is above the law, not even Government departments. 'If the Home Office or its contractors wish to place large numbers of illegal immigrants into our communities, they must follow the same planning rules as everyone else.' Mr Clarke said DUP councillors in other areas of Northern Ireland where hotels are being used to house asylum seekers are pressing for similar enforcement investigations. 'This issue isn't just about the specifics of the need for proper planning approval,' he added. 'It highlights the lack of proper oversight and control in terms of the entire UK immigration system. 'The fact these hotels do not have the proper planning approval to house asylum seekers is merely a symptom of the overall problem.' Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland director of Amnesty International, said people must be treated with dignity. 'Amnesty International has long raised concerns that hotels are wholly unsuitable for housing people seeking asylum,' he said. 'This judgment must not lead to even further disruption and insecurity for the refugees themselves. 'Proper investment by Government in planning and providing for appropriate accommodation is urgently needed. 'At the same time, that department must reset its asylum system to provide people with decisions on their asylum claims fairly and efficiently – so people are not stuck in limbo and can get on with their lives. 'People must be treated with dignity, just as we would expect if it was our families who were forced to flee war or persecution.'
