LEGO Unleashes Arkham Asylum Set With 24-Day Batman Advent Calendar
LEGOhas just revealed its latest collector's set: the LEGO DCBatmanArkham Asylum. Designed for adult fans, this 2,953-piece set doubles as both a display model and a 24-day Batman-themed Advent calendar.
Launching in collaboration withWarner Bros.Discovery Global Consumer Products, the set recreates the infamous GOTHAM CITY psychiatric institution with three removable segments—first floor, second floor and rooftop — offering access to interactive interiors, including prison cells, a delivery van and over 60 lore-rich stickers.
Sixteen iconic DC minifigures are included, each with transparent stands for customizable display. The roster features Batman, Robin, Batwoman, Batwing and a full lineup of villains, including The Joker, Harley Quinn, Catwoman, Bane, Mr. Freeze and more. Available now forpre-orderand on shelves from September 12, 2025, the set is priced at $300 USD.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
12 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Could DC actually be the future of comic book movies?
Since the fateful day in 2008 when Iron Man hit theaters, Marvel has enjoyed an almost uncontested reign as the king of comic book movies. In an age when superheroes were everywhere at the movie theater, Marvel was the studio that best understood how to bring them to life and make even people who had never read a comic book in their lives care about them. All of that reached what felt like a pretty natural climax with 2019's Avengers: Endgame, which became one of the biggest movies in the history of forever and capped off more than a decade of sprawling storytelling. Even as Endgame retired several of the franchise's core heroes, Marvel seemed determined to keep things going. Recommended Videos The results over the last six years have been less than pretty. Despite experiencing some successes, Marvel has faced significantly more failures compared to earlier periods, creating an opportunity for other franchises to flourish. DC was caught flat-footed when Marvel first came out of the gate. They had Christopher Nolan's Batman movies, but other than that, Warner Bros. simply didn't have a good way to compete. Their first attempt was the DC Extended Universe, which launched with 2013's Man of Steel and was a brief commercial success but was never as critically beloved as its Marvel alternative. Even more crucially, these movies never felt like they were genuine phenomena in quite the same way Marvel was. So, while Marvel continues the cinematic universe it started in 2008, DC is launching a new one this year. James Gunn's Superman is the first entry in that new universe, and it's also the first time I wondered whether Marvel might really be in trouble. While the numbers were close, Superman outgrossed Marvel's Fantastic Four: First Steps during its first weekend, and for the first time in more than a decade, DC might have the edge when it comes to word of mouth. Here's why DC could represent the future of comic book storytelling: DC is ready to embrace the silliness of its project Part of the Marvel movies' tremendous success has come from the way they manage to delicately balance two conflicting impulses in superhero storytelling. The first was toward telling stories that were real, grounded, and tactile. The second was to embrace the silliness inherent in superhero stories and use that to make the movies fun and colorful. Marvel essentially struck a balance, creating a universe populated by witty characters who donned the right costumes while also being aware of the humor in their situations. That wry, knowing attitude helped the movies do all the comic book stuff even as they also assured audiences that they knew it was a little bit nerdy. It's a tone that delivered tremendous results, but one that also began to wear thin after more than a decade. By contrast, Superman leaned all the way into the silly side. It's a movie filled with color where most scenes are set during the day, and one where every character feels both like a real person and like they were pulled from a comic. There's much less winking at the audience and much more earnest exploration of why people are drawn toward comic books to begin with. It's a signal that DC is not just going to try to do the Marvel thing. They're building a universe their own way, and that should be fascinating to watch. They are building out from the middle Marvel was doing something that had never been done before, and as a result, they started small. A few heroes, then a few more, until the universe felt massive and you were amazed that all of these characters could fit in a single movie together. By contrast, DC seems to know that we're all a little tired of origin stories. Instead, Superman drops us right in the middle of the action and trusts us to understand that superheroes have been around for a while. Crucially, while he's the most powerful superhero, Superman is not fighting bad guys on his own. Instead, he's dealing with the complexity of working with other people from the beginning in a universe where no one has any questions about what superheroes are. This approach feels much more like jumping right into a comic book where your favorite heroes are all right there. Some of them might not be present, but on the whole, the impression is one of a universe that is stuffed with both life and activity. In addition to avoiding the traps of origin stories, this approach also meets superhero fans where they are. We no longer need our hands to be held. We can simply dive in with only a little bit of intro text to orient us to what's going on. They are casting well, but aren't casting stars This might seem like a small thing, but it speaks to the project of the DCU that Superman is filled with great actors who are not major movie stars. If they keep making these movies, they will eventually become stars. That's part of the problem that Marvel is dealing with now. When you're trying to build a universe in which heroes can appear in multiple properties, you have to have great actors who can work in multiple tones and genres. You need actors who aren't going to try to take all your money for every appearance they put in. DC is trying to build a world that doesn't leave you wondering why Superman isn't on screen any time the world is ending, and part of that is making sure that Superman does show up, at least sometimes. DC wants you to believe in these movies Perhaps most importantly, DC seems like a sincere attempt to remind people why they like these movies to begin with. As the lore of Marvel gets more and more convoluted, DC could be building a new way forward, one that could make it a sincere, sweet, candy-colored alternative to the multiverse that Marvel has introduced.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
After ‘Suicide Squad,' WB Is Making Another Live-Service DC Game
Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League WB may be producing some solid movies and TV shows as of late, despite all its corporate and branding drama, but video games? It's in a weird place. After the huge success of the single-player Hogwarts Legacy and the utter disaster that was the live-service Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, the demand from David Zaslav at the top was…more live-service games. And here we are, with WB gearing up for another DC one, it seems. This news comes from a job listing (via Tech4Gamers) that lists a new executive producer job at WB Montreal hiring for an unannounced game. They are to 'lead the development of a high-quality AAA game based on one of the iconic IPs from the vast Warner Bros. and DC Comics catalog.' Okay, that's good! But they also have to 'oversee post-launch content and live service strategy, ensuring ongoing player engagement.' Oh no. It is not easy to forget what a disaster Rocksteady's Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League was, which debuted with poor scores, poor sales and poor retention for its live-service aspects. After Marvel's Avengers had tried and failed to make a live-service superhero game, Suicide Squad was an even worse attempt and reportedly lost WB $200 million. Suicide Squad There is supposed to be a more traditional Arkham game in the works from Rocksteady now, according to past reports, but WB does not seem like it's going to be able to give up the chase to try and jam DC superheroes into a live game. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder In 2025, it is hard enough to sustain a live-service game, especially one based on producing significant, ongoing PvE content. But it's even harder with a superhero concept, as evidenced by these failures. Marvel's Avengers had to awkwardly insert bizarre loot like finding drops of Black Widow belts or Hulk rib cages. They also quickly realized that the pace of delivering new heroes and content was wildly harder than they thought, and they fell behind without ever catching up. To its credit, Suicide Squad did produce its year of content in a timely manner before throwing in the towel but it…wasn't good. A similar problem existed with loot, as the game attempted to make all its characters use guns including ones where it made no sense like Captain Boomerang and King Shark. It also had a story everyone hated based around the uncomfortable concept of killing off the Justice League (though in the follow-up content no one played, it was revealed those were actually all clones, and the real JLA survived. Except uh, Wonder Woman. RIP). There are no indications about what kind of game this would be. James Gunn has previously said he wants the DCU to have attached video games, which seemed incredibly ambitious given development timelines. It's not impossible this could be the plan, however, as WB desperately wants to get the DCU off the ground, and a good live-service game could bolster that. Making a good live-service superhero game, however, is going to be next to impossible, a lesson WB very much should have learned. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
‘Superman' Just Beat ‘Man Of Steel' At The Box Office, With A Few Catches
Superman/Man of Steel The saga of Superman's box office run continues with different spins saying it's good or bad, depending on the narrative the observer wants to create. Now? Superman has hit a milestone that's sure to rile up the DCU versus DCEU crowd, it has now grossed more than Man of Steel at the domestic box office. Man of Steel earned $291 million domestically back in 2013, and as of today, Superman has passed that total There are some caveats here. Some important ones, I'd argue. First, of course, you can play the inflation game, and inflation has been…bad over the last decade. $291 million back in 2013 would equal $407 million today, and I mean, I don't think it's wholly wrong to consider that, even though many box office charts ignore that the vast majority of the time. Second, there's the rather important story that Superman is drawing a poor international audience in the context of the wider industry, and also if we want to keep going with these Man of Steel comparisons. Joining that $291 million was $379 million, for a total of $670 million with international receipts 56% of the total for Man of Steel. Meanwhile, Superman hitting the $500 million mark includes just 42% international revenue, $214 million. And given that this ratio is likely to continue, it seems pretty unlikely that Superman is going to top Man of Steel's $670 million overall. Superman James Gunn has cited that Superman is not a 'known commodity' in some places (not sure that works with the Man of Steel data) but also: 'It also affects things that we have a certain amount of anti-American sentiment around the world right now. It isn't really helping us.' That statement was widely criticized, but here in 2025, I'm not sure that's wrong, especially with a hero that has traditionally been about 'truth, justice and the American way.' The actual film portrays Superman as going directly against the US government and its war-based policies abroad, but the movie isn't getting much credit for that. I am no friend to Snyder die-hards but realistically, I don't think that Superman will hit Man of Steel totals even before inflation. That said, Superman hs been way better received than Man of Steel by both critics and audiences, and we also have to consider the era we're in. Superhero box office has generally declined past an era closer to 2018-2019 when you had mediocre movies like Aquaman and Captain Marvel even putting up billion dollar hauls. Years back, I think this would have earned more. I think Superman will do 'good enough' for this new era of DC, but I'm not sure it's all roses and confetti either. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
