
‘Self-amusement': Chinese expert spurns India's claims on downing Pakistani jets
China's former defence attache in South Asia Cheng Xizhong on Sunday spurned India's much-delayed claim that it had shot down six Pakistani aircraft during the May conflict, terming it 'self-amusement'.
Having faced international coverage of its own craft being downed by Pakistan and scathing criticism from the opposition, India's Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh — three months after the conflict — claimed yesterday that his country had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during those clashes.
Aritifical Inteligence usesAritifical Inteligence uses
While Pakistan had already denied that India downed any of its aircraft, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif swiftly rubbished Singh's 'belated assertions' yesterday.
Commenting on the matter today, Cheng said India's allegations lacked strong evidence and have been 'widely questioned by the international community, being considered groundless', the Associated Press of Pakistan reported.
Singh's remarks were 'comical, implausible and unconvincing'. 'We may call it self-amusement,' he said in a statement.
Pakistan said it downed six Indian planes during the conflict. India's highest-ranking general has also acknowledged that its forces suffered losses in the air, but denied losing six aircraft.
'The Indian side has not presented any evidence, such as photos of the wreckage of the fighter jets, radar monitoring data, etc, while the Pakistani side had previously presented a large amount of relevant evidence of shooting down the Indian fighter jets,' Cheng noted.
The defence expert believed that everything should be based on sufficient evidence.
He highlighted that now, more than three months have passed since the India-Pakistan clash. New Delhi has never produced any evidence to prove that it had shot down Pakistani fighter jets, Cheng highlighted.
'In contrast, the Pakistan side immediately provided a detailed technical report to international media after the clash ended,' he added.
The Chinese expert also cited 'confirmations from world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments that India suffered heavy losses of multiple aircraft'.
'It is thus evident that no Pakistani fighter jet was hit or destroyed by the Indian side. On the contrary, the Pakistani side shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed S-400 air defence positions, among other achievements, which is an indisputable fact,' he added.
Professor Cheng is currently a senior research fellow at the Chinese think tank Charhar Institute and has also served as a former United Nations senior military observer, according to CGTN.
In his claims yesterday, the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief did not mention the type of Pakistan's fighter jets that he insisted were taken down.
Asif, responding to Singh, stated that 'not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed' by India. He declared that Pakistan took out six Indian jets, S-400 air defence batteries and unmanned aircraft of India while 'swiftly putting several Indian airbases out of action'.
Former envoy to the United States Dr Maleeha Lodhi also termed Singh's claim 'laughable', quipping that it took him 'several months to count the planes to make this ridiculous assertion!'
Criticism also echoed from within India. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera cast his doubts, saying: 'The question we have after today's information … when we had such a strong army and we were advancing, then under whose pressure did you stop Operation Sindoor?'
New Delhi had previously claimed it had downed 'a few planes', refusing to go into the specifics of it. US President Donald Trump has echoed the figure of 'five jets' shot down during the military confrontation, albeit without specifying which side's craft he was referring to.
India's loss of jets affirmed globally
France's air chief, General Jerome Bellanger, has previously said that he has seen evidence of the loss of three Indian fighters, including a Rafale. The IAF has not commented on those claims.
Days after the air combat, The Washington Post, based on visual evidence analysed by experts, reported that at least two French-made Indian fighter aircraft were shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF).
India's defence attache to Indonesia, Indian Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, acknowledged in June that the PAF downed Indian fighters, according to The Wire.
India's intelligence failure was central to the hour-long air battle with Pakistan, which led to the downing of Rafale aircraft by the PAF's J-10 fighters using PL-15 missiles, according to a Reuters report.
In a press briefing two days after the May 7 air combat, Air Vice Marshal (AVM) Aurangzeb Ahmed, the deputy chief of operations of Pakistan Air Force (PAF), shared the locations where five Indian jets were downed — four along the Line of Control and one near Bathinda in northwest India. He also disclosed that one of the Indian jets was downed by Pakistani air defence systems.
According to a Dawn report, which cited PAF officials, India's three Rafales, one Su-30MKI and one MiG-29 were downed within a 40-minute span. Not a single Pakistani jet crossed the border or engaged in close combat.
Describing the engagement as a textbook case of modern aerial warfare, AVM Aurangzeb had said Pakistan had tracked over 70 Indian aircraft — including 14 Rafales — using its Electromagnetic Operational Environment and responded with a concentrated and pre-planned defensive counter-air strategy.
'Our side deployed 42 high-tech aircraft,' the PAF officer said. He noted that while India remained on its side of the border and launched air-to-ground weapons, Pakistani defences detected and engaged the threats instantly.
read more
Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why?
Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria?
Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits?
Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election?
Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: What Happens After Brexit?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra!
Videos & Features
Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video
News
Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters
Arts & Culture
"Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date
News
China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier
News
Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia
Business
Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs
Videos & Features
Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall
Lifestyle
Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt
Arts & Culture
South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle
Arts & Culture
Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
US and China agree to critical extension, preventing tariff surge on the world's two largest economies
The United States and China agreed to pause tariff hikes on each other's goods for an additional 90 days, according to an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on Monday. Without the agreement, tariffs were set to immediately surge, risking a return to ultra-high levels that had formed an effective blockade on trade between the world's two largest economies. The news, first reported by CNBC, comes hours ahead of a 12:01 am ET deadline when tariffs on Chinese goods were set to rise to 54 percent from 30 percent, and Chinese tariffs on American exports would return to 34 percent from 10 percent. In a joint statement with the US, China confirmed the 90-day trade truce extension and said it would maintain the 10 percent tariffs it has imposed on American goods during that period. The statement was based on the bilateral negotiations that took place in Sweden last month, it said. The extension comes after Trump imposed a slew of 'reciprocal' tariffs on trading partners around the world, which have raised the United States' effective tariff rate to levels not seen since the Great Depression. Higher tariffs on Chinese goods, America's second-largest source of imports, would have almost certainly raised the costs many American businesses and consumers could pay — or already are paying — because of increased import taxes Trump has enacted. After meeting in Sweden in July, Chinese negotiators went as far as to say that a deal was reached. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, both of whom attended the meeting, disputed that, saying nothing was final without Trump's word. 'We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi and myself,' Trump said earlier on Monday. A White House fact sheet on the extension said trade discussions with China have been 'constructive' and quoted Trump saying: 'We're getting along with China very well.' At the conclusion of last month's meeting with Chinese trade officials, Bessent said he warned his Chinese counterparts that continuing to purchase Russian oil would bring about huge tariffs under legislation in Congress that allows Trump to impose levies up to 500 percent. It's not clear if the administration is prepared to double down on those threats yet. Trump recently threatened India, which also purchases Russian oil, albeit considerably less than China, with a 50 percent tariff rate if it continues to do so by the end of this month. The move to penalize India and not other countries purchasing oil from Russia has been widely criticized by the Indian government, which claims it's being unfairly singled out. Trump suggested that more countries could face similar threats. 'You're going to see a lot more. So this is a taste,' he said last week. And over the weekend in a Fox News interview, Vice President JD Vance said such tariffs on China are on the table, though Trump had not yet made a decision. 'Given that we seem to be headed toward some type of deal with China leading to some kind of meeting between Xi and Trump, the administration has definitely been more conciliatory towards China in the past few weeks,' said Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator who is now vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. Were China to give in to the administration's desires to stop purchasing Russian oil, it would be done 'quietly and gradually' rather than a Trump announcement on social media, she added. Much remains unresolved Bessent also said he voiced concerns and regrets about China's sales of over $15 billion worth of dual-use technology equipment (that is, equipment that has both commercial and military uses) to Russia and its purchase of sanctioned Iranian oil. Another sticking point between the US and China has been exportations of rare earth magnets. China agreed to increase exports, but Trump says China has not held up its end of the bargain. The US also wants to find an American buyer for TikTok, which is currently owned by a Chinese company. Congress has set out a timeline for the app to find new ownership or face a US ban. US stocks closed lower Monday ahead of key inflation data set to be published Tuesday morning. This story has been updated. An earlier version misstated the tariff rate the United States would have placed on Chinese goods if the pause had not been extended


Daily News Egypt
2 days ago
- Daily News Egypt
Chinese defence expert dismisses India's claim of downing Pakistani jets
A former Chinese defence attache on Sunday dismissed India's delayed claim that it had shot down six Pakistani aircraft during their May conflict as 'self-amusement,' saying the assertion lacked evidence and was widely questioned by the international community. Three months after the clashes, Indian Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh claimed on Saturday that his country had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft. Cheng Xizhong, a former Chinese defence attache in South Asia, called Singh's remarks 'comical, implausible and unconvincing.' 'We may call it self-amusement,' he said in a statement reported by the Associated Press of Pakistan. 'The Indian side has not presented any evidence, such as photos of the wreckage of the fighter jets, radar monitoring data, etc, while the Pakistani side had previously presented a large amount of relevant evidence of shooting down the Indian fighter jets.' Pakistan has consistently denied that India downed any of its aircraft and says it shot down six Indian planes. Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif on Saturday swiftly rubbished Singh's 'belated assertions,' stating that 'not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed.' The Chinese expert noted that India had never produced any evidence to prove its claims, while Pakistan had 'immediately provided a detailed technical report to international media after the clash ended.' Cheng, who is currently a senior research fellow at the Charhar Institute think tank, also cited 'confirmations from world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments that India suffered heavy losses of multiple aircraft.' 'It is thus evident that no Pakistani fighter jet was hit or destroyed by the Indian side. On the contrary, the Pakistani side shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed S-400 air defence positions, among other achievements, which is an indisputable fact,' he added. Following the air combat in May, reports from international media and officials from various countries affirmed some of India's losses. The Washington Post, citing visual evidence, reported that at least two French-made Indian fighter jets were shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). France's air chief, General Jerome Bellanger, has previously said that he has seen evidence of the loss of three Indian fighters, including a Rafale. A Reuters report cited India's intelligence failure as central to the air battle, which led to the downing of Rafale aircraft by the PAF's J-10 fighters using PL-15 missiles. Two days after the May 7 air combat, a PAF deputy chief of operations, Air Vice Marshal Aurangzeb Ahmed, shared the locations where five Indian jets were downed — four along the Line of Control and one near Bathinda. A Dawn report, citing PAF officials, said that three Rafales, one Su-30MKI, and one MiG-29 were downed within a 40-minute spanwithout any Pakistani jet crossing the border. Singh's claim also drew criticism within India, with Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera questioning the timing and circumstances of the alleged operation.


See - Sada Elbalad
2 days ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
‘Self-amusement': Chinese expert spurns India's claims on downing Pakistani jets
SEENEWS China's former defence attache in South Asia Cheng Xizhong on Sunday spurned India's much-delayed claim that it had shot down six Pakistani aircraft during the May conflict, terming it 'self-amusement'. Having faced international coverage of its own craft being downed by Pakistan and scathing criticism from the opposition, India's Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh — three months after the conflict — claimed yesterday that his country had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during those clashes. Aritifical Inteligence usesAritifical Inteligence uses While Pakistan had already denied that India downed any of its aircraft, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif swiftly rubbished Singh's 'belated assertions' yesterday. Commenting on the matter today, Cheng said India's allegations lacked strong evidence and have been 'widely questioned by the international community, being considered groundless', the Associated Press of Pakistan reported. Singh's remarks were 'comical, implausible and unconvincing'. 'We may call it self-amusement,' he said in a statement. Pakistan said it downed six Indian planes during the conflict. India's highest-ranking general has also acknowledged that its forces suffered losses in the air, but denied losing six aircraft. 'The Indian side has not presented any evidence, such as photos of the wreckage of the fighter jets, radar monitoring data, etc, while the Pakistani side had previously presented a large amount of relevant evidence of shooting down the Indian fighter jets,' Cheng noted. The defence expert believed that everything should be based on sufficient evidence. He highlighted that now, more than three months have passed since the India-Pakistan clash. New Delhi has never produced any evidence to prove that it had shot down Pakistani fighter jets, Cheng highlighted. 'In contrast, the Pakistan side immediately provided a detailed technical report to international media after the clash ended,' he added. The Chinese expert also cited 'confirmations from world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments that India suffered heavy losses of multiple aircraft'. 'It is thus evident that no Pakistani fighter jet was hit or destroyed by the Indian side. On the contrary, the Pakistani side shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed S-400 air defence positions, among other achievements, which is an indisputable fact,' he added. Professor Cheng is currently a senior research fellow at the Chinese think tank Charhar Institute and has also served as a former United Nations senior military observer, according to CGTN. In his claims yesterday, the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief did not mention the type of Pakistan's fighter jets that he insisted were taken down. Asif, responding to Singh, stated that 'not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed' by India. He declared that Pakistan took out six Indian jets, S-400 air defence batteries and unmanned aircraft of India while 'swiftly putting several Indian airbases out of action'. Former envoy to the United States Dr Maleeha Lodhi also termed Singh's claim 'laughable', quipping that it took him 'several months to count the planes to make this ridiculous assertion!' Criticism also echoed from within India. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera cast his doubts, saying: 'The question we have after today's information … when we had such a strong army and we were advancing, then under whose pressure did you stop Operation Sindoor?' New Delhi had previously claimed it had downed 'a few planes', refusing to go into the specifics of it. US President Donald Trump has echoed the figure of 'five jets' shot down during the military confrontation, albeit without specifying which side's craft he was referring to. India's loss of jets affirmed globally France's air chief, General Jerome Bellanger, has previously said that he has seen evidence of the loss of three Indian fighters, including a Rafale. The IAF has not commented on those claims. Days after the air combat, The Washington Post, based on visual evidence analysed by experts, reported that at least two French-made Indian fighter aircraft were shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). India's defence attache to Indonesia, Indian Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, acknowledged in June that the PAF downed Indian fighters, according to The Wire. India's intelligence failure was central to the hour-long air battle with Pakistan, which led to the downing of Rafale aircraft by the PAF's J-10 fighters using PL-15 missiles, according to a Reuters report. In a press briefing two days after the May 7 air combat, Air Vice Marshal (AVM) Aurangzeb Ahmed, the deputy chief of operations of Pakistan Air Force (PAF), shared the locations where five Indian jets were downed — four along the Line of Control and one near Bathinda in northwest India. He also disclosed that one of the Indian jets was downed by Pakistani air defence systems. According to a Dawn report, which cited PAF officials, India's three Rafales, one Su-30MKI and one MiG-29 were downed within a 40-minute span. Not a single Pakistani jet crossed the border or engaged in close combat. Describing the engagement as a textbook case of modern aerial warfare, AVM Aurangzeb had said Pakistan had tracked over 70 Indian aircraft — including 14 Rafales — using its Electromagnetic Operational Environment and responded with a concentrated and pre-planned defensive counter-air strategy. 'Our side deployed 42 high-tech aircraft,' the PAF officer said. He noted that while India remained on its side of the border and launched air-to-ground weapons, Pakistani defences detected and engaged the threats instantly. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani