'Narco sub' found abandoned near Solomon Islands
Video transcript
Submarine blocks drug dealers who have it and so on.
Okay, float, come out, you will find him in the middle.
Space inside, you think the fuel tank, everything.
Engine behind them.
Now here.
You don't walk.
Yes, hey.
Mexico transport.
Can man.
What?
Look, must eighty-five.
Eighty-five.
Yes.
What.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Majority of ICE arrests in Trump's first 5 months were in these states
Most of the more than 109,000 arrests carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement during the first five months of President Trump's second term took place in border and Southern states, according to a CBS News analysis of government data. States in the southern U.S., as well as those along the border with Mexico, saw the highest levels of ICE arrests between the start of Mr. Trump's second term on Jan. 20 and June 27, the figures show. That continued a trend that predates the current administration, though ICE arrests have increased sharply across the country since last year. During the same time period in 2024, under the Biden administration, ICE made over 49,000 arrests, meaning that arrests by the agency have increased by 120% under the Trump administration. The statistics indicate that Texas saw nearly a quarter of all ICE arrests during that time period. About 11% of ICE arrests occurred in Florida and 7% in California, followed by 4% in Georgia and 3% in Arizona. ICE made the fewest arrests in Vermont, Alaska and Montana, about 100 total apprehensions combined. The locations of a small percentage of the arrests could not be discerned from the dataset, which was obtained by a group known as the Deportation Data Project through litigation. Overall, the individuals arrested by ICE between Jan. 20 and June 27 came from nearly 180 countries, but most were from Latin America or the Caribbean, according to the data. Mexico was the most common country of citizenship, with nearly 40,000 of those taken into ICE custody listed as Mexican citizens. Nationals of Guatemala and Honduras followed with around 15,000 and 12,000, respectively. Nearly 8,000 were citizens of Venezuela and over 5,000 of El Salvador. Immigration experts said the concentration of arrests in Southern and border states is not necessarily surprising and can largely be attributed to geography, demographics and the extent to which local law enforcement agencies cooperate with ICE. Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, explained that ICE tends to focus its resources in areas where local policies permit law enforcement interaction with federal immigration authorities, such as Texas and Florida. Other places, like California, may also see high levels of ICE arrests because they have large communities of immigrants, including those in the U.S. illegally, even though state and local policies limit collaboration with ICE. "It's easier for ICE to be picking people up from state and local jails where there's cooperation," Bush-Joseph said. In cities and states with so-called sanctuary policies, "ICE has to spend more resources picking up people for at-large arrests," she added. Bush-Joseph also noted the countries of origin for those arrested by ICE align with broader immigration trends. "Generally, we're talking about countries that are geographically close" to the U.S., she said. Latin American and Caribbean immigrants accounted for 84% of all unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2023, according to a recent report from the Migration Policy Institute. ICE is responsible for arresting, detaining and deporting immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, as well as other noncitizens who lose their legal status, including because of criminal activity. The agency has been given a sweeping mandate by Mr. Trump, tasked with carrying out his campaign promise of overseeing the largest mass deportation effort in American history. Under the Trump administration, ICE has reversed Biden-era limits on arrests in the interior of the country and allowed deportation agents to arrest a broader group of individuals, including those who are in the U.S. illegally but who lack a criminal record. Todd Lyons, the acting ICE director, told CBS News recently that while his agents are still prioritizing the arrest of violent offenders who are in the U.S. illegally, anyone found to be in the country in violation of federal immigration law will be taken into custody. Halfway into Mr. Trump's first year back in the White House, ICE recorded 150,000 deportations, putting the agency on track to carry out the most removals since the Obama administration, over a decade ago, CBS News reported. The tally is still far short of the 1 million annual deportations Trump officials have said they're targeting. Watch: Hawaii Gov. Josh Green gives update on tsunami warning Tennessee manhunt underway for suspect in killings of abandoned baby's relatives Arkansas officials reveal new details about Devil's Den murders of husband and wife
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
His crimes were uncovered after he was found asleep in someone else's house
A man's crimes were uncovered after police found him fast asleep at a house with thousands worth of drugs next to him. Callum Williams was found to be playing a "significant role" in dealing cocaine on the streets. Cardiff Crown Court heard that on May 29, 2025, police officers were called to a house on Parker Road in Ely, which had been left unsecured. Officers didn't expect to find anyone there as the tenant was in prison but when they arrived they found Williams asleep on the sofa. Sophie Keegan, prosecuting, told the court that Williams, 30, said to officers that he had been out the night before and had slept there as it was one of his friend's houses. READ MORE: Met Office weather maps show moment Storm Floris wall of rain will cover Wales READ MORE: Met Office issues 24-hour weather warning as Storm Floris to batter Wales In a shoe box close to the sofa police found £2,685 in cash, a Nokia phone, white powder and resealable bags. Williams told officers there was some cocaine there for his own personal use but said the rest of it was nothing to do with him. When the officers tested the white powder they found it was cocaine worth between £1,140 and £1,500. Upstairs in the house they found digital weighing scales and more cocaine, bringing the total amount to about 550g. The Nokia phone revealed messages relating to drugs sales and had the contact details of Williams' family members stored on it, suggesting it was his mobile. The court heard that Williams has 12 previous convictions for 19 offences and was last in court in 2017. He has only been in court for drug offences once before in 2011, relating to the possession of cannabis when he was a juvenile. Cora Sorensen, for the defendant, told the court that at the time her client had recently become estranged from his family and was homeless as a result. She explained he had also been in poor health and his face was injured at the time of his arrest. She added that since Williams has been in custody he has been trying to "avail himself of drugs" and for this reason his family were in court supporting him. Williams, of Heol Poyston, Caerau, Cardiff, pleaded guilty to the offence of possession and intent to supply cocaine. Don't miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here. Recorder Claire Pickthall said: "It's clear that you had an awareness of the extent of the operation and it's clear that you were dealing to street users." She added: "I accept that you are a cocaine addict and were in the depths of a cocaine addiction at the time." Recorder Pickthall sentenced Williams to four years and six months in prison of which she said he will serve up to half in custody before being released. A POCA hearing is due to be held at a later date. Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie rangers caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices on native animals
Australian authorities have admitted to unlawfully using a controversial device to capture dingoes so they could be killed, despite the possession and practice being 'in breach' of their own animal welfare rules. The ACT Government confirmed the mistake with Yahoo News, revealing it permitted soft-jaw traps to be used for years, even after it passed an amendment in 2019 that prohibited them. When stepped on, the trap's jaws snap tightly around the animal's foot, keeping it in a fixed position until a routine check is made, sometimes causing it pain for hours. Unlike steel-jawed traps, they have padding to lessen damage to the animal's limb, and they are commonly used for dingo control in other states. The practice of trapping dingoes on public land was never hidden. But it's understood that until recently, the territory authorities didn't realise the method was now banned. Most animal welfare groups oppose the traps, with Humane World for Animals (formerly Humane Society International) claims they are 'inherently cruel, cause intense stress, injury, and prolonged suffering'. While Deakin University ecologist Professor Euan Ritchie said governments have 'far better ways' to manage dingoes humanely. Alix Livingstone from wildlife protection organisation Defend the Wild described them as "outdated". Why are dingoes trapped? Dingoes are regarded as a separate species from domestic dogs, and they have notable behavioural differences, including howling like wolves. DNA testing across Australia suggests there is very little hybridisation between dogs and dingoes. Despite being culturally important to Indigenous people and playing an important ecological role as an apex predator, state and territory governments around Australia routinely trap, shoot and poison dingoes on public land that borders farmland, due to concerns they kill sheep. Two notable places they are protected are K'gari in Queensland and a small, critically endangered population in Victoria's northwest. How was the illegal trapping discovered? In July, a confidential source alerted Yahoo about conflicting descriptions of soft-jaw traps in ACT government documents. Their possession and use were explicitly prohibited as prescribed items alongside shock collars and cockfighting spurs under the Animal Weflare Act and the associated Animal Welfare Regulation. Yet another government document, the ACT Pest Animal Management Strategy, described them as an 'effective technique' to control wild dogs, which is a common term used to describe dingoes. On July 23 this year, Yahoo posed six questions to Parks and Conservation Services (PCS), which manages dingo control, about its use of soft-jaw traps. It did not respond directly and instead emailed a short statement from the government. 'The ACT Government is currently reviewing the legislation and the appropriateness of the regulatory settings regarding the management of overabundant wildlife in the ACT,' it said. For over a week, further requests for comment did not receive a response. Government amends laws and resumes dingo trapping Concerns about the use of soft-jaw traps were raised at an uncomfortable time for the ACT government. It is in the process of updating the Nature Conservation Act to change the status of dingoes from a pest species to a controlled native animal, giving it a similar status to eastern grey kangaroos. And this has upset some farmers who fear it could make it harder to control dingoes, and the matter was raised during budget estimates on Friday. After PCS was told it was illegally using traps, it suspended their use for weeks. But it quietly began working on amending legislation. On July 31, a new regulatory change was published by the government, creating an exemption for the use of soft-jaw traps by permit holders and conservation officers. Then on August 1, as the law came into effect, it resumed dialogue with Yahoo, responding to new questions by issuing a lengthy statement. 'The use of soft-jaw traps by [PCS], primarily for controlling pest animals or overabundant native wildlife under the Biosecurity Act 2023, was recently found to be in breach of the Animal Welfare Act 1992 and its associated Regulation,' it said in part. 'Although PCS had used these traps for many years as part of their pest management activities, an amendment in 2019 added soft-jaw traps to the list of prohibited items under the Animal Welfare Regulation 2001, rendering their continued use unlawful.' It then explained its decision to resume their use, claiming they are "essential for effective dingo control". "To resolve the issue, the ACT Government has amended the Animal Welfare Regulation to include exemptions to the possession and use of soft-jaw traps," it said. Government urged to consider 'humane' control methods The government said soft-jaw traps are used in accordance with national animal welfare standards, including the National Code of Practice for the humane control of dingoes and that daily inspections and prompt euthanasia ensure "humane treatment". But the decision to amend legislation rather than adhere to established animal welfare protections has frustrated a number of leading experts and ecologists. Humane World for Animals Dr Renae Charalambous described the change as 'deeply troubling'. 'Rather than bringing their wildlife management practices into line with the law and community expectations, the government has amended the legislation to suit its own operational needs,' she said. "The use of these traps to manage native species like dingoes is particularly disturbing. Dingoes are a native apex predator, not a 'pest', and lethal control methods like trapping and killing fail to provide long-term solutions to conflicts with livestock." In many cases, traps can kill or harm non-target native wildlife, including birds, wombats, and goannas. Due to the risks they pose to animal welfare, Professor Euan Ritchie warned trapping can also harm and, in some cases, said 'strong considerations' needed to be made about where and when they were used. 'Leg-hold traps can cause a range of impacts on dingoes, ranging from relatively minor and short-lived pain and discomfort, through to more severe pain and distress, swelling, dehydration, bruising, lacerations, dislocations, and fractures,' he told Yahoo. Continuing, he said there are 'better ways' to manage dingoes that are more humane than trapping, shooting and poisoning, and that more investment was needed in alternative methods. 'Strategic fencing, but not large barrier fencing, has a role. So too does the appropriate use of guardian dogs and donkeys, which have been demonstrated to be effective in Australia, and around the world,' he said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
