Trump is right to turbocharge American AI and confront Chinese government
Back then, we trained for traditional combat missions. Now, our biggest fights happen in cyberspace where hostile nations wage round-the-clock attacks against American targets.
Adversaries of the United States have invested billions in sophisticated hacking operations targeting our military and civilian infrastructure — from power plants to water systems to hospitals. These attacks aim not just to steal sensitive information, but to compromise critical systems and gain advantages that could give them the upper hand in future conflicts.
As a retired Army Brigadier General who served for 30 years, including a deployment during Operation Iraqi Freedom, I have seen how American technological supremacy helped protect our national security.
But the challenges we face in 2025 and beyond are more complex and dangerous than ever before. Thankfully, President Trump is addressing the challenge head on by bringing tech leaders together with the new Stargate Program, which will turbocharge AI development in America and ensure we protect emerging technologies and maintain our dominance.
President Trump's decisive action on AI is not a moment too soon. Chinese tech companies have rapidly developed and unveiled competing AI models like DeepSeek, despite technology export bans preventing the export of advanced chipmaking tools to China.
This raises troubling questions: How did these developments emerge so quickly, and are American companies operating in China inadvertently aiding Chinese AI development?
U.S. tech companies have rushed to gain a foothold in China. It makes sense – China's massive population and appetite for American tech makes it an irresistible market. But working in China comes with its own rules thanks to the iron grip of the Chinese Communist Party.
One of the American companies with the largest footprints in China is Microsoft. They maintain over 9,000 employees in China, with 80% working as software engineers who develop source code for products used throughout our government.
This arrangement might make business sense, but the risks to our national security are significant. Chinese law requires Microsoft to provide Communist government authorities access to this source code, encryption keys, and even backdoor access to their products.
Even more concerning, Microsoft must report software vulnerabilities to Chinese regulators before notifying American customers or authorities, giving potential adversaries advance notice of weaknesses they could exploit.
The consequences of these arrangements became painfully clear in the summer of 2023 when Chinese state-backed hackers breached Microsoft's systems and accessed over 60,000 emails from high-ranking officials, including our Commerce Secretary and Ambassador to China.
Months later, Russian hackers penetrated Microsoft's defenses again, stealing correspondence between U.S. federal agencies and the company itself. Plain and simple: the Chinese Communist Party is using American technology to threaten our national security.
Opinion: Taiwan shows how Tennessee with TVA support will be at forefront of innovation.
The scale of this threat becomes even clearer when you understand just how dependent our government has become on Microsoft's products. Approximately 85% of federal employees use Microsoft software for their daily work.
A core military principle is to never rely on a tool with a single point of failure − always maintain backup systems and alternate capabilities.
Yet we have abandoned this wisdom in our digital infrastructure, allowing our agencies to become dangerously reliant on a single provider that maintains deep ties with an adversary. Microsoft has also worked to stifle competition by locking these agencies into restrictive contracts and charging them significantly more to use their software with other providers.
The federal and military apparatus of our country is massive, yet we accept occasional security breaches of poorly secured software by China as inevitable. That's why I am encouraged by the Trump Administration and the Federal Trade Commission continuing to look at these concerning business practices.
Along with this investigation, Congress must examine American tech development in China and establish new requirements ensuring companies that handle sensitive government data are not compromised by foreign adversaries. We must also promote competition in government procurement to reduce our vulnerability to any single provider.
The oath I took to protect and defend the Constitution did not end when I retired from military service. Congress and the executive branch must act now to close this dangerous gap in our cyber defenses before more damage is done to our national security.
Our enemies are already inside the wire – it is time to strengthen our digital fortifications and ensure American technology serves American interests first.
Kurt Winstead is a retired U.S. Army Brigadier General and a practicing attorney in Nashville. He has served on the board of directors for numerous Middle Tennessee nonprofits and as an adjunct instructor for undergraduate Business Law at Belmont University.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Chinese state interference in U.S. businesses is a danger | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pension Funds Missing Tech Rally Turn to Completion Portfolios
(Bloomberg) -- Some pension funds are waking up to a harsh reality: they've been left behind by the market's hottest rally. Investors are discovering they're underexposed to names like Nvidia Corp. and Microsoft Corp. — both of which recently hit record highs. The shortfall traces back to active managers, who often sidestep expensive tech stocks in search of other opportunities. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Now they're shifting course, with the help of so-called 'completion portfolios,' tailored strategies that help plug gaps in exposure. Demand for these vehicles is on the rise, according to asset managers Pacific Investment Management Co., Russell Investments Group, and Australia's Queensland Investment Corp., which together oversee $2.5 trillion and offer the service. 'We have seen a marked increase from our clients adopting new completion portfolio solutions the last 18 months' said Nick Zylkowski, co-head of customized portfolio solutions at Russell Investments. 'Portfolio analytics that measure risk across the entire portfolio are critical to the decision making.' These portfolios are gaining traction as markets become more concentrated, pressuring institutional investors to rethink long-held caution or risk falling further behind. The Magnificent Seven now make up over 30% of the S&P 500 index, up from 10% a decade ago. Surging valuations for the group have powered US stocks in prior years, in turn amplifying the effect of pullbacks like that seen in the past week. The strategy involves pension systems pooling together their various managers' holdings, measuring where the combined portfolio falls short of a benchmark, and then uses a separate sleeve — often derivatives or baskets of stocks — to fill in the missing exposures. The idea is not to chase returns but to cut the risk of drifting too far from the market itself. Melbourne-based Mercer Superannuation Australia Ltd. is one pension that has leaned into the strategy to avoid underperformance in the past fiscal year. 'When we look across the universe of active global equity managers, we find that the overwhelming majority have been materially underweight to these large US technology companies,' said Mercer Chief Investment Officer Graeme Miller, who manages A$74 billion ($48 billion) in assets. LegalSuper, which has A$7 billion in assets, uses completion portfolios to hedge concentrated exposures. Relying on external active managers usually 'means that you're underweight the big mega caps,' said interim CIO Andrew Lill. 'As a result, there's an increasing need to reduce active risk,' through completion portfolios, he said. Still, they're not a cure-all. AustralianSuper, the country's largest pension with A$388 billion under management, uses completion portfolios but still blamed underweight exposure to megacap US tech in externally managed funds for lackluster returns last year. Others avoid them altogether. 'There are some great alpha opportunities out there,' said Mark Rider, chief investment officer of Brighter Super, a A$35 billion fund, according to their website. A completion portfolio would 'override' their contribution, he said. Benchmark Mismatches The strategy is also gaining traction in fixed income. Active bond managers are preferring corporate debt for higher yields, which creates a mismatch against benchmarks, according to Stuart Simmons, head of multi-asset solutions in the Liquid Markets Group for Queensland Investment Corp. As a result, more large investors are using completion portfolios to load up on US Treasuries exposure, Simmons added. Other investors have turned to the portfolios to manage risk across asset classes, aligning exposure to growth proxies in stocks, bonds and commodities, said Sam Watkins, who heads business in Australia and New Zealand at Pimco. 'What has changed is that it was a very narrow subset that we were dealing with in the past, and that now has broadened into a much larger group,' Watkins said, referring to the use of the strategy. (Updates fifth paragraph to show recent pullback in tech stocks. An earlier version corrected the spelling of Stuart Simmons) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fed Governor Lisa Cook will not step down despite Trump call
Federal Reserve board of governors member Lisa Cook has said she will not step down despite President Trump calling for her to do so. Cook said she had 'learned from the media that [Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)] Director William Pulte posted on social media that he was making a criminal referral based on a mortgage application from four years ago, before I joined the Federal Reserve,' according to a statement obtained by The Hill's sister network NewsNation 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she added. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' On Wednesday, Trump called for the resignation of Cook in the wake of allegations by FHFA's chief that she committed mortgage fraud. FHFA Director William Pulte said early Wednesday on the social platform X that Cook had designated two of her houses as her primary residences. 'Lisa D. Cook, committed mortgage fraud by designating her out-of-state condo as her primary residence, just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home where she also declared it as her primary residence,' he said. Trump pushed for Cook to step down shortly after Pulte's post. 'Cook must resign, now!!!' the president said on his own Truth Social platform. Pulte also said his agency gave a criminal referral to the Justice Department on the allegations against Cook. In recent months, Trump has also directed his ire towards Fed Chair Jerome Powell and pushed for his exit as well.

Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Fox News hosts were determined to help Trump stay in office after 2020 election, legal filing says
The 2020 presidential election is history, but a legal dispute over Fox News' reporting on President Trump's false claims of voter fraud is heating up. A motion for summary judgment by voting equipment company Smartmatic filed Tuesday in New York Supreme Court laid out in detail how phony allegations that it manipulated votes to swing the election to Joe Biden were amplified on Fox News. The motion also described how the Fox News Media hosts who are defendants in the suit — the late Lou Dobbs, Jeanine Pirro and Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business — were allegedly committed to helping Trump prove his fraud theories so he could remain in office. 'I work so hard for the President and the party,' Pirro wrote in a text to Ronna McDaniel, then chair of the Republican National Committee. Pirro left Fox News in May to become U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Smartmatic is suing Fox News for $2.7 billion in damages, claiming that the network's airing of the false statements hurt the London-based company's ability to expand its business in the U.S. Fox News settled a similar suit from Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million in 2023. The motion alleged that on-air hosts repeated the fraud claims even though executives and producers were told they were false. The Fox News research department, known as the 'Brainroom,' allegedly informed network producers that Smartmatic's role in the 2020 election was limited to Los Angeles County and that the company's software was not used in Dominion voting machines, another false claim made on the air. Fox News maintains the network's reporting on President Trump's false claims were newsworthy and protected by the 1st Amendment. But part of the company's legal strategy has been focused on minimizing the damage claims. Fox News has asserted that any problems Smartmatic has experienced in attracting new business are rooted not in its reporting but in the federal investigation into the company's activities with overseas governments. Last year, Smartmatic's founder, Roger Alejandro Piñate Martinez, and two other company officials were indicted by the U.S. attorney's office and charged with bribing Philippine officials in order to get voting machine contracts in the country in 2016. While the Trump camp's assertions that the election was fixed were not believed throughout Fox News and parent company Fox Corp., the conservative-leaning network gave continued to give them oxygen to keep its audience tuned in, the motion alleged. The motion described a 'pivot' that occurred on Nov. 8, 2020, when then-Fox News Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan asked Fox News Media Chief Executive Suzanne Scott to address the decline in the network's ratings after Biden was declared the winner of the election. The network also looked at research to evaluate why viewers were leaving. 'The conclusion reached based on performance analytics: give the audience more election fraud,' the court document stated. Such thinking, the filing said, permeated the company, already in a panic over losing viewers to right-leaning network Newsmax. The upstart outlet saw a ratings surge after Biden's win due to its unwavering support of Trump's claims. 'Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL,' Fox News host Jesse Watters said in a text to his colleague Greg Gutfeld. Throughout November and December 2020, the three hosts named in the suit, Dobbs, Pirro and Bartiromo, repeatedly featured Trump's attorneys Rudolph Giuliani and Sidney Powell as guests. They spread the falsehoods that Smartmatic software was used in Dominion voting machines and altered millions of votes. Smartmatic's work in Los Angeles during the 2020 election was meant to be an entry point for the company to expand its domestic business. The company's defamation suit claims that Fox News obliterated those efforts by presenting the false fraud claims. But Fox News believes that issues with Smartmatic's $282-million contract with Los Angeles County could help advance its case. On Aug. 1, federal prosecutors filing a legal brief alleging that taxpayer funds from the county went into a slush fund held by a shell company to help pay for its illegal activities. Federal prosecutors handling the case involving Smartmatic's business in the Philippines said they plan to detail similar alleged schemes out of L.A. County and Venezuela to show that the bribery fits a larger pattern. Fox News attorneys have filed a brief asking for county records that they believe will help bolster their case. The network is also expected to try to get the Smartmatic indictments in front of the court to raise doubts about the company's reputation. A Smartmatic representative said Fox News' records request is a diversion tactic. 'Fox lies and when caught they lie again to distract,' a Smartmatic representative said in a statement. 'Fox's latest filing is just another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation against Smartmatic.' The company added that it abided with the law in Los Angeles County and 'every jurisdiction where we operate.' Smartmatic's Tuesday court filing also included information that contradicted public statements Fox News made at the time. The document alleged that Fox News fired political analyst Chris Stirewalt and longtime Washington bureau executives Bill Sammon for their involvement in calling the state of Arizona for Biden on election night. The early call of the close result in the state upset the Trump camp and alienated his supporters. At the time, Fox News said Stirewalt departed as part of a reorganization and Sammon retired. But the motion said Rupert Murdoch himself signed off on the decision to sever Stirewalt and Sammon from the company in an effort to assuage angry viewers who defected. The motion cited a communication from Dana Perino, co-host of Fox News show 'The Five,' describing a phone call with Stirewalt after his dismissal. 'I explained to him — you were right, you didn't cave, and you got fired for doing the right thing,' Perino said. Both Sammon and Stirewalt now work in the Washington bureau of NewsNation, the cable news network owned by Nexstar Media Group.