logo
They call it ‘Merzcron': The EU's Franco-German engine is powering up once again

They call it ‘Merzcron': The EU's Franco-German engine is powering up once again

CNN5 hours ago

The clasped hands of French and German leaders have long embodied the spirit of European unity – most famously in 1984, when François Mitterrand and Helmut Kohl stood hand-in-hand at Verdun in a symbol of reconciliation.
So, when Chancellor Friedrich Merz grasped President Emmanuel Macron's hand on the steps of the Élysée palace in early May – a handshake that was long, warm, and accompanied by backslapping – it wasn't just a photo-op.
It was the clearest sign yet that Europe's most important alliance was back in motion. After years of sputtering and frustration under Olaf Scholz, the Franco-German engine is humming again, and it has a new name: Merzcron.
Since Merz's election, the two have met six times – most recently with other NATO leaders at The Hague. They will sit down together again on Thursday at the European Council meeting in Brussels.
Their shared agenda: to drive the European Union response on security, Ukraine and Trump-era uncertainties, and shape Europe's role on the global stage.
Ahead of Wednesday's NATO summit, Macron and Merz laid out their vision in a joint opinion piece in the Financial Times.
'In these testing times, Germany and France - together with our European and transatlantic friends and allies - stand united and strong, to defend our common values as well as the freedom and security of our citizens,' they wrote.
They outlined plans to boost defense spending – aiming to reach 3.5% of GDP in core military investments – and to deepen cooperation between NATO and the EU, calling for a stronger, more sovereign Europe that is no longer reliant on others for its security. They pledged to ensure Ukraine emerges 'prosperous, robust and secure,' and warned that European stability for decades to come hangs in the balance.
The signs are that the powerful 'Mercron' or 'Merkozy' alliance, portmanteaus derived from the names of former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Macron and his predecessor Nicholas Sarkozy, is evolving into an equally influential 'Merzcron.'
The two-day European Council summit now underway in Brussels, hot on the heels of a G7 meeting in Canada and the NATO leaders' summit in The Hague, is the first of Merz's chancellorship. It will likely be another demonstration of how strong this union could be.
CNN spoke to two stalwarts of the Franco-German partnership – former French President Francois Hollande, who worked closely with Merkel, and Wolfgang Ischinger, a former German deputy secretary of state once described as Europe's most connected former diplomat – to assess its significance for Europe and the world.
Under Scholz, the former German chancellor, the Berlin-Paris axis became strained, something that both Ischinger and Hollande noted.
Stefan Seidendorf, director at the Franco-German Institute in Ludwigsburg, Germany, said Scholz spent so much time doing 'domestic homework' that he was never able to fully focus on Europe.
The three-way coalition he headed was beset with infighting on domestic and Europe issues and eventually collapsed in November last year, triggering an early election.
However, there were also some interpersonal issues at play. 'It was difficult for Macron to get along with this very Protestant, northern German, not very emotional, not into the big symbols of political leadership,' Siedendorf told CNN in a phone interview.
He added that the same went for Scholz, 'who found it difficult to get along with this French president living in the palace of Élysée with all the gold and the glitter and the ceremony.'
But neither was Macron and Merz's friendship a given, considering their different styles. Macron, 47, is Jupiterian and theatrical, hailed by some as a visionary, dismissed by others as a narcissist. Merz, 69, is impulsive, prickly under pressure and occasionally leans into populist bluster.
That said, Ischinger said both leaders 'met rather easily – and got their act together.' Speaking about their shared character traits, he said they 'love interaction. They enjoy difficult questions. These two have a way of understanding each other – they are open.'
The clearest display of 'Merzcron' in action has been around support for Ukraine. Hollande told CNN the duo had already been 'effective' on the issue.
Their recent trip to Kyiv, alongside British and Polish leaders Keir Starmer and Donald Tusk, 'was a symbol of a new kind of determined getting-together of the major European powers to make progress,' Ischinger said.
Paris has long been more hawkish than Berlin on its support for Ukraine. Macron has been a strong proponent of boots on the ground in the country and has allowed Ukraine to fire French-made long-range missiles deep into Russia.
However, Hollande said, 'we've seen that Merz's position is a bit different from that of his predecessor… including on the delivery of missiles capable of reaching Russian territory.'
Since taking office, Merz has welcomed Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to Berlin and unveiled a new $5 billion package for Ukraine that includes joint co-operation in the development of long-range missiles capable of being fired deep into Russia, some of which could be online by the end of the year.
'Now we're in perfect unity,' Ischinger said of the Franco-German alignment on Ukraine.
Russia's unease over a more coordinated Franco-German approach to Ukraine is already starting to show.
News of last month's visit to Kyiv by Merz and Macron was accompanied by the release of a photo taken ahead of a meeting between them. Sitting on the table was a white tissue.
Its presence sparked an online rumor, amplified by Kremlin officials and later traced back to pro-Russian accounts, that falsely claimed the crumpled tissue – which Macron picked up and pocketed – was a cocaine bag.
The Élysée countered by saying 'when European unity becomes inconvenient, disinformation goes so far as to make a simple tissue look like drugs. This fake news is being spread by France's enemies, both abroad and at home.'
US President Donald Trump's return to the White House has also forced a new alignment between the European powerhouses, particularly on the issue of Europe's security.
The Trump administration's insistence that Europe should do more to defend itself triggered the shift, Hollande explained, saying that it 'forced France and Germany to work together diplomatically and militarily, whereas until then, their main alignment had been on monetary issues.
'Today there is a shared responsibility. Germany must do more for its defense, and France must be willing to share a number of proposals and initiatives – including on defense – with Germany,' Hollande says.
Before even formally taking office, Merz managed to push through the reform of Germany's constitutional debt brake to unlock over half a trillion dollars in defense spending. He has also committed to creating Europe's largest army. Both represent a major shift for Germany.
Previously, Hollande suggested, those moves might have been difficult for France to stomach.
'We used to be very reluctant about German rearmament. That was a politically sensitive issue after the war. But today, no one in France fears German rearmament –we welcome it,' he said.
Macron and Merz also appear to have taken a similar approach to dealing with Trump. Both have had effusive and positive meetings in the Oval Office with a president who has not always been so welcoming to visiting leaders.
Paris and Berlin are also trying to revive the decades-old 'Weimar Triangle.' Established after German reunification in 1991, it aimed to bring Poland deeper into the European fold, led by Germany and France.
Ischinger feels the relative weight of the European Union has shifted eastwards due to the war in Ukraine, meaning that Warsaw, now more than ever, must now be a vital ally for Paris and Berlin. 'Harmony (between France and Germany) is key, but it's not sufficient,' he said.
'The center of gravity of the good old European Union was somewhere between France and Germany. But today, almost half of the members are to the east of Germany,' he added, and giving Poland more say is the best way to bring the continent together.
That shift, too, is already playing out. As well as taking part in the Kyiv trip, Tusk has found himself directly involved in European talks with Trump, as the US president has attempted to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war.
Poland's status as Europe's fastest growing economy, its commitment to NATO defense spending – way above other member states' at 4.2% of GDP in 2024, projected to rise to 4.7% this year – and its geographic location bordering Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, have made the nation a key nexus for the continent.
Nonetheless, for Hollande, 'Europe only moves forward when France and Germany speak with one voice and pull in the same direction. Only then can the European machine function properly.'
Ischinger added: 'If Franco-German cooperation works well, you have a perfect precondition to get the entire European Union underway, moving forward.'
For now, the 'Merzcron' engine is firing up and, if it keeps its momentum, it could pull the rest of Europe into gear.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Ukraine Fell Down the Agenda at the NATO Summit
Why Ukraine Fell Down the Agenda at the NATO Summit

Miami Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Why Ukraine Fell Down the Agenda at the NATO Summit

KYIV, Ukraine -- It was yet another grim sign for Ukraine. Russia's invasion of the country, the main topic of recent NATO summits, seemed to slide down the list of priorities at this year's annual meeting, which ended Wednesday. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine was not feted as in years past. He was not even the center of attention. Instead, President Donald Trump took main stage at The Hague, where the summit was held. Trump has made no secret of his disdain for NATO, his desire for members to stop relying too heavily on U.S. military support and his admiration of President Vladimir Putin of Russia. The summit's official declaration mentioned nothing about Ukraine joining the alliance, a long-standing point of discussion. A meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump yielded no specific promises about peace talks, although Trump said it was possible that the United States would send more Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine. 'Ukraine? What's Ukraine?' quipped Michael John Williams, a former adviser to NATO and now a professor of international relations at Syracuse University who attended the summit. 'The Europeans were saying how committed they are to Ukraine, especially the British, which is no surprise. But there was also really an attempt to keep controversial issues off the table. Ukraine wasn't the front-and-center discussion it has been.' Everyone at the two-day meeting seemed to be trying to please Trump. Zelenskyy even wore a black suit jacket to meet with him, a rare abandonment of his military-style outfit -- a fashion choice that has stuck in the craw of Trump and his allies in the past. The two leaders met for 50 minutes; it was their second meeting since their disastrous encounter at the White House in late February, when Trump publicly berated the Ukrainian president. Zelenskyy said the talks were 'long and meaningful' and thanked Trump. The U.S. president said Zelenskyy 'couldn't have been nicer' but added that they did not discuss a ceasefire. In recent weeks, the news has also been bad for Ukraine on the ground. Russia has intensified attacks on civilians. A barrage of ballistic missiles Tuesday killed at least 20 people and injured more than 300 others in the eastern Ukrainian city of Dnipro, according to Ukrainian officials. Aerial attacks Monday killed at least 10 people in Kyiv, Ukraine's capital, Ukrainian officials said. On Wednesday, the United Nations said the number of civilian casualties in the first five months of 2025 was nearly 50% higher than in the same period in 2024. Russia's summer offensive is gaining territory on the battlefield, with small groups of troops crossing into the Dnipropetrovsk region of eastern Ukraine for the first time in three years. Halyna Konovalova, 75, who lives in Druzhkivka, a town about 15 miles from the front lines in the Donetsk region, said recently that she worried the fighting would soon reach her. The distant booms of artillery already echoed every few minutes in her garden, where she grows parsley, cucumbers and tomatoes. 'We need help,' she said. 'Weapons to defend ourselves with. And what will we defend ourselves with if America won't help?' Last week, the crisis in the Middle East overshadowed Ukraine's pleas for help at the meeting of the Group of 7 major industrialized nations in Canada. Trump left the meeting early to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict and canceled a meeting with Zelenskyy. He also rejected the idea of issuing a joint statement in support of Ukraine. Many in Ukraine saw the U.S. decision to enter Israel's war with Iran, even briefly, by striking three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites Sunday as a sign that the United States was walking away from the war in Ukraine. The United States, once Ukraine's biggest supporter, has not announced any new military aid packages for the country in nearly five months -- since Trump took office. The military aid authorized under former President Joe Biden is expected to run out this summer. European allies have promised more help, and Ukraine is producing more of its own weapons, particularly drones. But those weapons are not enough to make up the gap, military experts say. 'America won't help us until we do something ourselves,' said Nataliia Babych, 37, who sells hot dogs in Kyiv and started crying when she talked about the missile and drone attack Monday. 'But we just don't have the strength right now.' 'People are dying every day,' she continued, 'both civilians and soldiers. I don't think America will help us at all, because now they're focused on Iran.' For months, Ukrainians had hoped that Trump would pressure Russia to end the war, which Moscow started with its full-scale invasion in February 2022. But after months of fits and starts, peace talks have stalled. Almost a month ago, on May 28, Trump gave Putin another two-week deadline when asked whether he believed the Russian leader truly wanted the war to end. That deadline came and went. One Ukrainian lawmaker, Oleksandr Merezhko, said he felt as if Trump was blaming Ukraine for the war that Russia started. Merezhko, who nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize in November largely because of the president's promise to end the conflict, decided to rescind that nomination Monday. He said Trump had engaged in double standards by attacking Iran. 'He's decisive in reacting against the authoritarian regime in Iran, but he doesn't do anything like that with regard to Putin,' Merezhko said. 'To me, it's not consistent.' The contrast between last year's NATO summit in Washington and this week's in the Netherlands was striking. Last year, the United States and its European allies agreed that Ukraine should have an 'irreversible' path to membership of the alliance. At this year's summit, there was no such guarantee, likely because Trump opposes it. Mark Rutte, secretary-general of NATO, said in a news conference that the alliance continued to support Ukraine 'on its irreversible path to NATO membership.' But the official declaration only restated the alliance's 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine, whose security contributes to ours.' Last year, Russian missiles killed at least 41 civilians in Ukraine the day before the summit began. Jens Stoltenberg, then NATO's secretary-general, explicitly condemned the 'horrendous missile attacks against Ukrainian cities, killing innocent civilians, including children.' The NATO-Ukraine Council, made up of heads of state and government, issued a statement that decried 'in the strongest possible terms Russia's horrific attacks on the Ukrainian people.' This year, NATO allies did not collectively condemn Russia's missile attack in Dnipro on Tuesday, the first day of the summit. In addition to the 20 fatalities and 300 injured people, the attack damaged almost 50 apartment buildings, 40 educational institutions, eight medical facilities and one train. Some countries, like France, did condemn the attack. On Monday, Rutte warned that Russia remains the alliance's biggest threat. On Wednesday, at a news conference, Trump said 'it's possible' that Putin had ambitions beyond Ukraine. But he declined to call the Russian president an enemy. 'I consider him a person that's, I think, been misguided,' Trump said. This year's summit ended with a commitment from most NATO allies to raise their military spending to 5% of their economic output over the next 10 years. Danylo Yakovlev, 30, a soldier in the Ukrainian army, said that if Kyiv fell, the next targets would be countries such as Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova and Poland. Europe needed to step up, he added. 'At the end of the day, we must rely first and foremost on ourselves,' Yakovlev said. 'We cannot assume anyone will come and save us. But at the same time, we need to make it absolutely clear to all other countries: If Ukraine falls, they could be next. And they may not even have a tomorrow.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025

Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with NATO on spending despite Trump tariff threats
Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with NATO on spending despite Trump tariff threats

Associated Press

time20 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with NATO on spending despite Trump tariff threats

MADRID (AP) — Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez walked away from this week's NATO summit with an opt-out from spending more on defense. He also left with fresh threats of tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump. On Thursday, the progressive Spanish leader stuck by his decision to break with NATO allies and responded to Trump's comments by pointing out that the European Commission — and not Spain — was who decided the bloc's trade policy. 'What is clear is that trade policy is a policy directed from here, from Brussels,' Sánchez said. 'Spain is an open country. It is a country that is friendly to its friends, and we consider the United States a friend of Spain.' At the military alliance's summit Wednesday, members agreed to raise their defense spending to 5% of GDP. But Sánchez secured a last-minute exemption, saying that Spain will only spend up to 2.1%, which he called 'sufficient and realistic.' Trump criticized Spain after the summit, saying the country wanted 'a little bit of a free ride,' and that it would 'have to pay it back to us on trade' through higher tariffs. How Sánchez's gamble could play out was up for debate on Thursday. 'It is not always easy to interpret exactly what Mr. Trump means,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told reporters at an EU summit. 'How he wants to impose import tariffs on Spain separately is a mystery to everyone. Could this perhaps concern specific products from Spain? We will have to wait and see.' Spain's move on the international stage comes at a complex moment for Sánchez at home as corruption cases involving his inner circle have ensnared his Socialist party and resulted in louder calls — even from some leftwing allies — to announce early elections. So far, Sánchez has refused. 'To Trump's theatre, Sánchez responds with something similar,' said Montserrat Nebrera, political analyst and professor of constitutional law at the International University of Catalonia. 'Domestic problems are piling up, and this resistance to meeting the arbitrary 5% target also seeks to wink at his partners most critical of defense spending.' Spain was NATO's lowest spender last year, according to the alliance's estimates, spending around 1.28% of its GDP on defense expenditure. In April, Sánchez announced that the country would reach 2% this year, for which he was criticized by some leftwing allies. On Thursday, Antonio Garamendi, president of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organizations, criticized Sánchez for the spending opt-out. 'We have to stick with with our allies and not going along with the other Europeans is an error, and even more so if that increases the chance we will be punished,' Garamendi said. While Spain is under the umbrella of the European Union, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries, it could still be targeted by tariffs that hit its most vulnerable industries, Garamendi said. He specifically pointed to Spanish steel, cars and olive oil sectors. 'There are industries that can be impacted, and that has to concern us,' he added. ___ Wilson reported from Barcelona. AP journalist Lorne Cook contributed from Brussels.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store