logo
What is the Hillsborough Law? The 'all or nothing' legislation explained

What is the Hillsborough Law? The 'all or nothing' legislation explained

Yahoo08-04-2025
As the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster approaches, campaigners have said a law promised by the government to prevent future cover-ups of such tragedies must not be watered down.
The Inquest charity said the legislation must be presented to Parliament "without dilution or caveat", following concerns that changes to the bill could raise the threshold of accountability.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously pledged to introduce the so-called 'Hillsborough Law' before this year's anniversary of the tragedy, which took place on 15 April 1989.
It is expected to include a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials to tell the truth and proactively co-operate with official investigations and inquiries – with the potential for criminal sanctions for officials or organisations which mislead or obstruct investigations.
However, campaigners are understood to be concerned over whom the duty of candour will apply, and are calling on the government to provide reassurance.
Margaret Aspinall, whose 18-year-old son James died in the football stadium crowd-crush, said: 'After hearing the stories of all the other families fighting for justice, I am more determined than ever to demand that the Hillsborough Law presented to Parliament is all or nothing.
'This is the legacy of families and survivors – the bill has got to be right.'
Here, Yahoo News looks at the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster and what has been said so far about the law promised by Labour.
Survivors and the families of those who died have been involved in a lengthy campaign in pursuit of justice.
On its website, the Hillsborough Law Now campaign group sets out two key criteria for the law it wants to see put in place:
Create a new legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials to tell the truth and proactively cooperate with official investigations and inquiries - bringing to an end the depressingly familiar pattern of cover ups and concealment.
Ensure victims of disasters or state-related deaths are entitled to parity of legal representation during inquests and inquiries. This will mean that This will mean that bereaved families can get public funding, just as public money is used to support government and public authority lawyers.
In a report bringing together 'powerful voices of bereaved families, victims and survivors of some of the worst failings of public services and the legal system in the UK', Inquest has re-stated the need for a strong and watertight law.
Other major campaign groups including Grenfell United and Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice (CBFFJ) have backed Inquest's call.
In the report, Inquest director Deborah Coles says the law 'must be 'all or nothing', without dilution or caveat, to ensure the response to contentious deaths, harms and grave injustices dramatically improves'.
She says that while a delay in a bill being introduced to Parliament by the anniversary would be "disappointing", it is important that the proposed legislation fully meets campaigners' expectations.
Last week, the government confirmed that the Hillsborough Law will not be implemented before the next anniversary of the disaster, as "more time is needed" to draft the legislation, Sky News reported.
A source close to the discussions told the outlet that the legislation in its current form was an "absolute mess", with a number of loopholes that would leave the duty of candour "useless and ineffective".
Last month, it was reported that a meeting between Sir Keir and campaigners had been cancelled, with claims officials were attempting to have the contents of a bill watered down.
In an update last week, Commons leader Lucy Powell said the Government will take 'whatever time is necessary' to develop a law which 'meets the expectations' of the Hillsborough families.
She told MPs that the 'most important issue at this time is to ensure that the legislation reflects the full range of concerns and experiences, and meets the expectations of the families'.
'I think the very worst thing we can do at this point in time is to not meet those expectations when all of the trust and issues there are about the state failing to live up to those expectations of the families," she added.
'So we are working on the bill at pace, but we will take whatever time is necessary to work collaboratively with the families and their representatives, because getting that legislation right is actually our overwhelming priority at this time, I'm sure she can understand that.'
Last Tuesday building safety minister Alex Norris told a committee of MPs that there will be an update 'coming imminently' and that the calls for improvements on the law "have been understood".
Ninety-seven football fans died as a result of a crush at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest at Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield.
More than 50,000 men, women and children travelled to stadium, where just minutes after kick-off, a fatal crush occurred in the Leppings Lane end terraces, where the Liverpool fans were located.
Some media reporting focused on unfounded allegations that Liverpool fans' drunken behaviour caused the disaster and hindered the emergency response, but this has been "disproved many times", the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said.
In 1991, a jury returned a verdict of accidental death at the end of an inquest, but in December 2012, the High Court quashed the original verdicts and ordered fresh inquests.
It followed years of demands from campaigners for new inquests to be held, and the government setting up a Hillsborough Independent Panel in 2009 to review the evidence.
The fresh inquests began in March 2014, where jurors heard evidence about the stadium's design, police preparation and the overall emergency response, with at least one medical expert saying some of the victims could have been saved if earlier interventions were made.
Two years later, in April 2016, the jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing for the then 96 Liverpool fans who lost their lives and concluded that the fans played no role in causing the disaster.
Jurors found that 'errors and omissions' by South Yorkshire Police contributed to the deaths, while the response of South Yorkshire Metropolitan Ambulance also contributed to the disaster.
In 2021, Andrew Devine, who died aged 55 at the 1989 FA Cup semi-final, was confirmed as the 97th victim of the tragedy.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which began investigations into the disaster in 2013, said in March 2025 that although officers tried to 'deflect blame' they do not have a case to answer for misconduct.
In a letter to families, the police watchdog said: 'We found no evidence to support claims that the behaviour of supporters was a contributing factor.
'In the majority of cases, we were unable to find that officers had a case to answer for misconduct because the professional standards for policing at the time did not include a specific duty of candour.
'Despite the wider public interest to gain answers about what happened, South Yorkshire Police was entitled, within the law at the time, to present its 'best case' and be selective with the evidence it presented.'
Government will miss its own deadline to bring in Hillsborough Law (Sky News)
Fury among families after senior Hillsborough officers absolved by police watchdog (The Guardian)
'He gave so much' - the Hillsborough dad who refused to bow to injustice (The Liverpool Echo)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders
Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders

Sir Keir Starmer will co-chair a meeting with pro-Ukraine allies on Wednesday after a call with US President Donald Trump and European leaders about ending the war. Sir Keir will join a virtual call at midday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. They will then be joined by Mr Trump and US vice president JD Vance. Later, the Prime Minister will co-chair a Coalition of the Willing meeting to update wider partners on the day's discussions. The Coalition of the Willing is an international effort to support Ukraine towards a lasting peace, led by the UK, France and Ukraine. It is made up of 31 countries that have pledged strengthened support for Kyiv, including 27 European countries, as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan. Ahead of Wednesday's call, a Downing Street spokesperson said: 'The Prime Minister remains absolutely focused on a solution to this conflict grounded in Ukraine's national interests. 'He is determined to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, backed by robust and credible security guarantees that will deter Russia from threatening Ukraine in future.' This comes ahead of the expected meeting between Mr Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. The two leaders are set to meet to discuss the future of the Kremlin's invasion, without the presence of Mr Zelensky. The Ukrainian President said at a news briefing on Tuesday that Mr Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that Kyiv controls as part of a ceasefire deal. This was conveyed to him by US officials, Mr Zelensky explained. However, he reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls because it is unconstitutional and would only serve as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. Mr Trump has also signalled he thinks Ukraine might need to cede territory in order to end the conflict, stating there is likely to be 'some land-swapping going on'. Speaking during a lengthy press conference on Monday, Mr Trump pledged to 'try to get back' some of Ukraine's 'oceanfront property' from Russia. He said: 'We're going to change the lines, the battle lines. Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine. 'They have taken largely – in real estate we call it oceanfront property. That's always the most valuable property.' A statement released by the European Union on Tuesday read: 'A just and lasting peace that brings stability and security must respect international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and that international borders must not be changed by force. 'The people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. 'Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities.' In response, Mr Zelensky said on X (formerly Twitter): 'I am grateful to the leaders of Europe for their clear support for our independence, territorial integrity, and precisely such an active approach to diplomacy that can help end this war with a dignified peace. 'Indeed, We all support President Trump's determination, and together we must shape positions that will not allow Russia to deceive the world once again. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations. 'In such circumstances, it is important that the unity of the world is not threatened. 'As long as they continue the war and the occupation, all of us together must maintain our pressure – the pressure of strength, the pressure of sanctions, the pressure of diplomacy.'

Will Trump get played by Putin? Europe is worried
Will Trump get played by Putin? Europe is worried

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Will Trump get played by Putin? Europe is worried

President Trump's sharp criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday is sending chills across Europe, where leaders are working to guard against the worst-case scenario: Trump aligning with Russian President Vladimir Putin to force a bad deal on Kyiv. Trump blew past a deadline last week to impose punishing sanctions on Russia and its primary trading partners in exchange for the face-to-face meeting with Putin, set for Friday in Alaska. And while the president has expressed increased frustration with Putin and Russia's attacks on Ukraine, he this week reverted to criticisms that Zelelsky is to blame for stating the war. '[Trump] is very unpredictable,' Lesia Zaburanna, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament in Zelensky's Servant of the People party and the deputy chair of the budget committee, said in a call with The Hill. 'We highly appreciate all American support, and we highly appreciate all military, financial support. But if we talk about the situation with Trump's negotiation, we are not sure what we will have on Friday.' The worst case scenario, Zaburanna said, would be if Trump reached an agreement with Putin on territorial concessions without Ukraine, and a fatal blow for Kyiv would be if Trump withdrew U.S. support, particularly intelligence sharing on the battlefield and military support. Zaburanna described living in Kyiv now as similar to the first days of the full-scale invasion – nightly air raid alarms, massive explosions, menacing drones attacks, destruction of civilian buildings and mounting casualties. Trump has provided few details on his goals for the meeting, telling reporters on Monday he's using the summit as an opportunity to 'feel out' Putin, who has so far rebuffed all his calls for a ceasefire and increased the pace of attacks on Ukraine. But Zelensky told reporters this week that Ukraine could be asked to withdraw from the Donbas region to attain a ceasefire. Zelensky said he'd received these indications from Steve Witkoff, Trump's envoy to the region. 'Witkoff said that there should be territorial concessions from both sides – that's how it sounded,' Zelenskyy told NewsNation's Robert Sherman and other reporters in Ukraine. 'And that, most likely, Putin wants us to withdraw from Donbas. In other words, it didn't sound like it was America wanting us to withdraw. After we held two more NSA meetings, it became clear what Putin wants. This is not a proposal from Trump or Witkoff.' 'During the call, I said that I am not ready to discuss Ukraine's territories, as this is solely a matter of our Constitution,' Zelenskyy added. While Trump has called Putin's ongoing attacks on Ukraine 'cold,' he also offered criticism this week of Zelensky. 'I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying, 'I have to get constitutional approval,' he has approval to do a war and kill everybody but he needs approval for land swapping?' Trump told reporters on Monday. Marko Mihkelson, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Estonian Parliament, described it as 'quite crazy' that Trump was putting pressure on Zelensky instead of calling out Putin for launching the war. 'We don't have any high hopes on what's going to happen in Alaska,' he said in a phone call with The Hill. Mihkelson, along with 26 chairs of European foreign affairs committees, published a letter Tuesday saying that any outcome of the Alaska talks 'must firmly uphold Ukraine's sovereignty, territorial integrity, constitution and the principles of the United Nations Charter.' The letter matched a joint statement from European Union foreign ministers on Tuesday and a Saturday statement from the leaders of France, Italy, Poland, Finland, the United Kingdom and European Union. Mihkelson said the best-case scenario would be for the Alaska summit to be cancelled. He warned of repeating the mistakes of the 1938 Munich Conference – when European leaders agreed to allow Hitler to annex territory in then-Czechoslovakia, and that served as a prelude to the Nazi invasion of Europe. 'Can Alaska become a second Munich, or not?… We should not repeat mistakes from the past,' Mihkelson said. 'And obviously nothing can be decided about Ukraine without Ukraine, and nothing can be decided about Europe, without Europe.' Trump said he will call Zelensky and European leaders almost immediately after meeting with Putin, saying that he gets along great with European leaders and NATO members. The White House said Tuesday that Trump's meeting with Putin is exclusively focused on ending the war in Ukraine, and not about bilateral issues, or opportunities between Moscow and Washington. Zelensky warned that Putin is preparing the ground for more war, and is re-deploying troops and forces in what Ukraine assesses is a renewed military offensive. 'If someone is preparing for peace, this is not what he does. We continue to keep our partners informed about the real situation on the battlefield, in diplomacy, and in Russia's planning of further actions,' Zelensky said in his nightly address to the country. Zelensky told NewsNation on Tuesday that Ukraine is supportive of a trilateral track of negotiations, to get a ceasefire, an 'all-for-all exchange' [prisoners of war] and the return of Ukrainian children taken by Russia. 'Some period of time is set for the ceasefire – any period. Let America choose, let the Russians choose. This is to prepare a plan, so that we can find some compromises for ending the war,' Zelensky said. He also warned that compromises leading to peace cannot be found if Russia issues ultimatums. 'Putin always speaks in ultimatums. But I believe he does not have enough leverage against Trump to speak to him in ultimatums,' Zelensky said. Russian officials signal the Kremlin's demands will include the same it had when it launched its war: demanding Ukraine's demilitarization, Ukraine's commitment to neutrality and a commitment to never joining NATO, according to an analysis by the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank. It also believes Putin will angle for Ukrainian elections that could give Russia influence over their results. David Kramer, executive director of the George W. Bush Institute and an expert on Russia and Ukraine, said there are still ways for Trump to gain the upper hand in Alaska. 'We can ramp up the sanctions, we can invite Zelenskyy to the meeting, I mean, it's Tuesday now, there's time for Zelensky to travel… I think there are a number of things that the president can do to turn this opportunity into a meeting where he makes clear that Russia is the guilty party here… and any attempts to blame Zelensky, I think, are misguided,' he said. There will be scrutiny on the choreography surrounding Trump and Putin's greeting. In July 2022, President Biden fist-bumped Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to avoid a handshake after calling him a killer. In 2009, former President Clinton appeared straight-faced, no smile, alongside then-North Korean leader Kim Jung-Il. 'I hope he has the discipline,' Kramer said of Trump. 'I hope he goes into this meeting with the awareness that Putin has the blood of thousands of Ukrainians on his hands, but thousands and thousands of Ukrainians would still be alive if Putin did not decide on February 24, 2022 to launch this unjustified, unprovoked, full scale invasion that has included war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.'

The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?
The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?

Labour has been accused of creating a 'crisis over nothing' as the number of small boat crossings since the last election to reached 50,000. Home Office data confirmed that 474 asylum seekers made the perilous crossing yesterday, taking the total since Keir Starmer became prime minister 13 months ago to 50,271. According to the Daily Express, that is quicker than under Tory PMs Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'This is an invasion Labour are too cowardly to confront. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.' The number of small boat crossings are a major source of embarrassment for Labour, which pledged during last year's general election to 'smash the people-smuggling gangs' responsible. And even government minister Jacqui Smith, who served as the home secretary under Gordon Brown, told BBC Breakfast this morning that number pf crossings under Labour was 'unacceptable'. But independent migration policy researcher Zoe Gardner, told HuffPost UK the government is focusing on the wrong issue. She said Labour should instead increase the number of legal immigration routes to the UK, thereby taking away the need for asylum seekers to risk their lives in the English Channel. She said: '50,000 people since Labour came to power corresponds to about 5 or 6% of all immigration during that period. 'If it wasn't coming on boats but through safe, regulated routes instead these numbers would not even register. 'By refusing to offer safe routes, the government has created a crisis out of nothing at all.' Net migration in 2024 was 431,000 – much lower than the historical high of 906,000 recorded in 2023, but still a number which dwarves how many arrived people arrived in small boats during the same period (37,000). The government has often been criticised over its lack of safe and legal routes for people to claim asylum in the UK. And, as human rights organisation Amnesty International explained, a 'safe and legal route' means a journey formally approved by the government. But, 'the government allows nobody to make a claim for asylum in the UK unless they are physically present in the UK' and 'it is impossible to come to the UK for the purpose of seeking asylum in any way permitted by the government's immigration rules'. The only exceptions apply to people from Ukraine and someone who has family in the UK or has a partner or child who has been granted asylum in Britain. There is also a visa route for some Afghans who have worked for the government. As Amnesty International noted on its website: 'Seeking asylum from persecution is lawful – refugees don't need anyone's permission to do so.' It concluded: 'It is a government choice to require refugees wishing to seek asylum in the UK to rely on dangerous journeys and people smugglers.' The government is desperate to bring the number of small boat crossings down and prove to voters it is dealing with the migration crisis. It announced a new 'one in, one out' returns scheme with France last week, which will allow the UK to return one person to France who entered the Britain via so-called 'illegal' means. The UK then has to accept someone with a greater claim to asylum in Britain from France. The first returns are expected to take place in the coming weeks, but the impact will likely be very small initially as the scheme is tested. Related... Almost Half Of Brits Are Getting An Essential Fact About UK Immigration Wrong Yvette Cooper Delivers Brutal Commons Slapdown To Chris Philp Over The Tories' Immigration Failures 'A Horrific Moral Failure': Campaigner Slams Labour And Tories Over Illegal Immigration

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store