logo
What is the Hillsborough Law? The 'all or nothing' legislation explained

What is the Hillsborough Law? The 'all or nothing' legislation explained

Yahoo08-04-2025

As the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster approaches, campaigners have said a law promised by the government to prevent future cover-ups of such tragedies must not be watered down.
The Inquest charity said the legislation must be presented to Parliament "without dilution or caveat", following concerns that changes to the bill could raise the threshold of accountability.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously pledged to introduce the so-called 'Hillsborough Law' before this year's anniversary of the tragedy, which took place on 15 April 1989.
It is expected to include a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials to tell the truth and proactively co-operate with official investigations and inquiries – with the potential for criminal sanctions for officials or organisations which mislead or obstruct investigations.
However, campaigners are understood to be concerned over whom the duty of candour will apply, and are calling on the government to provide reassurance.
Margaret Aspinall, whose 18-year-old son James died in the football stadium crowd-crush, said: 'After hearing the stories of all the other families fighting for justice, I am more determined than ever to demand that the Hillsborough Law presented to Parliament is all or nothing.
'This is the legacy of families and survivors – the bill has got to be right.'
Here, Yahoo News looks at the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster and what has been said so far about the law promised by Labour.
Survivors and the families of those who died have been involved in a lengthy campaign in pursuit of justice.
On its website, the Hillsborough Law Now campaign group sets out two key criteria for the law it wants to see put in place:
Create a new legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials to tell the truth and proactively cooperate with official investigations and inquiries - bringing to an end the depressingly familiar pattern of cover ups and concealment.
Ensure victims of disasters or state-related deaths are entitled to parity of legal representation during inquests and inquiries. This will mean that This will mean that bereaved families can get public funding, just as public money is used to support government and public authority lawyers.
In a report bringing together 'powerful voices of bereaved families, victims and survivors of some of the worst failings of public services and the legal system in the UK', Inquest has re-stated the need for a strong and watertight law.
Other major campaign groups including Grenfell United and Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice (CBFFJ) have backed Inquest's call.
In the report, Inquest director Deborah Coles says the law 'must be 'all or nothing', without dilution or caveat, to ensure the response to contentious deaths, harms and grave injustices dramatically improves'.
She says that while a delay in a bill being introduced to Parliament by the anniversary would be "disappointing", it is important that the proposed legislation fully meets campaigners' expectations.
Last week, the government confirmed that the Hillsborough Law will not be implemented before the next anniversary of the disaster, as "more time is needed" to draft the legislation, Sky News reported.
A source close to the discussions told the outlet that the legislation in its current form was an "absolute mess", with a number of loopholes that would leave the duty of candour "useless and ineffective".
Last month, it was reported that a meeting between Sir Keir and campaigners had been cancelled, with claims officials were attempting to have the contents of a bill watered down.
In an update last week, Commons leader Lucy Powell said the Government will take 'whatever time is necessary' to develop a law which 'meets the expectations' of the Hillsborough families.
She told MPs that the 'most important issue at this time is to ensure that the legislation reflects the full range of concerns and experiences, and meets the expectations of the families'.
'I think the very worst thing we can do at this point in time is to not meet those expectations when all of the trust and issues there are about the state failing to live up to those expectations of the families," she added.
'So we are working on the bill at pace, but we will take whatever time is necessary to work collaboratively with the families and their representatives, because getting that legislation right is actually our overwhelming priority at this time, I'm sure she can understand that.'
Last Tuesday building safety minister Alex Norris told a committee of MPs that there will be an update 'coming imminently' and that the calls for improvements on the law "have been understood".
Ninety-seven football fans died as a result of a crush at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest at Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield.
More than 50,000 men, women and children travelled to stadium, where just minutes after kick-off, a fatal crush occurred in the Leppings Lane end terraces, where the Liverpool fans were located.
Some media reporting focused on unfounded allegations that Liverpool fans' drunken behaviour caused the disaster and hindered the emergency response, but this has been "disproved many times", the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said.
In 1991, a jury returned a verdict of accidental death at the end of an inquest, but in December 2012, the High Court quashed the original verdicts and ordered fresh inquests.
It followed years of demands from campaigners for new inquests to be held, and the government setting up a Hillsborough Independent Panel in 2009 to review the evidence.
The fresh inquests began in March 2014, where jurors heard evidence about the stadium's design, police preparation and the overall emergency response, with at least one medical expert saying some of the victims could have been saved if earlier interventions were made.
Two years later, in April 2016, the jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing for the then 96 Liverpool fans who lost their lives and concluded that the fans played no role in causing the disaster.
Jurors found that 'errors and omissions' by South Yorkshire Police contributed to the deaths, while the response of South Yorkshire Metropolitan Ambulance also contributed to the disaster.
In 2021, Andrew Devine, who died aged 55 at the 1989 FA Cup semi-final, was confirmed as the 97th victim of the tragedy.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which began investigations into the disaster in 2013, said in March 2025 that although officers tried to 'deflect blame' they do not have a case to answer for misconduct.
In a letter to families, the police watchdog said: 'We found no evidence to support claims that the behaviour of supporters was a contributing factor.
'In the majority of cases, we were unable to find that officers had a case to answer for misconduct because the professional standards for policing at the time did not include a specific duty of candour.
'Despite the wider public interest to gain answers about what happened, South Yorkshire Police was entitled, within the law at the time, to present its 'best case' and be selective with the evidence it presented.'
Government will miss its own deadline to bring in Hillsborough Law (Sky News)
Fury among families after senior Hillsborough officers absolved by police watchdog (The Guardian)
'He gave so much' - the Hillsborough dad who refused to bow to injustice (The Liverpool Echo)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government expected to unveil welfare Bill concessions after talks with rebels
Government expected to unveil welfare Bill concessions after talks with rebels

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Government expected to unveil welfare Bill concessions after talks with rebels

Sir Keir Starmer is understood to have offered concessions on his controversial welfare reforms in a Government climbdown that looks set to have won over leading Labour rebels. Number 10 had been locked in crisis talks with backbenchers after some 126 MPs within the party signed an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. On Thursday night, sources said a deal was being thrashed out between rebels and the Government as it seeks to head off the prospect of the Prime Minister's first Commons defeat in a crunch vote next week. The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week, phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. However, concessions offered by the Government to save the Bill from defeat are understood to include a commitment that those currently receiving Pip will continue to get the allowance. This would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but fresh changes such as these would leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere. Rebels had also been calling for ministers to row back on a freeze in the health element of universal credit, which was expected to lead to a £450 real decline in support for some 2.2 million existing claimants. It is understood that the Government has agreed to avoid such a reduction in support, as well as committing to a future consultation that would involve taking the views of disabled people about policy into account. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The Government had earlier said it was listening to suggestions to improve the legislation amid concerns about the swift timetable of the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. While the expected concessions look set to have reassured some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remain opposed. Speaking to the PA news agency, Rachel Maskell said: 'As the Government is seeking to reform the system they should protect all disabled people until they have completed their co-produced consultation and co-produced implementation. 'I cannot vote for something that will have such a significant impact … as disabled people are not involved, it is just a backroom deal.' One MP said that ministers would need to 'go back to the drawing board' to make the Bill acceptable. Another said they expected the legislation would get through second reading if the Government conceded the key sticking points relating to existing Pip claimants, the health element of universal credit and a policy consultation. 'It would need to be in the Bill, not just a commitment,' they said. Speaking in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to reflect 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He insisted there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' There was mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse,' director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said. But the MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Head of campaigns at the charity, Charlotte Gill, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'

Starmer Eases Welfare Cuts in Blow to Budget, and His Authority
Starmer Eases Welfare Cuts in Blow to Budget, and His Authority

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Starmer Eases Welfare Cuts in Blow to Budget, and His Authority

Keir Starmer agreed to pare back a divisive £5 billion ($6.9 billion) cut to welfare to quiet a rebellion by his own party, a decision that will likely leave both Britain's fiscal plans and the prime minister's own leadership in need of repair. Starmer agreed on Thursday to soften the blow of a sweeping welfare overhaul meant to press more people back to work and off benefits, according to people familiar with the matter. He offered, among other things, to let hundreds of thousands of existing claimants receive benefits at their current level, said the people, who asked to be named while discussing plans that haven't been publicly announced.

Kosovo Court Orders Parliament to End Deadlock Within 30 Days
Kosovo Court Orders Parliament to End Deadlock Within 30 Days

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Kosovo Court Orders Parliament to End Deadlock Within 30 Days

Kosovo's top court ordered lawmakers to complete the inaugural session of parliament within 30 days, pressing politicians to resolve a stalemate which has prevented the formation of a new government since February's election. The Balkan nation's newly-elected assembly has met 37 times since mid-April without electing a parliamentary speaker, a requirement before parliament can start functioning or form a new government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store