Former Liberal foreign minister Lloyd Axworthy wants a diplomatic reset for Canada
OTTAWA — Former Liberal foreign affairs minister Lloyd Axworthy says Ottawa's current approach to foreign policy has run out of road.
Axworthy says this year's election offers a welcome chance to shift Canada back toward a role of identifying issues that concern multiple countries and finding ways to address them.
He says that could mean working with peer countries to advance shared interests that don't align with those of U.S. President Donald Trump — by, for example, using the Arctic Council to fight climate change.
He also says Canada needs to reform its electoral system so that Parliament better reflects the Canadian public, because the current structure doesn't align with Ottawa's advocacy for democracy abroad.
Axworthy has warned recently that "a revolving door of ministers" in charge of foreign policy is undermining Ottawa's ability to build alliances and influence on the world stage.
Axworthy told a Monday panel discussion held by the Canadian International Council that this work will require going beyond sloganeering and rebuilding the strong ties Canada once had with developing countries.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 28, 2025.
Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
CNBC's UK Exchange newsletter: The U.K.'s pension shake-up is facing pushback
Since the Global Financial Crisis, poor productivity has bedeviled the U.K. economy for various reasons, including regional disparities and over-dependence on London and the southeast of England. Most economists agree, though, that the main factor has been low investment in skills and infrastructure. In response, the last government devised the "Mansion House reforms" in July 2023, so-called because Jeremy Hunt, then chancellor of the Exchequer, announced them at the official residence of the Lord Mayor of London (the Lord Mayor, not to be confused with Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, is head of the City of London Corporation, the Square Mile's governing body). The proposals sought to unlock £75 billion ($102 billion) from defined contribution and local government pension schemes with the aim of directing a greater proportion of retirement savings toward private markets and assets such as infrastructure. In his announcement — which carried approving quotes from the likes of Jamie Dimon, chairman and CEO of JP Morgan Chase, and C.S. Venkatakrishnan, the Barclays CEO — Hunt noted: "The United Kingdom has the largest pension market in Europe, worth over £2.5 trillion … but how this money is invested is limiting returns for savers." "Comparable Australian schemes invest ten times more in private markets than U.K. schemes, reaping rewards that U.K. savers are missing out on," he went on. The news was accompanied by a "Mansion House compact" in which nine of the U.K.'s largest defined contribution pension providers committed to allocate 5% of assets in their default funds to unlisted assets, such as private equity or start-ups, by 2030. When Rachel Reeves succeeded Hunt, in July 2024, she pledged to build on the proposals and, for a while, there was excitement in the pensions industry. Unfortunately, it feels as if that initial enthusiasm has curdled. An early indication the industry might not be completely in tune with Reeves's ambitions came after she announced, last November, plans to create "megafunds" — modelled on Australia's superannuation funds and Canadian pension schemes such as the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan — by consolidating assets from 86 separate local government pension scheme authorities into eight pools each worth an average of £50 billion by 2030. In theory, this would unlock huge efficiency gains, as well as allowing more money to be invested, longer term, in private assets and infrastructure. But it has run into criticism — partly because local authorities fear losing influence over how their pension assets are invested and partly because of the likely job losses among local government officials. Alongside this, the government aims to encourage consolidation among the U.K.'s defined contribution pensions, the main means by which Britons now save for retirement. It wants defined contribution multi-employer pension schemes to be worth at least £25 billion by 2030, again with the aim of building scale and efficiency, with schemes also empowered to transfer assets into the planned megafunds. This has won broad industry backing. In May, 17 leading defined contribution scheme providers signed the "Mansion House accord," building on Hunt's 2023 compact, volunteering to invest 10% of their workplace portfolios in assets like infrastructure, property and private equity by 2030. At least 5% would be ring fenced for U.K. assets. So far, so good. Explosively, though, the government is planning a "backstop provision" allowing it to set "binding asset allocation targets" — in other words, forcing megafunds to invest in private markets and U.K. assets if they fail to meet the voluntary targets. The justification is to ensure some schemes do not lose business by making costly up-front investments, while rivals hold back. But it has proved contentious. Some in the industry question why ministers should tell them how to allocate assets and have noted the irony in ministers and civil servants — who enjoy generous defined benefit pensions funded by taxpayers — obliging those same taxpayers to adopt more risk with their own retirement savings. Amanda Blanc, chief executive of Aviva, one of the U.K.'s biggest insurers, spoke for many when she called the measure a "sledgehammer to crack a nut." UK stocks in the spotlight There are questions on how mandation might be enforced and why, if unlisted assets are so attractive, these schemes are not already invested in them. Several senior leaders have also told me privately that there is insufficient industry expertise to manage such assets. Reeves sought to defend the move when, last week, she told The Times CEO Summit that she doubted it would be necessary to use the backstop. However, the following day, the Financial Times reported that Scottish Widows, the U.K.'s second-largest pensions provider, is cutting the U.K. equities allocation in its highest growth portfolio from 12% to just 3%. Significantly, Scottish Widows — which is owned by Lloyds Banking Group — had signed the original Mansion House compact, but not the later accord. Simon French, the influential head of research at the investment bank Panmure Liberum, described it as "an inevitable reaction to the Mansion House accord which … pushes/strong-arms U.K. pension flows into private assets over the next five years." Ironically, all this is happening just as, after years of indifference among investors, U.K. equities are having their moment in the sun, with the FTSE 100 so far outperforming not only the pan-European Stoxx Europe 600 but also the S&P 500 this year. One prominent City figure told me last week that his investment bank's trading desk had just enjoyed its busiest day in more than 20 years — with American investors, in particular, showing renewed interest in U.K. equities. Ministers will argue that, with tax relief to private pension contributions costing £46.8 billion in 2022-23, the latest year for which figures are available, they are entitled to ask for more pension savings to be channelled toward the U.K. economy. Institutions might respond that, if the government is keen to see that happen, it might remove some barriers to investing in the U.K. such as the unpopular 0.5% levy paid on share purchases. It all creates a sense that, while ministers and investors are agreed on the desirability of investing more in the U.K., there is little agreement on how to achieve that. And it certainly feels as if Reeves and her colleagues are more interested in seeing investment in private assets rather than public of London can be a springboard for economic growth in the UK, says the Lord Mayor Alastair King, the Lord Mayor of London, discusses business activity in London ahead of the UK government's 10-year industrial strategy. The future of exchanges: Global capital flows in the age of Trump, tariffs and trade wars CNBC's Martin Soong hosts a roundtable in Singapore with stock exchange leaders from around the world to discuss how U.S. exceptionalism is reshaping global capital flows. Europe has been underinvesting in defense, says Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing, CEO of Deutsche Bank discusses how the business is responding to current geopolitical uncertainty and outlines how the bank plans to finance defense spending through a mix of public and private sector could face changes to search in the UK as regulators crack down. Britain's Competition and Markets Authority said it's consulting on a proposal to give Google "strategic market status." NATO allies pledge to hike defense spending – but will they deliver? Whether allies' defense spending promises materialize is the key question. Conflict or ceasefire, most markets remain unfazed — here's why. Global equities posted muted gains Tuesday, as investors digested U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, as well as growing signs of fatigue toward Trump's policymaking.U.K. stocks have fallen by 0.8% over the last week, with the FTSE 100 finally closing flat on Tuesday after three consecutive trading days of losses. Meanwhile, the British Pound gained nearly 1% to reach $1.36, its strongest level against the U.S. dollar since January 2022, according to FactSet. In government bond markets, 10-year gilt yields slipped over the last week and now trade around 4.47%. In case you missed it, Amazon said it will invest £40 billion in the U.K. over the next three years to build and upgrade its large warehouses. The British government welcomed the investment as it looks to boost domestic growth and productivity.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK to buy F-35 stealth jets that can carry US nuclear warheads as global insecurity grows
The UK will buy at least 12 F-35 stealth jets that can carry nuclear warheads in the most significant strengthening of its nuclear capability in a generation, the government has said. Today, Sir Keir Starmer will tell a summit of NATO allies in The Hague that the new squadron will join an alliance mission that can be armed with US nuclear weapons. The dramatic move will doubtless draw condemnation and concern from Russia and China. But it comes at a time of growing global insecurity - and as the prime minister and his European and Canadian counterparts scramble to convince Donald Trump they are serious about bolstering their ability to defend Europe, instead of overly relying on the United States. The US president, a long-standing NATO sceptic, about whether he would uphold the alliance's founding Article 5 principle - that an attack on one is an attack on all - before he even arrived in the Dutch city last night. An urgent need to keep Mr Trump on side has prompted NATO allies to agree to increase spending on defence and national resilience to by 2035. As part of this push to rearm, Sir Keir will give the Royal Air Force the ability to carry airborne nuclear warheads for the first time since the 1990s. "In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted," he said. "These F-35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our allies. "The UK's commitment to NATO is unquestionable, as is the alliance's contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure, but we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come." It was not immediately clear when the F-35 jets would be bought or how much they will cost, but the new squadron will be part of a NATO-led nuclear deterrence mission. That is in contrast to the UK's national nuclear deterrence, based on a fleet of four nuclear-armed submarines, though they too are used to defend the whole of the alliance. Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, applauded the plan - saying: "The UK has declared its nuclear deterrent to NATO for many decades, and I strongly welcome today's announcement that the UK will now also join NATO's nuclear mission and procure the F-35A. "This is yet another robust British contribution to NATO." Aircraft operated by a small number of NATO countries, including Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, are cleared to carry US-provided nuclear weapons in a war. The RAF and the Royal Navy already operate F-35B jets that can fly off Britain's two aircraft carriers, but they are not equipped to drop nuclear warheads. The new planes will be the F-35A variant, operated by the air force, that take off from land but can fly further and be armed with nuclear or conventional weapons. The government said they would all be based together at RAF Marham in Norfolk. The government has long planned to purchase a total of 138 F-35 aircraft, but has so far only acquired around three dozen - seven years since the first jets entered service. The decision to purchase 12 of the A-variant does not mean extra aircraft. It just means a diversification in the fleet - something the RAF has long been pushing for - though it's a decision some in the Royal Navy have long pushed back against, believing it would reduce even further the number of the B-version that operate from their carriers. Read more: The government described the plan to purchase nuclear-capable aircraft as the "biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation". Defence Secretary John Healey said a major defence review published earlier in the month highlighted new nuclear risks. "It recommended a new UK role in our collective defence and deterrence through a NATO-first approach," he said. However, the public version of the Strategic Defence Review stopped short of making any specific recommendation. It merely said "the UK must explore how to support the US and its NATO allies in strengthening extended deterrence across the Euro-Atlantic". The F-35 aircraft is made by the US defence giant Lockheed Martin, but the British defence company BAE Systems is also a key contributor. The order will support 20,000 jobs in the F-35 programme in the UK.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maine governor comes face to face with Canadian travel fears
Maine's governor was confronted on Tuesday with the reality of how fearful some New Brunswickers are about visiting the United States while U.S. President Donald Trump is in the White House. Janet Mills was in Fredericton for the second day of a tour through Atlantic Canada, hoping to reverse — or at least slow — a steep decline in the number of tourists crossing the border to visit Maine. She and Premier Susan Holt delivered a joint ode to cross-border connections to a Fredericton Chamber of Commerce audience largely concerned about the impact of tariffs on their businesses. But two questions from participants brought into sharp relief how immigration raids and the rolling back of trans rights is scaring some Canadians away from U.S. visits. "A lot of members of the queer community — a lot of Canadians feel unsafe, Canadians who are 2SLGBTQI+ absolutely feel unsafe going there," said Vivian Myers-Jones, a member of the Saint John Pride board. "It's a terrifying thing going down there right now." Myers-Jones plans to travel to Bangor this weekend for Pride events there as part of a partnership between organizers in the two cities, but said many other members of the community are afraid to go. Another member of the audience, business owner David Dennis, said his Venezuelan-born wife vetoed a planned trip to Maine this year despite his attempts to assure her that having Canadian citizenship would protect her at the border. "Her fellow countrymen had been targeted for deportation and her comment was, 'I'm not going to the States this year,'" he told the two political leaders. WATCH | 'It's a terrifying thing, going down there': Premier, governor hear concerns: Even before the question-and-answer session, Holt herself used the U.S. political situation to encourage New Brunswickers to travel within the province this summer — as she has been since the Trump administration first announced tariffs on Canadian exports. "Lots of people don't feel safe in the U.S. right now and for good reason, and until that changes I think the climate for visitors will be difficult," she said. Mills said Maine has among the lowest crime rates in the U.S. and Canadians should feel secure hiking, skiing, swimming and shopping there. "You can do that safely," she said. She acknowledged as governor she has no control over how the U.S. Border Patrol or Immigration and Customs Enforcement operate in the state. "But for the most part, they're busy in other places. They know that the relationships between Calais and St. Stephen, Madawaska and Edmundston, are sacred, and I don't think they want to damage those relationships either," she said. After the 90-minute session wrapped up, Mills approached Dennis while he was speaking to reporters and hugged him. "Tell your wife we'll keep her safe," she said. The governor said she could understand Canadian angst "when you hear one or two stories on a 4,000-mile border. It can be scary and people have a right to feel anxiety. But tens of thousands of people are crossing the border every day." She called New Brunswick's multiple border crossings with Maine "the safest places in the world to cross an international border." Holt acknowledged that Mills opposes Trump's policies, even challenging them in court. But she said the governor's assurances that federal immigration crackdowns are happening far from Maine won't persuade everyone. "Not knowing where they're going to be next makes it a really uncertain environment for anyone who feels they might be targeted [by] ICE," Holt said. Visits by New Brunswickers to Maine have been down by about one-third this year compared to last year. Holt is spending this week travelling around New Brunswick with Tourism Minister Isabelle Thériault to promote various destinations within the province.
