Iran envoy urges A-bombed Japan to stand against U.S. attacks
The ambassador said in a recent interview with Kyodo News that the comment is an "insult" not only to Iran, but also to Japan, the world's only country to have suffered atomic bombings.
Japan should raise a "very loud voice," Seadat said, adding that Japan's voice is "important" to the international community.
The interview was held after the United States, Japan's close ally, bombarded key Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday. Israel and Iran had been engaged in a tit-for-tat conflict following Israeli airstrikes on military and nuclear targets on June 13 before announcing a cease-fire on Tuesday.
Trump said Wednesday during his visit to the Netherlands for a NATO summit, "I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war."
Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said in a statement Monday that Japan "understands" the U.S. military action as a demonstration of its resolve to de-escalate the situation while preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Stability in the Middle East is vital for resource-poor Japan, given its heavy dependence on the region for crude oil, and it has traditionally maintained friendly ties with Iran.
Seadat criticized Trump's reference to the atomic bombings on the two Japanese cities in the closing days of World War II as an "outrageous" and "irresponsible" statement showing "total disregard for human suffering."
The envoy said the U.S. attacks on the nuclear sites deserve "global condemnation," calling them "acts of aggression" committed in violation of international law.
He also said that "forcing peace is not peace," in reference to Trump's comment on his Truth Social media site that "Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region."
The U.S. military action right in the middle of nuclear negotiations was an act of "betrayal by the Trump administration," Seadat said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
29 minutes ago
- Japan Times
On economic policy, the White House is its own worst enemy
The path of U.S. politics over the past 10 years is scarcely believable — and keeps getting weirder. A miraculously successful amateur politician, now half a year into his second term in the White House, isn't content to take his wins and count his achievements. Instead, he seems eager to bring the ceiling down on his own head. Meantime, his career-politician opponents aren't just failing to hold him to account, they are doing what they can to shield him from falling debris. Forgive the median voter for being disgusted, bewildered or both. If systemic political failure is possible, this must surely be what it looks like. Consider a recent poll in the Wall Street Journal. On issue after issue they care most about, voters say they trust Republicans more than Democrats — yet, at the same time, they disapprove of the way the administration is managing them. Voters prefer Republicans to Democrats on the economy, inflation, immigration, tariffs, foreign policy and Ukraine. Yet on each of those topics, there's net disapproval of the president's initiatives. In particular, "51% say the change he is bringing is a form of chaos and dysfunction that will hurt the country. By contrast, 45% agree with the alternative statement that he is making needed and helpful changes.' The implication for both political parties might seem clear. The White House needs to calm down and choose consolidation, not further controversy and "chaos.' And the Democratic Party needs to dump (not just downplay) its plainly unpopular positions and concentrate on projecting competence and moderation. They're both doing just the opposite. If I were a conspiracy theorist, I could suspect each party of planting agents in the other, secretly dedicated to guiding the enemy to defeat. I'd be deeply impressed by the skill of these covert operatives, instead of stunned by the parade of willful political dysfunction. To be fair, in wrenching itself in a new direction, the Democratic Party has structural problems: zero leadership and activists who'd rather lose than compromise. That's challenging. The Republicans' dysfunction is more puzzling. They have a leader, to put it mildly, and he delights in winning above all. Yet Trump is willing to put his record of seemingly impossible political wins at risk for little or no return. On immigration, clear majorities agree that the border should be secure, there's a difference between legal and illegal immigration, and some of the millions of people who came to the U.S. illegally (especially those guilty of other offenses) should be sent home. Merely by committing itself to this, the administration defeated the Democrats. But clear majorities don't support rounding up any and all such violators regardless of their circumstances — without regard for due process — and using a hurriedly expanded force of masked enforcement officers and opaque network of makeshift, ostentatiously punitive detention centers. Resorting to such methods seems a good way for the administration to lose an argument that it had won. The same goes for economic policy. As it intended, the White House has successfully dismantled the postwar trading system and moved the U.S. into a new regime of discriminatory tariffs and managed trade. The recent Big Beautiful tax-and-spending bill abandoned all pretense of fiscal prudence and accelerated the trajectory of unsustainable public debt. Yet despite warnings of inevitable disaster, the S&P 500 continues to set records, seeming to validate Trump's thinking. So far, at least, another big political win. The political threat to this new economic regime isn't its long-term consequences — which in any case are uncertain. Large forces are in contention. Will the push to growth and productivity from AI-driven innovation, less regulation and generous tax relief for investment overpower the pull of tariff-driven stagflation, ill-conceived industrial policy and the crowding out of investment due to excessive government borrowing? Hard to say. But the debate about those questions will last well beyond the current administration. The politically salient threat to Trump's economic policies is short-term disruption in financial markets — the risk that Wall Street will stop applauding Trump, turn against him and drive the economy into a recession. As with immigration, the conduct of economic policy might have been calculated to sabotage the whole enterprise. Name three things capable of provoking a financial-market veto while delivering no offsetting benefit. How about stoking endless uncertainty over future tariffs, kneecapping the Federal Reserve's operational independence and undermining trust in official statistics? Done, done and done. Trump has escalated his unwarranted attacks on Fed Chair Jerome Powell (whom he appointed back in 2018), going as far as to drum up accusations of impropriety over the central bank's renovation of its headquarters. Just recently, he appointed Stephen Miran, a key thinker behind Trumpist heterodoxy, to a temporary position on the Fed's board, while the search for a suitably compliant successor to Powell proceeds. Doesn't it serve Trump's purposes to install a servant at the Fed? No, it doesn't. For a start, the idea that the Fed is scheming to defeat Trump's broader policy agenda is preposterous. Even if an obedient Fed were to deliver the much lower policy-rate that the president thinks appropriate, this wouldn't necessarily lower the interest rates he cares about — mortgage rates, cost of credit and long-term borrowing. It's much more likely that ending the Fed's perceived independence (to say nothing of a big cut in the policy rate with inflation still above target) would push market-driven rates higher. Politically, attacking the Fed is all risk and no return. Installing a follower at the Fed looks almost reasonable compared to firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics on patently specious grounds. The president accused Erika McEntarfer of rigging the July jobs figures released on Aug. 1, because they included unusually big downward revisions for May and June. It's hard to see how McEntarfer could have rigged the numbers even if she'd wanted to. Revisions happen and they're apt to be bigger when sectoral demands for labor are shifting a lot (as they are now, thanks to tariffs and the crackdown on illegal workers) and when the agency is short of the resources it needs to gather data (as it is, thanks to the drive to cut government workers). For sure, the agency needs to improve its methods and keep the revisions as small as possible — goals made harder by the administration's dismantling of the panel of unpaid technical experts responsible for doing so. To repeat, I'm fairly sure a Democrat saboteur hasn't tunneled into the White House — but the true explanation evades me. As with attacking the Fed, firing the head of the BLS to install a follower whose independence will be questioned is all risk and no return. Planting the suspicion that employment and inflation numbers might be manipulated would add a further premium to long-term interest rates. And as such doubts accumulate, so does the risk of a "Trump moment' for financial markets — with no short-term political benefit, beyond dominating the headlines, in exchange. On immigration, trade, the Fed and the integrity of official data, the White House seems determined to cast aside its successes and take risks that serve no purpose. To be sure, for as long as financial markets allow, the president will probably keep on winning — you know, because the Democrats. How such a great country wound up with such politicians, I cannot fathom. Look on their works, median voters, and despair. Clive Crook is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and member of the editorial board covering economics.
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Japan, Turkey agree to begin discussions on defense exchanges
ANKARA (Kyodo) -- Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani and his Turkish counterpart Yasar Guler agreed Tuesday to begin discussions on exchanges between the two nations' defense industries, Japan's government said. At their meeting in the Turkish capital Ankara, Nakatani and Guler discussed the possibility of collaboration in defense equipment and technology as a "potential cooperative field," the Defense Ministry said. They also confirmed their nations will widen defense cooperation while working together toward peace and stability in their respective regions, according to the ministry. The talks came as Japan has been considering buying drones made in Turkey as part of its efforts to strengthen its surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities. Turkey has provided offensive drones to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Nakatani, who already stopped in Djibouti during his three-nation trip from Sunday, became the first Japanese defense minister to visit Turkey. He is set to travel to Jordan on Thursday.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Upper House Election: ‘Conspiracy Theory' Mentions Rose During Japan's Upper House Election Campaign, a Study of Social Media Finds
The number of posts containing the Japanese word for 'conspiracy theory' averaged 45,000 per day on X during the latest House of Councillors election campaign period, doubling the number posted before the campaign, The Yomiuri Shimbun has found. The Japanese word 'inbo-ron' was frequently used in connection with political party Sanseito's assertions and allegations of foreign interference in the election. Noting that the spread of unverifiable claims has fueled this trend, an expert warned that an accelerated tit-for-tat conspiracy theory exchange could exacerbate social divisions. Conspiracy theories are claims that shadowy forces or secret organizations manipulate governments and media to control politics and the economy. On social media, they are often used to dismiss opinions that do not align with one's own beliefs. The Yomiuri Shimbun used an analysis tool from U.S.-based firm Meltwater to extract and analyze all posts — including reposts — containing the 'conspiracy theory' term from June last year to July this year. Last year saw the Tokyo gubernatorial election, the House of Representatives election and the Hyogo gubernatorial election, with 15,000 comments containing the term posted on an average day. The number increased to over 20,000 this year and surged to 45,000 during the July upper house election campaign of July the first half of the July campaign, a series of posts criticized assertions by Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya as conspiracy theories. These assertions included 'Jewish international financial capital controls the world' and '[Multinational corporations] are said to have caused the pandemic.' Sanseito members fought back against these criticisms with such a post as, 'They're still talking about conspiracy theories,' which went viral. Meanwhile, there were also posts labeling liberal arguments against nuclear power as conspiracy theories. The period toward the end of the campaign saw an increase in posts against a personal blog that raised suspicions of foreign interference in the election. The blog claimed that Russia was spreading Japanese-language posts criticizing Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's administration that would result in increasing support for Sanseito and other parties. When both ruling and opposition parties called for an investigation of the allegation, Kamiya posted, 'The claim that 'behind the rise of the Sanseito lies Russian interference' is precisely the kind of conspiracy theory we've been talking about.' This post was shared 14,000 times. Posts related to U.S. President Donald Trump's administration have also been prominent this year. A survey found an increase in English-language posts mentioning conspiracy theories overseas. 'Many posts sound the alarm about conspiracy theories, and that itself is a sign that unverified claims are spreading,' Osaka University of Economics Associate Prof. Masaki Hata, who has written books on conspiracy theories, said. 'Politicians also tended to exploit unverified claims for their own advantage during elections.' He said he has the impression that there has been an increase in posts alleging voting fraud, such as those claiming that 'votes are being rewritten,' and that could pose a dangerous threat to democracy.
