
India weighs GM-free 'self-certification' for US food imports
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Certification & Registration
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
India and the US, in intense parleys to stitch a trade deal before July 9, are looking to meet halfway on several politically-tricky issues, with market access by New Delhi in genetically modified (GM) crops leading the list, ET has learnt.The latest proposal under discussion is to permit a new 'self-certification' mechanism for US exporters to address India's concern on GM-free/non-GMO status of imported items and also help ease the process, ET has learnt.This will entail the US providing a fresh list of food crops for which 'no GM event' has been authorised in the country. It will also be asked to provide an online link to details of food crops for which GM events have been authorised for removing any doubts in the minds of Indian authorities when considered for imports.A GM event refers to insertion of a new DNA into the plant genome to change its characteristics.India's 2021 order on GM crops states that imports of 24 listed products such as grains, oilseeds, fruits, and vegetables require a GM free/non-GMO certificate, involving a health certificate and another validation from the exporting country.The US has been terming this "blanket" order a major trade barrier, alleging that it does not differentiate whether GE varieties of those 21 food crops/items are in commercial production or being exported to India at all.There is also the protracted issue of allowing US GM-based animal feed being discussed by trade negotiators on both sides.While there is slower progress on the strong US pitch to allow GM Alfalfa hay into India, an issue held up with the Department of Animal Husbandry, the other key issue of allowing imports of US corn-based genetically engineered Dried Distilled Grains (DDGs) may finally get the go-ahead, ET has learnt.India is learnt to have proposed that once US agencies submit the required technical dossiers, New Delhi will aim to assess the phytosanitary protocol to enable imports of GE DDGS within six months, keeping with Indian rulebooks.The US has contended that DDGS are a processed product and pose no risk to the environment and should not be treated as living modified organisms under the GM regime.There is also considerable discussion around India's 'certification' and 'registration' regime for import of certain 'high risk' items, ranging from dairy products to meat and meat products as well as poultry and fish besides infant food.The US has held that this certificate requirement is cumbersome as it involves multiple and duplicate attestations.While underlining the need for safety verifications in case of food items, India is learnt to have opened talks on allowing adequate transition time when implementing revised certification regimes for food and agriculture products, and concluding deliberations on such changes within a reasonable timeframe.Similarly, India, while still underlining the need for registration of US food manufacturing facilities, could open a window for them to directly apply to regulator Food Safety & Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) for self-registration for exports to India. However, in case any discrepancies are found, the issue will have to be addressed bilaterally, it is proposed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
27 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Reject double standards in countering terrorism': BRICS leaders condemn Pahalgam attack
The BRICS countries on Sunday condemned the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and called for combating terrorism in all its forms, including the cross-border movement of terrorists, terrorism financing and safe havens. In a joint declaration, the multilateral grouping expressed 'strong condemnation of any acts of terrorism as criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, whenever, wherever and by whomsoever committed'. The group reiterated that 'terrorism should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group and that all those involved in terrorist activities and their support must be held accountable and brought to justice' under national and international laws. BRICS comprises India, Brazil, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. The leaders of the BRICS nations met in Brazil's Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. The declaration did not name Pakistan, whom New Delhi has accused of supporting cross-border terrorism. In the past, China has blocked attempts by India to sanction terror groups based in Pakistan at the United Nations. The BRICS grouping has condemned terrorism in its past declarations too. The BRICS nations on Sunday urged 'to ensure zero tolerance for terrorism and reject double standards in countering terrorism'. The declaration also emphasised the 'primary responsibility of states in combating terrorism and that global efforts to prevent and counter terrorist threats must fully comply with their obligations under international law…' During the BRICS summit on Sunday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that the Pahalgam terror attack was a ' direct assault on the soul, identity and dignity' of India. 'This attack was not just a blow to India but to the entire humanity,' Modi said. The prime minister said that condemning terrorism must be a matter of principle and not just of convenience. Modi said that there must be no hesitation in imposing sanctions on terrorists. 'The victims and supporters of terrorism cannot be treated equally,' he said. 'For the sake of personal or political gain, giving silent consent to terrorism or supporting terrorists or terrorism, should never be acceptable under any circumstances…' The terror attack at Baisaran near Pahalgam town in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22 left 26 persons dead and 16 injured. The terrorists targeted tourists after asking their names to ascertain their religion, the police said. All but three of those killed were Hindu. In response to the terror attack, India launched military strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what New Delhi claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed. On May 10, India and Pakistan reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following a four-day conflict.


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Lost Rs 18 lakh in 6 months: Financial advisor's warning on online betting
A financial advisor recently watched one of his clients lose Rs 18 lakh in just six months. Not to stocks, not to crypto, but to online Kumar, a Sebi-registered analyst and founder of SahajMoney, shared the story in a LinkedIn post. 'One of my clients lost Rs 18 lakhs in 6 months,' he wrote. 'Not to stocks. Not to cryptos. To online betting.'advertisementThe client kept the losses hidden from his wife until the situation had already spiralled. 'He had taken a personal loan, and was borrowing from friends,' Kumar added. The rise of online betting apps, often disguised as harmless fantasy sports or casino-style games, has created a fast-growing but poorly understood problem in India's digital economy. Flashy interfaces, instant rewards, and near-constant notifications are all part of a design meant to keep users hooked. 'Betting apps are designed like slot machines,' Kumar noted. 'Flashy. Addictive. Instant dopamine hits. And they're just one swipe away.'According to him, the pattern is alarmingly familiar. It begins with a small, harmless-sounding amount—'Just Rs 500 for fun. You win once. You feel lucky. You chase the high.' But soon, the behaviour escalates.'These apps use casino psychology. Near wins. Fake bonuses. Constant notifications,' he wrote, warning that even young professionals with comfortable salaries are getting drawn in. 'I've seen it happen to young IT professionals making Rs 15 lakh a year.'The financial consequences are often severe. 'Loan apps, credit cards, even PF withdrawals,' Kumar said. 'People borrow to keep playing.'Beyond the money, the social and emotional toll is also significant. 'It destroys families,' he wrote. 'One guy told me he started lying to his wife, skipping EMIs, and hiding transactions. The stress? Unbearable.'While some Indian states have attempted to regulate online betting, national legislation is still missing. 'The Supreme Court just asked the govt if it's time for a national law. I say: long overdue.'Kumar is careful to clarify that his concern isn't about taking the fun out of digital platforms. It's about transparency and awareness. 'This isn't about being against fun. It's about understanding how these platforms exploit behavioral finance to trap users.'His message is aimed squarely at young people, often the most vulnerable to such platforms. 'If you're tempted by betting apps—pause. Think. You're not playing a game. You're playing against a system designed for you to lose.'(Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a certified financial advisor before making any investment or financial decisions. The views expressed are independent and do not reflect the official position of the India Today Group.)- Ends


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Tariffs on steel, auto unlikely in interim trade deal with US: Government sources
Sectoral tariffs on steel, automobiles and aluminium are unlikely in the interim deal with the US, government sources told India Today TV. This came as President Donald Trump said the US will finalise new trade deals soon and notify countries of higher tariffs by July 9, with new rates starting August had earlier told India Today TV that an interim trade deal between India and the US was likely to be signed before Trump's earlier July 9 deadline on the imposition of tariffs, which has now been pushed to August sources said both sides remained positive on the outcome of the trade talks and that negotiations were completed. No more rounds of negotiations were left now, they added. A fair deal was proposed to help India's labour-intensive sectors, government sources said, adding that they did not budge on sectors important to India, like rice, dairy, wheat and other genetically modified who has previously called India a big abuser of tariffs and a "tariff king", had announced a 26 per cent duty on Indian products as part of his April 2 "Liberation Day" reciprocal tariffs. The US President later suspended the tariffs for 90 days, allowing countries to strike a deal with the US.A major sticking point has been India's hard stance on not reducing tariffs on American agricultural imports such as maize and soybeans. The Trump administration's demand for wider access to the dairy sector, which employs over 80 million people in India, has also been a bone of the other hand, India has demanded greater access to US labour-intensive industries, including textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, and earlier told news agency Reuters that India has offered tariff cuts on almonds, pistachios and walnuts and was willing to extend preferential treatment for American imports in sectors like energy, autos and Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal asserted that India would enter into a trade agreement with the US only if its interests were protected. He underscored that India would not compromise the interests of the farm and dairy Minister Narendra Modi and Trump agreed in February to conclude the first phase of a bilateral trade agreement by autumn 2025 and to expand trade to USD 500 billion by 2030, from about USD 191 billion in 2024.- EndsTune In IN THIS STORY#United States of America#Donald Trump#Narendra Modi#Tariffs