Trump cites ‘big progress' after talks with Japan on tariff deal
U.S. President Donald Trump said negotiators made "big progress' after a meeting with a Japanese delegation on Wednesday aimed at securing a deal that would avoid higher levies he has threatened against trading partners.
"A Great Honor to have just met with the Japanese Delegation on Trade. Big Progress,' Trump wrote in a post to his Truth Social network.
Trump earlier in the day had said he would personally attend the talks, which were led by the U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments. Japan's economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa arrived in Washington to conduct the negotiations.
Foreign capitals are racing to negotiate deals with the U.S. to avert high import taxes Trump imposed — and then quickly paused — on about 60 trading partners.
The negotiations with Japan are being closely watched, offering a test case for other nations uncertain over what concessions Trump will seek to extract in exchange for trade agreements.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said Japan, a military ally, will likely be prioritized as the U.S. deals with a flood of nations all looking to cut their own deals. Bessent has said he envisions reaching agreements with Japan and other military allies to develop a collective effort to apply economic pressure on China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
23 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Trump's comparison of Iran attack to WWII atomic bombings irresponsible
U.S. President Donald Trump recently justified his country's attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran by likening them to the atomic bombings of Japan in 1945. His statement cannot be overlooked. He should face the reality of the atomic bombings and change his perception. Trump made the remarks during a visit to the Netherlands, stating, "I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war." The atomic bombings by the U.S. military during World War II destroyed two cities and claimed the lives of over 200,000 people. Even today many people continue to suffer from the aftereffects of exposure to radiation from the bombings. Could President Trump not imagine how his words would hurt the feelings of A-bomb survivors? The atomic bombings are not past tragedies that the American president should reference lightly. Trump has previously hailed the development of nuclear weapons as a "remarkable feat," stating that the Manhattan Project "helped end World War II." Forming the background to this stance is justification of the bombings grounded in the view they ended the war and saved many American soldiers' lives. Trump seems to share this view. But the overwhelming support for the bombings at the time has waned, with public opinion divided and criticism growing. Trump's remarks put a damper on this shift in American sentiment. Nuclear weapons are inhumane weapons of mass destruction. Former U.S. President Barack Obama, who called for "a world without nuclear weapons," acknowledged that the United States has a "moral responsibility" to act toward that goal. If the U.S. is to mention the atomic bombings, it must be at a time when it is expressing its resolve to eliminate nuclear weapons. Instead, Trump's comments risk increasing the threat of nuclear proliferation. It would not be surprising if some countries took Trump's comments as expressing the U.S. stance that it would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons in order to bring an end to conflict. This could lead to Iran not giving up on developing nuclear weapons, and North Korea accelerating its development of them. There is also a risk of escalating arms races involving Russia and China. Meanwhile, the Japanese government's response is difficult to understand. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi avoided commenting directly, stating, "The evaluation of historical events should be discussed by experts." The concept of "peace through strength" that Trump wields is dangerous because the use of nuclear weapons could become a concrete option. Even if Japan is protected by the "U.S. nuclear umbrella," it must underscore the inhumanity of nuclear weapons and continue to urge the U.S. not to use them. That is its responsibility as a nation that has experienced atomic bombings in warfare.
37 minutes ago
Hanging of Zama Killer is Japan's First Execution Since 2022
Shiraishi Takahiro became the first person to be executed in Japan for nearly three years on June 27, 2025. He murdered nine people in 2017 in Zama, Kanagawa. From August to October 2017, Shiraishi lured victims to his apartment after getting to know them via social media. He sexually assaulted and strangled them before taking their money and dismembering the bodies. While his defense counsel initially appealed the first death sentence verdict, Shiraishi withdrew the appeal himself and the sentence was finalized in January 2021. The execution is the first since that of Katō Tomohiro on July 26, 2022, for a 2008 stabbing spree in Akihabara, Tokyo. Japan's Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that the death penalty should be implemented within six months of the issuing of the sentence, but in fact this is almost never the case. From the beginning of 2000 to July 26, 2022, 98 death sentences were carried out. The shortest time span from sentencing to execution was 1 year, while the longest was 19 years and 5 months. The Ministry of Justice does not clarify any of the criteria on which the decision to execute a prisoner is based. In fact, in the past it was policy to not even publicly announce that an execution had been carried out. Disclosure of information on executions and the number of those executed only began in October 1998, under the direction of Minister of Justice Nakamura Shōzaburō. In September 2007, the justice minister of the time, Hatoyama Kunio, instructed the ministry to also release the name of each executed convict and the place of execution. Decisions about executions seem to reflect the thoughts and feelings of the minister of justice of the time. Sugiura Seiken, upon being appointed to that post in October 2005, for instance, openly declared that he would not issue an execution order on religious and philosophical grounds. Although he soon retracted the statement, amid criticism questioning his right as justice minister to refuse to carry out a duty stipulated by law, he did not end up signing an execution order during his tenure of roughly 11 months. Contrasting with Sugiura's attitude were the cases of those ministers who signed execution orders at the rapid pace of one every few months. Only nine people were executed from September 2009 to December 2012 under the administrations of the Democratic Party of Japan, whose justice ministers showed reluctance to carry out the penalty. Chiba Keiko, the DPJ's first justice minister, was originally opposed to the death penalty and had been one of a group of Diet members who called for its abolition. In July 2010, however, she signed the order to execute two death-row prisoners. Chiba witnessed the executions—a first for a Japanese justice minister—and expressed her desire that they should serve as an opportunity for a national debate over the death penalty. Toward that end, she set up a study group within the ministry to consider whether it should continue. In August of the same year, Chiba opened the Tokyo Detention House's execution chamber to the media for the first time, as well as the room it provides for prisoners to meet with religious representatives. Eda Satsuki, who was appointed justice minister in January 2011 under the DPJ government of Prime Minister Kan Naoto, stated at a press conference soon afterward that 'capital punishment is a flawed penalty'—although he later retracted the statement. In July of that year, Eda expressed his intention to not sign any execution orders for the time being since the study group on the issue established by Chiba was still meeting. That year no executions were carried out. The study group continued to meet under the next justice minister as well, but it convened for the last time in March 2012 without reaching any final conclusion, merely registering the various opinions expressed on both sides of the issue. When Japan introduced trial by jury in 2009, members of the public became involved in capital punishment decisions. In 2017, there was a string of executions of prisoners who were petitioning for retrial. Criticism was also raised inside and outside Japan in 2018 over the execution of 13 prisoners connected to the Aum Shinrikyō cult in the space of a few weeks. A recent high-profile case concerned Hakamata Iwao, who was sentenced to death in 1980 for the killing of four people in 1966. He maintained his innocence from prison and in 2014, Shizuoka District Court released him and granted him a retrial. The retrial began in 2023 and concluded in September 2024, with the court acquitting Hakamata after finding that investigators had fabricated evidence. The ruling came 58 years after his original arrest and 44 years after he was sentenced to death. Having been incarcerated for so many years with the death penalty hanging over him, Hakamata still has difficulty communicating with others. This story put the spotlight on capital punishment, sparking calls for reform. A panel including lawmakers, a former prosecutor general, and a former commissioner general of the National Police Agency released a statement in November 2024 calling for a halt on executions until authorities rethink the government's approach to capital punishment and institute fundamental changes to the system. (Translated from Japanese. Banner photo: The Tokyo Detention House, which contains an execution facility. © Jiji.)
Asahi Shimbun
43 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Olympic icon Seiko Hashimoto elected 1st female JOC president
Seiko Hashimoto, the new president of the Japanese Olympic Committee, speaks to reporters on June 26. (Takeshi Teruya) Seiko Hashimoto, a former Olympian and Cabinet minister, was elected as the new president of the Japanese Olympic Committee on June 26. The election, the first in the JOC's 36-year history, also marks the first time a woman has assumed the organization's top post. Hashimoto, 60, a bronze medalist in speed skating at the 1992 Albertville Winter Olympics and a veteran of seven Olympics in both winter and summer events, was chosen during a JOC board meeting held in Tokyo. She succeeds Yasuhiro Yamashita, 68, who served three terms since 2019. The race for the presidency saw two other candidates: former Japan Football Association President Kozo Tashima, 67; and Japan Basketball Association President Yuko Mitsuya, 66. After multiple rounds of secret ballots by board members, Hashimoto emerged victorious in a runoff vote against Mitsuya. According to sources, Hashimoto gained support during a presentation ahead of the voting, where she pledged to pursue another bid for Japan to host the Olympic and Paralympic Games. At a news conference following the election, Hashimoto appeared solemn but resolute. 'This is the first election in JOC history, and I am honored to become its first female president,' she said. 'I will carry out my duties with humility and never forget my original intention.' Her election marks a departure from tradition, emerging from a rare internal contest rather than the organization's historically closed-door process often influenced by sports politics and behind-the-scenes maneuvering. Sources say Hashimoto received encouragement from influential international figures, including then-International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach during his visit to Japan last month. Hashimoto is a member of the Upper House from Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party. She previously served as Olympic minister and as president of the Organizing Committee for the 2021 Tokyo Games. In an ironic turn, she now becomes the first politician to lead the JOC since its independence from the Japan Sport Association in 1989, a move originally intended to ensure political neutrality. Addressing concerns over a 20.57 million yen ($142,000) discrepancy tied to her name in a recent political funding scandal, Hashimoto defended her integrity. 'There was no slush fund, no misreporting. I would not have run if there had been any suspicion over my actions,' she said. As JOC president, Hashimoto pledged to build on the legacy of the Tokyo Games and to revitalize the Olympic movement amid ongoing challenges, including declining sponsorship. 'It is precisely because we are in a difficult period that bold new reforms are needed,' she said.
