From suffering to citizenship: Gujarat government grants citizenship to 185 Pakistani refugees
Linking their plight to the religious persecution in Pakistan, Sanghvi did not mince words.
He said, 'When you hear the stories of these people -- Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists -- you cannot hold back tears. A few lost their husbands, others lost their homes to flames. And yet they endured. I salute their strength.'
He contrasted India's pluralism with Pakistan's oppression, saying, 'India is a land where every religion is respected. If the world truly wants to witness human rights in action, they must look at India, especially Gujarat.'
He also raised a sharp question: 'Why is there no global outrage over the atrocities on minority Hindus in Pakistan?'
Amid emotional moments, newly naturalised citizens shared their stories of pain, resilience, and pride.
Bhavanaben Maheshwari, originally from Pakistan and now living in Rajkot, said, 'I faced a lot of hardships there. But today, after years of struggle, I proudly call myself an Indian.'
Another recipient, Champa Khambhala from Morbi, echoed the sentiment:
'Life in India is far better than in Pakistan, where Hindus can't even celebrate festivals freely.' With her voice trembling, she added, 'Many of my family members are still stuck in Pakistan. I hope they, too, get the chance to unite with us in India someday.'
The ceremony wasn't just about documents it marked a loud and clear message about India's stance on human dignity, national belonging, and justice for persecuted minorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
Sikh Regiment In British Army Soon? Here's What We Know
Curated By : Last Updated: July 28, 2025, 20:10 IST News18 Is the United Kingdom considering having a Sikh regiment in its forces? Several media reports have emerged recently hinting that the British Army is considering a proposal to induct a Sikh regiment. However, the UK's Ministry of Defence has denied, saying there are no such proposals in this regard. 'We want to do something to recognise Sikh contributions in some way, but not through a Sikh regiment," sources in the defence ministry told Times of India . The issue came into the limelight after Lord Sahota, a member of the House of Lords, asked UK defence minister Lord Coaker in the House of Lords on July 7 regarding the progress on having a Sikh regiment in the British Army. Coaker said, 'Let me consider that request from my noble friend. I am quite happy to meet him and see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs." Coaker's remark led to media headlines like 'UK considering to have Sikh Regiment." Lord Sahota's grandfathers have served in the British Indian army, including the 15th Punjab Regiment. Speaking to TOI , he said he does not think this proposal will not against the UK Equality Act, highlighting the Staffordshire Regiment, Brigade of Gurkhas, the Royal Yorkshire Regiment, Royal Welsh and Royal Regiment of Scotland. As per the TOI report, there are around 200 Sikhs in the British Armed Forces at present. Swipe Left For Next Video View all The Sikh Regiment's origins are found within the British East India Company Army. Sikh soldiers were notably recruited following the First Anglo-Sikh War (1845–46) and even more extensively after the Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848–49). Serving with distinction as part of the British Indian Army, the Sikh Regiment played a significant role in both World War I and World War II. During the First World War, over 100,000 Sikhs were part of the British Indian Army, with a number of Sikh soldiers receiving the Victoria Cross, the highest British military honour. For the Second World War, more than 300,000 Sikhs served in the Indian Army. Saurabh Verma Saurabh Verma covers general, national and international day-to-day news for as a Senior Sub-editor. He keenly observes politics. You can follow him on Twitter -- Saurabh Verma covers general, national and international day-to-day news for as a Senior Sub-editor. He keenly observes politics. You can follow him on Twitter -- view comments News world Sikh Regiment In British Army Soon? Here's What We Know Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Did you ask Maldives president his religion before hugging': Mamata Banerjee's jibe at PM Modi
West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee on Monday attacked the centre for allegedly depriving the state of funds even as she hit out over the recent announcement of India giving ₹4,850 crore Line of Credit to Maldives. Mamata Banerjee has recently slammed BJP states over 'linguistic terror' on Bengalis.(AFP File) Mamata Banerjee launched the 'Bhasha Andolan' (Language Movement) from Bolpur in Birbhum district, declaring that she would "give up her life, but not allow anyone to snatch her language", according to news agency PTI. Mamata Banerjee, taking a jibe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, asked, 'When you travel to Arab nations and hug the sheikhs, do you ask whether they are Hindus or Muslims?' She also hit out at the PM's recent visit to Maldives and said, 'Did you ask Maldives president his religion when you hugged him and donated 5,000 crore while depriving Bengal of its dues.' Also Read: Pahalgam attack mastermind Suleman Shah killed in Kashmir encounter: Sources Mamata said that she doesn't want a division on the basis of language and protested against the alleged attacks on Bengali migrants. She accused the Centre and the Election Commission of attempting to "implement the National Register of Citizens (NRC) through the backdoor" in Bengal by targeting Bengali-speaking migrants. The Bengal CM accused the centre of waging a "linguistic terror" and vowed not to allow the construction of detention camps in Bengal. "We will stop this conspiracy to jeopardise our existence in the name of linguistic terror and attempt to implement NRC by the backdoor," Banerjee said, according to PTI. "I won't allow the implementation of NRC or the building of detention camps in Bengal," Mamata added.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Keeping up with UP: Why insult women politicians in political slugfests?
The Samajwadi Party's (SP) national president Akhilesh Yadav recently visited a mosque near Parliament House in New Delhi with his MP wife Dimple Yadav, who was attired in a saree. This, unexpectedly, kicked off a controversy with a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Minority Morcha leader taking exception to Dimple's 'pehnava' (the Indian saree). The leader's comments crossed the line and were against a woman's dignity. Samajwadi Party (SP) MP from Rampur Mobiullah Naqvi, who is associated with the mosque, defended the Yadav couple by mentioning the previous visits of leaders to the 'historic mosque'. The SP quickly released a picture of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to some other mosque. The visit created a storm in the political circles and the exchange of barbs will continue. The issue here, however, is the undignified language in which Dimple was described. A few days later, a Maulana also used atrocious language to describe this. This kicked off a storm with some BJP leaders, who till the other day were demanding apology from Dimple and Akhilesh for turning mosque into a political centre, came out in her defence. An FIR was also lodged. On the other hand the Samajwadi Party MP Iqra Hasan demanded social boycott of the Maulana. The scorn targeted at women in politics is not new. The MP from Kairana, Iqra Hasan, recently suffered humiliation and embarrassment when a Karni Sena leader Yogendra Rana, who identified himself as its vice president, in a social media post, expressed his willingness to marry, or have 'nikah' with, her. Significantly, locals, including Hindus, had come out in the defence of Iqra, who describes herself as a 'leader of all communities.' The party later filed a police complaint against Rana while Karni Sena dissociated from him and his statement. The question is if Dimple and Iqra, both hailing from prominent political families, have to face verbal abuse, how safe are other women politicians at the village, district, state levels? Dimple is the daughter-in-law of the one-time powerful leader, the late Mulayam Singh Yadav, and Iqra is a third-generation politician. Similarly, both actors-turned-politicians Smriti Irani and Kangana Ranaut frequently face character assassination on social media. A look at the past reveals a disturbing trend. Mamata Banerjee, the West Bengal chief minister, Mayawati, the former UP chief minister and J. Jayalalithaa, late Tamil Nadu chief minister, faced physical assaults while they were climbing the political ladder in their respective states. Late JD(U) leader Sharad Yadav had once made disparaging comments against women leaders with short hair – 'balkati'. For one, the rise of women from being homebound to Parliament or state assemblies has routinely been described as nepotism as many have been from political families. Women politicians, from late PM Indira Gandhi to village pradhans, have faced objectionable comments. Some get reported, some not as many of the women politicians lack the voice or are bound by party discipline to publicly take on their perpetrators. Can it be a good sign for democracy when women in high or low positions have to bear the brunt of such mindless utterances? And when high-profile public representatives are not safe and are humiliated verbally or physically, how can the women on the street feel safe? It is time to bring in a law to check such unwarranted incidents in future. Perhaps, laws such as POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace) may give some protection to women leaders, whether in the party organisation or in the legislatures. At a time when the government is in the process of implementing 33% quota for women in state assemblies and the Lok Sabha, political parties should initiate steps to check such misogynistic mudslinging. The BJP has consistently spoken out against dynastic politics but how many independent women professionals would join politics in such a regressive atmosphere? A related question is: how and from where will political parties get candidates for assembly and Lok Sabha elections once the 33% quota is implemented. The Congress, for example, had promised 40% tickets to women in the 2022 assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh. Despite the best of intentions, the idea failed miserably. Campaigns like 'Ladki Hoon, Lad Sakti Hoon' or 'Beti Padao, Beti Bachao' will be successful only when women feel safe in their workplace, whether it is in offices of political parties or other organisations.
